Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 June 2022 | 14(6): 21161–21169

 

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7936.14.6.21161-21169

#7936 | Received 27 March 2022 | Final received 01 May 2022 | Finally accepted 10 June 2022

 

 

 

Feather characteristics of Common Myna Acridotheres tristis (Passeriformes: Sturnidae) from India

 

Swapna Devi Ray 1, Goldin Quadros 2, Prateek Dey 3, Padmanabhan Pramod 4  & Ram Pratap Singh 5

 

1,3,4,5 National Avian Forensic Laboratory, 2 Wetland Ecology Division,

Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641108, India.

1,3 Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641046, India.

5 Department of Life Science, School of Earth, Biological and Environmental Sciences, Central University of South Bihar, Gaya,

Bihar 824236, India.

1 swapnadray555@gmail.com, 2 goldinq@gmail.com, 3 pratikdey23@gmail.com, 4 neosacon@gmail.com,

5 rampratapsingh81@gmail.com (corresponding author)

 

 

Abstract: The systematic study of feather microstructure supports species identification, which is important in cases of illegally traded birds and bird-aircraft strikes. Our study focused on morphometric, macro- and micro-characters of feathers of Common Myna Acridotheres tristis from India. Among macro-characters, silver-colored filoplume feathers with pale black pigmentation on the barbs are specific for A. tristis. Morphometric measurements revealed that primary contour feathers (10.8±0.100 cm) were the longest and bristle feathers (1.26±0.051 cm) the shortest among all feathers. The longest (average) barb is found in primary contour feathers (1.875±0.123 cm), and the shortest in filoplume feathers (0.288±0.017 cm). We observed 3 types of nodal structures, and elongated prongs in bristle and filoplume feathers are significant characteristics of A. tristis. These insights into feather microstructures of A. tristis will aid species identification using plumology.

 

Keywords: Micro-structure, macro-structure, morphometry, plumology, Sturnidae.

 

 

 

Editor: P.A. Azeez, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.        Date of publication: 26 June 2022 (online & print)

 

Citation: Ray, S.D., G. Quadros, P. Dey, P. Pramod & R.P. Singh (2022). Feather characteristics of Common Myna Acridotheres tristis (Passeriformes: Sturnidae) from India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 14(6): 21161–21169. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.7936.14.6.21161-21169

 

Copyright: © Ray et al. 2022. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.

 

Funding: This work was supported by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC).

 

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Author details: Swapna Devi Ray is doctoral student of Bharathiar University, Coimbatore and affiliated to SACON. She is a researcher from ecology and environmental Science background. For her doctoral degree she is working on wildlife crime, plumology and molecular markers of avian species at National Avian Forensic Laboratory, SACON.  Dr. Goldin Quadros is working as Principal Scientist at the Wetland Ecology Division of SACON. His area of specialization is the benthic fauna from the intertidal regions of coasts, estuaries and creeks. He is also working as the coordinator of ENVIS Centre at SACON.  Prateek Dey is a doctoral student of Zoology (Avian Genetics) at SACON. He has Integrated MSc in life sciences from Central University of Tamil Nadu. Currently he is working on whole genome sequencing of birds. Dr. Padmanabhan Pramod is a Senior Principal Scientist and head of Nature Education programme at SACON. Over a period of 27 years he has carried out variousresearch projects in the field of ecosystem assessments, eco-development and mitigation measures for the bird hazards to aircrafts. Dr. Ram Pratap Singh is Associate Professor and Head, Department of Life Science at Central University of South Bihar. The primary focus of Dr. Singh’s research is Avian Genetics and Avian Forensic. He established the National Avian Forensic Laboratory and started the Genome Resource Bank at SACON.

 

Author contributions: S.D.R. collected the sample; R.P.S., G.Q. and P.P. conceived the idea and supervised the research; R.P.S., and P.P. generated the funds for the study. S.D.R, G.Q., P.D. and R.P.S. standardized the methodology; S.D.R. generated the data. S.D.R., G.Q. and R.P.S. wrote the manuscript and analyzed the data. All the authors reviewed the manuscript.

 

Acknowledgements: We are thankful to the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) for providing funding to the project. We thank to the Assam Forest Department and the Assam State Biodiversity Board for providing necessary permissions. We are greatly thankful to the field assistance Mr. Niren Singh for his assistance during field works in Assam.

