Avifaunal diversity in unprotected wetlands of Ayodhya District, Uttar Pradesh, India
Main Article Content
Abstract
Nine unprotected wetlands of Ayodhya district, Uttar Pradesh, India were studied to assess the bird species composition and richness from March 2019 to February 2020 using point count method. A total of 105 species of birds belonging to 79 genera, distributed among 35 families and 12 orders were recorded. Passeriformes had the highest diversity with 25 species and 12 families. Anatidae was the most dominant family with 15 species, constituting 14.29% of the wetland bird community in the study area. These wetlands provided habitat for 62 residential species, 42 winter migrants and one vagrant. The carnivore guild was the most dominant with 46 species. The wetland sites under study were continuously used by humans mainly for land encroachment, fishing activities and livestock grazing apart from other minor uses. Out of the nine selected wetlands, three wetlands (˂2 ha) had very few bird species (≤3), therefore were excluded from further calculations. But the rest of the six selected wetlands (˃5 ha) provided habitat for 12 bird species of conservation importance (one Endangered species, five Vulnerable species, and six Near Threatened species) according to the IUCN Red list. These wetlands also supported 39 species of birds having a declining population trend globally. These findings highlight the role of medium and large-sized unprotected wetlands in providing critical habitat to the birds throughout the year in Ayodhya district. Future research must concentrate on understanding the key factors influencing the presence and absence of birds in such unprotected wetlands so that these wetlands can be managed effectively to secure the potential habitat of birds.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2785.8.7.8953-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.
References
Ali, S. & S.D. Ripley (1987). Compact handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan together with those of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka. Oxford University Press, Delhi, 737 pp.
Basavarajappa, S. (2006). Avifauna of agro-ecosystems of Maidan area of Karnataka. Zoos’ Print Journal 21(4): 2217–2219. https://doi.org/0.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.1277.2217-9
Bassi, N., M.D. Kumar, A. Sharma & P. Pardha-Saradhi (2014). Status of wetlands in India: a review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 2: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.07.001
Behera, M.D., V.S. Chitale, A. Shaw, P.S. Roy & M.S.R. Murthy (2012). Wetland monitoring, serving as an index of Land use change – a study in Samaspur Wetlands, Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Indian society of Remote Sensing 40(2): 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-011-0139-6
Bibby, C.J., D.A. Hill, N.D. Burgess & S. Mustoe (2000). Bird census techniques. Academic Press, London, 302 pp.
Blackenberg, M., M.C. Mlambo, D. Parker, S.N. Motitsoe & C. Reed (2020). Protected and un-protected urban wetlands have similar aquatic macroinvertebrate communities: A case study from the Cape Flats Sand Fynbos region of southern Africa. PloS One 15(5): e0233889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233889
Chopra, G. & S.K. Sharma (2012). Avian biodiversity in and around major wetlands of ‘‘lower shivalik foothills’’, India. Nature and Science 10(7): 86–93.
CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) (2012). Checklist of Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. CITES, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.cites.org. Accessed on 02 January 2021.
Colwell, M.A. & O.W. Taft (2000). Waterbird Communities in Managed Wetlands of Varying Water Depth. Waterbirds 23(1): 45–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4641109
Custer, T.W. & R.G. Osborn (1977). Wading birds as biological indicators: 1975 Colony Survey. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C.
eBird (2021). eBird Uttar Pradesh, India. https://ebird.org/region/IN-UP?yr=all Accessed on 06 March 2021.
Gopal, K., H.O. Verma & S. Tripathi (2015). Water quality monitoring of Sur Sarovar (Keetham) Lake, Agra (Uttar Pradesh). Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health 15(3&4): 95–103.
Grimmett, R., C. Inskipp & T. Inskipp (2011). Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. Oxford University Press & Christopher Helm, London, 480 pp.
Helmers, D.L. (1992). Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network. Manomet, MA, 58 pp.
IUCN (2021). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021-3. http://www.iucnredlist.org.
IWPA (1972). The Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 (as amended up to 1993). Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Govt. of India, Delhi. http://www.envfor.nic.in/legis/wildlife/wildlife1.html. Accessed on 02nd January 2021.
Jha, K.K. (2013). Aquatic food plants and their consumer birds at
Sandi Bird Sanctuary, Hardoi, Northern India. Asian Journal of Conservation Biology 2(1): 30–43.
Kumar, A., J.P. Sati, P.C. Tak & J.R.B. Alfred (2005). Handbook on Indian Wetland Birds and their Conservation. Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India, 468 pp.
Kumar, P. & A. Sharma (2018). Diversity and status of avifauna in man-made sacred ponds of Kurukshetra, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 10(9): 12173–12193. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.3729.10.9.12173-12193
Kumar, P. & S.K. Gupta (2009). Diversity and abundance of wetland birds around Kurukshetra, India. Our Nature 7: 212–217.
