Journal of Threatened
Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 August 2026 | 18(8): 29483–29492
ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9819.18.8.29483-29492
#9819 | Received 07 April 2025 | Final received 03 August 2026| Finally
accepted 11 August 2026
Distribution, population status,
associations, and biotic challenges of Sanjappa
cynometroides, an endemic legume tree
(Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) in the southern
Western Ghats, Kerala, India
Suresh Gopika
1 & Moothedathu
Venugopalan Nair Krishnaraj
2
1 Department of Botany and Centre
for Research, St. Teresa’s College (Autonomous), Ernakulam, Kerala 682011,
India.
2 Department of Botany, Baselius College, Kottayam (Autonomous), Kerala 686001,
India.
1 gopikasuresh799@gmail.com
(corresponding author), 2 krishnarajmv@baselius.ac.in
Abstract: Sanjappa cynometroides (Bedd.)
E.R.Souza & Krishnaraj, an unique species indigenous to the lush
environs of the southern Western Ghats, India, epitomises
the intricate interplay between flora, fauna, and conservation challenges. This
tree was earlier categorized as Critically Endangered; however, no updated
status is available. Extensive field surveys resulted in locating two new
populations in Kathipara and Kambimood
parts of the southern Western Ghats, Kerala and these population consist
of about 20 and 70 mature trees respectively. The Kambimood
population is distinct with epicormic branching, cauliflory, and stem galls.
This study also offers a meticulous examination of its associations with other
taxa, like epiphyllous lichens, such as Racoplaca
subtilissima Fée, Byssoloma chlorinum
(Vain) Zahlbr, Tricharia
vainioi R. Sant; Corticolous
lichens, Hemithecium sp., and Trichothelium sp.; leafy liverwort, Cololejeunea lanciloba Steph.;
Corticolous bryophytes including Meteoriopsis
squarrosa (Hook. ex Harv.)
M.Fleisch and Actinodontium
rhaphidostegum (Müll.Hal.)
Bosch & Sande Lac.; a snail belonging to the Beddomea
genus; and a preying mantis Indomenella
indica Ghate &
Mukherjee. In addition to restricted seedling regeneration in their natural
habitat, they also suffer from leaf infestations caused by whiteflies, flower
bud infestations by mealybugs & aphids, and fruit & seed predation by
Bonnet Macaques. Moreover, the downward-growing branches of the tree touch the
soil and subsequently form roots, facilitating vegetative propagation; even
fallen trees do the same. This natural vegetative propagation is observed in
the wild as a survival strategy in their natural habitat.
Keywords: Cauliflory, epicormic branching, fabaceae, new populations, phenology, plant-animal
interactions, restricted seedling establishment, riparian, threats, vegetative
propagation.
Editor: V. Sampath Kumar, Formerly Botanical Survey
of India, Coimbatore, India. Date
of publication: 26 August 2026 (online & print)
Citation: Gopika, S. & M.V.N. Krishnaraj
(2026).
Distribution, population status, associations, and biotic challenges of Sanjappa cynometroides,
an endemic legume tree (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae)
in the southern Western Ghats, Kerala, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 18(8): 29483–29492. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9819.18.8.29483-29492
Copyright: © Gopika & Krishnaraj
2026. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use,
reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing
adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.
Funding: This work was supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-University Grants Commission (CSIR-UGC), Government of India (NTA
Ref.No.:211610063886).
Competing interests: We declare that we have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence this work.
Author details: Gopika Suresh is a research scholar (UGC-SRF) in the Department of Botany and Centre for Research, St. Teresa’s College (Autonomous), Ernakulam, Kerala, India. Her current research focuses on the reproductive biology, population ecology, and conservation of Sanjappa cynometroides from the southern Western Ghats of India. Krishnaraj M.V.
is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Botany, Baselius College, Kottayam (Autonomous), Kerala, India. His research interests are the systematics, reproductive biology, and ecology of Fabaceae in India, and he has published 55 research papers in National and international journals.