 

 

 

Introduction

 

Feathers cover the body of birds (Gill 2007) and support their survival in a wide range of climatic conditions (Lovette & Fitzpatrick 2016). The study of the microscopic structures of feathers and their systematic description (i.e., plumology) has provided a useful tool in studies of bird evolution (Chandler 1916; Dove 1997), paleontology, archeology, ecology (e.g., examining feeding habits using prey remains) and in the forensic examination of bird strikes (Dove 1997), where feather microstructures support the identification of avian species (Chandler 1916; Lei et al. 2002; Dey et al. 2021). In India only a few recent plumology studies (Dey et al. 2021; Ray et al. 2021) have been reported.

The Common Myna Acridotheres tristis belongs to the family Sturnidae, and is widely distributed across the Indian subcontinent. It is a medium-sized (~25 cm) bird, with no distinct sexual dimorphism (Ali & Ripley 1987; Kannan & James 2020). It is one of the world’s most invasive species as per IUCN (Lowe et al. 2004), and according to Ahmed (2001), A. tristis is among the top five most traded avian species in Indian pet markets and in the illegal pet/avian trade (Ahmed 1997, 2013). A. tristis is sold at a high price in both domestic and international illegal pet markets as Hill Myna Gracula religiosa by disguising its appearance with slight morphological modifications (Ahmed 1997). Without detailed examination it is difficult to distinguish these species (Ahmed, 1997; Lei et al. 2002), and the high demand for G. religiosa in the pet trade has put pressure on population of A. tristis. Plumology can be used to identify these birds from their feather microstructures (Dove 1997; Lei et al. 2002; Lee et al. 2016; Dey et al. 2021; Ray et al. 2021).

In the present study, we have focused on the systematic approach to document qualitative and quantitative feather characteristics of A. tristis useful for identifying species-specific feather signatures. We describe specific microstructures present in both pennaceous and plumulaceous barbs that can be used as baseline data for future plumology studies in India.

 

 

Methods

 

Feathers from a specimen of A. tristis (26.60°N; 93.47°E) were collected during a road-kill survey in September 2019 from adjacent road-stretches of Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India (Figure 1). Permissions were obtained for the collection of avian biological samples from the office of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Assam Forest Department (Ref. no. WL/FG.31/Pt/Technical Committee/2018) and office order (No. 258, date: 11/01/2019) and Assam State Biodiversity Board (Ref. no: ABB/Permission/2012/82). Feathers from the collected individuals were sampled, and macro characteristics, microstructures and morphometric measurements were documented following methods described by Chandler (1916), Dove (1997), and Dey et al. (2021).

Nine different types of pennaceous and plumulaceus feathers were sampled from five different body locations (Image 1) as follows:

Primary contour feathers and secondary contour feathers were collected from the right wing;

Tail contour feathers were collected from the tail region;

Body contour, semiplume, down and powder down feathers were collected from dorsal, ventral, and tail regions.

Modified contour feathers known as bristle feathers were collected from specific locations near the eyes and beak.

Filoplume feathers, which are filamentous in structure, were retrieved from the right wing.

For primary contour, secondary contour, tail contour, body contour, semiplume, down and powder down types of feathers, two numbers from each type from their respective locations were retrieved for the study. Due to the location specificity, five each of bristle and filoplume feathers were collected. A total of 38 different feathers were studied to document macro characteristics and microstructures.

Based on morphometric measurements of rachis, the feathers were divided into three different regions, proximal, intermediate and distal, except for powder down and bristle feathers (Dey et al. 2021). Because of the absence of proper rachis, the powder down and bristle feathers were not divided into the three regions. From each region, five barbs were sampled for slide preparation. Five each of bristle and filoplume feathers were whole-mounted on slides. The slides were prepared using the dry mount method (Ray et al. 2021; Dey et al. 2021).

Feather macro characters were observed by focusing on three main characters: colour, pattern and texture. Morphometric characters were measured from feathers’ photographs for calamus length, vane length and rachis length using imageJ software. The feather microstructures were observed and documented using LaboMed Lx 500 compound light microscope. Slides were observed under 4X, 10X and 40X magnification for different characters, including presence of sub-pennaceous region, presence of villi, shape of villi, presence of nodes, shape of nodes, presence of hooklets, presence of prongs, size of prongs, presence of ventral teeth, shape of internodes, pigmentation on nodes, internodes, and ramus.

 

 

Results

 

Feather macro characters

The feather macro characters documented for A. tristis are presented in Table 1. Feather color varied from black and white to dark brown to pale white and brown, even dark brown with a tinge of white. Only filoplume feathers showed a silvery appearance with pale black colored barbs at the tip. The texture of feathers varied. Flight contour feathers (primary contour, secondary contour and tail contour feathers) and bristles that represent modified contour feathers were firmly rigid, body contour feathers irrespective of their location were semi-rigid, and semiplume, down and powder down feathers were soft and fluffy.

