Journal
of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 August 2024 | 16(8):
25700–25711
ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN
0974-7893 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8971.16.8.25700-25711
#8971 | Received 15 February
2024 | Final received 28 June 2024 | Finally accepted 16 August 2024
The present state of leech fauna
(Annelida: Hirudinea) in Dal Lake, Jammu & Kashmir, India
Niyaz Ali Khan 1 ,
Zahoor Ahmad Mir 2 & Yahya Bakhtiyar 3
1,2,3 Fish Biology and Limnology
Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Kashmir, Srinagar,
Jammu & Kashmir 190006, India.
1 niyazali411@gmail.com, 2 mirzahoor88@gmail.com,
3 yahya.bakhtiyar@gmail.com (corresponding author)
Editor: Chandra Kanta Mandal, Zoological Survey of
India, Kolkata, India. Date
of publication: 26 August 2024 (online & print)
Citation: Khan,
N.A., Z.A. Mir & Y. Bakhtiyar (2024). The present state of leech fauna (Annelida:
Hirudinea) in Dal Lake, Jammu & Kashmir, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 16(8): 25700–25711. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8971.16.8.25700-25711
Copyright: ©
Khan et al. 2024. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in
any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of
publication.
Funding: One of the authors Niyaz Ali Khan
is highly thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)
for providing financial assistance in the form of SRF CSIR sanction letter no.09/251(0160)/2019-EMR-I
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing
interests.
Author details: Niyaz
Ali Khan Ph.D. research scholar, Department
of Zoology, University of Kashmir is currently working in the Fish Biology and
Limnology Research Laboratory on the taxonomy of aquatic annelids. Zahoor Ahmad Mir Ph.D. in zoology working on the taxonomy and ecology of macrobenthic invertebrates. Yahya Bakhtiyar Ph.D. in zoology currently working as senior assistant professor in
the Department of Zoology, University of Kashmir, supervises the team in Fish
Biology and Limnology Research Laboratory on broad research areas like fish population dynamics, reproductive biology, zooplankton,
macrobenthic invertebrates, and limnology with reference to Kashmir Himalaya.
Author contributions: Conceptualization—Yahya Bakhtiyar, Niyaz Ali Khan. Methodology—Niyaz Ali Khan, Zahoor
Ahmad Mir. Identification—Niyaz Ali Khan, Yahya Bakhtiyar, Zahoor Ahmad
Mir. Writing—original draft preparation—Niyaz Ali Khan, Yahya Bakhtiyar. Review
and editing— Yahya Bakhtiyar, Niyaz Ali Khan, Zahoor Ahmad Mir.
Supervision—Yahya Bakhtiyar.
Acknowledgements:The authors are
highly thankful to the head of the Department of Zoology, University of Kashmir
for providing the necessary facilities while conducting this research work.
Abstract: Dal Lake supports a diverse group
of fauna, including fishes, aquatic birds, zooplankton, and macrobenthic
invertebrates. This study is the first taxonomic documentation of the leech
fauna of Dal Lake. A total of nine leech taxa belonging to four families were
identified and described: Glossiphoniidae – Alboglossiphonia weberi, A.
heteroclita, Glossiphonia complanata, Helobdella stagnalis, Hemiclepsis
marginata asiatica, and Theromyzon sp.; Erpobdellidae – Erpobdella
octoculata; Hirudinidae – Poecilobdella granulosa; and Haemopidae – Haemopis
indicus. Leeches play key roles in prey-predator dynamics and host-parasite
relationships in freshwater ecosystems and as bioindicators of water pollution.
This study provides essential data for taxonomic accounts and the diversity of
leech fauna in Dal Lake.
Keywords: Freshwater ecosystem, annelid diversity, Himalaya,
taxonomy, distribution, Glossiphoniidae, Erpobdellidae, Hirudinidae,
Haemopidae.
