Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 December 2023 | 15(12): 24357–24367

 

 

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8260.15.12.24357-24367

#8260 | Received 06 November 2022 | Final received 05 December 2023 | Finally accepted 12 December 2023

 

 

A review of Baya Weaver Ploceus philippinus (Linnaeus, 1766) (Aves: Passeriformes: Ploceidae): ecological and conservation status

 

Yusufkhan Pathan 1  & Arvindgiri Goswami 2

 

1,2 Biology Department, M.V.M. Science & Home Science College, Saurashtra University, Rajkot, Gujarat 360005, India.

1 pathanyn4@gmail.com (corresponding author), 2 arvindgirigoswami@gmail.com

 

 

Editor: H. Byju, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.                    Date of publication: 26 December 2023 (online & print)

 

Citation: Pathan, Y. & A. Goswami (2023). A review of Baya Weaver Ploceus philippinus (Linnaeus, 1766) (Aves: Passeriformes: Ploceidae): ecological and conservation status. Journal of Threatened Taxa 15(12): 24357–24367. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8260.15.12.24357-24367

  

Copyright: © Pathan & Goswami 2023. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.

 

Funding: SHODH- ScHeme Of Developing High Quality Research, Education Department, Gujarat State.

 

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Author details: Pathan, Y. is a research scholar at Saurashtra university, Rajkot. He has been working on the avian diversity and ecology of Baya Weaver for the last five years and has an interest in study of ornithology and conservation of birds. Dr. A. Goswami is associate professor of  Zoology at Biology Department, M.V.M Science and home science college,  Rajkot. His area of specialization includes fisheries ecology, avifaunal ecology and aquatic biodiversity.

 

Author contributions: YP explore the research articles and draft the manuscript. A. Goswami supervised and finalized a manuscript.

 

Acknowledgements: YP was supported by SHODH fellowship, Govt. Of Gujarat. The authors are thankful to Dr. K.J. Ganatra, Principal of the  M.V.M Science & Home Science College, Rajkot for providing necessary permissions and support during research work.

 

 

Abstract:  Baya Weaver Ploceus philippinus is a highly social and gregarious bird of the family Ploceidae that has been recently listed as ‘Least Concern’ by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. In India, four species of genus Ploceus are reported to date. This study focused on the appearance, distribution, diet specificity, nesting ecology, mating behaviour, and physiological responses to seasonal changes of P. philippinus. Populations have declined due to poor cultivation practices by farmers, rapid urbanization, and industrialization that have resulted in habitat loss. Weaver birds also face threats due to natural predators such as birds, and from insect damage to chicks, eggs, and nests.

 

Keywords: Diet specificity, Least Concern, mating behaviour, nesting ecology, threats, Weaver Bird.

 

 

 

Introduction

 

Baya Weaver Ploceus philippinus is a docile, intelligent, and gregarious sparrow-sized bird that is popularly known for excellent nest-weaving skills (Quader 2006). In 1760, the French zoologist Mathurin Jacques Brisson included a description of the Baya Weaver in his book of ornithology that was based on a specimen that he believed had been collected in the Philippines. Linnaeus (1766) provided a brief description of the Baya Weaver, citing the elongated description of Brisson, and repeated the locality as the Philippines. More than a century later, Hartert (1902) realized that the Baya Weaver does not occur in the Philippines and suggested the type locality should be Ceylon (Sri Lanka). This species is now placed in the genus Ploceus that was introduced by the French naturalist Georges Cuvier in 1816. India is home to four Ploceus (Lack 1954, 1968; Grewal et al. 2016; Grimmett et al. 2016): Black-breasted Weaver P. benghalensis, Streaked Weaver P. manyar, Finn’s Weaver P. megarhynchus, and Baya Weaver P. philippinus.  There are many works on nesting and population ecology (Quader 2005, 2006; Borges et al. 2002; Raju 2009; Pandian & Ahimas 2018; Kumar et al. 2018; Pandian 2022), but a combined review has not been prepared to date. This review provides baseline information about the nesting, mating, and population ecology, in addition to conservation status.

 

 

Material and Methods

 

Available literature was scrutinised for the ecological and conservation studies of Baya Weaver P. philippinus. Old articles were obtained from the Biodiversity Library and open source/online publications. References were collected from various institute libraries and recognised web-based literature. For the present study, 78 articles and books were screened for Baya Weaver studies including aspects such as nesting, mating, population ecology, and conservation status.

 

Appearance

Female and nonbreeding male: A male and female looks similar in nonbreeding season males exhibit brighter and more vibrant colours during the breeding season (Inskipp et al. 2011). The non-breeding male Baya Weaver boasts a yellow head cap, adorned with fine darker shaft streaks, while its mantle feathers exhibit a central brown hue complemented by distinct yellow margins. The tail and wings are dark brown with lighter margins. On the tertials, margins of the outer vanes are buffy to rusty while they are yellow-olive on the secondaries forming an unobtrusive wing panel. The throat is light brown, the breast yellow and the belly is light yellowish to whitish while the flanks are rather buffy. In addition, tarsi and toes are horn-coloured (Stiels & Schidelko 2013).

Breeding male: The males assumed bright golden yellow plumage on the crown, nape, breast, and sides of the neck. The bill was pale yellow in the non-breeding season but turned blackish in April and became black between May and October (Narasimhacharya et al. 1988).

Distribution in India: Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Goa, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal, Gujarat (Arigela et al. 2021).