Author contributions: Gopika Suresh—conceptualization, Field investigation, Methodology, Data collection, Data analysis, Writing-original draft. MKV—conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Supervision, Manuscript review and editing.
Acknowledgements: We want to express our deep gratitude to the Kerala Forest Department, Government of India, for permitting us to conduct the present study. We are indebted to Dr Siljo Joseph (junior scientist/scientist B, Department of Forest Botany, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Kerala) for the identification of epiphyllous lichens and Dr Stephen Sequeira (assistant professor, Postgraduate Department of Botany, Maharaja’s College, Ernakulam, Kerala) for the identification of Corticolous lichens. We are grateful to Dr Manju C. Nair (associate professor, Department of Botany, University of Calicut, Kerala) for identifying the epiphyllous and corticolous bryophytes. We immensely thank Dr Sankararaman H. (assistant professor, Entomology, Vanavarayar Institute of Agriculture, Pollachi, Tamil Nadu) for identifying and giving valuable information about Apefly, Mealybugs, and Treehoppers. We are pleased to thank Ancy Raju (research scholar, Department of Zoology, Government College for Women, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala) for the identification of the preying mantis and Aleena Elizabeth Cyril (research scholar, PG and Research Department of Zoology, Nirmala College, Muvattupuzha, Kerala) for the genus level identification of snail.
Introduction
Leguminosae is the third largest
angiosperm family after Asteraceae and Orchidaceae
with 796 genera and 22,450 species, and the recent Legume Phylogeny Working
Group re-classified the family to six monophyletic subfamilies, viz., Caesalpinioideae DC. (Including Mimosoideae
DC.), Cercidoideae LPWG, Detarioideae
Burmeist., Dialioideae
LPWG, Duparquetioideae LPWG, and Papilionoideae
DC. (https://www.legumedata.org/; LPWG 2017). In India, the family is
represented with 273 genera and 1510 species (Sanjappa
& Pusalkar 2024). Kerala harbours
115 genera and 449 species, of which 17 species are strictly endemic to the
state (Vajravelu & Kabeer 2016; Balan & Predeep 2021).
Sanjappa cynometroides (Image 1) is an endemic tree
legume in the southern Western Ghats, Kerala, India. Beddome (1873)
described the species, Calliandra cynometroides based on his collection from Tinnevelly and Travancore mountains at an elevation of
about 760 m. Although Bentham (1875), while revising the suborder Mimoseae, treated it under Calliandra
Benth., Baker (1878) and Kuntze
(1891) transferred it to the genus Inga Mill. (Inga cynometroides (Bedd.)
Baker), and Feuilleea Kuntze
(Feuilleea cynometroides
(Bedd.) Kuntze) respectively.
After thorough morphological and molecular phylogenetic studies by de Souza et
al. (2016), the taxonomic identity of this enigmatic taxon, previously placed
in the genera Calliandra, Inga, and Feuilleea was clarified, and a new genus Sanjappa E.R. Souza & Krishnaraj
was erected to accommodate the same. Recently, Thulin (2023) expanded the genus
by adding two more species, viz., Sanjappa umbrosa (Wall.) Thulin and Sanjappa
vietnamica Thulin. However, Sanjappa
& Pusalkar (2024) described a new genus Kanjilalia Sanjappa
& Pusalkar comprising two species viz., Kanjilalia griffithii
(Baker ex Benth.) Sanjappa
& Pusalkar and Kanjilalia
umbrosa (Wall.) Sanjappa
& Pusalkar, based on the characters of flowers, stipular spines, and distribution pattern. Hence, presently
the genus Sanjappa E.R. Souza & Krishnaraj comprises only two species.
In the present work, apart from
the discovery of two new populations of
Sanjappa cynometroides,
provided an overview of the current population status, floral-faunal associations,
and the threats in its natural habitat.