INTRODUCTION
Leeches are annelids that coexist
in freshwater ecosystems with molluscs, oligochaetes, and insect larvae and are
found on every continent and in every ocean, except for terrestrial Antarctica
(Sket & Trontelj 2008). Leeches prefer diverse environments and exhibit
tolerance to extreme conditions such as variation in temperature, moisture,
salinity, pressure, light, and pollution. They can be found in some wet soil on
land and bottom substrates of freshwater, estuarine, and marine ecosystems
(Phillips et al. 2020). Leeches are regarded as one of the most significant
ecological indicators in freshwater ecosystems. Several aquatic species of
leeches are important components in the aquatic food web at different trophic
levels and also play a role in prey-predator and parasite-host relationships.
Additionally, they are good bioindicators of water pollution, making them
highly relevant from a scientific perspective (Bezmaternykh 2007; Romanova
& Klimina 2010; Kaygorodova et al. 2014). Leeches serve as
intermediary hosts for some larval stages of trematodes and are essential
components of prey-predator and parasite-host relationships in aquatic
environments (Pyrka et al. 2021). Around one-third of the total leech species
have feeding mode as predators, while majority of leech species consume the blood
of other invertebrates and vertebrates for their nutrition (Atkauskien &
Rutkauskaitė-Sucilien 2022). Considering the taxonomic accounts, leeches have a
circumoral and a posterior ventral sucker for attachment to substratum as well
as a fixed number of segments (Wetzel 1992). They also lack setae but have a
genital orifice and analogue jaws as diagnostic characters. One of the
species, Hirudo medicinalis, of the class Hirudinea was traditionally
used to treat people suffering from a variety of illnesses and medical ailments
(Sig et al. 2017). In India, numerous new species of terrestrial and freshwater
leeches have been documented over time beginning with the works of (Harding
1924; Baugh 1960 a,b; Soota & Ghosh 1977; Chandra
1982; Nesemann et al. 2004; Mandal 2004, 2013, 2015; Mandal et al. 2020a,b,
2022; Uttam & Langer 2021). There is a significant lack of comprehensive
data regarding the distribution, biology, and ecology of many Indian leech
species (Bhatia 1930, 1940; Baugh 1960 a,b; Ray 1980;
Raut & Nandi 1985; Raut 1986; Raut & Saha 1987; Mandal et al. 2022).
The existing literature regarding the leech fauna in the Kashmir valley’s water
bodies is mostly fragmented. Moreover, there are very few old records about the
species composition of leeches from the waterbodies of Kashmir. In the 20th
century, Moore (1924); Bhatia (1930, 1934, 1939, 1940), and Soota (1956)
conducted studies on the leech fauna in Kashmir. Therefore, the literature
reveals the need for fresh surveys and redescription of species regarding the
leech fauna in freshwater bodies of the Kashmir valley. Considering the
taxonomic concerns and lack of data available regarding the leech fauna, the
present study has been conducted to explore the current leech fauna of Dal
Lake.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area
Dal Lake, one of the most
cherished water bodies, in the Kashmir Himalaya, is situated in the urban area,
providing numerous ecosystem services to the local population and boosting the
urban economy. The lake is located between geographic coordinates 34.067–34.183
°N & 74.800–74.880 °E (Figure 1) covering a total catchment area of
approximately 337 km2. The lake has a surface area of 24 km2,
with 10.5 km2 available as open water (Rashid et al. 2017). It is
divided into four distinct basins: Hazratbal, Lokut Dal, Nigeen, and Gagribal
(Amin et al. 2014). Dal Lake functions as an open drainage system, receiving
water input from various streams and springs. Telbal Nallah and Botkol serve as
the two main inflow channels, while smaller streams such as Meerakshah Nallah
along with multiple springs originating from the lake bed and nearby mountains
contribute to its water sources (Qadri & Yousuf 1980). The lake has two
primary outlets, namely Nallah Amir Khan and Dalgate (Kumar et al. 2022). In
the present study, the samples were collected from different locations within
Dal Lake.