Wider distribution: Java & Sumatra (Indonesia) (Wood 1926), Pakistan, Bangladesh, Thailand, Malaysia, and Sri Lanka (Ali & Ripley 1999), and Afghanistan (Stiels & Schidelko 2013).

Food preference: P. philippinus feeds on wider varieties of herbs as annotated in the Table 1.  These birds forage in flocks for grains in cultivated fields and sometimes this bird is considered an agricultural pest (Sengupta 1974; Kale et al. 2014) but, in contrast, they also feed on different insects which are causing damage to the cultivated crops (Arigela et al. 2021). 

 

Nesting ecology of P. philippinus

Nest construction pattern and its stages: The Baya Weaver P. philippinus, has been considered an architectural genius for the delicate craftsmanship of building intricate pendant nests. The nest of P. philippinus is pendulous, suspended to leaf tips, mono-storied, stalked, and retort shaped with a central nesting chamber and long vertical tube that leads to a side entrance to the chamber (Venkataramani 1981). Wood (1926) mentioned that weaver birds instead of building a nest once or twice in a year they reuse the old nest by repairing it, Raju (2009) reported that male Weaver birds constructed a new nest because of old ones may fall along with the leaf during an annual leaf fall. The Weaver bird rarely constructs a stalk-less nest because such nests are hardly ever excepted by the female weaver bird (Sharma 1995). There are five stages in the construction of a nest initial attachment, roof and egg/brood chamber, antechamber, entrance, and entrance tube (Raju 2009). Nest building was initiated by winding strands of grass around a selected twig until firm support was secured. A bunch of strands was then woven to form a ‘wad’ which was further expanded into an initial ring. The initial ring was then built up to form a helmet-shaped nest. Gradually, an egg chamber was added to the helmet and, at this stage, the bird’s nest-building activity slowed down. Nest building only continued if the partially completed nest was accepted by the female weaver bird, Once the nest was accepted, a long entrance tube was added marking the completion of nest construction (Narasimhacharya et al. 1987).

Nest building material: The nest-building material used by this bird may vary according to the locality in India. Most often they use herbs of the family Poaceae as a nest-building material (Table 2). Baya weaver also preferred to build nests close to the power cable, roads and human dwellings (Pandian 2022).

Nest orientation: Borges et al. (2002) reported that the orientation of most of the nests is towards the east, while very few nests are oriented towards the south and north direction and no single nest oriented to west direction. Mean nest-entrance orientation was generally opposite to wind direction so as to be least affected by the south-west monsoon wind (Davis 1971; Pandian 2021a). It was reported that 40% of nest colonies in Rajasthan (Sharma 1990) and 89% of nests in Tindivanam taluka (Pandian & Ahimas 2018), 70% nests towards the east in Villupuram district and 81% of nests in Arakkonam taluka, Tamil Nadu (Pandian 2022) were oriented towards the east probably to protect their nests from the battering south-west monsoon winds.

Nesting platforms: In India, there is a wide variety of plants available to serve the purpose of nesting platforms for the P. philippinus (Ali & Ambedkar 1957; Ambedkar 1958). Availability of nesting materials, surrounding biological environment, temperature, light intensity, humidity, etc., restrict the nest selection of birds (Asokan et al. 2008). Psychic factor such as photoperiodic sensitivity also influence the nest site selection (Welty 1982). A regional bias seems to exist in the choice of certain plant species for nesting by the weaver bird, one of the reasons proposed for such a choice is the protection against intruders provided by the different plant species (Borges et al. 2002). A taking priority over the availability of food and nesting fibres has considered as a primitive factor for selection of nesting site.  (Davis 1974). The nesting sites in the fields were always located near a water supply such as irrigation wells, rivers, lakes, ponds, and sewage stagnant water, and in urban areas underneath shady trees (Kumar et al. 2018; Pandian 2022). The apparent bias in the selection of plant species observed in various regions of the subcontinent raises the question of whether this reflects a genuine preference or is simply a consequence of their widespread occurrence in the region. The bird’s selection criteria for nesting plants may involve choosing those with tall, sturdy, unbranched trunks, and a crown of swaying fronds. This choice not only provides protection against intruders, rain, and wind but also serves as a means of seeking attention from female weaver birds (Davis 1974). Among the various preferred nesting platforms (Table 3), some of them are also used for roosting and foraging.  These birds move in flock to the sugarcane crops and Prosopis juliflora for roosting and foraging purposes (Pandian 2021b).

 

Mating Behaviour

Mate and nest choice: In many species of weaverbirds, males display their nests to females, suggesting that females may use nests for mate choice (Quader 2005). After the completion of the nest up to the wad stage, females arrive and visit several nests before pairing. Female choice of mates has been presumed to be based largely on the color; material and quality of the available nest (Collias & Collias 1964b, 1984; Crook 1960; Narasimhacharya et al. 1987). Female choice of the site may be influenced by both wind direction and safety from predation (Quader 2003). Most helmets were never made into complete nests and hence nest completion is a good indicator of female choice (Quader 2006). Ambedkar (1964) and Crook (1964) reported that the nest at a higher height is safer from predation than lower-heightened nests. Nest height is believed to be an important influence on nesting success in birds (Martin 1993) within tree nesting species, predation tends to decrease with height (Cresswell 1997; Schmidt & Whelan 1999). Both males and females are polygamous. Males usually build partial nests and complete them only after courting females (Ali et al. 1956). The male may build another helmet to attract another female. If a helmet is not accepted by any female the male often tears it down and builds a new one in its place (Abdar 2013). Quader (2006) found that several aspects of nest location (tree type, diameter of branch, nest height) and nest architecture (fibre thickness) predict direct benefit to females when nesting date and year are statistically controlled.

