Journal of Threatened Taxa |
www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 October 2023 | 15(10): 24104–24115
ISSN 0974-7907
(Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8603.15.10.24104-24115
#8603 | Received 19
June 2023 | Final received 22 September 2023 | Finally accepted 01 October 2023
Diversity of Calliphoridae and
Polleniidae (Diptera) in the Himalaya, India
Meenakshi Bharti
Department of Zoology and
Environmental Sciences, Punjabi University, Patiala, Punjab 147002, India.
Editor: R.M. Sharma, Zoological Survey of India,
Pune, India. Date of publication:
26 October 2023 (online & print)
Citation: Bharti, M. (2023). Diversity of Calliphoridae and
Polleniidae (Diptera) in the Himalaya, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 15(10): 24104–24115. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8603.15.10.24104-24115
Copyright: © Bharti 2023. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction,
and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to
the author(s) and the source of publication.
Funding: Financial assistance rendered by
Department of Science and technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, New
Delhi vide grant no. SR/WOS-A/LS-109/2016 is gratefully acknowledged.
Competing interests: The author declares no competing
interests.
Author details: Dr.
Meenakshi Bharti is currently based at the Department of
Zoology and Environmental Sciences Punjabi University, Patiala. Her prime area
of interest is forensic entomology, insect systematics, chemical ecology and
molecular phylogeny. She is one of the leading experts in
the field of forensic entomology in India and is trying her best to popularise
this applied field in the country. She is the first one to generate insect
data, which has the potential to be applicable in solving criminal cases. Besides, she aims to streamline the taxonomy of dipteran flies
from India with major focus on family Calliphoridae
and is also actively involved in such
studies from other countries. Her other significant contributions are in the
field of ant ecology and molecular phylogeny of blow
flies.
Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank Dr.Krzysztof Szpila, Nicholaus Copernicus University, Torun,
Poland, for valuable suggestions.
Abstract: The family Calliphoridae
(Diptera: Calyptratae: Oestroidea) is primarily known for its synanthropic,
necrophagous, and myiasis–causing species.
This study presents an updated checklist of blow fly species recorded in
the Himalayan regions of India, Nepal, and Pakistan. The dataset includes 23
genera and 69 Species from Indian Himalayas, 18 genera and 52 species from the
Pakistani Himalayas, and 22 genera and 74 species from Nepalese Himalaya. The
data is categorised into three elevation zones: the Shivalik range (350–1,200
m), Lesser Himalaya (1200-2,200 m), and Upper Himalaya (2,200 m and above)
taking into consideration factors such as vegetation, temperature, and other
environmental variables. The Sorensen Similarity Index was utilized to quantify
the degree of species overlap and similarity among blow fly communities within
these elevation ranges.
Keywords: Calliphoridae, Himalaya,
Ameniinae, Bengallinae, Calliphorinae, Chrysomyinae, Luciliinae, Phumosiinae,
Rhiniinae, Polleniidae,
Sorensen index.
Introduction
The upsurge of the youngest,
largest, and highest chains of mountains, the Himalaya, from the Mediterranean
seabeds of Tethys involved three distinct and widely separated phases of the
uplift (Pandit et al. 2014). The upliftment of marine sediments during the
post-Eocene epoch gave rise to the present-day “Greater ranges of Himalaya”.
The second upheaval at the end of the Miocene epoch formed the present-day
“Middle or Lesser Himalayan ranges” and the last movement at the end of the
Tertiary period led to the formation of the “Shivalik range” of Himalaya (Wadia
1963). Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan, China, and Myanmar have
sovereignty over the Himalayan landscape (Xu et al. 2009; Pandit et al. 2014).
The Shivalik ranges and the Lesser Himalayan ranges fall in the Oriental region
and witness a subtropical to sub-temperate type of climate. On the other hand,
the Greater Himalayan ranges, which lie in the Palaearctic zone, experience a
temperate type of climatic conditions. Thus, the complex ecosystem and
topography of the Himalaya, coupled with factors such as adaptive divergence,
speciation, following immigration, or allopatric speciation, have made it a
hotspot of biodiversity (Xu et al. 2009). While extensive research has
explored the biodiversity and evolutionary dynamics of plants and vertebrates
in the Himalayan region, there is a significant knowledge gap. This gap
pertains to our understanding of the biodiversity and distribution of
invertebrates, especially insects, which constitute the largest percentage of
organisms worldwide.
The origin and diversification of dipteran
lineages (true flies) encompass the four largest Mesozoic insect radiations
within its sub-order Brachycera, i.e., the “higher Diptera” (Wiegmann et al.