Methods applied for sampling,
processing, and identification
Freshwater leeches were collected
with standard bottom samplers (EU-WFD) used in different zones of Dal Lake,
during the research work from January 2021 to December 2022. An Ekman’s dredge
was used to collect the mud samples in the deep water (limnetic zone) while the
kick method was applied in shallow water (littoral zone) to collect samples
from macrophytes, leaf packs, submerged logs, stones, concrete banks, and
debris. Leech samples were carefully separated from extraneous material by
handpicking tools and delivered as live samples in water- filled plastic jars
(1l) to the Fish Biology and Limnology Research Laboratory, Department of
Zoology, University of Kashmir. The specimens were first narcotized using a
gradient of low ethanol solutions and then preserved in 80% ethanol following
the standard protocol of Kaygorodova & Bolbat (2020). Morphological
analysis and photography were carried out using stereo zoom microscopes (Magnus
MS 24 and LEICA S98) with a digital microscope camera (Magcam DC 10).
Identification of species was done by using existing standard taxonomic keys of
leeches (Klemm 1985; Chandra 1991; Nesemann et al. 2004; Mandal 2013).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Family: Glossiphoniidae
Alboglossiphonia weberi (Linnaeus, 1761)
Location: Telbal, 34.140oN
& 74.863oE, 29.viii.2021, 13.ix.2022,
coll. Niyaz Ali Khan.
Material examined: Image 1A–C;
number of specimens observed = 15.
Diagnosis: The body is
translucent ovate 10 mm in length; the dorsal surface is roughened by the
presence of numerous tubercles (Image 1A); colour of the live specimen is
somewhat yellowish-brown and on preservation in alcohol it becomes greenish white;
it possesses a radial stripe of the same dark pigment which occurs upon the
body (Image 1A); Presence of three pair of eyes one each on sixth, seventh and
eighth ring (Image 1C); crop with six pairs of lateral diverticula.
Habitat: Alboglossiphonia weberi
occurs in ponds, tanks, pools, lakes, slow-moving streams, and rivers. This
species is found attached to the smooth surfaces of cobbles and pebbles in
streams, and rivers.
Distribution: Widely
distributed throughout India while outside India occurs in Pakistan, Nepal,
Myanmar, and Sumatra (Chandra 1991).
Glossiphonia complanata (Linnaeus, 1758)
Location: Telbal, 34.140oN
& 74.863oE, 27.viii.2021, 15.iii.2022,
coll. Niyaz Ali Khan; Nigeen, 34.123oN & 74.827oE,
27.viii.2021, coll. Niyaz Ali Khan; Ashai bagh, 34.114oN &
74.836oE, 27.viii.2021, 15.iii.2022, coll. Niyaz Ali Khan.
Material examined: Image
1D–H; n = 23.
Diagnosis: Body flat,
leaf- shaped, dark brown and greenish in colour; the length is 14–25 mm; dorsal
surface of the body is covered with six rows of papillae; dorsal surface has
two paramedial dark lines interrupted by papilla which extends up to the middle
portion of the body (Image 1D,G); two strips are also prominent on the ventral
side (Image 1E); three pair of eye spots located on the anterior somite’s
(Image 1F); posterior sucker is disk- like while the anterior sucker is
triangular; six pair of crop caeca can be seen in freshly collected live
specimens.
Habitat: Glossiphonia
complanata was commonly found in stagnant water bodies and slow-flowing
rivers characterized by plentiful vegetation and molluscs. Typically, this
species was observed under submerged wood or stones.
Distribution: The species is
widely distributed in India such as Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh,
Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, West
Bengal, Meghalaya, Manipur, and Odisha while outside India it has been reported
from Pakistan, Nepal, Myanmar, Indonesia, Japan, U.S.A, and Europe (Chandra
1991; Mir et al. 2024).
Alboglossiphonia heteroclita (Linnaeus, 1761)
Location: Telbal, 34.140oN
& 74.863oE, 29.iii.2021, coll. Niyaz Ali Khan; Nigeen, 34.123oN
& 74.827oE, 10.viii.2021, coll. Niyaz Ali Khan.
Material examined: Image
2A–C; n = 23.
Diagnosis: Small, flat,
and ovate leeches are generally yellowish translucent in live specimens; the
head region is bulbous consisting of three pair of eyes of which the first pair
of eyes lie close to each other and are the smallest ones as compared to the
other two pairs (Image 2C); second and third pair of eyes are widely separated
but the components lie near together giving approximately a triangular shape
(Image 2C); three pair of eyes generally lie in rings five , seven and eight
respectively; one median line of dark black spots on every third annulus and
numerous small spots on the dorsal surface (Image 2A); dorsal and ventral
surface of the body is smooth and without papillae (Image 2A,B).
