Mangrove sediment core analysis of foraminiferal assemblages - a study at two sites along the western coast of India

P. Vidya ¹ & Rajashekhar K. Patil ²

^1,2 Department of Applied Zoology, Mangalore University, Mangalagangotri, Mangalore, Karnataka 574199, India

¹ vidya_p31@yahoo.com, ² patilsirmu@gmail.com (corresponding author)

Abstract: Mangroves are anunique habitat and are largely influenced by sea level changes and wave energy. Foraminifera (Protista) preserved in mangrove sediments provide an excellent proxy for deducing past conditions. One meter deep mangrove core samples at two sites on the western coast of India were collected. The foraminiferal assemblages at various depths showed significant changes in the abundance and diversity down the cores. A total of 59 species belonging to 32 genera, 24 families and five suborders were identified from the cores of these two sites. The cores showed an abundance of genus Rotalidiumparticularly the species Rotalidium annectans. Other species identified include Ammonia, Elphidium,Nonion, Spiroloculina, Quinqueloculina, Globigerinoides etc. The pH, organic matter and CaCO₃ also showed variations down the cores. There was a lack of correlation between sediment characteristics and the abundance of foraminifera in the cores. The low diversity and differences in distribution of foraminifera compared to surface intertidal samples may be due to intense post depositional changes or anthropogenic disturbances. The mangrove ecology thus appears disturbed by various factors.

Keywords: Diversity, ecology, Foraminifera, mangroves, sediment cores, western coast.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3653.5485-91 | ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:85FF3200-300A-4113-B815-1EC61E93A1D9

Editor: R. Ramanibai, University of Madras, Chennai, India. Date of publication: 26 February 2014 (online & print)

Manuscript details: Ms # o3653 | Received 04 June 2013 | Final received 07 October 2013 | Finally accepted 11 February 2014

Citation: Vidya, P. & R.K. Patil (2014). Mangrove sediment core analysis of foraminiferalassemblages - a study at two sites along the western coast of India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 6(2): 5485–5491; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3653.5485-91

Copyright: © P. Vidya & Patil 2014. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication.

Funding: UGC- Special Assistance Programme (SAP).

Competing Interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

Acknowledgements: The present study was supported by UGC SAP funds. The Research Fellowship to Vidya P., through an UGC-SAP grant is gratefully acknowledged. We would like to thank people who assisted in the field during the collection of sediment cores.

For figures, images, tables -- click here

Mangroves are specialized ecosystems consisting of diverse groups of tropical trees and shrubs adapted to grow in intertidal regions. The ecological and economical importance of this most productive and diverse ecosystem are well explored (Blasco et al. 1996; Oakes et al. 2010). Mangroves efficiently trap sediments and the sedimentation process is influenced by various factors like sediment supply, hydrodynamics of the area, geochemical parameters etc. (Alongi 2008; Sanders 2012). The high rates of accretion make the mangrove sediments useful in palaeoclimatic studies (Kumaran et al. 2004). These sediments show presence of many organisms including Foraminifera which are unicellularprotists (Lezine et al. 2002). They typically produce a test, or shell, made up of calcium carbonate or agglutinated sediment particles which are well preserved following their death. The evolutionary significance of Foraminifera and the exceptional quality of fossil records make them an excellent proxy for inferring past climatic conditions (Nigam 2005; Murray 2006). Studies around the world have shown that the shell deposits of Foraminifera in the sediments of mangroves help in palaeoclimatic reconstructions (Horton et al. 2003; Gehrels & Newman 2004; Woodroffe et al. 2005).

The diversity and distribution of foraminiferalassemblages in mangrove sediments are controlled by environmental factors (Bradshaw 1968; Murray 2001), post depositional changes (White & Walker 2011) and anthropogenic activities (Sarkar & Bhattacharya 2010). The present study was designed to understand the diversity and distribution of foraminiferal assemblages in down core mangrove sediments collected from two areas in the western coast of India.

Materials and Methods

Mangroves of Chithrapu (13⁰04’34”N & 74⁰46’49’’E), Karnataka and Kumbla(12⁰35’41’’N & 74⁰56’19”E), Kerala along the western coast of India were selected for the present study (Image. 1). The main species of mangroves present in these areas were Sonneratia alba, Rhizophora mucronata, Avicennia officinalis, Bruguiera zymnorhiza, Acanthus ilicifoliusalong with some associated species. Parallel sediment cores of about 1m depth were collected from each of these mangroves during periods of low tide (Image. 2). The areas cored were not much disturbed by anthropogenic activities and were minimally infused with fresh water. The cores were transported to lab, cut and sub-sampled at every inch (2.5cm intervals). The sediment samples for foraminiferal assemblage study were oven dried at 60⁰C. The foraminiferal tests in the cores were easily susceptible to breakage and dissolution due to the long time deposition. Hence, chemical treatments were avoided and samples were repeatedly washed through 63μm sieve under low water pressure. The sand fractions were collected over whatman filter paper and oven dried at 60⁰C. 5–10 g of dried sediment samples were used for foraminiferalassemblage studies and all the results were finally represented as per gram weight of sediment samples. Foraminiferal tests were examined, picked on to micropalaeontological slides and identified with the help of a stereo microscope. The species were identified according toLoeblich & Tappan (1987). Biodiversity indices were calculated by using Past software version 2.17 b.pH of the sediment samples down the core were measured in supernatant suspension of a 1:5 soil liquid mixture potentiometrically using pH meter (Trivedi & Goel 1986). Modified WalkleyBlack method (Trivedi & Goel1986) was used for calculating the percentage organic matter present in the sediment samples down the core. An estimation of calcium carbonate was done by acid soluble weight loss method (Campillo et al. 1992) and the percentage was calculated.