2011). Most hypotheses suggest that the four major Brachyceran lineages
(Xylophagomorpha, Tabanomorpha, Stratiomyomorpha (SXT clade), and Muscomorpha)
originated in the Jurassic (200 MYA) and radiated rapidly into the diverse
extant forms present today. The family Calliphoridae belongs to the clade
Schizophora and the group Calyptratae of the infra-order Muscomorpha. According
to Wiegmann (2011), the clade Schizophora originated within the Upper
Cretaceous (74–98 MYA) and diversified in the Tertiary (65–20 MYA), exploding
into numerous families of acalyptrate Diptera between 65–40 MYA, radiation that
has occurred within a short period. The calyptrate, on the other hand,
comprises the youngest lineage of Diptera, e.g., blow flies, house flies, etc.,
and first appeared in the fossil record about 40 million years ago (Wiegmann et
al. 2011). Schizophoran radiation, which accounts for more than a third of
extant fly diversity and 3% of all animal diversity, is the largest insect
radiation in the Tertiary (Wiegmann et al. 2011). This period coincides with
the formation of the Himalaya. The blow fly species of seven subfamilies have
adapted well to the environmental stress of the region and have undergone
adaptive radiation. It is also believed that the flies appear to become diverse
because of higher rates of speciation and lower rates of extinction (Wiegmann
et al. 2011). Compared to other dipteran lineages, the young calyptrate taxa
have evolved a variety of life strategies, namely, the development of ptilinum
sacs, the capacity to feed in almost any nutrient-rich medium,
and have diversified to occupy a broad range of trophic niches (Cerretti
et al. 2017).
The family Calliphoridae
(Diptera: Calyptratae: Oestroidea) is largely known for its synanthropic,
necrophagous, and myiasis-causing species (Courtney et al. 2017). Historically,
the group was an assemblage of paraphyletic taxa (Rognes 1997; Kutty et al.
2010) and comprised up to 14 sub-families, viz., Ameniinae, Aphyssurinae,
Bengaliinae, Calliphorinae, Melanomyinae, Chrysomyinae, Helicoboscinae,
Luciliinae, Mesembrinellinae, Phumosiinae, Polleniinae, Prosthetosominae,
Rhiniinae, and Toxotarsinae (Yan et al. 2021). The study of Calliphoridae
phylogeny has accelerated in the last decade thanks to the application of
molecular methods. Multiple hypotheses and taxonomic actions have been put
forth in the study of certain fly families, such as raising polleniids,
rhiniids, and mesembrinellids to full family status (Kutty et al. 2010; Marinho
et al. 2011, 2017; Singh & Wells 2013; Cerretti et al. 2017, 2019). These
hypotheses have faced challenges in terms of robust support, particularly in
critical nodes, when relying on traditional multi-locus Sanger sequencing.
A pivotal shift occurred with the
adoption of next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods, leading to the emergence
of three highly supported phylogenetic hypotheses (Kutty et al. 2019;
Buenaventura et al. 2021; Yan et al. 2021). Notably, Yan et al. (2021) proposed
a formal reclassification of the family, revisiting the concept of a broad
Calliphoridae family that includes various subfamilies: Ameniinae
(incorporating the former Helicoboscinae), Bengaliinae, Calliphorinae
(encompassing the former Aphyssurinae, Melanomyinae, and Toxotarsinae),
Chrysomyinae, Luciliinae, Phumosiinae, Rhiniinae, and Rhinophorinae.
This study focuses on exploring
the taxonomic and ecological diversity of the Calliphoridae and Polleniidae
groups in the Himalayan region, with a specific emphasis on their elevation
ranges. In the Oriental region, these groups are expansive, encompassing
approximately 47 genera and 390 species (Kurahashi & Kirk-Spriggs 2006).
Within India, there are 128 species belonging to these groups, distributed
across 30 genera and eight subfamilies (Bharti & Kurahashi 2009, 2010;
Bharti 2011, 2012, 2014a,b, 2015a,b,c, 2018, 2019;
Bharti & Bharti 2016; Bharti & Bunchu 2016; Bharti & Verves 2016;
Bharti & Singh 2017; Bharti & Rognes 2018). In contrast, the Indian
Himalayan region is represented by 23 genera and 69 species. Similarly,
Pakistan exhibits a diversity of 18 genera and 57 species (Hassan et al. 2018),
with 52 species located on the Pakistani side of the Himalaya. The Nepalese
Himalaya house 22 genera and 74 species of blow flies (Kurahashi & Thapa
2002) (Table 1). This comprehensive checklist provides an updated record of blow
fly species found across various Himalayan regions in India, Nepal, and
Pakistan.
Materials
and Methods
The Himalayan blow flies
(including families Calliphoridae and Polleniidae) checklist is based on
original papers (Senior-White et al. 1940; Kurahashi 1989, 1994; Rognes 1993;
Wells & Kurahashi 1995; Cerretti 2017, 2019; Hassan et al. 2018), lead
author’s collection data from northwestern and northeastern Himalaya (Bharti
& Kurahashi 2009, 2010; Bharti 2011, 2012, 2014a,b, 2015a,b,c, 2018, 2019;
Bharti & Bharti 2016; Bharti & Bunchu 2016; Bharti & Verves 2016;
Bharti & Singh 2017; Bharti & Rognes 2018) and Pakistan (Kurahashi
& Afzal 2002; Hassan et al. 2018). It includes the currently valid genera
and species of the two families reported from India, Pakistan, and the Nepalese
Himalaya. The data is divided into three altitude zones: the Shivalik range
(350–1,200 m), the Lesser Himalaya (1,200–2,200 m), and the Upper Himalaya
(2,200 m and above) with respect to vegetation, temperature, and other environmental
factors (Mani 1968). The Sorensen similarity index was calculated to measure
the extent of species overlap or similarity among blow fly communities in the
three ranges.
Results
Representatives of seven
subfamilies, namely Ameniinae (including Helicoboscinae), Bengaliinae,
Calliphorinae, Chrysomyinae, Luciliinae, Phomosiinae, and Rhiniinae, are
present in the Himalaya. Subfamily Ameniinae is represented by two species of
the genus Catapicephala (C. pattoni from Pakistan and the
Nepalese Himalaya and C. splendens and C. pattoni) and one
species of the genus Gulmargia from the Indian Himalaya.
