Main Article Content
Begonia satrapis was studied for its pollination aspects at Sumbuk, Sikkim, India. The floral details and the foraging behaviour of insects visiting the flowers were examined to define the pollination syndrome and its functionality for the success of sexual reproduction in this species. The flowers do not produce nectar and offer only pollen as floral reward to foraging insects. Therefore, male flowers were foraged more for its pollen than the female flowers. There was a significant difference in the visit to male and female flowers by both Apis florea and Bombus breviceps, respectively. The bees spent more time on male flowers than on female flowers. The bees appear to rely on visual stimuli to visit male and female flowers. The plant produces abundant fruit and seed set in both hand and open-pollinations indicating that it is facultatively xenogamous. The female flowers lacking any reward resemble male flowers and in effect are pollinated by deceit.
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.27126.96.36.19953-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.
Adhikari, D., Z. Reshi, B.K. Datta, A. Chettri, K. Upadhaya, M.A. Shah, P.P. Singh, R. Tiwary, K. Majumdar, A. Pradhan, M.L. Thakur, N. Salam, S.H. Mir, Z.A. Kaloo & S.K. Barik (2018). Inventory and characterization of new populations through ecological niche modelling improve threat assessment. Current Science 114(3): 519â€“531. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i03/519-531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i03/519-531
Ã…gren, J. & D.W. Schemske (1991). Pollination by deceit in a neotropical monoeious herb, Begonia involucrata. Biotropica 23: 235â€“241. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388200
Bawa, K.S. (1980). Mimicry of male by female flowers and intrasexual competition for pollinators in Jacaratia dolichaula (D. Smith) Woodson (Caricaceae). Evolution 34: 467â€“474. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2408216
Castillo, R.A., C. Cordero & C.A. DomÃnguez (2002). Are reward polymorphisms subject to frequency- and density-dependent selection? Evidence from a monoecious species pollinated by deceit. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 544â€“552. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00425.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00425.x
Corff, J.L., J. Ã…gren & D.W. Schemske (1998). Floral display, pollinator discrimination and female reproductive success in two monoecious Begonia species. Ecology 79: 1610â€“1619.
Larson, B.M.H & S.C.H. Barrett (2000). A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69: 503â€“520.
Little, R.J. (1983). A review of floral food deception mimicries with comments on floral mutualism, pp294â€“309. In: Jones, C.E. & R.J. Little (eds.). Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. New York Press, New York, 558pp.
Lunau, K. (1991). Innate flower recognition in bumblebees (Bombusterrestris, B. lucorum; Apidae): Optical signals from stamens as landing reaction releasers. Ethology 88: 203â€“214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1991.tb00275.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1991.tb00275.x
Renner, S.S. (2006). Rewardless flowers in Angiosperms and the role of insect cognition in their evolution, pp123â€“144. In: Waser, N.M. & J. Ollerton (eds.). Plant-pollinator Interactions. From Specialization to Generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Schemske, D.W. & J. Ã…gren (1995). Deceit pollination and selection on female flower size in Begonia involucrata: an experimental approach. Evolution 49: 207â€“214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb05972.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb05972.x
Vogel, S. (1998). Remarkable nectarines: structure, ecology, organophyletic perspectives IV. Miscellaneous cases. Flora 193: 225â€“248.
Wiens, D. (1978). Mimicry in plants, pp365â€“403. In: Hecht, M.K., W.C. Steere & B. Wallace (eds.). Evolutionary Biology. Plenum Press, New York, 655pp.
Wyatt, G.E & M. Sazima (2011). Pollination and reproductive biology of thirteen species of Begonia in the Serra Do Mar State Park, Sao PÃ£ulo, Brazil. Journal of Pollination Ecology 6: 95â€“107.