Materials
and Methods
Field exploration was conducted
during 2022–2024 in parts of the Agasthyamalai
Biosphere Reserve. Continuous field surveys and the collection of various plant
parts, including leaves, inflorescences with flower buds & flowers, fruits,
and seeds, were made in populations located at Rosemala
(part of Shendurney Wildlife Sanctuary), Kallar, Kathipara, and Kambimood (part of Agasthyamalai
Biosphere Reserve), southern Western Ghats, Kerala. Preliminary
morphological observations of the vegetative and reproductive parts for floral,
faunal associations and infestations were examined using a 15x hand lens in the
field. Unidentified biological specimens were later identified with the help of
experts in the respective fields. The epiphyllous lichen specimens and
bryophytes were deposited at Kerala Forest Research Institute (KFRI) Herbarium
and Herbarium of the Department of Botany, Calicut University (CALI),
respectively. Photographs of the specimens were taken using a stereo microscope
MSZ-Tr LED with Magcam
DC10MP camera, manufactured by Magnus Opto Systems, India,
and a macro lens (SKYVIK Signi 15x macro lens). The
geographic coordinates of study sites were recorded using a handheld device of
Garmin eTrex 10.
Results
and Discussion
Population status
Sanjappa cynometroides is an endemic species to the
southern Western Ghats and was thought to be extinct until Sasidharan
(1998) rediscovered it after a lapse of 125 years from Rosemala
(Kollam District, Kerala). After almost 20 years, Somen
et al. (2017) found another population of this species in Kallar
(Thiruvananthapuram district, Kerala). Diminishing to less than 40 mature
individuals and restricted seedling regeneration in Rosemala,
present a bleak picture of it in the wild and earlier was categorized under
Critically Endangered (IUCN 2012). While the present study was going on, six
new seedlings were found in the Rosemala
population in July 2024, however, only three out of the six survived (50%). The
Kallar population has 4–10 mature trees, but no
seedlings could be traced. Both populations have an area of occupancy of less
than 1 km2 each, and they inhabit areas close to streams (Image 2).
During this field study, we found two new populations in the wild, Kathipara and Kambimood (Image
2). The population at Kathipara (8.6922o
N, 77.1353o E, at an altitude of 114 m) (Image 3A) is riparian
and 2–3 km farther from the Kallar population, with
lesser exposure to human habitation. In this population, S. cynometroides survives with seedlings, saplings, and
mature trees. Seedlings and saplings range from 4–5, and mature individuals are
20–25 in number, including fallen trees. However, the fallen trees are
successfully alive through vegetative propagation (Image 3B). The second
population is at Kambimood (8.7570110 N,
77.1242980 E) (Image 3C), near the Ponmudi
hilltop, Thiruvananthapuram. This population is found near to tea plantation at
an altitude of 770 m, and interestingly, this is the only one not inhabited
close to a stream (see Image 2). This one is the largest population comprising
70–80 mature trees and a few saplings without any seedlings. Moreover, the
morphology of the tree trunk is much more varied than that of the other
three populations and shows epicormic branching throughout (Image 3D). The plant’s epicormic branching is a survival
mechanism against environmental disturbances to recover its damaged shoot
system (de Campos et al. 2021). Anthropogenic disruption is low in this
population, and forest fire activities are not reported in this area. So,
further investigation is essential to find the reason behind epicormic
branching.
The bud bank is a collection of
buds that includes axillary and adventitious buds in dormant form, which act as
a reserve and play a crucial role in the regeneration of the shoot system. When
any disturbance (like injury) happens, these buds are actively grown, leading
to vegetative regeneration (Klimes˘ová & Klimeš 2007). In the Kambimood
population, we have noticed bud growth in the main trunk, even though the tree
was completely damaged (Image 3E). Cauliflory, an intimately related phenomenon
to epicormic branching, is reported for the first time in S. cynometroides (Image 3F); here, the number of cauliflorous inflorescences is more than axillary
inflorescences in the branches. In the Rosemala
population, one tree showed an epicormic branching–like pattern, and another
showed cauliflory.
