Checklist of moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of Lumami campus, Nagaland University, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9984.17.12.28111-28124Keywords:
Biodiversity, conservation, diversity, environmental change, first record, habitat degradation, light trap, moth fauna, northeastern India, ZunhebotoAbstract
The present study was carried out to document the moth fauna of Lumami campus between February 2024 to April 2024 using the light trapping method with a 100 W LED bulb. A total of 106 species belonging to 83 genera under 12 families and seven superfamilies were recorded. The family Erebidae dominated with 46 species (43%), followed by Geometridae with 32 species (30%), Notodontidae with five species (4%), Crambidae and Saturniidae with four species each (4%), Drepanidae, Lasiocampidae, and Sphingidae with three species (3% each), Euteliidae and Nolidae with two species each (2%), and Zygaenidae and Noctuidae with one species each (1% each). Of the 106 moth species, 36 species are first reports from Nagaland; of which Geometridae dominates with 18 genera (e.g., Amblychia sp., Hypomecis seperata), followed by Erebidae with 13 genera (e.g., Asota heliconia, Dierna strigata, Ommatophora sp.), Euteliidae with two genera (e.g., Targalla apcifascia, Eutelia discistriga), and Nolidae with two genera (e.g., Westermannia superba, Xenochroa sp.). Species such as Acosmeryx naga are potential pollinators, and Chadisra bipartita is an indicator of forest health, as their decline suggests detrimental environmental changes such as increased pesticide use or habitat degradation. This study thereby offers baseline data for future studies on moth fauna as well as for the creation of sustainable forest development and conservation strategies.
References
Andersen, A.N., A. Fisher, B.D. Hoffmann, J.L. Read & R. Richards (2004). Use of terrestrial invertebrates for biodiversity monitoring in Australian rangelands, with particular reference to ants. Austral Ecology 29(1): 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01362.x
Anderson, M., E.L. Rotheray & F. Mathews (2023). Marvellous moths! pollen deposition rate of bramble (Rubus futicosus L. agg.) is greater at night than day. PLoS One 18(3): e0281810. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281810
Devoto, M., S. Bailey & J. Memmott (2011). The ‘night shift’: nocturnal pollen‐transport networks in a boreal pine forest. Ecological Entomology 36(1): 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01247.x
Dey, P., V.P. Uniyal & A.K. Sanyal (2015). Moth assemblages (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) as a potential tool for biodiversity monitoring-study in western Himalayan protected areas. Indian Forester 141(9): 985–992.
Fox, K., P. Vitt, K. Anderson, G. Fauske, S. Travers, D. Vik & M.O. Harris (2013). Pollination of a threatened orchid by an introduced hawk moth species in the tallgrass prairie of North America. Biological Conservation 167: 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.026
Government of Nagaland. Annual Administrative Report 2024–2025. Department of Soil and Water Conservation. https://snwc.nagaland.gov.in
Grimm, N.B., D. Foster, P. Groffman, J.M. Grove, C.S. Hopkinson, K.J. Nadelhoffer, D.E. Pataki & D.P. Peters (2013). The changing landscape: ecosystem responses to urbanization and pollution across climatic and societal gradients. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6(5): 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1890/070147
Hampson, G.F. (1892). The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Moths. Volume 1. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London, 527 pp.
Hampson, G.F. (1894). The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Moths. Volume 2. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London, 609 pp.
Hampson, G.F. (1895). The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Moths. Volume 3. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London, 546 pp.
Hampson, G.F. (1896). The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Moths. Volume 4. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London, 594 pp.
Haruta, T. (Eds.) (1992). Moths of Nepal Part 1, Tinea 13 (Supplement 2). Japan Heterocerists’ Society, Tokyo, 122 pp.
Haruta, T. (Eds.) (1993). Moths of Nepal Part 2, Tinea 13 (Supplement 3). Japan Heterocerists’ Society, Tokyo, 160 pp.
Haruta, T. (Eds.) (1994). Moths of Nepal Part 3, Tinea 14 (Supplement 1). Japan Heterocerists’ Society, Tokyo, 171 pp.
Haruta, T. (Eds.) (1995). Moths of Nepal Part 4, Tinea 14 (Supplement 2). Japan Heterocerists’ Society, Tokyo, 206 pp.
Haruta, T. (Eds.) (1998). Moths of Nepal Part 5, Tinea 15(Supplement 1). Japan Heterocerists’ Society, Tokyo, 330 pp.
Haruta, T. (Eds.) (2000). Moths of Nepal Part 6, Tinea 16 (Supplement 1). Japan Heterocerists’ Society, Tokyo, 163 pp.
Highland, S. A., J.C. Miller & J.A. Jones (2013). Determinants of moth diversity and community in a temperate mountain landscape: vegetation, topography, and seasonality. Ecosphere 4(10): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES12-00384.1
Hill, G.M., A.Y. Kawahara, J.C. Daniels, C.C. Bateman & B.R. Scheffers (2021). Climate change effects on animal ecology: butterflies and moths as a case study. Biological Reviews 96(5): 2113–2126. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12746
Hilt, N. & K. Fiedler (2006). Arctiid moth ensembles along a successional gradient in the Ecuadorian montane rain forest zone: how different are subfamilies and tribes? Journal of Biogeography 33(1): 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01360.x
iNaturalist (2025). iNaturalist Research-grade Observations. iNaturalist.org. Accessed on 15 March 2025.