Thirteen taxa of Bengaliinae are known from
the world (Rognes 2011), out of which only two, namely, Bengalia and Termitoloeus,
are known from Nepal, Pakistan, and the Indian Himalaya. The adults of Bengalia
are predaceous on the immature stages of ants (Rognes 2009), and their larvae
feed in termite nests (Rognes 2011). There is also an observation of an adult Bengalia
sucking the abdomen of a termite (Rognes 2011). Termitoloeus marshalli
Baranov is the sole species known from the Indian Himalaya that attacks and
captures termite mounds and feeds on termite broods. The fly in question is so
voracious that it can finish a termite colony in a few months, and this aspect
could potentially be used to control the termite menace in India.
Sub-family Calliphorinae
(including Aphyssurinae, Melanomyinae, and Toxotarsinae) is represented by the
genera Aldrichina, Calliphora, Cynomya, Melinda, Nepalonesia,
Onesia, and Polleniopsis from Nepal, Pakistan, and the Indian
Himalaya (Kurahashi & Afzal 2002; Bharti 2015a,b,
2018; Bharti & Rognes 2018; Hassan et al. 2018). Representatives of the
genus Cynomya have been reported from Pakistan and the Indian Himalaya
(Bharti & Rognes 2018). Nepalonesia only comes from the Nepalese
Himalaya. The genus Aldrichina is represented by single species, Calliphora,
Polleniopsis, and Melinda by seven species, and Onesia by six
each from the region under study (Table 1). The flies belonging to this group
are oviparous or viviparous. Larvae are saprophagous, parasites of snails, or
predators of earthworms.
The subfamily Chrysomyinae
encompasses 12 genera, including Phormia Robineau-Desvoidy, Protophormia
Townsend, Protocalliphora Hough, Trypocalliphora Peus, Phormiata
Grunin, and Chrysomya Robineau-Desvoidy, all generally characterized as
Holarctic/Paleotropical or belonging to the Old World Chrysomyines.
Additionally, it includes Chrysopyrellia Seguy, Cochliomyia
Townsend, Compsomyiops Townsend, Hemilucilia Brauer, Paralucilia
Brauer & Bergenstamm, and Chloroprocta Wulp, classified as
Neotropical. The previous practice of employing arbitrary tribal
classifications, as proposed by Rognes in 1991 and later reaffirmed by Singh
& Wells in 2013, has been abandoned. In the Himalayan region, this
subfamily is represented by the genera Chrysomya, Protocalliphora,
and Trypocalliphora. For instance, Chrysomya comprises thirteen
species distributed across different Himalayan ranges, each playing distinct
ecological roles such as scavenging, parasitism, and predation (Bharti &
Kurahashi 2009; Bharti 2019).
Subfamily Luciliinae includes two
species of the genus Hemipyrellia and 11 species of the genus Lucilia
from the studied area. All species are oviparous, with larvae primarily
exhibiting saprophagous behaviour in decaying animal matter. The adults visit
flowers, faeces, and dead animals, and many species are involved in human or
animal myiasis, inflicting wounds. The genus Lucilia is of great
medical, hygienic, and forensic importance, with some species suspected of
transmitting the poliomyelitis virus to humans (Rognes 1991).
Phumosia testacea is the sole representative of
the Phumosiinae subfamily identified in the Nepalese Himalayan region. Records
also confirm its presence in southern India, where observations have been made
regarding the breeding of these flies within frog egg masses. An interesting
aspect of their behaviour is the targeted attack on frog egg nests, with the
larvae actively preying upon and consuming the developing embryos. This
phenomenon was documented by Senior-White et al. (1940), shedding light on the
unique ecological interactions of these flies within their habitat.
Subfamily Rhiniinae is broadly
divided into two subfamilies, Cosminiinae and Rhiniinae. It is one of the most
diverse and widely distributed families in the Oriental region, with
approximately 14 genera. The subfamily includes the genera Borbororhinia,
Cosmina, Strongyloneura, Isomyia, Metallia, Rhyncomya, Chlororhinia,
Idiella, Rhinia, and Stomorhina from the Nepalese, Pakistani, and
Indian Himalaya. These flies are closely associated with Hymenoptera, Isoptera,
and Orthoptera. Some species are predators of locust egg capsules, while others
are associated with termites and ant nests (Senior-White 1940; Arce et al.
2019). The subfamily remains relatively unexplored biologically (Dear 1977).
