Study on the impacts of LULC change on the wildlife habitat and the livelihood of people in and around Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mizoram, India
Main Article Content
Abstract
Anthropogenic activities are a matter of serious concern in the Indian Himalayan region due to adverse impacts on wildlife and habitats. This study examines resource use patterns by local people in relation to the habitat of Malayan Sun Bear in and around Dampa Tiger Reserve in Mizoram. Standard questionnaire surveys and vegetation sampling methods were used for data collection and analysis. It was found that 221.3 km2 (33.3%) of the forested areas have high human interference in the form of logging, indiscriminate tree falling and fuel wood collection, while 26% was moderately affected and 18% of the reserve had no impact. Among vegetation resources, fuel wood was used in the highest quantity (28%) followed by bamboo and edible plants (21%) and (11%), respectively. Ethno-zoological usage comprises of parts of animals like snake, bear, monitor lizard, and porcupine. Sun bears were considered pests that feed on maize, cucumber, sweet potato and pumpkins grown in ‘jhum’ crop fields. Anthropogenic pressures from farm-bush hunting, monoculture, and unplanned roads have contributed to severe biodiversity loss, and must be constrained for the conservation of sun bear and their habitat
in the region. The Land Use/ Land Cover on human built-up, jhum land (current and abandoned jhum/shifting cultivation), forests (dense and open), bamboo forest, plantation etc. were used to develop maps for each village. The land use pattern for the eight villages studied. Information obtained from MIRSAC and its mapping in Arcview shows that highest number of agricultural land was in villages of West Phaileng (319sq.ha) and Damparengpui (283.8sq.ha). Closed or dense forest was in highest proportion in Phuldungsei and least in Tuipuibari (120sq.ha). Grazing activities was relatively low or absent in most part of DTR. Abandoned jhum fields were in largest number in Damparengpui (939.60sq.ha) followed by Silsuri (881.17sq.ha) and Serhmun (880.99sq.ha).
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2785.8.7.8953-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.
References
Aiyadurai, A., N.J. Singh & E.J. Milner-Gulland (2014). Wildlife hunting by indigenous tribes: A case study from Arunachal Pradesh, north-east India. Oryx 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605309990937
Barrueto, M., A.T. Ford & A.P. Clevenger (2014). Anthropogenic effects on activity patterns of wildlife at crossing structures. Anthropogenic effects on activity patterns of wildlife at crossing structures. Ecosphere 5(3): 27. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00382.1
Bargali, H.S., N. Akhtar & N.P.S. Chauhan (2012). The Sloth bear activity and movement in highly fragmented and disturbed habitat in central India. World Journal of Zoology 7(4): 312–319.
Becker, D.J., D.G. Streicker & S. Altizer (2015). Linking anthropogenic resources to wildlife-pathogen dynamics: a review and meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 18: 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12428
Becker, D.J., R.J. Hall, K.M. Forbes, R.K. Plowright & S. Altizer (2018). Anthropogenic resource subsidies and host– parasite dynamics in wildlife. Philogy Transition Royal Society B 373: 20170086 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0086
Broekhuis, F., E.K. Madsen & B. Klaassen (2019). Predators and pastoralists: how anthropogenic pressures inside wildlife areas influence carnivore space use and movement behavior. Animal Conservation 22(4): 404–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12483
Can, O.E., N.D’Cruze, D.L. Garshelis, J. Beecham & D.W. Macdonald (2014). Resolving Human-Bear Conflict: A Global Survey of Countries, Experts, and Key Factors. Conservation Letters 7(6): 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12117
Ceballos, G., P.R. Ehrlich & R. Dirzo (2017). Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proceeding of the National Academic of Science 114: E6089–E6096. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704949114
Chauhan, N.P.S. & Lalthunpuia (2008). Status and distribution of Malayan Sun Bear (Helarctos malayanus) in north-eastern states, India. Indian Forester 134(10): 1339–1348.
Choudhury, A.U. (2011). Records of Sloth Bear and Malayan Sun Bear in North East India. Final report to International Association for Bear Research and Management (IBA), Guwahati, Assam, India: The Rhino Foundation for Nature in North East, India, 53pp.