Habitat: Alboglossiphonia
heteroclita is found in lakes and ponds attached to submerged articles and
are parasitic mainly on molluscs (Chandra 1991).
Distribution: Alboglossiphonia
heteroclita is a species with a Holarctic distribution, found in central
and western Europe (Nesemann & Neubert 1999; Bielecki et al. 2011). It has
also been recorded in Lithuania while in India, the species occur in Rajasthan
and Bihar (Chandra 1991).
Helobdella stagnalis (Linnaeus, 1758)
Location: Telbal, 34.140oN
& 74.863oE, 2.iv.2021, 22.x.2022, coll. Niyaz Ali Khan.
Material examined: Image
3A–C; n = 7.
Diagnosis: Small flat,
leaf- shaped ceramic white when alive and pale white on preservation with
numerous tiny spots on the dorsal surface; an anterior region with a single
pair of eyespots and a chitinous scute (nuchal plate) is visible on the dorsum
(Image 3A,C); smooth body surface without any
papillae.
Habitat: Helobdella stagnalis
is found in stagnant water bodies in association with molluscs. Adults show
parental care where young ones are attached to the ventral side of the body
(Image 3B).
Distribution: In India,
the species occur in Himachal Pradesh and Jammu & Kashmir (Mir et al. 2024)
while outside India it has been reported from the USA, Lithuania (Zettler &
Daunys 2007), Canada, and Paraguay (Chandra 1991).
Theromyzon sp. Philippi, 1867
Location: Telbal, 34.140oN
& 74.863oE, 22.x.2021, coll. Niyaz Ali Khan.
Material examined: Image
3D– J; n = 33.
Diagnosis: Large
dorsoventrally flattened olive green or brownish in colour (Image 3G);
preserved specimens are brownish due to decolouration (Image 3D); six rows of
yellow spots on the dorsal side of the body; ventral side possesses a large
number of small papillae; suckers are small and weak in comparisons to the body
size; four pair of eyespots arranged straight in head region; first pair of
eyespots lie close to each other and second, third and fourth pair of eyes
widely separated in ascending order (Image 3J); four annuli between male and
female gonopore (Image 3F); young ones appear green in colour and are found
attached to the ventral side of the parent body (Image 3H).
Habitat: Theromyzon sp.
was found mainly in the stagnant water with the presence of aquatic birds. They
are found attached to the submerged articles, under stones and wood. Adult
shows parental care where around 100 young ones are attached to the ventral
side of the body (Image 3H).
Distribution: Theromyzon
sp. has been reported in many states of India (Chandra 1982) while outside
India, the species occurs in European, American, and African countries (Davies
et al. 2008).
Hemiclepsis marginata asiatica (Moore, 1924)
Location: Telbal, 34.140oN
& 74.863oE, 27.viii. 2021, coll. Niyaz
Ali Khan.
Material examined: Image
4A–D; n = 11.
Diagnosis: The leech is commonly
known as the disproportioned- eyed leech; two pairs of eyes are present, with
the anterior pair being extremely small (Image 4C); the first pair of eyes are
closely positioned and very tiny (Image 4C); eyes are typically located just
ahead of the more noticeable and widely spaced posterior pair of eyes; leech is
translucent in appearance; size is approximately 16 mm in length and 6 mm in
width; the head region is enlarged and differentiated from the rest of the
body; leech exhibits a reddish-brown colour in natural environment and whitish
on preservation; dorsal surface with broken transverse stripes in a pale-yellow
(Image 4A); crop region contains 11 pairs of lateral diverticula.
Habitat: Hemiclepsis marginata
asiatica is common in shallow margins of lakes and ponds overgrown by
vegetation. Found attached to submerged articles, plants, stones, and wood as
microhabitats.
Distribution: Mostly occurs in Jammu
& Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh states of India (Chandra 1991; Mir et al.
2024).
Family: Erpobdellidae
Erpobdella octoculata (Linnaeus, 1758)
Location: Telbal, 34.140oN
& 74.863oE, 2.i.2021, coll. Niyaz Ali
Khan; Nigeen, 34.123oN & 74.827oE, 2.i.2021, coll.