Results and Discussion

A total of 59 species belonging to 32 genera, 24 families and five suborders were identified collectively from mangrove cores of Chithrapu and Kumbla (Table 1). Chithrapucores showed the presence of 55 species of Foraminifera belonging to all the 32 genera 24 families and five suborders while in Kumblacores there were 33 species of 20 genera 12 families and three suborders (Fig. 1). The cores of both the sites showed abundance of Rotalidium species mainly Rotalidium annectanswhich are the abundant species found in the western coast of India (Nigam &Chathurvedi 2000; Gadi& Rajashekhar 2009). 77% and 72% of the foraminiferaltests in Chithrapu and Kumblacores respectively were that of Rotalidium annectans. Ammoniabeccarii was the next abundant species (11% in Chithrapu and 9% in Kumbla) while most of the other species were found in fewer numbers. The occurrence of many species like Pseudononion japanicum, Donsissonia florae, Hastigerinella riedieli etc., were restricted to a single test per gram of sediment in the cores. The most predominant suborder in the cores studied here were Rotalina followed by Miliolina, Globigerinina, Textularrina and Legenina. The foraminiferaldiversity and distribution (Shannon (H’), Evenness (J’)) was low in both Chithrapu cores (H’=1.056, J’=0.2634) and Kumbla cores (H’=1.205, J’=0.3445) (Table 2). There were considerably wide variations in the diversity and distribution of tests at every depth down the core. The comparatively lower diversity in mangrove cores might be due to the poor preservation of tests in the deposited sediments which resulted in the loss or change in the relative abundance of particular species, or a loss in species diversity (Smith 1987). The distribution of the tests in the down core samples could have been affected by the dominance of some particular species which could resist the post depositional and other destructive changes (Hayward et al. 2004; Husain et al. 2007). Both the cores showed a complete absence of foraminiferal tests at some continuous depths (40–57.5 cm depth in Chithrapu, 90–97.5 cm depth in Kumbla), which might be indications of past climatic changes such as sea level regression, increased atmospheric CO₂ etc or due to post depositional taphonomicchanges etc. (Fig. 2).

The pH, organic matter (%) and CaCO₃ (%) down the cores varied from 7.3–8.6, 0.1–2.7 %, 2–13 % respectively in Chithrapu cores and 7.7–8.0, 0.2–3.5 %, 1–14 % respectively in Kumbla cores (Fig. 3). Hydrogen ion concentration (pH) significantly affects the existence of foraminiferaltests. Lower pH (<7.0) accompanied by lower temperatures can cause dissolution of calcium carbonate in sediments (Bradshaw 1968). In Chithrapu cores, the calcium carbonate showed a slightly decreasing trend towards depth while there was a slight increase in bottom segments. According to Sundararajan & Srinivasalu (2010), high sedimentation might be the reason for the high value of calcium carbonate in the bottom segments and active detritus dilution might have caused the lower concentration in the middle depths. The lower values of organic matter at certain depths could be due to higher decomposition rates. Studies have shown that surface sediments from intertidal zones show a significant correlation between these sediment characteristics and the abundance of Foraminifera (Gadi & Rajashekhar2007; Gandhi et al. 2007). But in core samples especially those from mangroves, such correlations may not be found due to the interference of many other factors (Sanders et al. 2010; Sundararajan & Srinivasalu2010). In the present study also, such correlations between sediment characteristics and foraminiferalassemblages were not significant. This may be due to intense post depositional changes including post-mortem taphonomical changes (Berkeley et al.2007) or the past environmental conditions which the mangroves experienced (Ellison & Zouh 2012). In addition to this, anthropogenic activities can also disturb the post-sedimentation process and alter the physico-chemical and biotic components of core samples to a greater extent (Qiu et al. 2011; Lezineet al. 2002).

References

Alongi, D.M. (2008). Mangrove forests: resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 76(1): 1–13; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.08.024

Blasco, F., P. Saenger & E. Janodet (1996). Mangroves as indicators of coastal change. Catena 27(3–4): 167–178; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(96)00013-6

Bradshaw, J.S. (1968). Environmental parameters and marsh foraminifera. American Society of Limnology and Oceanography 13(1): 26–38.

Campillo, M.C.D., J. Torrent & R.H. leoppert (1992). The reactivity of carbonates in selected soils of southern spain. Geoderma 52(1–2): 149–160; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(92)90080-Q

Ellison, J.C. & I. Zouh (2012). Vulnerability to climate change of mangroves: assessment from Cameroon, Central Africa. Biology 1: 617–638; http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology1030617

Gadi, S.D. & K.P. Rajashekhar (2007). Changes in inter-tidal foraminifera following tsunami inundation of Indian coast. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences 36(1): 35–42.