Breeding season: The Baya Weaver breeds during the rainy season (monsoon) in the Indian subcontinent (Ali & Ripley 1987). The breeding period of the Baya Weaver is largely based on seasonal changes and the availability of the diet. Food availability is preferably dependent on environmental factors such as temperature and rainfall and its ultimate cause to control seasonal breeding (Baker 1938; Immelmann 1971).

Physiological Responses to seasonal changes: The reproductive activity stimulates responses to the photoperiod (Thapliyal & Saxena 1964; Singh & Chandola 1981) as increasing day length during the pre-monsoon season. The stimulation of gonadotropic hormones in P. phillipinus such as leutinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone level varies in response to day length (Thapliyal & Saxena 1964; Stokkan & Sharp 1980) as its concentration increases during the month of April and May and highest between June and September (Narasimhacharya et al. 1987). The expression of gonadotropin inhibiting hormone is high on short days when the duration of nocturnal melatonin is increased, and low on long days when the duration of nocturnal melatonin is decreased (Ubuka et al. 2005). The environmental factors also contributed to the ecological significance via accompanying pre-breeding sexual changes and behaviour (Morley 1943; Sharp et al. 1986). A pre-nuptial molt occurred between March and June and a post-nuptial molt between October and November (Narasimhacharya et al. 1987). The lightning of the bill color starts to cause in August and its turns to a complete straw color in November and depigmented their plumage to the non-breeding type (Rani et al. 2007; Pandey & Bhardwaj 2015). The alteration in night light as a bright light during the night alters the resting pattern of this bird it induced a fragmented activity in the early phase of night and enhancement at late night instead of the actual onset of the day (Raap et al. 2015; Touitou et al. 2017; Kumar et al. 2018). The midnight activity increases in presence of bright light due to advancement in the endogenous clock function as the suppression level of melatonin and increased body temperature (Kumar et al. 2002; Jong et al. 2015; Kumar et al. 2018). An endogenous clock system sensitive to light enables the bird to synchronize its physiological activities at the appropriate time of the day and time of the year (Kumar & Follett 1993a; Kumar et al. 1996).

Clutch size and coloration: The female lay 2–4 white eggs and incubates them for 14–17 days. (Ali & Ambedkar 1957). Two eggs per nest were observed by Venkatramani (1981) and Sharma (1995).

 

Threats 

Pandian (2021b) reported that farmers are the prime reason behind the declining population of the Ploceus philippinus in India. They burn herbs and shrubs under nest supporting trees and by clearing grasses around irrigation wells which may cause the scarcity of the nesting substrata for the P. philippinus. Individuals of Rufous treepie damage the nest of the weaver birds by driving a circular hole over the nest and predating the egg and chicks and it is also damaged by other bird species such as Corvus splendens, Corvus macrorhynchos, Dicrurus macrocercus, and Eudynamys scolopaceus (Ali 1931; Pandian 2021a, 2022). Ali et al. (1957) observed that the predation by House Crow Corvus splendens (Passeriformes: Corvidae) is very common. Pandian (2022) reported that 1,050 nests had fallen during their study period among various sites in Tamil Nadu, it has been found that total of 25 eggs and 18 dead chicks were spread near fallen nests may  due to various biotic and abiotic factors as suggested by Ali et al. (1957), Collias & Collias (1959, 1962), and Pandian (2021b). Rapid urbanization and industrialization have resulted in declining areas of cultivation up to 20%, particularly cereal crops, thus causing lack of food grains and insect fauna to P. philippinus (Pandian 2018). The presence of heavy metal contamination in excreta has indicated that it might have a negative impact on the abundance of Baya Weaver in Punjab state (Sidhu & Kler 2021). Ploceus philippinus has most recently been assessed for The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species in 2016 as ‘Least Concern’ (Birdlife International 2016).

 

 

Conclusion

 

This study provides information about appearance, food specificity, nesting ecology, and mating behaviour of the P. philippinus. It is found that a small sparrow sized weaver bird shows sexual dimorphism in appearance. They mostly prefer a wider variety of herbs species in their diet as it perennially found during all seasons but highly flourish during cold season. Along with the food availability some physiological changes bring a seasonal breeding bird. These birds are famous for their nest weaving practices, it can be considered as a nidificate architect.  Species specific studies and detailed knowledge of local bird population can greatly help in effective management measures, as several scientific aspects covered by the many initiators among diverse countries. It can help to bridge gaps in knowledge and benefit the future survival of a population of P. philippinus in the threatened environment. However, this review could act as a baseline for further research on ecology of P. philippinus.

 

 

Table 1. Details about the food specificity of Ploceus philippinus.

 

Plant type

Family

Scientific name

1

Herb

Poaceae

Acrachne racemosa (B. Heyne ex Roth) Ohwi

2

Herb

Poaceae

Alloteropsis cimicina (L.) Stapf

3

Herb

Poaceae

Arundinella pumila (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Steud.

4

Herb

Poaceae

Arundinella setosa Trin.

5

Herb

Poaceae

Brachiaria eruciformis (Sm.) Griseb.