Family Polleniidae, previously
considered a part of the Calliphoridae family, has undergone a reclassification
based on molecular studies and their breeding habits as parasitoids of
soil-dwelling invertebrates. Molecular research conducted by Singh and Wells
(2013), Winkler et al. (2015), Cerretti et al. (2017), Blaschke et al. (2018),
Kutty et al. (2019), Stireman et al. (2019), and Johnston et al. (2022) has
indicated their sister group relationship with Tachinidae, suggesting a
phylogenetic distance from Calliphoridae. Furthermore, Cerretti et al. (2014)
and Stireman et al. (2019) proposed that a non-molecular synapomorphy could be
established based on their breeding habit as parasitoids of soil-dwelling
invertebrates, aligning them with sister group tachinids, which also parasitize
soil-dwelling insect larvae. Presently, 147 species of Polleniidae are
classified under eight genera worldwide (Cerretti et al. 2019). The genus Pollenia
stands out as the most species-rich, with 95 representatives from Oriental,
Australasian, and Palaearctic regions. Dexopollenia comprises 21
species, Morinia 13, Melanodexia 8, and Xanthotryxus 7,
with Anthracomyza Malloch, Alvamaja Rognes, and Nesodexia
Villeneuve each represented by a single species. In the Himalaya, these flies
are represented by the genera Dexopollenia, Morinia, and Pollenia
(Table 1). Morinia species primarily feed on dead decaying matter, whereas
lumbricids serve as hosts and substrates for larval development in Pollenia
species. Cluster fly larvae exclusively develop on earthworms and do not accept
other food sources, although there are occasional reports of alternative hosts
such as insect larvae (Yahnke & George 1972; Jewiss-Gaines et al. 2012).
Ecological diversity
Blow flies being ubiquitous seem
to occur in almost all the available ecosystems on Earth. Having said so, it is
also true that there is a disparity in the distribution of species regarding
climate, latitude, and altitude. Like many other groups of plants and animals,
blow flies show a strong latitudinal gradient in their diversity, with the
highest at the equator and declining towards the poles. Similarly, altitude
also has a profound effect on the richness and abundance of Calliphoridae.
Generally, species diversity decreases with an increase in altitude. But, in
the case of Himalayan blow flies, diversity was maximum at the mid-elevation
(MDE), i.e., lower Himalaya (79 species) compared to Shivalik (64) and upper
Himalayan ranges (56).
Conclusions
A comprehensive survey in the
regions of Pakistan, Nepal, and the Indian Himalayas has resulted in the
recording of a total of 30 genera and 120 species of blow flies. Among these
regions, Pakistan exhibits 60% of the generic diversity, while the Nepalese and
Indian Himalaya each contribute 70% (Figure 1).
To assess the spatial variability
of environmental conditions and describe species composition along
environmental gradients, the Himalayan blow fly fauna was categorised into
three distinct elevation ranges: 350–1,200 m (Shivalik range, sub-tropical),
1,200–2,200 m (Lower Himalayan ranges, sub-temperate), and 2,200 m onwards
(Upper Himalayan ranges, temperate) (Table 3). It’s important to note that the
first two elevation ranges are situated in the Oriental region, while the Upper
Himalayan ranges belong to the Palaearctic region.
The evaluation of faunal
similarity between these three assemblages used the incidence-based Sorensen
Similarity Index (Sorensen 1948): 2a/(2a+b+c), where ‘a’ represents the number
of shared species, ‘b’ the number of unique species in the first assemblage,
and ‘c’ the number of unique species in the second assemblage. Findings
indicate that the Shivalik range shares approximately 43% faunal similarity
with the Lower Himalayan ranges but only about 21.42% with the Upper Himalayan
ranges. Conversely, the lower and upper ranges exhibit a 37.11% similarity in
their species assemblages (Table 2). Additionally, 11 genera were identified
that are common to all three elevational ranges, differing only in the
composition of species along different gradients in the Himalaya. The highest
generic similarity was observed between the lower and upper ranges of the Himalaya,
accounting for 56.6% similarity. Specifically, the genera Morinia and Phumosia
were unique to the lower ranges, while Dexopollenia, Trypocalliphora,
and Cynomya were unique to the upper Himalayan ranges.
These findings contribute
valuable insights into the distribution and diversity of blow flies across the
Himalayan region, shedding light on the unique characteristics of each
elevation range.
Figure 1. Map showing Himalayan
regions spanning across India, Pakistan, and Nepal.
Family |
Sub-family |
Species |
Indian Himalaya |
Pakistan Himalaya |
Nepalese Himalaya |
Calliphoridae |
Ameniinae |
Catapicephala splendens |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Catapicephala pattoni |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Gulmargia angustisquama |
√ |
|
|
|
Bengaliinae |
Bengalia varicolor |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Bengalia martinleakei |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Bengalia surcoufi |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Bengalia torosa |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Bengalia unicolor |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Bengalia emarginata |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Bengalia escheri |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Bengalia subnitida |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Bengalia hastativentris |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Termitoloemus marshalli |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Aldrichina grahami |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Calliphora chinghaiensis |
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
Calliphora himalayana |
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
Calliphora uralensis |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Calliphora vicina |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Calliphora vomitoria |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Calliphora loewi |
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
Calliphora pattoni |
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
Cynomya mortuorum |
√ |
√ |
|
|
|
Melinda sugiyamai |
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
Melinda scutellata |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Melinda abdominalis |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Melinda bengalensis |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Melinda pusilla indica |
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
Melinda nuortevae |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Melinda nepalica |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Nepalonesia pulchokii |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Nepalonesia shinonagai |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Onesia sp. |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Onesia kiyoshii |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Onesia menechmiodes |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Onesia flavisquama |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Onesia atripalpis |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Onesia khasiensis |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Onesia girii |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Polleniopsis sp. |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Polleniopsis himalayana |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Polleniopsis nepalica |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Polleniopsis pilosa |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Polleniopsis kasmirensis |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Polleniopsis pulchokii |
|
|
√ |
|
Chrysomyinae |
Chrysomya megacephala |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Chrysomya albiceps |