Gadi, S.D. & K.P. Rajashekhar (2009). Monsoon related flux in intertidal foraminiferal diversity in the west coast of India. International Journal of Ecological and Environmental Sciences35(2): 343–357.

Gandhi, M.S., A. Solai& S.P. Mohan (2007). Benthic foraminiferal and its environmental degradation studies between the tsunamigenic sediments of Mandapam and Tuticorin, south east coast of India. Science of Tsunami Hazards 26(2): 115–120.

Gehrels, R.W. & S.W.G. Newman (2004). Salt-marsh foraminifera in Ho Bugt, western Denmark, and their use as sea-level indicators. Danish Journal of Geography 104(1): 97–106; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2004.10649507

Hayward, B.W., G.H. Scott, H.R. Grenfell, R. Carter & J.H. Lipps (2004). Techniques for estimation of tidal elevation and confinement (similar to salinity) histories of sheltered harbours and estuaries using benthic foraminifera: examples from New Zealand. Holocene14(2): 218–232; http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0959683604hl678rp

Horton, B.P., P. Larcombe, S.A. Woodroffe, J.E. Whittaker, M.R. Wright & C. Wynn (2003). Contemporary foraminiferal distributions of a mangrove environment, Great Barrier Reef coastline, Australia: implications for sea-level reconstructions. Marine Geology 198(3–4): 225–243; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-3227(03)00117-8

Husain, M.L., B. Satyanarayana& R.B. Ibrahim (2007). Down core variations of foraminiferal distribution in the mangrove sediments of Kapar and Matang, West coast of peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management 2(2): 38–44.

Kumaran, K.P.N., M.R. Shindikar& T.R. Mudgal (2004). Floristic composition, palynology and sedimentary facies of Hadimangrove swamp (Maharashtra). Journal of Indian Geophysics Union 8(1): 55–63.

Lezine, A.M., J.F. Saliege, R. Mathieu, T.L. Tagliatela, S. Mery, V. Charpentier & S. Cleuzion(2002). Mangroves of Oman during late Holocene; Climatic implications and impact on human settlements. Vegetation History and Archeobotany 11(3): 221–232.

Loeblich, A. & H. Tappan (1988). ForaminiferalGenera and Their Classification. Van NostrandReinhold, Newyork, 960pp.

Murray, J.W. (2001). The niche of benthic foraminifera, critical thresholds and proxies. Marine Micropaleontology41(1–2): 1–7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8398(00)00057-8

Murray, J.W. (2006). Ecology and Applications of Benthic Foraminifera. Cambridge University Press, 278pp.

Nigam, R. & S.K. Chaturvedi (2000). Foraminiferal study from Kharo Creek, Kachchh (Gujarat), North west coast of India. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences 29(2): 133–138; http://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/459

Nigam, R. (2005). Addressing environmental issues through foraminifera - case studies from the Arabian Sea. Journal of PalaeontologicalSociety of India 50(2): 25–36; http://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/422

Oakes, J.M., R.M. Connolly & A.T. Revill (2010). Isotope enrichment in mangrove forests separates microphytobenthos and detritus a scarbonsources for animals. American Society of Limnology and Oceanography 55(1): 393–402.

Qiu, Y.W., K.F. Yu, G. Zhang & W.X. Wang (2011). Accumulation and partitioning of seven trace metals in mangroves and sediment cores from three estuarine wetlands of Hainan Island, China. Journal of Hazardous Materials 190(1–3): 631–638; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.091

Sanders, C.J., J.M. Smoak, A.S. Naidu, D.R. Araripe, L.M. Sanders & S.R. Patchineelam (2010). Mangrove forest sedimentation and its reference to sea level rise, Cananeia, Brazil. Environmental Earth Sciences 60(6): 1291–1301; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0269-0

Sarkar, S.K. & B. Bhattacharya (2010). 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World. 1–6 August 2010, Brisbane, Australia.

Smith, R.K. (1987). Fossilization potential in modern shallow-water benthic foraminiferal assemblages. Journal of ForaminiferalResearch 17(2): 117–122.

Sundararajan, M. & S. Srinivasalu (2010). Geochemistry of Core Sediments from Gulf of Mannar, India. International Journal of Environmental Research 4(4): 861–876.

Trivedi, R.K. & P.K. Goel (1986). The chemical and biological methods for water pollution studies. Environmental publication, Karad, India, 104–248pp

White, S.R. & S.E. Walke (2011). Diversity, taphonomyand behavior of encrusting foraminifera on experimental shellsdeployed along a shelf-to-slope bathymetric gradient, Lee Stocking Island, Bahamas. Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology312(3): 305–324; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.02.021

Woodroffe, S.A., B.P. Horton, P. Larcombe & J.E. Whittaker (2005). Intertidal mangrove foraminifera from the Central Great Barrier Reef Shelf, Australia: Implications for sea-level reconstruction. Journal of Foraminiferal Research35(3): 259–270; http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/35.3.259