6

Herb

Poaceae

Brachiaria remota (Retz.) Haines

7

Herb

Poaceae

Brachiaria semiundulata (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf

8

Herb

Poaceae

Cyrtococcum trigonum (Retz.) A. Camus

9

Herb

Poaceae

Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.) Willd.

10

Herb

Poaceae

Diplachne fusca (L.) P. Beauv. ex Roem. & Schult.

11

Herb

Poaceae

Echinochloa colona (L.) Link

12

Herb

Poaceae

Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.

13

Herb

Poaceae

Echinochloa esculenta (A. Braun) H. Scholz

14

Herb

Poaceae

Echinochloa frumentacea Link

15

Herb

Poaceae

Echinochloa oryzoides (Ard.) Fritsch

16

Herb

Poaceae

Echinochloa picta (J. Koenig) P.W. Michael

17

Herb

Poaceae

Echinochloa stagnina (Retz.) P. Beauv.

18

Herb

Cyperaceae

Eleocharis dulcis (Burm. f.) Trin. ex Hensch.

19

Herb

Poaceae

Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.

20

Herb

Poaceae

Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.

21

Herb

Poaceae

Eriochloa fatmensis (Hochst. & Steud.) Clayton

22

Herb

Poaceae

Eriochloa procera (Retz.) C.E. Hubb.

23

Herb

Poaceae

Hymenachne amplexicaulis (Rudge) Nees

24

Herb

Juncaceae

Juncus bufonius L.

25

Herb

Juncaceae

Juncus effusus L.

26

Herb

Juncaceae

Juncus inflexus L.

27

Herb

Juncaceae

Juncus prismatocarpus R.Br.

28

Herb

Poaceae

Leptochloa chinensis (L.) Nees

29

Herb

Poaceae

Leptochloa panicea (Retz.) Ohwi

30

Herb

Poaceae

Leptochloa uniflora Hochst. ex A. Rich.

31

Herb

Poaceae

Oryza rufipogon Griff.

32

Herb

Poaceae

Oryza sativa L.

33

Herb

Poaceae

Panicum brevifolium L.

34

Herb

Poaceae

Panicum curviflorum Hornem.

35

Herb

Poaceae

Panicum humile Steud.

36

Herb

Poaceae

Panicum miliaceum L.

37

Herb

Poaceae

Panicum notatum Retz.

38

Herb

Poaceae

Panicum paludosum Roxb.

39

Herb

Poaceae

Panicum repens L.

40

Herb

Poaceae

Panicum sparsicomum Nees ex Steud.,

41

Herb

Poaceae

Panicum sumatrense Roth

42

Herb

Poaceae

Paspalum distichum L.

43

Herb

Poaceae

Paspalum scrobiculatum L.

44

Herb

Poaceae

Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.

45

Herb

Poaceae

Sacciolepis indica (L.) Chase

46

Herb

Poaceae

Sacciolepis myosuroides (R. Br.) Chase ex E.G. Camus & A. Camus

47

Herb

Poaceae

Setaria geminata (Forssk.) Veldkamp

48

Herb

Poaceae

Setaria intermedia Roem. & Schult.

49

Herb

Poaceae

Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.

50

Herb

Poaceae

Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult.

51

Herb

Poaceae

Setaria punctata (Burm. f.) Veldkamp

52

Herb

Poaceae

Setaria verticillata (L.) P. Beauv.

53

Subshrub

Solanaceae

Solanum diphyllum L.

54

Herb

Poaceae

Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench

55

Herb

Poaceae

Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.

56

Herb

Poaceae

Sporobolus coromandelianus (Retz.) Kunth

57

Herb

Poaceae

Sporobolus diandrus (Retz.) P. Beauv.

58

Herb

Poaceae

Triticum aestivum L.

59

Herb

Poaceae

Triticum turgidum L. subsp. dicoccum (Schrank ex Schübl.) Thell.

60

Herb

Poaceae

Urochloa deflexa (Schumach.) H. Scholz

61

Herb

Poaceae

Urochloa distachya (L.) T.Q. Nguyen

62

Herb

Poaceae

Urochloa kurzii (Hook. f.) T.Q. Nguyen

63

Herb

Poaceae

Urochloa maxima (Jacq.) R.D. Webster

64

Herb

Poaceae

Urochloa mutica (Forssk.) T.Q. Nguyen

65

Herb

Poaceae

Urochloa panicoides P. Beauv.

66

Herb

Poaceae

Urochloa ramosa (L.) T.Q. Nguyen

67

Herb

Poaceae

Urochloa reptans (L.) Stapf

68

Herb

Poaceae

Urochloa setigera (Retz.) Stapf

69

Herb

Poaceae

Urochloa trichopus (Hochst.) Stapf

Subramanyam (2017), Surender et al. (2018), Arigela (2021), Pandian (2022).

 

 

Table 2. Annotated list of the nest building material used by P. philippinus.

 

 

Habit

Family

Scientific Name

1

Subshrub

Poaceae

Arundo donax L.

2

Shrub

Poaceae

Bambusa bambos (L.) Voss

3

Tree

Arecaceae

Borassus flabellifer L.

4

Tree

Arecaceae

Caryota urens L.

5

Herb

Poaceae

Chrysopogon zizanioides (L.) Roberty

6

Tree

Arecaceae

Cocos nucifera L.

7

Herb

Cyperaceae

Cyperus alopecuroides Rottb.

