Importance of integrating multiple criteria in breeding habitat management for urban frogs and toads (Amphibia: Anura) in Jakarta City, Indonesia

Authors

  • Mohamad Isnin Noer Program Studi Biologi, Faculty of Maths and Sciences, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Gd. Hasjim Asjarie lt.9. Jl, Rawamangun Muka, Jakarta 13220, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5024-9109
  • Ivan Hafidhuddin Central Proteina Prima, Jakarta 12920, Indonesia.
  • Agung Sedayu Program Studi Biologi, Faculty of Maths and Sciences, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Gd. Hasjim Asjarie lt.9. Jl, Rawamangun Muka, Jakarta 13220, Indonesia.
  • Ratna Komala Program Studi Biologi, Faculty of Maths and Sciences, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Gd. Hasjim Asjarie lt.9. Jl, Rawamangun Muka, Jakarta 13220, Indonesia.
  • Alvira Salsabila Program Studi Biologi, Faculty of Maths and Sciences, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Gd. Hasjim Asjarie lt.9. Jl, Rawamangun Muka, Jakarta 13220, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9628-1031

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9782.18.4.28615-28622

Keywords:

Anthropogenic, conservation, green infrastructure, landscape ecology, native, urban wetland

Abstract

This study assessed the local and landscape factors that support breeding habitats for native frog species in Jakarta, the capital city of Indonesia. We surveyed 25 wetlands categorized into two management states and varying local and landscape features. Our results revealed that frog species exhibit diverse habitat preferences for breeding; some species prefer constructed or managed environments, some depend on more natural or minimally managed habitats, and one species was highly linked with vegetation cover and light intensity. These findings emphasize the need to incorporate multiple criteria when designing strategies to support breeding habitats for all native frog species in Jakarta. We also explored specific factors influencing breeding site selection, providing insights into the drivers of breeding habitat preferences in urban environments.

References

Ardiansyah, A., R. Hernina, W. Suseno, F. Zulkarnain, R. Yanidar & R. Rokhmatuloh (2018). Percent of building density (PBD) of urban environment: a multi-index approach based study in DKI Jakarta Province. Indonesian Journal of Geography 50(2): 154–161. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.36113

Băncilă, R.I., D. Cogălniceanu, A. Ozgul & B.R. Schmidt (2017). The effect of aquatic and terrestrial habitat characteristics on occurrence and breeding probability in a montane amphibian: insights from a spatially explicit multistate occupancy model. Population Ecology 59: 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-017-0575-4

Bickford, D., T.H. Ng, L. Qie, E.P. Kudavidanage & C.J.A. Bradshaw (2010). Forest fragment and breeding habitat characteristics explain frog diversity and abundance in Singapore. Biotropica 42(1): 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00542.x

Callaghan, C.T., G. Liu, B.A. Mitchell, A.G.B. Poore & J.J.L. Rowley (2021). Urbanization negatively impacts frog diversity at continental, regional, and local scales. Basic and Applied Ecology 54: 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.04.003

Edirisinghe, W.G.M. & A.A.T. Amarasinghe (2011). An unusual mislead communication behaviour of Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Schneider, 1799) (Amphibia: Bufonidae) and Polypedates cruciger Blyth, 1852 (Amphibia: Rhacophoridae) at a human habitation in Sri Lanka. TAPROBANICA 1(1): 39–42. https://doi.org/10.4038/tapro.v1i1.2777

Feoktistova, N.Y., I.G. Meschersky, P.L. Bogomolov, S.I. Meschersky, E.A. Katzman, L.A. Pelgunova, E.V. Potashnikova & A.V. Surov (2020). An unintentional experiment: Settlement of a Sinurbic species, the common hamster (Cricetus cricetus L., 1758), in a newly established city park. Biology Bulletin 47: 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359020020028

Garcia-Gonzalez, C. & E. Garcia-Vazquez (2011). Reasonable Economic Costs of Amphibian Conservation in Urban Environments: A Case Study in North Spain. Human Ecology 39: 807–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-011-9437-4

Gridi-Papp, M., A.S. Rand & M.J. Ryan (2006). Complex call production in the túngara frog. Nature 441(7089): 38. https://doi.org/10.1038/441038a