 

Feather morphometry

Calamus length, vane length and rachis length of the nine different types of feathers were measured (Table 2). The primary contour feather from the wing was the longest; the average length for the calamus was 1.45±0.050 cm, vane length 9.35±0.050 cm and rachis 10.8±0.100 cm. Bristles were the shortest feathers, with an average calamus length of 0.26±0.024 cm, average vane length of 1±0.032 cm and average rachis length of 1.26±0.051 cm. The vane and rachis length was not measured for powder down due to the absence of rachis. As there was no quill present in filoplume, only the feather and barb lengths were measured.

The average length of barbs was measured. The longest feather type i.e. primary contour feathers followed with the longest barbs measured as 1.875±0.123 cm while the barbs of filoplume feathers measured as the shortest with 0.288±0.017 cm.  

 

Feather microstructures

The barbs from the nine different feather types of A. tristis were dry-mounted onto slides to observe different microstructures (Table 3) under the microscope that included elongated barbules, distinct nodes, internodes, sub-pennaceous region, villi, prongs, hooklets, ventral teeth, pigmentation and other focused microstructures, elaborated below.

Sub-pennaceous region: The barbs of all the feathers showed the absence of a sub-pennaceous region in both pennaceous and plumulaceous barbules in all feather types.

Villi: Villi are the unique diagnostic microstructural characteristic of passerine birds that extend out from the basal cell of the barbules, only present in the basal cell region of the plumulaceous barbs. The shape of villi was either knobbed or pointed, but sometimes both were present in the basal cells forming finger-like structures (Image 2A–B).

Nodes and their shape: The barbules of all feathers had nodes that were swollen, with three different shapes: plain nodes (Image 2C–D), plain pronged nodes (Image 2E–F) and quadrilobed nodes (Image 2G–H). The plumulaceous barbs have all three node types, which were absent in pennaceous barbs. The quadrilobed nodes were mainly present in the proximal region of barbules (Image 2), while the distal region had plain nodes either with prongs or without prongs. These nodes were present in all the different feather types, except in powder down, bristle and filoplume feathers.

Internode shape: The region between two nodes is the internode, which is straight in shape and present in the barbules of plumulaceous barbs (Image 2C–H).

Prongs and their size: Prongs are present only on the swollen nodes. Nodes with small prongs were present in the plumulaceous barbs of primary contour, secondary contour, tail contour, body contour, semiplume and down feathers. On the nodes of the bristle (Image 2I–J) and filoplume (Image 3K–L) feathers, elongated and large-sized prongs are present. Prongs were totally absent in powder down feathers.

Hooklets: Distinct hooklets were present in pennaceous barbs of primary contour, secondary contour and tail contour feathers, and were present after the basal cells of the barbules (Image 3M–N). Hooklets were completely absent in all plumulaceous barbs of A. tristis.

Ventral teeth: Pennaceous barbs had ventral teeth at the end of basal cells that were less broadened (Image 3O–P).

Pigmentation: Dark pigmentation was mainly present on the nodes where internodes mostly had patchy pigmentation. However, in the semiplume and powder down feathers, nodes had both types of pigmentation (Image 3S–T). Ramus was present with both patchy (Image 3Q) and dark pigmentation (Image 3R).

 

 

Discussion

 

In this study we have documented feather macro-characters, morphometry and microstructures of A. tristis. The colour and texture of feathers mainly depends on their location in the body, and also their functional aspects (Ray et al. 2021). According to Chandler (1916), colour is the most important characteristic in species identification, and we observed silver-colored filoplume feathers with pale black pigmentation on the barbs as a specific character of A. tristis. It must be noted, however, that it is difficult to retrieve filoplume feathers due to their location and almost transparent nature.  Except for the filoplume feathers, we recorded varying colors specific to feather types.

The texture of feathers is known to vary based on their body location and functions, such as flight, thermoregulation, signaling and protection (Lovette & Fitzpatrick 2016). The texture of the feathers of A. tristis mainly comprised of three types: rigid, semi-rigid, and soft and fluffy, associated with flight, protection and thermoregulation respectively. While macro characteristics and morphometric measurements tend to vary according to bird age and sex, the measurements are species-specific (Dove 2000; Lee et al. 2015). Data on feather morphometry can also provide clues about physical size (Lee et al. 2015). The present study provides ranges for feather morphometry of A. tristis that can be used for these purposes.