√ |
√ |
|
|
|
Chrysomya nigripes |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Chrysomya phaonis |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Chrysomya pinguis |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Chrysomya putoria |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Chrysomya regalis |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Chrysomya rufifacies |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Chrysomya bezziana |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Chrysomya defixa |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Chrysomya villeneuvi |
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
Chrysomya chani |
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
Chrysomya thanomthini |
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
Protocalliphora azurea |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Protocalliphora maruyamensis |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Protocalliphora terraenovae |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Trypocalliphora braueri |
|
|
√ |
|
Luciliinae |
Hemipyrellia ligurriens |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Hemipyrellia pulchra |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Lucilia cuprina |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Lucilia papuensis |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
lucilia porphyrina |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Lucilia sericata |
√ |
√ |
|
|
|
Lucilia ampullacea |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Lucilia bazini |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Lucilia calviceps |
√ |
√ |
|
|
|
Lucilia illustris |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Lucilia bismarkensis |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Lucilia shenyangensis |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Lucilia sinensis |
|
|
√ |
|
Phumosiinae |
Phumosia testacea |
|
|
√ |
|
Rhiniinae |
Borborhinia bivitatta |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Cosmina prasina |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Cosmina nepalica |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Cosmina limbipennis |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Isomyia aurifacies |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Isomyia fulvicornis |
√ |
√ |
|
|
|
Isomyia pseudoviridana |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Isomyia coei |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Isomyia electa |
|
√ |
√ |
|
|
Isomyia facialis |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Isomyia gomezmenori |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Isomyia hetauda |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Isomyia nepalana |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Isomyia oestracea |
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
Isomyia pichoni |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Isomyia pictifacies |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Isomyia shelpa |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Isomyia singhi |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Isomyia sivah |
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
Isomyia versicolor |
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
Isomyia delectans |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Isomyia viridaurea |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Isomyia nebulosa |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Metallea flavibasis |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Metallea setosa |
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
Metallea setiventris |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Rhyncomya townsendi |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Rhyncomya setipyga |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Strongyloneura prolata |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Chlororhina exempta |
√ |
|
|
|
|
Idiella divisa |
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
Rhinia apicalis |
√ |
√ |
|
|
|
Stomorhina cribrata |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Stomorhina discolor |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Stomorhina procula |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Stomorhina lunata |
√ |
√ |
|
|
|
Stomorhina melastoma |
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
Stomorhina xanthogaster |
√ |
√ |
√ |
|
|
Stomorhina luteigaster |
|
|
√ |
Polliniidae |
|
Dexopollenia nigriscens |
|
|
√ |
|
|
Dexopollenia testacea |
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
Morinia argenticincta |
√ |
|
√ |
|
|
Pollenia dasypoda |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Pollenia pediculata |
|
√ |
|
|
|
Pollenia rudis |
√ |
√ |
√ |
Table 2. Sorensen similarity
index shows similarity between different assemblages.
|
Shivalik Range |
Lower Himalaya |
Upper Himalaya |
Shivalik Range |
_ |
0.43 |
0.21 |
Lower Himalaya |
|
_ |
0.37 |
Upper Himalaya |
|
|
_ |
Table 3. List of blowfly species
from Pakistan, Nepal, and Indian Himalaya.
Family |
Sub-family |
Species |
Shivalik Range |
Lower Himalaya |
Upper Himalaya |
Calliphoridae |
Ameniinae |
Catapicephala splendens |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Catapicephala pattoni |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Gulmargia angustisquama |
A |
P |
P |
|
Bengaliinae |
Bengalia varicolor |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Bengalia martinleakei |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Bengalia surcoufi |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Bengalia torosa |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Bengalia unicolor |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Bengalia emarginata |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Bengalia escheri |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Bengalia subnitida |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Bengalia hastativentris |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Termitoloemus marshalli |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Aldrichina grahami |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Calliphora chinghaiensis |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Calliphora himalayana |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Calliphora uralensis |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Calliphora vicina |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Calliphora vomitoria |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Calliphora loewi |
A |
P |
P |
|
|
Calliphora pattoni |
A |
P |
P |
|
|
Cynomyamortuorum |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Melinda sugiyamai |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Melinda scutellata |
A |
P |
P |
|
|
Melinda abdominalis |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Melinda bengalensis |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Melinda pusilla indica |
A |
P |
P |
|
|
Melinda nuortevae |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Melinda nepalica |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Nepalonesia pulchokii |
A |
P |
P |
|
|
Nepalonesia shinonagai |
A |
P |
P |
|
|
Onesia sp. |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Onesia kiyoshii |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Onesia menechmiodes |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Onesia flavisquama |
A |
P |
P |
|
|
Onesia atripalpis |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Onesia khasiensis |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Onesia girii |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Polleniopsis sp. |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Polleniopsis himalayana |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Polleniopsis nepalica |
A |
P |
P |
|
|