8

Herb

Cyperaceae

Cyperus articulatus L.

9

Herb

Cyperaceae

Cyperus corymbosus Rottb.

10

Herb

Cyperaceae

Cyperus digitatus Roxb.

11

Herb

Cyperaceae

Cyperus exaltatus Retz.

12

Herb

Cyperaceae

Cyperus pangorei Rottb.

13

 

Arecaceae

Dypsis lutescens (H.Wendl.) Beentje & J. Dransf.

14

Herb

Poaceae

Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.

15

Herb

Poaceae

Echinochloa esculenta (A. Braun) H. Scholz

16

Herb

Poaceae

Echinochloa frumentacea Link

17

Herb

Poaceae

Echinochloa oryzoides (Ard.) Fritsch

18

Herb

Poaceae

Echinochloa picta (J. Koenig) P.W. Michael

19

Herb

Poaceae

Echinochloa stagnina (Retz.) P. Beauv.

20

Herb

Cyperaceae

Eleocharis dulcis (Burm. f.) Trin. ex Hensch.

21

Herb

Poaceae

Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.

22

Herb

Poaceae

Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.

23

Herb

Poaceae

Eragrostis atrovirens (Desf.) Trin. ex Steud.

24

Herb

Poaceae

Eragrostis gangetica (Roxb.) Steud.

25

Herb

Poaceae

Eragrostis japonica (Thunb.) Trin.

26

Herb

Poaceae

Eragrostis nutans (Retz.) Nees ex Steud.

27

Herb

Poaceae

Eragrostis riparia (Willd.) Nees

28

Herb

Poaceae

Eragrostis tenuifolia (A. Rich.) Hochst. ex Steud.

29

Herb

Poaceae

Eriochloa fatmensis (Hochst. & Steud.) Clayton

30

Herb

Poaceae

Eriochloa procera (Retz.) C.E. Hubb.

31

Herb

Poaceae

Ischaemum afrum (J.F. Gmel.) Dandy

32

Herb

Poaceae

Oryza sativa L.

33

Herb

Poaceae

Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.

34

Tree

Arecaceae

Phoenix sylvestris (L.) Roxb.

35

Herb

Poaceae

Phragmites karka (Retz.) Trin. ex Steud.

36

Herb

Poaceae

Pogonatherum paniceum (Lam.) Hack.

37

Tree

Arecaceae

Roystonea regia O.F.Cook

38

Herb

Poaceae

Saccharum spontaneum L.

39

Herb

Poaceae

Saccharum officinarum L.

40

Herb

Poaceae

Sacciolepis interrupta (Willd.) Stapf

41

Herb

Poaceae

Setaria verticillata (L.) P. Beauv.

42

Herb

Poaceae

Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench

43

Herb

Poaceae

Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.

44

Herb

Poaceae

Sorghum nitidum (Vahl) Pers.

45

Herb

Poaceae

Sporobolus diandrus (Retz.) P. Beauv.

46

Herb

Poaceae

Thysanolaena latifolia (Roxb. ex Hornem.) Honda

47

Herb

Poaceae

Triticum aestivum L.

48

Herb

Poaceae

Triticum turgidum L. subsp. dicoccum (Schrank ex Schübl.)

Thell.

49

Herb

Typhaceae

Typha angustifolia L.

50

Herb

Typhaceae

Typha domingensis Pers.

51

 

Typhaceae

Typha elephantina Roxb.

52

Herb

Poaceae

Urochloa maxima (Jacq.) R.D. Webster

53

Herb

Poaceae

Urochloa mutica (Forssk.) T.Q. Nguyen

54

Herb

Poaceae

Urochloa panicoides P. Beauv.

55

Herb

Poaceae

Urochloa trichopus (Hochst.) Stapf

56

Tree

Arecaceae

Wodyetia bifurcata A.K. Irvine

Borges et al. (2002), Arigela (2021), Pandian (2022).

 

 

Table 3. Detail about the nesting platforms preferred by the P. philippinus among the various part of the countries.

 

Type of plant

Host plant

No. of nest

Locality

Reference

1

Unbranched Trees

Borassus flabellifer

247

Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu, India

Pandian (2018)

2

Cocos nucifera

3

Phoenix sylvestris

4

Branched trees

Casuarina equisetifolia

12

5

Ficus benghalensis

6

Azadirachta indica

7

Morinda tinctoria

8

Prosopis juliflora

9

Pithecellobium dulce

10

Shrubs

Phyllanthus reticulatus

7

11

Securinega leucopyrus

12

Twiner

Cissampelos pareira

3

13

Herb

Ruellia prostrata

1

14

Power cables

4

15

Unbranched Trees

Acacia nilotica

--

Western ghat, Maharashtra, India

Abdar (2013)

16

Cycas sphaerica

--

Jalantrakota reserve forest

Raju (2009)

17

Cocos nucifera

244

Agricultural study plot at Chorao an island in the Mandovi estuary in Goa, India.

Borges et al. (2002)

18

Eucalyptus sp.

136

19

Careya arborea

2

20

Saccharum sp.

3

21

Bambusa sp

3

22

Borassus flabellifer

--

Nagapattinam and Tiruvarur District of Tamil Nadu, India.