Phenology
The phenological behaviour of the species in the Rosemala
population shows relatively narrow variation. Floral bud initiation occurs
during July–August, followed by peak flowering between late August and early
October. Although the flowering period of individual trees is brief (4–5 days),
flowering is highly synchronous within the population. Fruiting commences in
November, with fruits maturing in December and January.
Floral-Faunal associations
In the Kallar
population, the adaxial surface of the leaf is intensely colonized with
epiphyllous lichens such as Racoplaca subtilissima Fée (Image 4A), Byssoloma chlorinum
(Vain) Zahlbr (Image 4B) and Tricharia
vainioi R. Sant (Image 4C). This is the first
report of epiphyllous lichens from Sanjappa
cynometroides. As per the study of Randive et al. (2017), the abundant proliferation of
lichens on foliage indicates minimal human disturbances. Despite the high level
of human interference, the epiphyllous lichens are growing abundantly on trees
in the Kallar population. Additionally, we found two corticolous lichens, Hemithecium
sp. (Graphidaceae) and Trichothelium
sp. (Porinaceae), associated with the twigs of Sanjappa cynometroides
from the Kambimood population.
It is also observed that S. cynometroides as a host plant of an epiphyllous
liverwort called Cololejeunea lanciloba Steph. of the family Lejeuneaceae
(Image 4D). Leafy liverworts exhibit sensitivity to changes in moisture and
temperature levels, making them reliable indicators of climate change and
forest fragmentation (Jiang et al. 2018). The trees growing at the Kambimood population are home to Corticolous
bryophytes, Meteoriopsis squarrosa (Hook. ex Harv.) M.Fleisch (Meteoriaceae) (Image 4E) and Actinodontium
rhaphidostegum (Müll.Hal.)
Bosch & Sande Lac. (Hookeriaceae) (Image 4F).
During the field surveys, observed a snail belonging to the genus Beddomea of the family Camaenidae
(Image 4G) found attached to the leaves of Sanjappa
cynometroides. Due to the lack of studies on
arboreal snails in the Western Ghats, not able to identify it up to the species
level. It would be interesting to study the interaction between the snails and
the trees. In addition, the Ootheca (egg mass) of the praying mantis, Indomenella indica Ghate & Mukherjee was observed, which is attached to
the lower surface of many leaves, even on stems (Images 4H,I),
and also spotted the nymphs and mature ones frequently in the Rosemala population. Additionally, it was interesting to
notice I. indica displayed egg mass guarding behaviour that lasts for 5–10 days. The researchers in this
field did not observe any plant-specific egg-laying mechanisms. However, the
site selection for capturing prey and the deposition of ootheca are essential
for their reproduction and survival. Habitat selection is also influenced by
camouflaging dense foliage, prey availability, predators, microclimatic
conditions, and various other elements (Balakrishnan 2012). A wide range of
butterflies, moths, beetles, bees, flies, and ants were also observed on the
tree across flowering and non-flowering seasons. However, we have not found any
pollination-like behaviour during the daytime so far.
Natural threats in the wild
Natural threats that have a
negative impact on the population of Sanjappa
cynometroides are infestation and predation of
leaves, flower buds, fruits, and seeds. In Rosemala
and Kallar, severe leaf infestation is caused by the
Whiteflies (Image 5A). Whiteflies are highly invasive, exotic, phytophagous
insect species belonging to Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae.