Polleniopsis pilosa |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Polleniopsis kasmirensis |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Polleniopsis pulchokii |
A |
A |
P |
|
Chrysomyinae |
Chrysomya megacephala |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Chrysomya albiceps |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Chrysomya nigripes |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Chrysomya phaonis |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Chrysomya pinguis |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Chrysomya putoria |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Chrysomya regalis |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Chrysomya rufifacies |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Chrysomya bezziana |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Chrysomya defixa |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Chrysomya villeneuvi |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Chrysomya chani |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Chrysomya thanomthini |
A |
P |
P |
|
|
Protocalliphora azurea |
A |
P |
P |
|
|
Protocalliphora maruyamensis |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Protocalliphora terraenovae |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Trypocalliphora braueri |
A |
A |
P |
|
Luciliinae |
Hemipyrellia ligurriens |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Hemipyrellia pulchra |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Lucilia cuprina |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Lucilia papuensis |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Lucilia porphyrina |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Lucilia sericata |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Lucilia ampullacea |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Lucilia bazini |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Lucilia calviceps |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Lucilia illustris |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Lucilia bismarkensis |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Lucilia shenyangensis |
A |
P |
P |
|
|
Lucilia sinensis |
A |
P |
P |
|
Phumosiinae |
Phumosia testacea |
A |
P |
A |
|
Rhiniinae |
Borborhinia bivitatta |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Cosmina prasina |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Cosmina nepalica |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Cosmina limbipennis |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Isomyia aurifacies |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Isomyia fulvicornis |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Isomyia pseudoviridana |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Isomyia coei |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Isomyia electa |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Isomyia facialis |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Isomyia gomezmenori |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Isomyia hetauda |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Isomyia nepalana |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Isomyia oestracea |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Isomyia pichoni |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Isomyia pictifacies |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Isomyia shelpa |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Isomyia singhi |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Isomyia sivah |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Isomyia versicolor |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Isomyia delectans |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Isomyia viridaurea |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Isomyia nebulosa |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Metallea flavibasis |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Metallea setosa |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Metallea setiventris |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Rhyncomya townsendi |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Rhyncomya setipyga |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Strongyloneura prolata |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Chlororhina exempta |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Idiella divisa |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Rhinia apicalis |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Stomorhina cribrata |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Stomorhina discolor |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Stomorhina procula |
P |
P |
P |
|
|
Stomorhina lunata |
A |
P |
P |
|
|
Stomorhina melastoma |
P |
A |
A |
|
|
Stomorhina xanthogaster |
P |
P |
A |
|
|
Stomorhina luteigaster |
A |
A |
P |
Polliniidae |
|
Dexopollenia nigriscens |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Dexopollenia testacea |
A |
A |
P |
|
|
Moriniaargenticincta |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Pollenia dasypoda |
A |
P |
P |
|
|
Pollenia pediculata |
A |
P |
A |
|
|
Pollenia rudis |
A |
P |
A |
For
figures - - click here for full PDF
References
Arce, B.J.,
S. Clout, D.L. Pat, M. Bharti, T. Pape, & S.A. Marshall (2020). Viviparity and oviparity in
termitophilous Rhiniidae (Diptera: Oestroidea) in the Western Ghats,
India. Oriental Insects 54(2): 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00305316.2019.1618407
Bharti, M.
& H. Kurahashi (2009). Finding of feral derived form (fdf) of Chrysomya megacephala
(Fabricius) from India with an evolutionary novelity (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Japanese
Journal of Systematic Entomology 15(2): 411–413.
Bharti, M.
& H. Kurahashi (2010). Lucilia calviceps Bezzi, new record from India
(Diptera: Calliphoridae). Halteres 2: 29–30.
Bharti, M.
& B. Singh (2017). DNA-based identification of forensically important blow flies from
India. Journal of Medical Entomology 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjx084
Bharti, M.
& H. Bharti (2016). Association and impact of ectoparasitic blowflies (Diptera:
Calliphoridae) on Himalayan ants of genus Myrmica. Insectes Sociaux
63: 477–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-016-0480-4
Bharti, M.
& K. Rognes (2018) First report of genus Cynomya Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Diptera:
Calliphoridae) from India. Halteres 9: 185 –186.
Bharti, M.
& N. Bunchu (2016). Three new records of genus Isomyia (Walker, 1859) (Diptera:
Calliphoridae) from India, with a revised key to the known Indian species. Japanese
Journal of Systematic Entomology 22(2): 241–244.
Bharti, M.
& Y. Verves (2016). A new species of genus Polleniopsis from India (Diptera:
Calliphoridae) with a key to the Indian species. Halteres 7: 1–4.
Bharti, M.
(2011). An updated
checklist of blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) from India. Halteres 3:
34–37.
Bharti, M.
(2012). Altitudinal
diversity of forensically important blowflies collected from decaying carcasses
in Himalaya. The Open Forensic Science Journal 5: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874402801205010001
Bharti, M.
(2014). New record
of Stomorhina siamensis Kurahashi et Tumrasvin, 1992 from India, with a
revised key to the known Indian species of genus Stomorhina (Diptera:
Calliphoridae). Far Eastern Entomologist 281: 7–11.
Bharti, M.
(2015a). Melinda
pusilla pusilla (Villeneuve, 1927) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) a new record
from India with a revised key to the known Indian species. Halteres 7:
43–45.
Bharti, M.
(2015b). Melinda
flavibasis (Malloch, 1931) (Diptera: Calliphoridae), a new record from
India with a revised key to the known Indian species. International Journal
of Dipterological Research 26(1): 3–7.
Bharti, M.
(2015c). Polleniopsis
annamensis Kurahashi, 1972 (Diptera: Calliphoridae) a new record from
India, with a revised key to the known Indian species. Halteres 6:
63–65.