Asokan et al (2008)

23

Cocos nucifera

--

24

Phoneix psuilla

--

25

Acacia Nilotica

286

Nanded, Maharashtra, India

 

26

Prosopis Juliflora

14

27

Azadirachta Indica 

18

28

Ziziphus mauritiana

41

29

Acacia Karroo

39

30

Mgifera Indica

1

31

Dalbergia Sisooroxh 

13

32

Cocos Nucifera

6

33

Ficus Religiosa

17

34

Borassus fabellife

8304

 

 

Tindivanam, Tamil Nadu, India

 

Pandian (2022)

35

Phoenix sylvestris (Arecaceae)

1083

36

Cocos nucifera (Arecaceae)

1277

37

Prosopis julifora (Fabaceae)

186

38

Morinda tnctoria (Rubiaceae)

64

39

Casuarina equisetfolia

102

40

Phyllanthus retculatu

31

41

Vachellia nilotca (Fabaceae)

41

42

Azadirachta indica (Meliaceae)

39

43

Flueggea leucopyrus

38

44

Ficus benghalensis (Fabaceae)

58

45

Unbranched Trees

Lantana camara (Verbanaceae)

113

Tindivanam, Tamil Nadu, India

 

Pandian (2022)

46

Pithecellobium dulce (Fabaceae)

12

47

Senna siamea

10

48

Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae)

8

49

Ficus religios

3

50

Leucaena leucocephela (Fabaceae)

8

51

Albizia lebbeck (Fabaceae)

21

52

Cortaderia selloana (Poaceae)

12

53

Passifora foetda (Passiforaceae)

1

54

Tamarindus indica (Tamarindus)

1

55

Ehereta pubescens (Boraginaceae)

3

56

Ziziphus oenopolia (Ramnaceae)

1

57

Cocculus carolinu

1

58

Solanum trilobatum (Solanaceae)

1

59

Musa paradisiaca (Musaceae)

1

60

Moringa oleifera (Moringaceae)

4

61

Crop

Cereal grain crop

7477

Pandian (2022)

62

Sugarcane

1641

63

Pulses & oil seeds

767

64

Fallow lands

381

65

Casuarina groves

568

66

Residental area

173

67

Flower crops

106

68

Other groves

273

69

Abnormal nest supporting plant

Borassus fabellifer- female

3682

Pandian (2022)

 

70

Borassus fabellifer- male

2272

71

Cocos nucifera

776

72

Phoenix sylvestris

452

73

Morinda tnctoria

43

74

Prosopis julifora

73

75

Vachellia nilotica

11

76

Azadirachta indica

15

77

Ficus benghalensis

90

78

Flueggea leucopyrus

10

79

Lantana camara

7

Arigela (2021), Abdar (2012), Pandian (2018), Abdar (2013), Raju (2009), Borges et al. (2002), Asokan et al. (2008), Pandian (2022).

 

 

For images - - click here for full PDF

 

 

References

 

Abdar, M.R. (2013). Nesting Ecology of Baya Weaver Ploceus Philippinus (Linnaeus): Passeriformes pp 75–80. In: Jadhav, B., U. Jadhav & U. Bagde. Current Trends in Life Sciences. Lambert Academy Publishing, Saarbrücken, Germany, 209 pp.

Ali, S. & S.D. Ripley (1987). Birds of India and Pakistan. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 737 pp.

Ali, S. & V.C. Ambedkar (1957). Further notes on Baya, Ploceus philippinus (Linn.). Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 54(3): 491–502.

Ali, S. (1931). The nesting habits of the Baya (Ploceus philippinus). Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 4(4): 947–964.

Ali, S., Vijayakumar & V.C. Ambedkar (1956). Notes on the Baya weaver Bird. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 53: 381–389.

Ambedkar, V.C. (1958). Notes on the Baya breeding season. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 55(1): 100–106.

Ambedkar, V.C. (1964). Some Indian Weaver Birds: A Contribution to their Breeding Biology. University of Bombay, Bombay, 75 pp.

Arigela, R.K., R.K. Singh, N. Siddabathula, K. Prasad & B.S. Yadav (2021). Botanical view of the Baya Weaver’s choices in India. Species 22(70): 420–430.

Asokan, S., M.S. Ali & R. Nagarajan (2008). Studies on nest construction and nest microclimate of the Baya Weaver, Ploceus philippinus (Linn.). Journal of Environmental Biology 29: 393–396.

Baker, J.R. (1938). The relation between latitude and breeding seasons in birds. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 108: 557–582.

BirdLife International (2016). Ploceus philippinus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22719005A94606190. Accessed on 08 July 2022. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22719005A96006190.en

Borges, S.D., M. Desai & A.B. Shanbhang (2002). Selection of nest platforms and the differential use of nest building fibers by the Baya Weaver Ploceus philippinus Linn. Tropical Biology 15: 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03946975.2002.10531164

Brisson, M.J. (1760). Ornithology, or a methodical synopsis showing the division of birds into orders. Vol. 3. Joannes-Baptista Bauche, Paris, 734 pp.

Brisson, M.J. (1st ed.) (1760). Ornithology, or method containing the division of birds into orders, sections, genera, species and their varieties. To which has been added an exact description of each species, with the citations of the authors who have dealt with them, the names they have given them, those given to them by different nations, and the common names. Cl. Jean-Baptiste Bauche, Paris, 4: 576 pp.

Collias, N.E. & E.C. Collias (1962). An experimental study of the mechanisms of nest building in a weaver bird. The Auk 79: 568–595.

