An updated checklist and new records of butterfly species in Kedarnath Musk Deer Sanctuary (western Himalaya), Uttarakhand, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.10468.18.7.29269-29286Keywords:
Butterfly diversity, distribution extension, elevational gradient, insect conservation, insect fauna, Lepidoptera, new records, Papilionoidea, photographic documentation, Protected areaAbstract
This study presents an updated checklist of butterflies of Kedarnath Musk Deer Sanctuary (KMDS), located in the Garhwal Himalaya of Uttarakhand, India, based on systematic field surveys conducted across multiple elevations and habitats. A total of 300 butterfly species belonging to six families and 19 subfamilies were recorded from the Sanctuary. The present work documents 153 species newly recorded from KMDS, substantially expanding the previously known butterfly fauna of the area. Species records were verified through photographic documentation and standard taxonomic literature, and only diagnostically confirmed records were included in the checklist. The updated inventory highlights the sanctuary as an important repository of butterfly diversity in the western Himalaya and provides a reliable baseline for future faunistic, taxonomic, and biodiversity assessments.
References
Acharya, B.K. & L. Vijayan (2015). Butterfly diversity along the elevation gradient of eastern Himalaya, India. Ecological Research 30(5): 909–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11284-015-1292-0
Ara, Z.G. & A.R. Haque (2021). A comprehensive review on synthetic insecticides: toxicity to pollinators, associated risk to food security, and management approaches. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 46(3): 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42853-021-00104-Y
Champion, H.G. & S. Seth (1968). A Revised Survey of The Forest Types of India. Manager of Publications, New Delhi, India, 404 pp.
Devi, R., P. Kumar & V.K. Mattu (2023). An assessment of diversity patterns of butterfly fauna (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) from subalpine zone of Western Himalaya. Oriental Insects 57(4): 1084–1101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00305316.2023.2186507
Dewan, S., I.K. Chettri, A.H.S. Limboo & B.K. Acharya (2024). Butterflies of the Indian Himalaya Along with Nepal and Bhutan, pp. 271–292. In: Pullaiah, T. (ed.). Biodiversity Hotspot of the Himalaya. Apple Academic Press, 538 pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003455202-11
Ghazoul, J. (2006). Floral diversity and the facilitation of pollination. JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3599633. Accessed on 4.v.2025.
Hill, G.M., A.Y. Kawahara, J.C. Daniels, C.C. Bateman & B.R. Scheffers (2021). Climate change effects on animal ecology: butterflies and moths as a case study. Biological Reviews 96(5): 2113–2126. https://doi.org/10.1111/BRV.12746
Jaryan, V., S.K. Uniyal, R.C. Gupta & R.D. Singh (2013). Alien flora of Indian himalayan state of Himachal Pradesh. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185: 6129–6153.
Kehimkar, I. (2008). The Book of Indian Butterflies. Bombay Natural History Spciety, Oxford University, Delhi Press, 497 pp.
Kehimkar, I. (2016). The Book of Indian Butterflies. Bombay Natural History Society, Oxford University Press, Mumbai.
Kubelková, K. (2024). The effect of pesticides on ecology and communities of butterflies (Lepidoptera) as non-target organisms. Bachelor’s Thesis, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, 33 pp.
Kumar, S., R.S. Singh, P. Singh & S. Kumar (2019). Rediscovery of butterflies Arhopala bazalus Hewitson, 1862 and Catapaecilma major Druce, 1895 from Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 7(2): 864–867.
Kunte, K. D.N. Basu & G.G. Kumar (2019). Taxonomy, systematics, and biology of Indian butterflies in the 21st Century, pp. 275–304. In: Ramani, S., P. Mohanraj & H.M. Yeshwanth (eds.). Indian Insect. Diversity and Science. CRC Press, Florida, USA, 472 pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429061400
Lochan, R., A. Kumar & S. Dewan (2022). First record of Epicopeia polydora Westwood, 1841 (Lepidoptera: Epicopeiidae) — a rare day flying moth from northwestern Himalaya, India. The Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 76(2): 155–157.
Mani, M.S. (1974). Ecology and Biogeography in India. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 725 pp.
Parmesan, C. (2003). Butterflies as bioindicators for climate change effects, pp. 541–560. In: Boggs, C.L., Watt, W.B. & Ehrlich, P.R. (eds.). Butterflies: Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 739 pp.
Sharma, K., B.K. Acharya, G. Sharma, D. Valente, M.R. Pasimeni, I. Petrosillo & T. Selvan (2020). Land use effect on butterfly alpha and beta diversity in the eastern Himalaya, India. Ecological Indicators 110: 105605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105605
Sharma, N., M.D. Behera, A.P. Das & R.M. Panda (2019). Plant richness pattern in an elevation gradient in the eastern Himalaya. Biodiversity and Conservation 28: 2085–2104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01699-7
Singh, A.P. & S. Sondhi (2016). Butterflies of Garhwal, Uttarakhand, western Himalaya, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(4): 8666–8697. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2254.8.4.8666-8697
Smetacek, P. (2011). Review of Indian Lepidoptera collections and their significance in conservation. ENVIS Bulletin: Arthropods and their conservation in India (Insects & Spiders) 14(1): 135–139.
Singh, A.P. (2009). Butterflies of Kedarnath Musk Deer Reserve, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 1(1): 37–48. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o1873.37-48
Sondhi, S. & K. Kunte (2018). Butterflies of Uttarakhand: A Field Guide. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, India, 310 pp.
Stattersfield, A.J. (1998). Identifying threatened species in the “south” using new criteria. Pacific Conservation Biology 4(1): 33–38.
Uniyal, S.K. & R.D. Singh (2013). Vegetation characteristics, floral diversity and resource use in Western Himalayas, pp. 162–179. In: Chopra, V.L. (ed.). Climate Change and its Ecological Implications for the Western Himalaya. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India, 406 pp.
Uniyal, V.P. (2004). Butterflies of Nanda Devi National Park– a world heritage site. Indian Forester 130: 800–803.
Uniyal, V.P., M. Bhardwaj & A.K. Sanyal (2013). An Assessment of Entomofauna for Management and Conservation of Biodiversity in the Gangotri Landscape. Annual Progress Report, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 237 pp.
Vázquez, D.P. (1998). Endemic bird areas of the world-Priorities for biodiversity conservation. Cir.Nii.Ac.Jp. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1573105975027777280. Accessed on 06.iv.2025.
Wani, R.F.C. & I.M. Shah (2024). Impact of Environmental Pollution on Diversity of Insects: A Case Study of Some Major Insect Orders, pp. 17–53. In: Hajam, Y.A., S.H. Parey & R.A. Bhat (eds.). Insect Diversity and Ecosystem Services, Volume 2: Environmental Indicators, Molecular Approaches, and Management Strategies. Apple Academic Press, Florida, USA, 268 pp.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anand Kumar, Priyanshu Kumar, Gourav Lochan, Prachi Arya, Rajeev Lochan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2785.8.7.8953-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.