Bharti, M.
(2018). First
verified record of genus Onesia (Diptera: Calliphoridae) from India. Halteres
9: 141–142.
Bharti, M.
(2019). New records
of Chrysomya putoria and Chrysomya thanomthini (Diptera: Calliphoridae)
from India; with a revised key to the known Indian species. Journal of
Threatened Taxa 11(1): 13188–13190. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4470.11.1.13188-13190
Blaschke,
J.D., J.O. Stireman, III, J.E. O’Hara, P. Cerretti & J.K. Moulton (2018). Molecular phylogeny and the
evolution of piercers in the bug-killing flies (Diptera: Tachinidae:
Phasiinae). Systematic Entomology 43: 218–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12272
Buenaventura,
E., M.W. Lloyd, J.M.P. Lopez, V.L. Gonzales, A. Thomas-Cabinanca & T. Dikow
(2021).
Protein-encoding ultraconserved elements provide a new phylogenomic perspective
of Oestroidea flies (Diptera: Calyptratae). Systematic Entomology 46:
5-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12443
Catts, E.P.
& M.L. Goff (1992). Forensic entomology in criminal investigations. Annual Review of
Entomology 37: 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.001345
Cerretti, P.,
J.O. Stireman III, T. Pape, J.E. O’Hara, M.A.T. Marinho, K. Rognes & D.A.
Grimaldi (2017). First fossil of an oestroid fly (Diptera: Calyptratae: Oestroidea) and
the dating of oestroid divergences. PLOS ONE 12(8): e0182101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182101
Cerretti, P.,
J.O. Stireman, D. Badano, S. Gisondi, K. Rognes, G.L. Giudice & T. Pape
(2019). Reclustering
the cluster flies (Diptera: Oestroidea, Polleniidae). Systematic Entomology
44(4): 957–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12369
Cerretti, P.,
G. Lo Giudice & T. Pape (2014). Remarkable Rhinophoridae in a
growing generic genealogy (Diptera: Calyptratae, Oestroidea). Systematic
Entomology 39: 660–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12080
Courtney,
G.W., T. Pape, J.H. Skevington & B.J. Sinclair (2017). Biodiversity of Diptera, Chapter
9., pp. 229–278. In: Foottit, R.G. & P.H. Adler (eds.). Insect
Biodiversity: Science and Society, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Hoboken, New
Jersey, U.S.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch9
Dear, J.P.
(1977). Revision of
Australian Rhiniinae (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Australian Journal of Zoology
25(4): 779–826.
Hassan, M.A.,
I. Bodlah, M. Bharti & K. Mahmood (2018). An updated checklist of blow fly
fauna (Diptera: Calliphoridae) of Pakistan with new records for the country. Halteres
9: 1–5.
Jewiss-Gaines,
A., S.A. Marshall & T.L. Whitworth (2012). Cluster flies (Calliphoridae:
Polleniinae: Pollenia) of North America. Canadian Journal of
Arthropod Identification 19. https://doi.org/10.3752/cjai.2012.19
Johnston,
N.P., M. Piwczynski, P. Trzeciak, K. Walczak & K. Szpila (2022). Integration of mitogenomic and
morphological data disintangles the systematics of Pollenia and
establishes a revised phylogenetic hypothesis for the Polleniidae. Systematic
Entomology 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12576
Kurahashi, H.
& A. Kirk-Spriggs (2006) The Calliphoridae of Namibia (Diptera: Oestroidea). Zootaxa
1322: 1–131
Kurahashi, H.
& M. Afzal (2002) The blow flies recorded from Pakistan, with the description of one new
species (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Medical Entomology and Zoology 53(2):
213 –230.
Kurahashi, H.
(1989) Family
Calliphoridae. In: Evenhuis, N.L. (Ed.). Catalog of the Diptera of the
Australasian and Oceanian Regions. Bishop Museum Serial Publication 86,
Honolulu, 180 pp.
Kurahashi, H.
(1995) Two new
species of Dexopollenia from Thailand, with a key to the Oriental
species (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Japanese Journal of Sanitary Zoology
46(2): 139–144.
Kutty, S.N.,
K. Meusemann, K.M. Bayless, M.A. Marinho, A.C. Point, X. Zhou, B. Misof, B.M.
Weigmann, D. Yeates, O. Cerretti & R. Meier (2019) Phylogenomic analysis of
Calyptratae: resolving a major radiation of Diptera. Cladistics 35(6):
605–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12375
Kutty, S.N.,
T. Pape, B.M. Wiegmann & R. Meier (2010). Molecular phylogeny of the
Calyptratae (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha) with an emphasis on the superfamily
Oestroidea and the position of Mystacinobiidae and McAlpine’s fly. Systematic
Entomology 35: 614–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00536.x
Mani, M.S.
(1968). Ecology
and Biogeography of High Altitude Insects. Series
Entomologica vol. 4. The Hague: Dr. W. Junk N.V. Publ. XVI+528 pp.
Marinho,
M.A.T., A.C.M. Junqueira & A.L.M. Azeredo-Espin (2011). Evaluation of the internal
transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) as a molecular marker for phylogenetic inference
using sequence and secondary structure information in blow flies (Diptera:
Calliphoridae). Genetica 139(9): 1189–1207.