Collias, N.E. & E.C. Collias (1964). The development of nest building behavior in a weaver bird. The Auk 81: 42–52.

Collias, N.E & E.C. Collias (1964b). Evolution of nest-building in the weaverbirds. University of California Publications in Zoology 73: 1–162.

Collias, N.E. & E.C. Collias (1959). Breeding behaviours of the Black-headed Weaver bird, Textor cucullatus graueri (Hartert), in the Belgian Congo. Proceedings of the First Pan-African Ornithological Congress, Ostrich, Suppl. No. 3: 233–241.

Collias, N.E. & E.C. Collias (1984). Nest building and bird behaviour. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 358 pp.

Cresswell, W. (1997). Nest predation: the relative effects of nest characteristics, clutch size and parental behaviour. Animal Behaviour 53(1): 93–103.

Crook, J.H. (1960). Studies on the reproductive behavior of the Baya Weaver bird Ploceus philippinus (Linn.). Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 57(1): 1–44.

Crook, J.H. (1964). The evolution of social Organisation and visual communication in the weaver birds (Ploceinae). Brill – book. 178 pp.

Cuvier, G. (1816). The Animal Kingdom distributed according to its organization: to serve as a basis for the natural history of animals and an introduction to comparative anatomy (in French), 3rd edition, Vol. 1. Déterville, Paris, 383 pp.

Davis, T.A. (1971). Variation in nest structure of the common weaver birds P. philippinus of India. Forma et functio 4: 225–239.

Davis, T.A. (1974). Selection of nesting trees and the frequency of nest visits by Baya weaver bird. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 71(3): 356–366.

Grewal, B., S. Sen., S. Singh., N. Devasar & G. Bhatia (2016). A pictorial field guide to birds of India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Om Book International, Noida, 792 pp.

Grimmett, R., C. Inskipp & T. Inskipp (1998). Birds of the Indian Subcontinent, 1st edition. Christopher Helm, A & C Black, London, 888 pp.

Grimmett, R., C. Inskipp & T. Inskipp (2016). Birds of the Indian Subcontinent: India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and the Maldives. Bloomsbury Publishing, India, 448 pp.

Hartert, E. (1902). On birds from Pahang, eastern Malay Peninsula. Novitates Zoologicae 9: 537–580. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22719005A94606190.en

Immelmann, K. (1971). Ecological aspects of periodic reproduction. Avian biology 1: 341–389.

Inskipp, C., R. Allen., T. Inskipp & R. Grimmett (2011). Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. United Kindom: Christopher Helm, 528 pp.

Jong, M., L. Jeninga, J.Q. Ouyang, K. Oers, K. Spoelstra & M.E. Visser (2015). Dose-dependent responses of avian daily rhythms to artificial light at night. Physiology and Behavior 155: 172–179.

Kale, M.A., N. Dudhe, R. Kasambe & P. Bhattacharya (2014). Crop Depredation by Birds in Deccan Plateau, India. International Journal of Biodiversity 2014: 8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/947683

Kumar, J., S. Malik., S.K. Bhardwaj & S. Rani (2018). Bright light at night alters the perception of daylength in Indian weaver bird (Ploceus philippinus). Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology 329(8–9): 488–496.

Kumar, V. & B.K. Follett (1993a). The nature of photoperiodic clock in vertebrates. Proceeding Zoological Society of Calcutta, J.B.S. Haldane Commemoration Volume: 217–227.

Kumar, V., S. Singh, M. Misra, S. Malik & S. Rani (2002). Role of melatonin in photoperiodic time measurement in the migratory redheaded bunting (Emberiza bruniceps) and the nonmigratory Indian weaver bird (Ploceus philippinus). Journal of Experimental Zoology 292: 277–286.

Lack, D. (1954). The natural regulation of animal numbers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 343 pp.

Lack, D. (1968). Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. Methuen and Co., London, 409 pp.

Linnaeus, C. (1766). The system of nature through the three kingdoms of nature, according to classes, orders, genera, species, with characters, differences, synonyms, places, Vol 1, 12th edition reformed. Lawrence Salvius, Holmiae, 532 pp.

Martin, T.E. (1993). Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: revising the dogmas. The American Naturalist 141(6): 897–913.

Mohanathan, P. & A. Preston (2018). Nesting behavior of the Baya weaver bird, Ploceus philippinus (Linnaeus) (Passeriformes: Ploceidae) in rural Tamil Nadu, India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 44(1): 33–42.

Morley, A. (1943). Sexual behaviour in British birds from October to January. IBIS International journal of avian science 85: 132–158.

Narasimhacharya, A.V.R.L. (1987). Investigations on hormonal factors integument and certain aspects of breeding biology of the male Indian baya weaver bird Ploceus philippinus l. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Bio Science, Sardar Patel University, 215 pp.

Narasimhacharya, A.V.R.L., V.C. Kotak & P.J. Sharp (1988). Environmental and hormonal interactions in the regulation of seasonal breeding in free-living male Indian baya weaver birds (Ploceus philippinus). Journal of Zoology 215(2): 239–248.

Pandey, R.K. & S.K. Bhardwaj (2015). Photoperiodic regulation of seasonal responses in Indian weaver bird (Ploceus philippinus). Biological Rhythm Research 46(4): 483–495.

Pandian, M. & P. Ahimaz (2018). Nesting behavior of the Baya Weaver Bird, Ploceus philippinus (Linnaeus) (Passeriformes: Ploceidae) in rural Tamil Nadu, India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 44(1): 33–42.

