Diet composition of three syntopic, ecologically divergent frogs (Euphlyctis>, <Minervarya>, <Polypedates) from paddy fields of Kohima, Nagaland, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9370.17.7.27242-27248Keywords:
Aquatic, arboreal, class, index of relative importance, northeastern India, order, terrestrial.Abstract
Monitoring indicator species like amphibians is crucial to assess habitat health. The diet of 129 anurans belonging to the three most abundant species found in the paddy fields of Kohima district in Nagaland, northeastern India—the aquatic Euphlyctis adolfi, the terrestrial Minervarya nepalensis and the arboreal Polypedates himalayensis—was studied. Results revealed 302 intact prey items belonging to 11 prey categories, gleaned through the stomach-flushing method. While Coleoptera was the most abundant prey found in all three species; Clitellata (terrestrial earthworms), Diptera, and Orthoptera were also important prey items. The high degree of overlap in the dietary niche of the three species despite their diverged microhabitat associations, could be the result of abundant prey items and the segregation of microhabitats. Lastly, as these frogs share a common prey base, they evidently segregate their foraging microhabitats to avoid competition.
References
Ao, M., S. Bordoloi & A. Dutta (2001). Food and feeding behaviour of Hyla annectans (Jerdon, 1870) in Nagaland, India. Zoos’ Print Journal 16: 535–536. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.16.7.535-6
AmphibiaWeb (2025). University of California, Berkeley, California. https://amphibiaweb.org Accessed 15.iii.2025.
Bahuguna, V., A. Chowdhary, S. Singh & S. Bahuguna (2019). A food spectrum analysis of three bufonid species (Anura: Bufonidae) from Uttarakhand region of the western Himalaya, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 11(13): 14663–14671. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4335.11.13.14663-14671
Chanda, S. (1993). Food and Feeding habits of some Amphibian species of northeast India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 93: 15. https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v93/i1-2/1993/160858
Chanda, S.K. (2002). Handbook. Indian Amphibians. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, India, 335 pp.
Colli, G.R. & D.S. Zamboni (1999). Ecology of the Worm-Lizard Amphisbaena alba in the Cerrado of Central Brazil. Copeia 1999(3): 733–742. https://doi.org/10.2307/1447606
Das, I. (1996a). Folivory and seasonal changes in diet in Rana hexadactyla (Anura: Ranidae). Journal of Zoology 238(4): 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05430.x
Das, I. (1996b). Resource use and foraging tactics in a south Indian amphibian community. Journal of South Asian Natural History 2(1): 30.
Das, I. & M. Coe (1994). Dental morphology and diet in anuran amphibians from south India. Journal of Zoology 233: 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb05274.x
Dinesh, K.P., K. Deuti & B. Saikia (2024). Checklist of Fauna of India: Animalia, Chordata, Amphibia. E-checklist. Publications of the Zoological Survey of India, 21 pp.
Donnelly, M. (1991). Feeding Patterns of the Strawberry Poison Frog, Dendrobates pumilio (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Copeia 1991: 723. https://doi.org/10.2307/1446399
Dufresnes, C., S. Mahony, V.K. Prasad, R.G. Kamei, R. Masroor, M.A. Khan, A.M. Al-Johany, K.B. Gautam, S.K. Gupta, L.J. Borkin, D.A. Melnikov, J.M. Rosanov, D.V. Skorinov, A. Borzée, D. Jablonski & S.N. Litvinchuk (2022). Shedding light on taxonomic chaos: Diversity and distribution of South Asian skipper frogs (Anura, Dicroglossidae, Euphlyctis). Systematics and Biodiversity 20(2102686): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2022.2102686
Elphick, C. (2000). Functional Equivalency between Rice Fields and Seminatural Wetland Habitats. Conservation Biology 14: 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98314.x
Gibb, T. & C. Oseto (2006). Arthropod Collection and Identification Field and Laboratory Techniques. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, Boston, 311 pp.
Khatiwada, J.R., S. Ghimire, S. Paudel Khatiwada, B. Paudel, R. Bischof, J. Jiang & T. Haugaasen (2016). Frogs as potential biological control agents in the rice fields of Chitwan, Nepal. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 230: 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.025
Modak, N., H. Chunekar & A. Padhye (2018). Life History of Western Ghats endemic and threatened Anuran – Matheran Leaping Frog, (Indirana leithii) with notes on its feeding preferences. Journal of Natural History 52: 27–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2018.1488008
Pianka, E. (1974). Niche Overlap and Diffuse Competition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 71: 2141–2145. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.71.5.2141
Piatti, L. & F. Souza (2011). Diet and resource partitioning among anurans in irrigated rice fields in Pantanal, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology = Revista Brasleira de Biologia 71: 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842011000400009
Piatti, L., F. Souza & P.L. Filho (2010). Anuran assemblage in a rice field agroecosystem in the Pantanal of central Brazil. Journal of Natural History 44: 1215–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930903499804
Pinkas, L. (1971). Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters. Fish Bulletin U.S. 152: 1–139.
Rangad, D., R.K.L. Tron & R.N.K. Hooroo (2012). Geographic distribution: Polypedates himalayensis. Herpetological Review 43(4): 614.
Saikia, B., A. Bora, B. Sinha & J. Purkayastha (2020). A note on the type locality of Himalayan Treefrog, Polypedates himalayensis (Annandale, 1912) (Anura: Rhacophoridae). Reptiles & Amphibians 27: 517–518.
Sanchez, E., S.D. Biju, M.M. Islam, M.K. Hasan, A. Ohler, M. Vences & A. Kurabayashi (2018). Phylogeny and classification of fejervaryan frogs (Anura: Dicroglossidae). Salamandra 54: 109–116.
Sarkar, S. & M. Dey (2022). Feeding Selectivity in Anuran Species from a Tea Cultivation Area of Barak Valley, Assam, India. Russian Journal of Herpetology 29: 127–136. https://doi.org/10.30906/1026-2296-2022-29-3-127-136
Seshadri, K.S., J. Allwin, S. Karimbumkara & G. Tg (2020). Anuran assemblage and its trophic relations in rice-paddy fields of South India. Journal of Natural History 54: 2745–2762. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2020.1867772
Shannon, C. & W. Weaver (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana, 117 pp.
Solé, M., O. Beckmann, B. Pelz, A. Kwet & W. Engels (2005). Stomach-flushing for diet analysis in anurans: An improved protocol evaluated in a case study in Araucaria forests, southern Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 40: 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650520400025704
Talukdar, S. & S. Sengupta (2020). Edible frog species of Nagaland. Journal of Environmental Biology 41(4): 927–930.
Toft, C.A. (1980). Feeding ecology of thirteen syntopic species of anurans in a seasonal tropical environment. Oecologia 45(1): 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346717
Toft, C.A. (1985). Resource partitioning in amphibians and reptiles. Copeia 1985(1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1444785
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Thejavitso Chase, Santa Kalita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2785.8.7.8953-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.