Kumar, P., D. Rai & S.K. Gupta (2016). Wetland bird assemblage in rural ponds of Kurukshetra, India. Waterbirds 39(1): 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1675/063.039.0111
Kumar, S. (2018). Cultural landscape and heritage of Ayodhya-Faizabad: A geographical analysis. Ph.D. Thesis submitted to Department of Geography, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh.
KVK (2021). Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ayodhya. https://ayodhya.kvk4.in/district-profile.html Accessed on 02 January 2021.
Margalef, R. (1958). Temporal succession and spatial heterogeneity in phytoplankton, pp. 323–347. In: Buzzati-Traverso, A.A. (ed.). Perspectives in Marine Biology. University of California Press, Berkeley, 621 pp.
Mazumdar, S. (2019). Composition of avian communities in a human-modified wetland Okhla Bird Sanctuary, India: with notes on conservation initiatives. Proceedings of Zoological Society 72: 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-017-0239-6
Murkin, H.R. & J.A. Kadlec (1986). Relationships between waterfowl and macroinvertebrate densities in a northern prairie marsh. Journal of Wildlife Management 50(2): 212–217. https://doi.org/10.2307/3801899
NWA (2010). Uttar Pradesh, SAC/RESA/AFEG/NWIA/ATLAS/12/2010, National Wetland Atlas. Space Applications Centre, ISRO, Ahmedabad, India, 372 pp.
Pielou, E.C. (1966). The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology 13: 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0
Praveen, J., R. Jayapal & A. Pittie (2020). Taxonomic updates to the checklists of birds of India, and the South Asian region – 2020. Indian Birds 16(1): 12–19.
Rajashekara, S. & M.G. Venkatesha (2010). The diversity and abundance of waterbirds in lakes of Bangalore city, Karnataka, India. Biosystematica 4(2): 63–73.
Rani, R., R. Gautam & R.K. Gautam (2009). Floristic survey of medicinal plants in Sur Sarovar wetland, Kheetam, Agra, India. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 1(2): 196–200.
Reddy, C.S., M. Rangaswamy, C. Pattanaik & C.S. Jha (2009). Invasion of alien species in wetlands of Samaspur Bird Sanctuary, Uttar Pradesh, India. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution 6(3): 43–50.
Sarkar, B., P. Hazra, S.P. Kumar, P. Ghosh, A. Banerjee & T.N. Khan (2013). Habitat attributes and waterbird-use of four wetlands in Manas National Park, Assam, India. Proceedings of Zoological Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-013-0074-3
Saygili, F., N. Yigit & S. Bulut (2011). The spatial and temporal distributions of waterbirds in Lakes Aksehir-Eber and Lake Koycegiz in western Anatolia, Turkey - a comparative analysis. Turkish Journal of Zoology 35(4): 467–480.
Shannon C.E. & W.W. Wiener (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communications. University of Illinois, Urbana, USA.
Sharma, N. (2007). Butterflies of Sur Sarovar Bird Sanctuary, Keetham, Agra (Uttar Pradesh, India). Records of Zoological Survey of India 107(2): 103–112.
Shine, C. & C. Klemm (1999). Wetlands, Water and the Law. Using law to advance wetland conservation and wise use. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, Cambridge, UK and Bonn, Germany, 330 pp.
Simpson, E.H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688.
Sorenson, T. (1948). A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biologiske Skrifter/ Kongellege Danske Videnskabernes Selskab 5
Sundar, K.S.G. & S. Kittur (2012). Methodological, temporal and spatial factors affecting modeled occupancy of resident birds in the perennially cultivated landscape of Uttar Pradesh, India. Landscape Ecology 27: 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9666-3
Sundar, K.S.G. & S. Kittur (2013). Can wetlands maintained for human use also help conserve biodiversity? Landscape-scale patterns of bird use of wetlands in an agricultural landscape in north India. Biological Conservation 168: 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.09.016
Tak, P.C., J.P. Sati & A.N. Rizvi (2010). Status of waterbirds at Hathnikund Barrage wetland, Yamunanagar District, Haryana, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 2(4): 841–844. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT. o2200.841-4
Torre-Cuadros, M.D.L.A.L., S. Herrando-Perez & K.R. Young (2007). Diversity and structure patterns for tropical montane and premontane forests of central Peru, with an assessment of the use of higher-taxon surrogacy. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 2965– 2988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9155-9
TWI (2020). The Wetlands Initiative. What is a Wetland? http://www.wetlands-initiative.org/what-is-a-wetland. Downloaded on 17 December 2020.
Urfi, A.J. (2003). The birds of Okhla barrage bird sanctuary, Delhi, India. Forktail 19: 39–50.
Woodward, R.T. & Y-S. Wui (2001). The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 37: 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00276-7
Yashmita-Ulman & M. Singh (2021). Bird composition, diversity and foraging guilds in agricultural landscapes: A case study from eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 13(8): 19011–19028. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7089.13.8.19011-19028