Niyaz Ali Khan; Ashai bagh, 34.114oN & 74.836oE,
17.viii.2021, 27.viii.2022, coll. Niyaz Ali Khan.
Material examined: Image
4E–H; n = 43.
Diagnosis: These leeches
vary in size, ranging from medium to large, and also exhibit a variety of colours;
possess a relatively robust body form compared to other species in the same
family, with a nearly uniform shape that tapers anteriorly to the clitellum;
head is relatively small in proportion (Image 4E); typically, they have four
pairs of eyes; first pair located on segment II; second pair at the furrow
between segments II and III; third and fourth pairs situated on the sides of
the buccal ring on segment IV (Image 4F); breeding individuals display a
well-defined clitellum; gonopores are separated by approximately two and a half
annuli (Image 4H).
Habitat: Most common leech
species found in both lentic and lotic water bodies attached to stones,
submerged articles, and leaves of aquatic plants.
Distribution: In India, occurs
mostly in Jammu and Kashmir (Mir et al. 2024) while outside India, it occurs in
Lahore (Pakistan), Palestine, and Europe (Chandra 1991).
Family: Hirudinidae
Poecilobdella granulosa (Savigny, 1826)
Location: Nigeen, 34.123oN
& 74.827oE, 10.ix.2021, coll. Niyaz Ali Khan.
Material examined: Image
5(A–D); n = 10.
Diagnosis: The average adult body
is about 70 mm long; dark greenish-brown in colour, and has a dorsal surface
covered in geometrically structured black patterns and squares (Image 5A); the
median line is always dark; the body is solid and has a very rough surface with
the abundance of big papillae; typical five sets of eyes present (Image 5C).
Habitat: Poecilobdella
granulosa was found in stagnant water or nearly stagnant
water bodies with muddy bottoms, vegetation, and water with organic- rich
material.
Distribution: In India,
occurs in Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Gujrat, Maharashtra, Madhya
Pradesh, Tamil Nadu (Chandra 1983), Jammu & Kashmir, Kerala, Manipur,
Odisha, Rajasthan, Sikkim, Uttarakhand, and West Bengal (Ahmed 2021) while
outside India, occurs in Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Myanmar.
Family: Haemopidae
Haemopis indicus Bhatia, 1940
Location: Ashai Bagh,
34.114oN & 74.836oE, 3.iii.2022, coll. Niyaz Ali
Khan.
Material examined: Image
6A–C; n = 6.
Diagnosis: The body of the leech
is characterized by its remarkably soft and flabby texture; it appears thick
for the majority of its length; gradually tapering towards both ends; the
ventral surface is relatively flat; the dorsal surface is broadly arched; the
posterior sucker is small and lacks strength; leech displays a dark colouration
without any distinct markings (Image 6A); the arrangement of the five pairs of
eyes follows the typical pattern; fourth eye separated from the third by a
single annulus; fifth eye separated from the fourth by two annuli; gonopores
are separated by approximately five and a half annuli (Image 6B).
Habitat: Haemopis
indicus also known as barrowing leech was mainly found attached to
submerged articles in stagnant water bodies or nearly stagnant water rich in
organic matter and vegetation.
Distribution: The species has
been mostly reported in Jammu and Kashmir, India (Chandra 1991; Mir et al.
2024).
During the present study, a total
of nine taxa belonging to the class Hirudinea were identified on the basis of
morphological characteristics like colour, size and shape, number and position
of eyes, papillation, number of annulations, and position of male and female
gonopores (Table 1). The taxa identified were Alboglossiphonia weberi, A.