Pandian, M. (2018). Baya Weaver Bird: Nest colonies and abnormal nests of Ploceus philippinus in Tindivanam Taluk, Tamil Nadu, India. Bird-o-soar. In: Zoo’s Print 33(12): 15–27.

Pandian, M. (2021a). Nesting habits of Baya Weaver Ploceus philippinus (Linnaeus, 1776) in rural Arakkonam Taluk, Vellore district, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 118: 03–17.

Pandian, M. (2021b). Incidences of White-rumped Munia occupying the nest of Baya Weaver in Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu. Bird-o-soar 65, In: Zoo’s Print 36(1): 07–09.

Pandian, M. (2022). Nesting habits of the Baya Weaver Ploceus philippinus (Linnaeus, 1766) in the agricultural landscape of Tindivanam, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 14(5): 20970–20987. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7762.14.5.20970-20987

Quader, S. (2003). Nesting and mating decisions and their consequences in the Baya Weaverbird Ploceus philippinus. PhD Thesis. Graduate School, University of Florida, 116 pp.

Quader, S. (2005). Elaborate Nests in a Weaver birds: Arole for female choice? Ethology 111: 1073–1088.

Quader, S. (2006). Sequential settlement by nesting male and female Baya weaverbirds Ploceus philippinus: the role of monsoon winds. Journal of Avian Biology 37:396–404.

Raap, T., R. Pinxten & M. Eens (2015). Light pollution disrupts sleep-in free-living animals. Science Reports 5(8): 13557.

Raju, A.J.S. (2009). Nesting behaviourof the Baya Weaver bird, Ploceus philippinus (Ploceidae) and the life-cycle of the Plains Cupidbutterfly, Chilades pandava (Lycaenidae) with thered-listed Cycas sphaerica and C. beddomei (Cycadaceae). Journal of Threatened Taxa 1(8): 429–433. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o21735.429-33

Rani, S., S. Singh & V. Kumar (2007). Photoperiodism, pineal clock and seasonal reproduction in the Indian weaver bird (Ploceus philippinus). Journal of Ornithology 148(2): 601–610.

Schmidt, K.A. & C.J. Whelan (1999). Nest placement and mortality: is nest predation a random event in space and time? The Condor 101(4): 916–920. https://doi.org/10.2307/1370089

Sengupta, S. (1974). The Common Baya (Ploceus philippinus) - a serious pest of agriculture. Current Science 43: 24–125.

Sharma, S.K. (1990). Orientation of nest colonies by Baya Weaver Birds. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 87(3): 454–455.

Sharma, S.K. (1995). A study of abnormal nests of Baya weaver bird Ploceus philippinus (Linn.) in Rajasthan. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 92(1): 67–76.

Sharp, P.J., R. Massa, L. Bottoni, V. Lucini, R.W. Lea, I.C. Dunn & V. Trocchi (1986). Photoperiodic and endocrine control of seasonal breeding in grey partridge (Perdix perdix). Journal of Zoology 209(2): 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1986.tb03575.x

Sidhu, S.K. & T.K.  Kler (2021). Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination in Excreta of Baya Weaver Bird (Ploceus philippinus) from Three Districts of Different Zones of Punjab. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 106(5): 799–804.

Singh, S. & A. Chandola (1981). Photoperiodic control of seasonal reproduction in a tropical weaver bird. Journal of Experimental Zoology 216: 293–298.

Stiels, D. & K. Schidelko (2013). Records of Indian’ Baya Weaver Ploceus philippinus (Linnaeus, 1766) and Hooded Wheatear Oenanthe monacha (Temminck, 1825) from Afghanistan (Aves: Passeriformes). Bonn Zoological bulletin 62(2): 171–176.

Stokkan, K.A. & P.J. Sharp (1980). Seasonal changes in the concentrations of plasma luteinizing hormone and testosterone in willow ptarmigan (Lagopus lagopus lagopus) with observations on the effects of permanent short days. General and Comparative Endocrinology 40: 109–115.

Surender G., R.V. Vasudeva, S.S Mahesh, R.S. Tripati & K. Swamy (2018). Unusual Depredatory Birds in Sunflower and Sorghum. Entomology Ornithology Herpetology: Current research 7: 291. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0983.1000291

Thapliyal, J.P. & R.N. Saxena (1964). Absence of a refractory period in the common Weaver bird. The Condor 66: 199–208.

Touitou, Y., A. Reinberg & D. Touitou (2017). Association between light at night, melatonin secretion, sleep deprivation, and the internal clock: Health impacts and mechanisms of circadian disruption. Life Sciences 173: 94–106.

Ubuka, T., G.E. Bentley, K. Ukena, J.C. Wingfield & K. Tsutsui (2005). Melatonin induces the expression of gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone in the avian brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 3052–3057.

Kumar, V., N. Jain & B.K. Follett (1996). The photoperiodic clock in black headed buntings (Emberizamelanocephala) is mediated by a self-sustaining circadian system. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 179: 59–64.

Venkataramani, K. (1981). Nests of weaver birds on telegraph wires. Newsletter for Birdwatchers 21: 18.

Welty, C.J. (1982). The Life of Birds. W.B. Saunders Co., New York, 754 pp.

Wood, C.A. (1926). The nest of the Baya Weaver bird. The Auk 43(3): 295–302. https://doi.org/10.2307/4075422