Mammalian fauna in an urban influenced zone of Chandaka-Dampara Wildlife Sanctuary in Odisha, India

Main Article Content

Subrat Debata
Kedar Kumar Swain


A camera trapping survey to estimate the species richness and relative abundance of different mammalian fauna and various anthropogenic activities was carried out for four months within an urban influenced zone of Chandaka-Dampara Wildlife Sanctuary, Odisha.  The survey extended over 120 days in January–April 2019 over 10% of the total sanctuary area.  With nine cameras and a total effort of 771 trap days, 2,855 independent photographs including 14 species of wild mammals and birds, human traffic, and movement of stray animals were captured.  Among the mammalian fauna, Golden Jackal was the most photographed species whereas the Asian Elephant, Striped Hyaena, and Common Palm Civet were the least photographed species.  Various anthropogenic activities like intensive movement of departmental vehicles, staff, feral livestock, and stray dogs and cats were also recorded and these activities need to be addressed in management activities for long term conservation of the area and its mammalian fauna.  In order to enhance biological connectivity and improve movement of wildlife between the main part of the Chandaka Sanctuary and its near-detached reserved forests in Jagannathprasad-Bharatpur, the study recommends removal of feral cattle, extensive plantations, and construction of a fly-over for vehicular traffic. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Debata, S. and Swain, K.K. 2020. Mammalian fauna in an urban influenced zone of Chandaka-Dampara Wildlife Sanctuary in Odisha, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa. 12, 8 (May 2020), 15767–15775. DOI:
Author Biographies

Subrat Debata, Aranya Foundation, 625/12, Mars Villa, Panchasakha Nagar, Dumduma, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751019, India.

Department of Biodiversity and Conservation of Natural Resources, Ph.D. Scholar

Kedar Kumar Swain, Office of the Divisional Forest Officer, Chandaka Wildlife Division, Gaja Vihar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751003, India

Office of the Divisional Forest Officer, Chandaka Wildlife Division, Gaja Vihar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751003, India


Biamonte, E., L, Sandoval, E. Chacon & G. Barrantes (2011). Effect of urbanization on the avifauna in a tropical metropolitan area. Landscape Ecology 26: 183–194. DOI:

Cole, E.K., M.D. Pope & R.G. Anthony (1997). Effects of road management on movement and survival of Roosevelt Elk. The Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 1115–1126. DOI:

Debata, S. & K.K. Swain (2018). Estimating mammalian diversity and relative abundance using camera traps in a tropical deciduous forest of Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary, eastern India. Mammal Study 43: 45–53. DOI:

IUCN (2017). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2017-3. . Downloaded on 20 May 2019.

Jenks, K.E., P. Chanteap, K. Damrongchainarong, C. Peter, P. Cutter, T. Redford, A.J. Lynam, J. Howard & P. Leimgruber (2011). Using relative abundance indices from camera-trapping to test wildlife conservation hypotheses-an example from Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Tropical Conservation Science 4: 113–131. DOI:

Jokimaki, J. & M.L. Kaisanlahti-Jokimaki (2003). Spatial similarity of urban bird communities: a multiscale approach. Journal of Biogeography 30: 1183–1193. DOI:

Madhusudan, M.D. (2004). Recovery of wild large herbivores following livestock decline in a tropical Indian wildlife reserve. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 858–869. DOI:

Menon, V. (2014). Indian Mammals: A Field Guide. Hachette Book Publishing India Pvt. Ltd, India, 528pp.

Mullu, D. (2016). A review on the effect of habitat fragmentation on ecosystem. Journal of Natural Sciences Research 6(15): 1–15.

Naik, M. (2013). Urban sprawl of Bhubaneswar city using GIS applications and entropy. B Tech Thesis, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, 63pp.

O’Brien, T., G. Kinnaird, M.F. & H.T. Wibisono (2003). Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape. Animal Conservation 6: 131–139. DOI:

Palei, H.S., T. Pradhan, H.K. Sahu & A.K. Nayak (2015). Estimating mammalian abundance using camera traps in the tropical forest of Similipal Tiger Reserve, Odisha, India. Proceedings of the Zoological Society 69: 181–188. DOI:

Prater, H.S. (2005). The book of Indian animals. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 324pp

Routray, J.K., K.C. Rath & N. Nath (1996). Growth, development and planning of Bhubaneswar. Cities 13(2): 79–96.

Samson, A., B. Ramakrishnan, A. Veeramani, P. Santhoshkumar, S. Karthick, G. Sivasubramanian, M. Ilakkia, A. Chitheena, J.L. Princy & P. Ravi (2016). Effect of vehicular traffic on wild animals in Sigur Plateau, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(9): 9182–9189. DOI:

Sollmann, R., A. Mohamed, H. Samejima & A. Wilting (2013). Risky business or simple solution-Relative abundance indices from camera-trapping. Biological Conservation 159: 405–412. DOI:

Srivastava, S.S. & L.A.K. Singh (2003). Status of wild dog (Cuon alpinus) in Similipal and possible impacts of ‘village dogs’. Zoos’ Print 18(10): 18–21.

Tiwari, S.K., J.R.B. Alfred & S.K. Dutta (2002). Vertebrate Fauna of Chandaka-Dampara Wildlife Sanctuary, Orissa. Zoological Survey of India, Conservation Area Series 14, 126pp.

Tobler, M.W., S.E. Carrillo-Percastegui, R.L. Pitman, R. Mares & G. Powell (2008). An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large- and medium-sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Animal Conservation 11: 169–178. DOI:

United Nations (2011). World population prospects: the revision 2010. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 481pp.

United Nations (2012). World urbanization prospects, the 2011 revision: Final report and tables. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 302pp

Wilby, R.L. & G.L.W. Perry (2006). Climate change, biodiversity and the urban environment: a critical review based on London, UK. Progress in Physical Geography 30: 73–98. DOI:

Most read articles by the same author(s)