heteroclita, Glossiphonia complanata, Helobdella stagnalis, Hemiclepsis
marginata asiatica, Theromyzon sp., Erpobdella octoculata,
Poecilobdella granulosa, and Haemopis indicus. As per earlier
record, Bhatia (1939) described and reported Theromyzon mathai from
Kashmir which is morphologically similar to Theromyzon sp. collected
during the current study except the latter possesses four annuli between male
and female gonopore instead of three annuli. The collected specimen resembles
more to the European species Theromyzon tessulatum but it still needs
confirmation based on the comparative studies with the closer species of Theromyzon
sp. The paper presents the first photographic documentation of aquatic leeches
occurring in Dal Lake. This study redescribed the leech species that were
previously recorded in the valley. In contrast to the previous species found in
the valley, most of the species are found in Dal Lake and many other species
have no records. Based on existing records, there have been a total of 32 known
leech species documented in Jammu and Kashmir (Mandal et al. 2022). To verify
the species richness and specifically identify any new species, it is necessary
to conduct proper surveys in the water bodies of the valley to overcome the
fragmented and scanty record of the previous two decades. The current knowledge
of leech diversity in Kashmir is far from being a comprehensive study and needs
detailed surveys for complete documentation.
CONCLUSION
The present study provides
knowledge about the taxonomic description, habitat, and distribution of
freshwater leech fauna from the Kashmir Himalaya. A total of nine species
belonging to four families of class Hirudinea were recorded and documented. Six
species were reported from the family Glossiphonidae while single species were
reported each from the families Hirudinidae, Erpodellidae, and Haemopidae. As
per the literature and present status, the habitat of leech fauna has been
disturbed due to growing poor water quality and shrinkage of freshwater water
bodies. The present study has been conducted to address the taxonomic record of
leech fauna in Dal Lake of Kashmir Himalaya.
Table 1. The
systematic list of leech species collected from Dal Lake.
|
Phylum |
Class |
Order |
Family |
Genus/Species |
Authority |
Common Name |
|
Annelida |
Hirudinea |
Rhynchobdellida |
Glossiphoniidae |
Alboglossiphonia weberi |
(Blanchard, 1897) |
Proboscis-bearing Leech |
|
Glossiphonia complanata |
(Linnaeus, 1758) |
Proboscis-bearing Leech |
||||
|
Helobdella stagnalis |
(Linnaeus, 1758) |
Proboscis-bearing Leech |
||||
|
Theromyzon sp. |
Philippi, 1867 |
Duck Leech |
||||
|
Alboglossiphonia hetroclita |
(Linnaeus, 1761) |
Small Snail Leech |
||||
|
Hemiclepsis marginata asiatica |
(Moore, 1924) |
Disproportioned-eyed leech |
||||
|
Archynchobdellida |
Erpobdellidae |
Erpobdella octoculata |
(Linnaeus, 1758) |
Worm Leech |
||
|
Hirudinidae |
Poecilobdella granulosa |
(Savigny, 1826) |
Cattle Leech |
|||
|
Haemopidae |
Haemopis indicus |
(Bhatia, 1940) |
Blood-sucking Leech |
For
images - - click here for full PDF
REFERENCES
Ahmed, S.
(2021). Annelida:
Hirudinea (Leeches). Zoological Survey of India, Fauna of Himachal Pradesh,
State Fauna Series 26: 51–56.
Amin, A., S.
Fazal, A. Mujtaba & S.K. Singh (2014). Effects of land transformation
on water quality of Dal Lake, Srinagar, India. Journal of the Indian
Society of Remote Sensing 42: 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-013-0297-9
Atkauskien,
I. & J. Rutkauskait-Sucilien (2022). The present state of the leech
fauna (Annelida: Hirudinea) in Lithuania. Zootaxa 5115(1):
47–62. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5115.1.3
Bandyopadhyay,
P.K. & C.K. Mandal (2006). Studies on a new species of leech of the genus Haemadipsa
(Hirudinea: Haemadipsidae) from the Kodair forest of Tamil Nadu, India. Records
of the Zoological Survey of India 106(1): 33–37. https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v106/i1/2006/159213
Baugh, S.C.
(1960a). Studies on
Indian Rhynchobdellid leeches. I. Parasitology 50(3–4): 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000025403
Baugh, S.C.
(1960b). Studies on
Indian Rhynchobdcllid leeches. II. Zoologischer Anzeiger 165:
468–477.
Bezmaternykh,
D.M. (2007). Zoobenthos as
an indicator of water ecosystems state in Western Siberia. Ecology, A
series of Analytical Reviews of World Literature 85: 1–86.
Bhatia, M.L.