Cozzi, G., M. Chynoweth, J. Kusak, E. Coban, A. Coban, A. Ozgul & C. Sekercioglu (2016). Anthropogenic food resources foster the coexistence of distinct life history strategies: year-round sedentary and migratory brown bears. Journal of Zoology 300: 142. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12365
Dhyani, D., S. Dhyani & R.K. Maikhuri (2013). Assessing Anthropogenic Pressure and Its Impact on HippophaesalicifoliaPockets in Central Himalaya, Uttarakhand. Journal of Mountain Science 10(3): 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2424-z
Fedriani, J.M., T.K. Fuller & R.M. Sauvajot (2001). Does availability of anthropogenic food enhance densities of omnivorous mammals? An example with coyotes in southern California. Ecography 24: 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240310x
Fraser, D. & A.M. MacRae (2011). Four types of activities that affect animals: Implications for animal welfare science and animal ethics philosophy. Animal Welfare 20(4): 581–590.
Gouda, S., J. Sethy & N.P.S. Chauhan (2016). First photo capture of Asiatic golden cat in Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mizoram, India. CAT News 64: 26–27.
Gouda, S., N.P.S. Chauhan & J. Sethy (2020). Status and distribution of Malayan sun bear (Helarctosmalayanus) in Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mizoram, India. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity 3(4): 45–56.
Jones, K.R., O. Venter, R.A. Fuller, J.R. Allan, S.L. Maxwell, P.J. Negret & J.E. Watson (2018). One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure. Science 360: 788.
Kamusoko, C (2007). Land use/cover change and landscape fragmentation analysis in the Bindura district, Zimbabwe. Land Degrade. Dev.18, 221–233.
Ladle, A., R. Steenweg, B. Shepherd & M.S. Boyce (2018). The role of human outdoor recreation in shaping patterns of grizzly bear-black bear co- occurrence. PLoS ONE 13(2): e0191730. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191730
Lambin, E. & H. Geist (2007). Causes of Land-use and Land-cover Change. The Encyclopedia of Earth. Lambin EF, Geist HJ, Lepers E (2003) Dynamics of Land-use and Land-cover Change in Tropical Regions. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 28: 205–241.
Mohanta, R & N.P.S. Chauhan (2014). Anthropogenic threats and its conservation on Himalayan Brown Bear (Ursus arctos) habitat in Kugti wildlife sanctuary, Himachal Pradesh, India. Asian Journal of Conservation Biology 3(2): 175–180.
Nasi, R., D. Brown, D. Wilkie, E. Bennett, C. Tutin, G. Van-Tol & T. Christophersen (2008). Conservation and use of wildlife-based resources: the bushmeat crisis. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, and Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor. Technical Series no. 33, 50.
Raman, T.R.S. (2001). Effect of Slush and Burn shifting cultivation on rainforest birds iin Mizoram, Northeast India. Conservation Biology 15(3): 685–698.
Sahoo, U.K., J. Lalremruata, L. Jeeceelee, J.H. Lalremruati, C. Lalliankhuma & H. Lalramnghinglova (2010). Utilization of non-timber forest products by the tribal around Dampa Tiger Reserve in Mizoram. The Bioscan 3: 721–729.
Sethy, J. & N.P.S. Chauhan (2013). Human-sun bears conflict in Mizoram, North East India: Impact and conservation management. International Journal of Conservation Science 4: 317–328.
Sethy, J., S. Gouda & N.P.S. Chauhan (2017). Confirm occurrence and photographic evidence of marbled cat from Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mizoram, India, CAT News 65: 26–27.
Sethy, J. & N.P.S. Chauhan (2018). Dietary preference of Malayan sun bear (Helarctosmalayanus) in Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh, India, Wildlife Biology (Bio One) 2018(1): wlb.00351. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00351
Sih, A., M.C.O. Ferrari & D.J. Harris (2011). Evolution and behavioral responses to human-induced rapid environmental change. Evolution and Application 4: 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00166.x
Singh, P. & D.W. Macdonald (2017). Populations and activity patterns of clouded leopards and marbled cats in Dampa Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Mammalogy 98(5): 1453–1462. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyx104