Morphological and statistical perspectives on genital sexual dimorphism in Eupterotidae Swinhoe, 1892 (Insecta: Lepidoptera)

Authors

  • Sujata Saini Department of Biosciences, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab 140413, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4332-8172
  • Shabnum Shafi Department of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab 140413, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.10058.18.3.28552-28563

Keywords:

Apona, Eupterote, Ganisa, genitalia, morphology, principal component analysis, taxonomy

Abstract

The family Eupterotidae (Lepidoptera) exhibits pronounced sexual dimorphism, particularly in genital structures, which are critical for species identification and understanding evolutionary relationships. This study investigates sexual dimorphism in the genital morphology of select species within the genera Eupterote, Apona, and Ganisa of the subfamily Eupterotinae. Detailed morphological analyses of male and female genitalia were conducted using specimens collected from Himachal Pradesh and Jammu & Kashmir, India. Key findings reveal distinct differences in the uncus, valva, and aedeagus in males, and the corpus bursae, ductus bursae, and apophyses in females across the studied species. Notably, Eupterote species lack a gnathos, while Apona and Ganisa species possess it, with Ganisa showing a unique demarcation between the uncus and tegumen. Principal component analysis of morphometric data highlights significant variation in genital and wing measurements, supporting taxonomic differentiation. These differences underscore the taxonomic significance of genital structures and their role in reproductive isolation. The results enhance the understanding of sexual dimorphism in Eupterotidae and provide insights into their phylogenetic relationships and ecological adaptations.

Author Biographies

Sujata Saini, Department of Biosciences, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab 140413, India.

.

Shabnum Shafi, Department of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab 140413, India.

.

References

Swinhoe, C. (1892). Catalogue of Eastern and Australian Lepidoptera Heterocera. Oxford University Museum, Oxford, U.K., 324 pp.

Eberhard, W.G. (1985). Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, U.S.A., 244 pp. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674330702

Mutanen, M. (2006). Genitalic evolution in Lepidoptera. Systematic Entomology 31: 1–20.

Holloway, J.D. (1987). The moths of Borneo: part 3. Malayan Nature Journal 41: 1–164.

Pugaev, S. & T. Du (2011). Eupterotidae of the world. Proceedings of the 4th Economic Scientific Conference: 311–315.

Raha, A., M. Sanyal & P. Majumder (2017). Synonymy in Eupterote species. Revista Lepidopterologica 45(180): 656–658. https://doi.org/10.57065/shilap.890

Fry, R. & P. Waring (1996). A guide to moth traps and their use. The Amateur Entomologist 24: 1–60.

Miller, L.D. (1970). Nomenclature of wing veins and cells. Journal of Res Lepidoptera 8(2): 37–49.

Klots, A.B (1970). Lepidoptera, pp. 115–130. In: Tuxen, S.D. (ed.). Taxonomists Glossary of Genitalia in Insects, 2nd Edition. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 144 pp.

Robinson, G.S. (1976). Dissection techniques for Lepidoptera. Journal of Natural History 10: 151–161.

Kaleka, A.S., D. Singh & S. Saini (2019). Further studies on two species of the moth genus Paralebeda Aurivillius (Lepidoptera: Bombycoidea: Lasiocampidae) from northwestern India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 11(12): 14593–14598. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4621.11.12.14593-14598

Saini, S. (2019). Taxonomic studies on external genitalic attributes of two species of genus Rhagastis Rothschild and Jordan (Lepidoptera: Hawkmoths). International Research Journal of Biological Sciences 8(11): 9–14.

Hampson, G.F. (1892). Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma, Moths, 1. Taylor and Francis, 527 pp.

Nässig, W.A. & R.G. Oberprieler (2008). Phylogenetic relationships in Eupterotidae. Zootaxa 1910: 1–25.

Downloads

Published

26-03-2026

Issue

Section

Communications