It is infested on the lower surface of the leaves and causes damage to the host
plants by sucking the plant sap and interfering the normal growth. Furthermore,
the whiteflies cause indirect damage by excreting honeydew and producing wax
(Selvaraj et al. 2024). Sundararaj et al. (2021)
assessed the intensity of damage caused by whiteflies using the following
parameters: “Low (less than ten live egg spirals or adults/leaflet), Medium
(11–20 live egg spirals or adults/leaflet), and Severe (more than 20 live egg
spirals or adults/leaflet)”. In the case of S. cynometroides,
the whitefly population and intensity of damage are low in the Kallar population. However, it was observed more than 20
adults/leaflets at Rosemala in January, indicating a
severe population and damage caused by whiteflies. Although the tree showed
signs of recovery through leaf flushing, this process was not immediate. Also
observed empty pupa shells hidden under the leaves, which seem to be either a
butterfly or moth pupa; more evidence is needed to confirm this.
The Kambimood
population is distinctive due to the numerous stem galls on the trees (Image
5B). Usually, galls are formed due to abnormal tissue growth caused by
biological agents such as viruses, bacteria, nematodes, and insects. The
interaction between gall-inducing insects and their host plant species is
highly species-specific (Silva & Urso-Guimarães
2021). The causative organism for the stem galls in S. cynometroides
has not been studied. Additionally, within the same population spotted the
nymph of the treehopper (Membracidae, Hemiptera)
associated with the stem gall (Image 5C). Treehoppers are phytophagous insects
that cause damage to host plants by sucking large amounts of plant sap, and the
honeydew they excrete is an alternative nectar to other organisms such as ants,
bees, wasps, and even to butterflies (Bartlett et al. 2018).
Interestingly, a prey-predator
(mealybug-apefly) relationship as part of flower bud
infestation in S. cynometroides in the Kallar population is an interesting to record. Mealybugs
are pests that feed on plant sap and reduce plant vigour.
Here, it attacks the flower bud, causing stunted growth, leading to the
malformation of the flower (Image 5D). The butterfly larvae of Spalgis epeus (Apefly) (Image 5E) were also found within the same
inflorescence. Apefly larvae are recognized as
predators of mealybugs (Saengyot & Burikam 2012).
In Rosemala
population, aphids (Aphidoidea, Hemiptera)
exclusively attack flower buds in the late monsoon and post-monsoon periods
(usually August–November). This significantly affects the reproductive
mechanisms of the plant, resulting in a limited number of healthy flower buds
and flowers suitable for pollination and fruit development. It was also observed that an ant-aphid
mutualistic relationship associated with Sanjappa
cynometroides (Image 5F) in the same population.
Aphids ingest the phloem sap using stylets and excrete sugary honeydew. Ants
use this honeydew as food; in return, they protect the aphids from predation,
parasitism, and fungal infections (Phillips & Willis 2005). As the
infestation progresses, the host plant may develop a morphological barrier or
attract natural enemies of aphids. Meanwhile, natural enemies have started to
use honeydew produced by the aphids as food (Guerrieri
& Digilio 2008). So, this mutualistic
relationship has a negative impact on the plants’ health.
Some notable infestations on
fruits include reddish patches on immature fruit surfaces. Moreover,
infestation, the signs of the predation-like act, are seen on immature, mature,
and even dried fruit surfaces at Rosemala (Image 5G).
Additionally, part of the fruit wall, where the seeds occur, appears as an
ample vacant space with fully consumed empty seeds (Image 5H); nevertheless,
the dehiscence mechanism is carried out without fail at maturity. The
infestations are more prominent on the trees near the stream at Rosemala.
Ramachandran (1995) recorded 23
feeding plants of Bonnet Macaque Macaca
radiata from Shendurney Wildlife Sanctuary and
observed monthly variations in the diet. During this study it is observed that
Bonnet macaques consume young fruits of Sanjappa
cynometroides and themselves serve as seed
dispersers after fruit maturity. Their movement across the tree branches,
coupled with the elastically dehiscent character of fruits from the apex
downwards, favours effective seed dispersal. However,
only a few seeds were found on the forest floor, indicating further predation.
