DNA Barcode based species delineation within Freshwater Garfish Xenentodon cancila (Hamilton, 1822) (Beloniformes: Belonidae) reveals the existence of multiple lineages under single nominal taxon

Authors

  • Ranjit More Department of Zoology, Pratapsinh Mohite-Patil Mahavidyala, Near Girdhardas Devi Highschool, Pune Road Tal Karmala, Solapur District, Maharashtra 413203, India.
  • Jiwan Sarwade Department of Zoology, Arts, Science and Commerce College Indapur, Pune-Solapur Road (NH 65), Indapur, Pune, Maharashtra 413106, India.
  • A. Shabnam Zoological Survey of India, Western Regional Centre, Vidya Nagar, Sector-29, P.C.N.T. (PO), Rawet Road, Akurdi, Pune, Maharashtra 411044, India.
  • Dinesh Zoological Survey of India, Western Regional Centre, Vidya Nagar, Sector-29, P.C.N.T. (PO), Rawet Road, Akurdi, Pune, Maharashtra, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6700-4896

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.10249.18.9.29729-29735

Keywords:

Cryptic diversity, freshwater biodiversity, garfish, integrative taxonomy, morphological datasets, phylogeny, polyphyletic, Ujani Reservoir

Abstract

The present correspondence provides the first DNA barcode-based evidence of multiple evolutionary lineages within the freshwater garfish Xenentodon cancila across South Asia. Taxonomically validated specimens from the Ujani Reservoir, Maharashtra, India, were analyzed with 77 publicly available mt COI sequences. Phylogenetic and species delimitation analyses revealed seven distinct clades within Xenentodon, substantially exceeding the currently recognized two species. The Ujani population formed a strongly supported monophyletic cluster with sequences from India, Bangladesh, and Korea, corresponding closely to the nominal X. cancila. Other geographically structured lineages from southern, northeastern, and central India, exhibit deep genetic divergence, indicating potential undescribed taxa. These findings highlight persistent taxonomic gaps within Xenentodon and emphasize the need for integrative revision combining molecular and morphological datasets. 

Author Biography

  • Dinesh, Zoological Survey of India, Western Regional Centre, Vidya Nagar, Sector-29, P.C.N.T. (PO), Rawet Road, Akurdi, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

    Scientist E, Zoological Survey of India, Western Regional Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India

References

April, J. et al. (2011). Genetic calibration of species diversity among North America’s freshwater fishes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(26): 10602–10607. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016437108

Bleeker, P. (1854). Vijfde bijdrage tot de kennis der ichthyologische fauna van Celebes. Natuurkundig Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch Indië 7: 225–260.

Fricke, R. et al. (2018). Catalog of fishes: genera, species, references. California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA. http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp. Accessed on 16.x.2025.

Froese, R. & D. Pauly (eds.) (2026). FishBase. www.fishbase.org. Accessed in vi.2026.

Hamilton, F. (1822). An account of the fishes found in the river Ganges and its branches, Vol. 1. Archibald Constable, Edinburgh.

Hajibabaei, M. et al. (2007). DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Trends in Genetics 23(4): 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.001

Hossain, M.Y. et al. (2013). Life-history traits of the freshwater garfish Xenentodon cancila (Hamilton, 1822) (Belonidae) in the Ganges River, northwestern Bangladesh. Sains Malaysiana 42(9): 1207–1218. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Life-history-traits-of-the-freshwater-garfish-1822)-Hossain-Jewel/af3b257c2386728d31c58e912dd307a34ed91698

Islam, M.S. & P. Dutta (2018). Food, feeding habit and reproductive biology of freshwater garfish (Xenentodon cancila) from south-western Bangladesh: implications to fishery management. Journal of Fisheries and Life Sciences 3(2): 26–33.

Jayaram K.C. (1999). The freshwater fishes of the Indian region. Narendra Publishing House, Delhi, 551 pp.

Kalawate, A.S. et al. (2022). Morphological characterization and mt DNA barcode of a tiger moth species, Asota ficus (Fabricius, 1775) (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Erebidae: Aganainae) from India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 14(1): 20503–20510. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7638.14.1.20503-20510

Keskin, E. & H.H. Atar (2013). DNA barcoding commercially important fish species of Turkey. Molecular Ecology Resources 13(5): 788–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12120

Khedkar, G.D. et al. (2014). DNA barcodes for the fishes of the Narmada, one of India’s longest rivers. PLoS ONE 9(7): e101460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101460

Kumar, S. et al. (2018). MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(6): 1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096

Lakra, W.S. et al. (2011). DNA barcoding Indian marine fishes. Molecular Ecology Resources 11(1): 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02894.x

Landi, M. et al. (2014). DNA barcoding for species assignment: the case of Mediterranean marine fishes. PLoS ONE 9(9): e106135. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106135

Panprommin, D. et al. (2019). DNA barcodes for the identification of species diversity in fish from Kwan Phayao, Thailand. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 12(3): 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2019.05.003

Patil, T.S. et al. (2018). DNA barcode based delineation of freshwater fishes from northern Western Ghats of India, one of the world’s biodiversity hotspots. Biodiversity and Conservation 27(13): 3349–3371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1604-0

Puillandre, N. et al. (2021). ASAP: assemble species by automatic partitioning. Molecular Ecology Resources 21(2): 609–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13281

Rahman, M.M. et al. (2019). Building a DNA barcode library for the freshwater fishes of Bangladesh. Scientific Reports 9: 9382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58810-0

Ratnasingham, S. & P.D.N. Hebert (2007). BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System. Molecular Ecology Notes 7(3): 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x

Stein, E.D. et al. (2014). Is DNA barcoding actually cheaper and faster than traditional morphological methods: results from a survey of freshwater bioassessment efforts in the United States? PLoS ONE 9(4): e95525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095525

Thapliyal, M. et al. (2013). DNA barcoding of fishes from River Song, Dehradun, Uttarakhand using mitochondrial cytochrome-c Oxidase-I gene. Environment Conservation Journal 14(3): 113–121. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2013.14320

Trifinopoulos, J. et al. (2016). W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 44: W232–W235. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw256

Weigt, L.A. et al. (2012). Using DNA barcoding to assess Caribbean reef fish biodiversity: expanding taxonomic and geographic coverage. PLoS ONE 7(7): e41059. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041059

Zhang, J. (2011). Species identification of marine fishes in China with DNA barcoding. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2011: 978253. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/978253

Downloads

Published

26-09-2026

Issue

Section

Communications

Most read articles by the same author(s)