Hahs, A.K., B. Fournier, M.F.J. Aronson, C.H. Nilon, A. Herrera-Montes, A.B. Salisbury, C.G. Threlfall, C.C. Rega-Brodsky, C.A. Lepczyk, F.A. La Sorte, I. MacGregor-Fors, J.S. MacIvor, K. Jung, M.R. Piana, N.S.G. Williams, S. Knapp, A. Vergnes, A.A. Acevedo, A.M. Gainsbury, A. Rainho, A.J. Hamer, A. Shwartz, C.C. Voigt, D. Lewanzik, D.M. Lowenstein, D. O’Brien, D. Tommasi, E. Pineda, E.S. Carpenter, E. Belskaya, G.L. Lövei, J.C. Makinson, J.L. Coleman, J.P. Sadler, J. Shroyer, J.T. Shapiro, K.C.R. Baldock, K. Ksiazek-Mikenas, K.C. Matteson, K. Barrett, L. Siles, L.F. Aguirre, L.O. Armesto, M. Zalewski, M.I. Herrera-Montes, M.K. Obrist, R.K. Tonietto, S.A. Gagné, S.J. Hinners, T. Latty, T.D. Surasinghe, T. Sattler, T. Magura, W. Ulrich, Z. Elek, J. Castañeda-Oviedo, R. Torrado, D.J. Kotze & M. Moretti (2023). Urbanisation generates multiple trait syndromes for terrestrial animal taxa worldwide. Nature Communications 14(1): 4751. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39746-1

Holzer, K.A. (2014). Amphibian use of constructed and remnant wetlands in an urban landscape. Urban Ecosystems 17(4): 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0373-0

Hutto Jr, D. & K. Barrett (2021). Do urban open spaces provide refugia for frogs in urban environments? PLoS One 16(1): e0244932. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244932

Hwang, Y.H., I.K. Nasution, D. Amonkar & A. Hahs (2020). Urban green space distribution related to land values in fast-growing megacities, Mumbai and Jakarta–unexploited opportunities to increase access to greenery for the poor. Sustainability 12(12): 4982. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124982

Inger, R.F. & R.B. Stuebing (1997). A Field Guide to the Frogs of Borneo. Natural History Publications, Sabah, 228 pp.

Inger, R.F., R.B. Stuebing, T.U. Grafe, & J.M. Dehling (2017). Frog voices of Borneo [Audio recordings]. Supplement to A Field Guide to the Frogs of Borneo. Natural History Publications, Kota Kinabalu.

Iskandar, D.T. (1998). The Amphibians of Java and Bali. Research and Development Centre for Biology LIPI, Bogor, 117 pp.

Klop-Toker, K., J. Valdez, M. Stockwell, L. Fardell, S. Clulow, J. Clulow & M. Mahony (2016). We made your bed, why won’t you lie in it? Food availability and disease may affect reproductive output of reintroduced frogs. PLoS One 11(7): e0159143. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159143

Kuraishi, N., M. Matsui, A. Hamidy, D.M. Belabut, N. Ahmad, S. Panha, A. Sudin, H.S. Young, J. Jiang, H. Ota, H.T. Thong & K. Nishikawa (2013). Phylogenetic and taxonomic relationships of the Polypedates leucomystax complex (Amphibia). Zoologica Scripta 42(1): 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2012.00562.x

Kurniati, H. (2006). The Amphibians Species in Gunung Halimun National Park, West Java, Indonesia. Zoo Indonesia 15(2): 107–120.

Kurniati, H. & A. Hamidy (2017). Variasi suara panggilan kodok Hylarana nicobariensis (Stoliczka, 1870) dari lima populasi berbeda di Indonesia (Anura: Ranidae). Jurnal Biologi Indonesia 12(2): 165–173.

Kurniati, H., A. Sumadijaya, A. Boonman & W.T. Laksono (2010). Ecology, Distribution and Bio-acoustic of Amphibians in Degraded Habitat. Research Center for Biology Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Cibinong, Indonesia, 1–22 pp.

Laurence, F., V. Nicolas, H.J. Ayoro & A. Ohler (2023). Species distribution modelling of Hylarana Species (Anura, Ranidae) and the problem of accurate species identification. Zootaxa 5258(1): 99–112. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5258.1.4

Mahapatra, C. & P.K. Mahapatra (2015). Interspecific Variations in Duration of Tail Regression in Two Tropical Anurans. Journal of Histology 2015(1): 307439. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/307439

Márquez, R. & X.R. Eekhout (2006). Advertisement calls of six species of anurans from Bali, Republic of Indonesia. Journal of Natural History 40(9–10): 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930600712129

McCaffery, R.M., L.A. Eby, B.A. Maxell & P.S. Corn (2014). Breeding site heterogeneity reduces variability in frog recruitment and population dynamics. Biological Conservation 170: 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.013

Mogali, S. (2017). Influence of desiccation threat on the metamorphic traits of the Asian common toad, Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Anura). Acta Herpetologica 12(2): 175–180 https://doi.org/10.13128/acta_herpetol-21016

Nakanishi, K., A. Honma, M. Furukawa, K.-I. Takakura, N. Fujii, K. Morii, Y. Terasawa & T. Nishida (2020). Habitat partitioning of two closely related pond frogs, Pelophylax nigromaculatus and Pelophylax porosus brevipodus, during their breeding season. Evolutionary Ecology 34: 855–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-020-10061-1

Pereira, P., M. Inacio, M. Kalinauskas, K. Bogdzevič, I. Bogunovic & W. Zhao (2022). Land-use changes and ecosystem services, pp. 1–27. In: Pereira P., E. Gomes & J. Rocha (eds.). Mapping and Forecasting Land Use. Elsevier, 325 pp.