(1930). Sur une
nouvelle hirudinée rhynchobdelle, Glossiphonia cruciate n. sp.,
provenant du vivier à truites d’Achha Bal, Kashmir. Annales de
Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 8(3-4): 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/1930083344
Bhatia, M.L.
(1934). Nouvelle
sangsu rhynchobdellide Glossiphonia lobata n. sp. de l’établishment de
pisciculture d’Achha Bal (Kashmir). Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et
Comparée 12(2): 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/1934122121
Bhatia, M.L.
(1939). On some
leeches from Kashmir. Bulletin of Punjab University Zoology 2:
1–17.
Bhatia, M.L.
(1940). On Haemopis
indicus n. sp. a new Arhynchobdellid carnivorous leech from Kashmir. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences, India. Section B 10(4): 133–144.
Bielecki, A.,
J.M. Cichocka, I. Jeleń, P. Świątek & Z. Adamiak-Brud (2011). A checklist of leech species
from Poland. Wiadomości Parazytologiczne 57(1): 11–20.
Chandra, M.
(1982). A check-list of leeches of India. Records
of the Zoological Survey of India 80: 265–290.
Chandra, M.
(1983). The leech
fauna of the Jammu region of Jammu and Kashmir state, India. Records of
the Zoological Survey of India 81(1–2): 289–298. https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v81/i1-2/1983/161269
Chandra, M.
(1991). The Leeches
of India. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta 3782: 1–17.
Davies, R.W.,
F.R. Govedich & W.E. Moser (2008). Leech parasites of birds, pp 501–511. In:
Atkinson, C.T., N.J. Thomas, D.B. Hunter (eds.). Parasitic Diseases of Wild
Birds. John Wiley & Son, 595 pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780813804620.ch28
Harding, W.A.
(1924). Descriptions
of some new Leeches from India, Burma, and Ceylon. Annals and Magazine
of Natural History 14(82): 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222932408633143
Kaygorodova,
I., N. Bolbat & A. Bolbat (2020). Species delimitation through
DNA barcoding of freshwater leeches of the Glossiphonia genus
(Hirudinea: Glossiphoniidae) from Eastern Siberia, Russia. Journal of
Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 58(4): 1437–1446. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12385
Kaygorodova,
I.A., N. Mandzyak, E. Petryaeva & N.M. Pronin (2014). Genetic diversity of freshwater
leeches in lake gusinoe (Eastern Siberia, Russia). The Scientific World
Journal 2014: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/619127
Klemm, D.J.
(1985). A guide
to the Freshwater Annelida (Polychaeta, Naidid and Tubificid Oligochaeta, and
Hirudinea) of North America. Kendall Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque,
Iowa, 198 pp.
Kumar, R., S.
Parvaze, M.B. Huda & S.P. Allaie (2022). The changing water quality of
lakes - a case study of Dal Lake, Kashmir Valley. Environmental
Monitoring and Assessment 194(3): 228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-09869-x
Mandal, C. K.
(2004). Endemic leech
fauna of India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 80: 103–110. https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v103/i1-2/2004/159489
Mandal, C.K.
(2013). Annelida:
Hirudinida: Fauna of Karnataka. Zoological Survey of India 21: 51–55.
Mandal, C.K.
(2015). Paraclepsis
jorapariensis sp. nov. (Hirudinea: Glossiphonidae): a new leech from
Jharkhand, India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 115(3):
231–235. https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi/v115/i3/2015/120707
Mandal C.K.,
H. Tariyal, P. Naiwal, D. Thakur & S. Ghosh (2020a). Haemadipsa champhaiensis
sp. nov. (Hirudinea: Hirudidae): a new leech from Mizoram, India. Journal of
Applied Zoological Research 31(1): 86–90.
Mandal C.K.,
H. Tariyal, P. Naiwal, D. Thakur & S. Ghosh (2020b). Haemadipsa satyanarayanai sp. nov. (Clitellata:
Haemadipsidae): a new leech from Nagaland, India. Journal of Applied
Zoological Research 31(2): 149–155.
Mandal, C.K.,
J.W. Reynolds, M.N. Hasan & K. Deuti (2022). Leech fauna of north- east India
(Annelida: Hirudinea). Megadrilogica 27(1): 1–12.