Marinho,
M.A.T., M. Wolff, Y. Ramos-Pastranab, A.M.L. de Azeredo-Espin & D.D.S.
Amorim (2017). The first
phylogenetic study of Mesembrinellidae (Diptera: Oestroidea) based on molecular
data: clades and congruence with morphological characters. Cladistics
33: 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12157
McAlpine,
J.F. (1989). Phylogeny
and Classification of the Muscomorpha, pp. 1397–1518. In: McAlpine, J.F.
(eds.). Manual of Nearctic Diptera, Research Branch Agriculture.
Monograph No. 32, Vol. 3, Canadian Government Publishing Centre, Hull, Canada.
Pandit, M.K., M. Kumar & L.P. Koh (2014). Dancing on the roof of the
world: ecological transformation of the Himalayan landscape. BioScience
64(11): 980–992. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu152
Rognes, K.
(1986). The
systematic position of Helicobosca Bezzi with a discussion of the
monophyly of the calyptrate families Calliphoridae, Rhinophoridae,
Sarcophagidae and Tachinidae (Diptera). Entomologica Scandinavica 17:
75–92.
Rognes, K.
(1991). Blowflies
(Diptera, Calliphoridae) of Fennoscandia and Denmark Ed Fauna Entomologica
Scandinavica Vol. 24. E. J. Brill/Scandinavian Science Press Ltd,
Leiden.
Rognes, K.
(1997). The
Calliphoridae (blowflies) (Diptera: Oestroidea) are not a monophyletic group. Cladistics
13: 27–66.
Rognes, K.
(2002). Blowflies
(Diptera: Calliphoridae) of Israel and adjacent areas, including a new species
from Tunisia. Insect Systematics & Evolution 59: 1–148.
Rognes, K.
(2009). Revision of
the Oriental species of the Bengalia peuhi species- group (Diptera,
Calliphoridae). Zootaxa 2251: 1–76. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2251.1.1
Rognes, K.
(2011). A review of
the monophyly and composition of the Bengaliinae with the description of a new
genus and species, and new evidence for the presence of Melanomyinae in the
Afrotropical Region (Diptera, Calliphoridae). Zootaxa 2964: 1–60. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2964.1.1
Rognes, K.
(2013). A new
species in the genus Pseudorhyncomyia Peris, 1952 and the identity of P.
Deserticola Zumpt and Argo, 1978 (Diptera, Rhiniidae). Zootaxa 3736:
249–264. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3736.3.3
Senior-White,
R., D. Aubertin & J. Smart (1940). The Fauna of British India,
Including the Remainder of the Oriental Region, Diptera, Vol. VI. Family
Calliphoridae. Taylor and Francis, London.
Singh, B.
& J.D. Wells (2013). Molecular systematics of the Calliphoridae (Diptera: Oestroidea):
evidence from one mitochondrial and three nuclear genes. Journal of Medical
Entomology 50: 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1603/ME11288
Stevens, J.R.
& J.F. Wallman (2006). The evolution of myiasis in humans and other animals in the Old and New
Worlds (part I): phylogenetic analyses. Trends in Parasitology 22:
129–136.
Stireman,
J.O. III, P. Cerretti, J.E. O’Hara, J.D. Blaschke & J.K. Moulton (2019). Molecular phylogeny and
evolution of world Tachinidae (Diptera). Molecular Phylogenetics and
Evolution 139: 106358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2018.12.002
Tomberlin,
J.K. & M.E. Benbow [eds.] (2015). Forensic Entomology:
International Dimensions and Frontiers. Chemical Rubber Company Press, Boca
Raton, Florida, USA, 433 pp.
Wadia, D.N.
(1963). The
Himalaya Mountains: Their age, origin and sub-crustal relations. Meghnad
Saha Lecture, National Institute of Sciences of India, New Delhi, 17 pp.
Wells, J.D.
& H. Kurahashi (1994). Chrysomya
megacephala (Fabricius)
(Diptera: Calliphoridae) development: rate, variation and the implications for
forensic entomology. Japanese Journal of Sanitary Zoology 45(4):
303–309.
Wiegmann, B.M.,
M.D. Trautwein, I.S. Winkler, N.B. Barr, J.W. Kim, C. Lambkin, M.A. Bertone,
B.K. Cassel, K.M. Bayless, A.M. Heimberg & B.M. Wheeler (2011). Episodic radiations in the fly
tree of life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America 108: 5690–5695. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012675108
Winkler, I.S.,
J.D. Blaschke, D.J. Davis, J.O. III. Stireman, J.E. O’Hara, P. Cerretti &
J.K. Moulton (2015). Explosive
radiation or uninformative genes? Origin and early diversification of tachinid
flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 88:
38–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.021
Xu, J., R.E.
Grumbine, A. Shrestha, M. Eriksson, X. Yang, Y. Wang & A. Wilkes (2009). The melting Himalayas: cascading
effects of climate change on water, biodiversity, and livelihoods. Conservation
Biology 23: 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01237.x
Yahnke, W. &
J.A. George (1972). Rearing and
immature stages of the cluster fly (Pollenia rudis) (Diptera:
Calliphoridae) in Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist 104(4): 567–576.
Yan, L., T. Pape, K. Meusemann, S.N. Kutty, R. Meier,
K.M. Bayless & D. Zhang (2021). Monophyletic blowflies revealed by phylogenomics. BioMed
Central Biology 19: 230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01156-4