Apart from infestation and
predation, some trees were washed out during the flood at the Kallar River. In Rosemala, strong
winds cause large woody trees to fall onto S. cynometroides.
In the new Kathipara population, more fallen trees
are observed due to flooding in the stream. However, roots are formed from the
fallen branches of S. cynometroides,
indicating a change in their reproductive strategy towards vegetative
propagation in reaction to difficulties encountered in their natural
environment. This changing reproductive strategy is more prominent at Rosemala (Image 5I) and Kathipara
(Image 5J). Moreover, at Kathipara, because tree
branches extend over the stream, seeds can fall directly into the water. Under
low streamflow conditions, the seeds may be deposited in the sandy streambed,
where they can germinate and grow into seedlings (Image 5K), even on large
rocks within the streambed as saplings (Image 5L). As a result, seedlings are
more likely to be washed out during the rainy season or periods of heavy
streamflow; conversely, this flow may help the seeds spread farther.
Anthropogenic threats
The populations at Rosemala and Kallar are
concentrated around the pedestrian routes, and they are popular tourist
destinations in southern Kerala. In Rosemala, the
trail acts as a path for vehicles, mostly Jeeps used by the local people and
tourists. Consequently, to prevent travelling issues, the branches of Sanjappa cynometroides
along the path are chopped down. The neighbouring
local community uses the branches of this tree to produce domestic items like
handles of pick-axes, etc., without having enough awareness of its taxonomic or
conservation significance, which negatively affects the population. In Ponmudi, the local people called S. cynometroides
as ‘Penarakam’ in their mother tongue, Malayalam.
According to them, in earlier times, the leaves were boiled in water along with
leaves of other medicinal plants (not revealed their exact local names), and
bathing in this decoction was believed to alleviate arthritic problems.
Conclusion
Through continuous field surveys,
two new populations in the wild and expanded distribution of Sanjappa
cynometroides were reported in this work and believe
that this new reports will have an impact on their IUCN threat status. The
field surveys indicate that all the populations have restricted seedling
regeneration, and the species is undergoing considerable risks including
natural calamities and man-made disasters. It is also witnessed that the plant adopt vegetative propagation to survive in its natural
environment. The reason for the shift in reproductive strategy is currently
under study. The stem cuttings were directly planted in the humus-rich soil of
the population at Rosemala, as a trial, resulting in
the successful regeneration of the plant. To conclude, this species grapples
with various challenges despite its taxonomic novelty and ecological
significance, underscoring the necessity for comprehensive conservation
strategies.
For
images - - click here for full PDF
References
Balakrishnan,
P. (2012). Ambush and oviposition site selection by giant Asian mantis Hierodula membranacea
Burmeister (Mantodea: Mantidae)
in tropical wet evergreen forests. Western Ghats, India. The Journal of
Tropical Asian Entomology 01: 13–19.
Balan, A.P.
& S.V. Predeep (2021). Legumes of Kerala, India:
a checklist. Journal of Threatened Taxa 13(5): 18257–18282. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6475.13.5.18257-18282
Baker, J.G.
(1878). Leguminosae: Mimosoideae, pp. 56–306. In:
Hooker J.D. (ed.). The Flora of British India, Vol. 2. L. Reeve and Co.,
London.
Bartlett,
C.R. et al. (2018). The Diversity of the True Hoppers (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha), pp. 501–590. In: Foottit,
R.G. & P.H. Adler (eds.). Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society (1st
ed.). Wiley.
Beddome, R.H. (1873). The flora
sylvatica for southern India. Gantz Brothers.
Bentham, G.
(1875). Revision of the suborder Mimoseae.
Transactions of Linnean Society London 30: 335–664.
de Campos,
B.H. et al. (2021). Epicormic bud protection traits vary along a latitudinal
gradient in a neotropical savanna. The Science of Nature 108 (2): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-021-01722-4
de Souza,
E.R. et al. (2016). Sanjappa, a new genus in
the tribe Ingeae (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae)
from India. Rheedea 26(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2016.26.01.01
Guerrieri, E. & M.C. Digilio (2008). Aphid–plant interactions: a review. Journal
of Plant Interactions 3(4): 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429140802567173
IUCN (2012).
IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival
Commission Gland.
Jiang, Y. et
al. (2018). Past distribution of epiphyllous liverworts in China: The usability
of historical data. Ecology and Evolution 8(15): 7436–7450. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4274
Klimes˘ová, J. & L. Klimeš
(2007). Bud banks and their role in vegetative regeneration–A literature review
and proposal for simple classification and assessment. Perspectives in Plant
Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 8(3): 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2006.10.002
Kuntze, O. (1891). Revisio generum plantarum: vascularium
omnium atque cellularium multarum secundum leges nomenclaturae internationales cum enumeratione
plantarum exoticarum in itinere
mundi collectarum.
Leipzig Arthur Felix [etc.]. Vol. 1.
LPWG (2017).
A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically
comprehensive phylogeny. Taxon 66(1): 44–77. https://doi.org/10.12705/661.3
Phillips,
I.D. & C.K.R. Willis (2005). Defensive behavior of ants in a mutualistic
relationship with aphids. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 59(2): 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0046-3
Ramachandran,
K.K. (1995). Status survey of primates in Shendurney
Wildlife Sanctuary and adjacent areas. KFRI Research Report No.106, Peechi, 34 pp.
Randive, P. et al. (2017). Notes on Foliicolous Lichens from Western Ghats Part of Goa, India.
Indian Journal of Forestry 40(3): 217–221. https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2017-SO7E69
Saengyot, S. & I. Burikam
(2012). Bionomics of the apefly, Spalgis
epius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae),
predatory on the papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae),
in Thailand. Songklanakarin. Journal of Science &
Technology 34(1): 1–7.
Sanjappa, M. & P.K. Pusalkar (2024). Fabaceae (Leguminosae)–Part–1, pp.
258–262. In: Sanjappa, M., P. K. Pusalkar
& A.A. Mao (eds.). Flora of India, Vol. 6. Botanical Survey of India,
Kolkata.
Sasidharan, N. (1998). Rediscovery of four
threatened and possibly extinct endemic tree legumes from Kerala. In: Higher
plants of Indian Subcontinent. Indian Journal of Forestry 10: 205–213.
Selvaraj, K.
et al. (2024). Guide on Diagnosis of Invasive Whiteflies and Their Natural
Enemies. Technical Bulletin No. 01/2021, Revised 2024 ICAR-National Bureau of
Agricultural Insect Resources, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, vi + 42 pp.
Silva, E.A.M.
& M.V. Urso-Guimarães (2021). New records and
expansion of the geographic distribution of gall inducers of the family Cecidomyiidae (Diptera)
associated to Andira Lam. (Fabaceae) species in
Brazil. Revista Brasileira
de Entomologia 65(4): e20210071. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9665-RBENT-2021-0071
Somen, C.K. et al. (2017). Population evaluation and
development of propagation protocol for three Rare, Endangered, and Threatened
(RET) trees from the Kerala part of Western Ghats. KFRI Research Report No.
526, Peechi, 63 pp.
Sundararaj, R. et al. (2021). Invasion and
expansion of exotic whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)
in India and their economic importance. Phytoparasitica
49(5): 851–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-021-00919-7
Thulin, M.
(2023). Studies of Asian ‘Calliandra’ lead to
expansion of Sanjappa (Fabaceae–Caesalpinioideae).
Nordic Journal of Botany e04241. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.04241
Vajravelu, E. & K.A.A. Kabeer (2016).
Fabaceae, pp.1–296. In: Murthy, G.V.S. & V.J. Nair (eds.). The Flora of
Kerala, Vol. 2. Botanical Survey of India.