Mir, Z.A., Y.
Bakhtiyar, M. Parveen & N.A. Khan (2024). Taxonomy and diversity of
Annelids in two Jhelum tributaries of Kashmir Himalaya, India. Proceedings
of National Academy of Sciences, India, Section B Biological Sciences 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-024-01607-2
Moore, J.P.
(1924). Notes on
some Asiatic leeches (Hirudinea) principally from China, Kashmir, and British
India. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 76:
343–388.
Nesemann, H.
& E. Neubert (1999). Annelida, Clitellata: Branchiobdellida, Acanthobdellea, Hirudinea. Süßwasserfauna
von Mitteleuropa 6: 27–32.
Nesemann, H.,
G. Sharma & R.K. Sinha (2004). Aquatic Annelida (Polychaeta, Oligochaeta, Hirudinea)
of the Ganga River and adjacent water bodies in Patna (India: Bihar), with
description of a new leech species (Family Salifidae). Annalen des
Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 105(B): 139–187.
Phillips,
A.J., F.R. Govedich & W.E. Moser (2020). Leeches in the extreme:
morphological, physiological, and behavioral adaptations to inhospitable
habitats. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and
Wildlife 12: 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2020.09.003
Pyrka, E., G.
Kanarek, G. Zaleśny & J. Hildebrand (2021). Leeches as the intermediate host
for strigeid trematodes: genetic diversity and taxonomy of the genera Australapatemon
Sudarikov, 1959 and Cotylurus Szidat, 1928. Parasites &
Vectors 14(1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04538-9
Qadri, M.Y.
& A.R. Yousuf (1980). Limnological studies on lake Malpur Sar 1. The Biotope Geobios
117–119.
Rashid, I.,
S.A. Romshoo, M. Amin, S.A. Khanday & P. Chauhan (2017). Linking human-biophysical
interactions with the trophic status of Dal Lake, Kashmir Himalaya,
India. Limnologica 62: 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2016.11.008
Raut, S.K.
& N.C. Nandi (1985). The leech Glossiphonia weberi in the control of the snails Lymnaea
luteola, a predator–prey interaction. Environment and Ecology 3(1):
21–24.
Raut, S.K.
& T.C. Saha (1987). Life history of sanguivorous leech Hemiclepsis marginata marginata
(Muller) Annelida: Glossiphoniidae. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 57:
970–972.
Raut, S.K.
(1986). Parental
care of leech Hemiclepsis marginata marginata. Environment and
Ecology 4: 150 pp.
Ray, R.
(1980). Parental
care of a Glossiphonid leech, Helobdella nociva Harding. Bulletin
of the Zoological Survey of India 3: 121 pp.
Romanova,
E.M. & O.M. Klimina (2010). Bioresources class Hirudinea in the area of the
middle Volga region: ecological significance and prospects. Proceedings
of the Samara Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences 1(12):
208–211.
Sig, A.K., M.
Guney, A.U. Guclu & E. Ozmen (2017). Medicinal leech therapy — an
overall perspective. Integrative Medicine Research 6(4):
337–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2017.08.001
Sket, B.
& P. Trontelj (2008). Global diversity of leeches (Hirudinea) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia
595: 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9010-8
Soota, T.D.
& G.C. Ghosh (1977). On some Indian Leeches. Newsletter of Zoological Survey of India
3(6): 359–360.
Soota, T.D.
(1956). Fauna of the
Kashmir Valley: leeches. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 54(1–2):
1–4.
Uttam, S.
& S. Langer (2021). Taxonomic studies and seasonal variations in density of fresh water
leech Erpobdella bhatiai (Nesemann, 2007) inhabiting torrential hill
stream in greater Himalayas. Indian Journal of Ecology 48(4):
1203–1208.
Wetzel, M.J.
(1992). Aquatic
Annelida of Illinois: introduction and checklist of species. Transactions
of the Illinois State Academy of Science 85(1): 87–101.
Zettler, M.L. & D. Daunys
(2007). Long-term macrozoobenthos
changes in a shallow boreal lagoon: comparison of a recent biodiversity
inventory with historical data. Limnologica 37(2): 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2006.12.004