Pope, S.E., L. Fahrig & H.G. Merriam (2000). Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations. Ecology 81(9): 2498–2508. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2498:LCAMEO]2.0.CO;2

Rout, J., S. Mahapatra, S. Asrafuzzaman, S.K. Dutta & G. Sahoo (2019). Oviposition site selection by the Asian common toad Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Schneider, 1799), in an Indian biosphere reserve. Herpetozoa 31(3–4): 157–171.

Rushayati, S.B., R. Hermawan, D.A. Rahman, L.N. Ginoga, Y.A. Mulyani, R. Soekmadi & A.K. Wijayanto (2023). Profil Keanekaragaman Hayati Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Pemerintah provinsi daerah khusus ibukota jakarta, Dinas lingkungan hidup, Jakarta, 200 pp.

Saidapur, S.K. (2025). Behavioural ecology and developmental plasticity in Indian anuran tadpoles. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 79(3): 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-025-03583-7

Sandifer, P.A., J.S. Hopkins, A.D. Stokes & C.L. Browdy (1993). Preliminary comparisons of the native Penaeus setiferus and Pacific P. vannamei white shrimp for pond culture in South Carolina, USA. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 24(3): 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1993.tb00161.x

Scheffers, B.R. & C.A. Paszkowski (2013). Amphibian use of urban stormwater wetlands: the role of natural habitat features. Landscape and Urban Planning 113: 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.001

Sedayu, A., N. Putri, A. Aminudin, M. Mawardi, M.I. Noer & L. Maulana (2024). Fern Species-Area Relationship in Urban Anthropogenic Islands in Slawi, Tegal, Central Java. Journal of Tropical Biodiversity and Biotechnology 9(3): 87781. https://doi.org/10.22146/jtbb.87781

Shahrudin, S. (2016). Interspecific amplexus between male Rhacophorus prominanus and female Polypedates leucomystax from Peninsular Malaysia. Herpetological Bulletin 135: 30–31.

Simmons, L.W., M.L. Thomas, F.W. Simmons & M. Zuk (2013). Female preferences for acoustic and olfactory signals during courtship: male crickets send multiple messages. Behavioral Ecology 24(5): 1099–1107. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art036

Simon, J.A., J.W. Snodgrass, R.E. Casey & D.W. Sparling (2009). Spatial correlates of amphibian use of constructed wetlands in an urban landscape. Landscape Ecology 24(3): 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9311-y

Simon, N., M.M. Top, M.Z. Hamzah, N.A.A. Aziz, M.A. Alias, M.R. Awang, R Awang, Z. Ibrahim, A.F.A. Majid, M.S.A. Salleh & A. Anuar (2022). Microhabitat and Microclimate Preferences of Anuran Species Inhabiting Restoration and Adjacent Forest of Cameron Highlands, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana 51(6): 1635–1651. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2022-5106-03

Siswanto, S., D.E. Nuryanto, M.R. Ferdiansyah, A.D. Prastiwi, O.C. Dewi, A. Gamal & M. Dimyati (2023). Spatio-temporal characteristics of urban heat Island of Jakarta metropolitan. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 32: 101062. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2023.101062

Wang, Y.P. & K. Kintrea (2021). Urban expansion and land use changes in Asia and Africa. Environment and Urbanization ASIA 12(1_suppl): S13–S17. https://doi.org/10.1177/09754253219990

Watchorn, D.J., T.A. Duncan & M.A. Cowan (2023). The risks and rewards of using artificial habitat structures for wildlife conservation. Austral Ecology 48(6): 1207–1222.

Wells, K.D. (1977). The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Animal Behaviour 25: 666–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(77)90118-X

Widyasamratri, H., K. Souma & T. Suetsugi (2019). Study of urban temperature profiles on the various land cover in the Jakarta Metropolitan Area, Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Geography 51(3): 357–363. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.45934

Xeno-canto Foundation (2026). Xeno-canto: Sharing wildlife sounds from around the worldhttps://xeno-canto.org/ accessed 24 April 2026.

Downloads

Published

26-04-2026

Issue

Section

Articles