Joshi, R., P.C. Pathania, A. Das, A. Mazumder, R. Ranjan & N. Singh (2021). Insecta: Lepidoptera: Heterocera (Moths). Faunal diversity of biogeographic zone of India: NorthEast. Director Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, pp. 511–576.
Kerr, J.T., A. Sugar & L. Packer (2000). Indicator taxa, rapid biodiversity assessment, and nestedness in an endangered ecosystem. Conservation Biology 14: 1726–1734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2000.99275.x.
Khan, A.U., N.U. Poly, S. Dutta & F. Alam (2023). Lepidopteran Insects Status and Diversity: A Review. Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Natural Science 3(1): 55–80. https://doi.org/10.47352/jmans.2774-3047.140
Kitching, R.L., A.G. Orr, H.M. Thalib, M.S. Hopkins & A.W. Graham (2000). Moth assemblages as indicators of environment quality in remnants of upland Australian rain forest. Journal of Applied Ecology 32(2): 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00490.x
Kumar, V., S.R. Kundu, A. Sanyal, A. Raha, O. Sanyal & K. Chandra (2019). DNA barcoding of Geometridae moths (Insecta: Lepidoptera): a preliminary effort from Namdapha National Park, eastern Himalaya. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 4(1): 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2018.1544037
LeCroy, K.A., H.W. Shew & P.A. van Zandt (2013). Pollen presence on nocturnal moths in the Ketona Dolomite glades of Bibb County, Alabama. Southern Lepidopterists’ News 35(3): 136–142.
Maes, D., W. Langeraert, T. Onkelinx, H. van Calster, W. Veraghtert & T. Merckx (2024). Species traits to guide moth conservation in anthropogenic regions: a multi‐species approach using distribution trends in Flanders (northern Belgium). Insect Conservation and Diversity 17(6): 1016–1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12767
Moths of India. (n.d.). An online resource. Available at https://www.mothsofindia.org/node/14. Accessed on 1.vi.2025.
Mozhui, L., A. Rana, K. Neikha & L.N. Kakati (2020). A checklist of long horn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) of Lumami, Zunheboto District, Nagaland with 23 new records. Halteres 11: 118–128. https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4405843
Nneji, L.M., A.C. Adeola, Y.Y. Wang, A.M. Ajao, O. Anyaele, Y. Malann & C.S. Olory (2020). Testing the effectiveness of DNA barcoding for biodiversity assessment of moths from Nigeria. Diversity 12(2): 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12020085
Peralta, G., C.M. Frost, T.A. Rand, R.K. Didham & J.M. Tylianakis (2014). Complementarity and redundancy of interactions enhance attack rates and spatial stability in host–parasitoid food webs. Ecology 95(7): 1888–1896. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1569.1
Regier, J.C., A. Zwick, M.P. Cummings, A.Y. Kawahara, S. Cho, S. Weller, A. Roe, J. Baixeras, J.W. Brown, C. Parr & D.R. Davis (2009). Toward reconstructing the evolution of advanced moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera: Ditrysia): an initial molecular study. BioMed Central Evolutionary Biology 9: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-280
Schowalter, T.D., W.W. Hargrove & D.A. Crossley (1986). Herbivory in forested ecosystems. Annual review of Entomology 31(1): 177–196.
Thomas, C.D., A. Cameron, R. E. Green, M. Bakkenes, L.J. Beaumont, Y.C. Collingham & S.E. Williams (2004). Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427(6970): 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02121
Thomas, J.A. (2005). Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360(1454): 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1585
Wagner, D.L. (2012). Moth decline in the northeastern United States. News of the Lepidopterists’ Society 54(2): 52–56.
Wagner, D.L. (2025). Moths of the World: A Natural History. Princeton University Press, 240 pp.
Walther, G.R., E. Post, P. Convey, A. Menzel, C. Parmesan, T.J. Beebee, J.M. Fromentin, O.H. Guldberg & F. Bairlein (2002). Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416(6879): 389. https://doi.org/10.1038/416389a
Warren, M.S., J.K. Hill, J.A. Thomas, J. Asher, R. Fox, B. Huntley & C. Thomas (2001). Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414(6859): 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/35102054
Zethner, O., R. Koustrup, A.M.S. Reza, D.K. Subba, D. Barooah, N. Barooah, M.M. Win, S. Tiwari, Y. Dhoj, G.A. Bajwa, R.A. Bajwa & D. Ahangama (2015). South Asian ways of silk: a patchwork of biology, manufacture, culture and history. Bookbell, Guwahati, Assam, 254 pp.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Keneisano Yhoshii, Lobeno Mozhui
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright to the articles published in JoTT. This is indicated explicitly in each publication. The authors grant permission to the publisher Wildlife Information Liaison Development (WILD) Society to publish the article in the Journal of Threatened Taxa. The authors recognize WILD as the original publisher, and to sell hard copies of the Journal and article to any buyer. JoTT is registered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows authors to retain copyright ownership. Under this license the authors allow anyone to download, cite, use the data, modify, reprint, copy and distribute provided the authors and source of publication are credited through appropriate citations (e.g., Son et al. (2016). Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the southeastern Truong Son Mountains, Quang Ngai Province, Vietnam. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(7): 8953–8969. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2785.8.7.8953-8969). Users of the data do not require specific permission from the authors or the publisher.