Several studies have examined the variation of diagnostic feather features among species, and among different feathers (Chandler 1916; Dey 1966; Robertson et al. 1984; Brom 1991; Dove 2000; Dove & Peurach 2002; Lee et al. 2015; Dey et al. 2021; Ray et al. 2021). These studies illustrate that the feather microstructures of a species remain the same irrespective of individual variation (Dove 1997; Lee et al. 2015; Ray et al. 2021). To identify passerine birds, Chandler (1916) stated that the pennaceous barbs would contain three to four hooklets, while Lee et al. (2015) observed the presence of the broadened shape of ventral teeth in A. tristis. However, Lee et al. (2015) cautioned that these microstructures cannot be used as an exclusive character for the identification of species, while Dove (2000) suggested that pigmentation patterns provide diagnostic clues for determining species groups. From our study of A. tristis feathers, we observed that there is no particular uniform pigmentation pattern present in nodes, internodes, and ramus. However, the presence of dark and patchy pigmentation on different shapes of nodes can be used as a micro character for the identification of A. tristis. Also from this study we report three microstructures that can be used in the identification of A. tristis species: (i) the presence of finger-like villi that are distinctively knobbed and pointed on the border of the basal cells, (ii) the presence of all three types of nodes: quadrilobed, pronged and plain, and (iii) the presence of sharply pointed pronged nodes on bristle and filoplume feathers.

 

 

Conclusion

 

Plumology uses feather macro characters, morphometry, and microstructures to aid the identification of order, family and species of birds. During our study we used a systematic approach towards identification of A. tristis. Macro-characters including filoplume feathers helped to identify this as a passerine species, while examination of microstructures including finger-like projection of villi, the presence of three node types and the presence of elongated prongs on the nodes of bristle and filoplume feathers were identified as specific to A. tristis. This study provides feather morphometry measurements for future reference as a baseline for the identification of A. tristis from India.

 

Table 1. Feather macro-characteristics.

 

Feather type

Feather location

Color

Pattern

Texture

1

Primary contour feather

Wing

Black and white

No Pattern

Rigid

2

Secondary contour feather

Wing

Dark brown

No Pattern

Rigid

3

Tail contour feather

Tail

Dark brown with white tinge

No Pattern

Rigid

4

Body Contour

Dorsal

Pale brown

No Pattern

Semi-rigid

5

Body Contour

Ventral

Pale brown

No Pattern

Semi-rigid

6

Semiplume

Dorsal

Pale brown

No Pattern

Soft and fluffy

7

Semiplume

Ventral

Pale brown

No Pattern

Soft and fluffy

8

Semiplume

Tail

White

No Pattern

Soft and fluffy

9

Down

Dorsal

Pale brown

No Pattern

Soft and fluffy

10

Down

Ventral

Pale white

No Pattern

Soft and fluffy

11

Down

Tail

Pale white

No Pattern

Soft and fluffy

12

Powder Down

Dorsal

White

No Pattern

Soft and fluffy

13

Powder Down

Ventral

White

No Pattern

Soft and fluffy

14

Powder Down

Tail

White

No Pattern

Soft and fluffy

15

Bristle

Near Eye and Beak

Black

No Pattern

Rigid

16

Filoplume

 Wings

Silver

No Pattern

Soft

 

 

Table 2. Feather morphometric measurements.

 

Feather type

Feather location

Length (in cm)

Calamus ± S.E.

Vane ± S.E.

Rachis ± S.E.

Barb ± S.E.

1

Primary contour feather

Wing

1.45±0.050

9.35±0.050

10.8±0.100

1.875±0.123

2

Secondary contour feather

Wing

1.35±0.050

7.80±0.000

9.25±0.050

1.821±0.111

3

Tail contour feather

Tail

0.8±0.100

7.3±0.100

8.25±0.050

1.637±0.079

4

Body contour

Dorsal

0.2±0.000

3.85±0.050

4.25±0.050

1.391±0.026

5

Body contour

Ventral

0.35±0.050

4.85±0.050

5.25±0.050

1.646±0.043

6

Semiplume

Dorsal

0.35±0.050

3.40±0.100

3.80±0.100

1.532±0.033

7

Semiplume

Ventral

0.45±0.050

4.51±0.395

4.58±0.425

1.901±0.037

8

Semiplume

Tail

0.45±0.050

4.95±0.150

5.50±0.100

1.034±0.024

9

Down

Dorsal

0.25±0.050

3.15±0.050

3.45±0.050

1.415±0.068

10

Down

Ventral

0.3±0.000

3.45±0.050

3.70±0.100

1.604±0.064

11

Down

Tail

0.2±0.000

3.25±0.050

3.45±0.050

1.078±0.057

12

Powder down

Dorsal

0.2±0.000

N/A

N/A

1.2799±0.046

13

Powder down

Ventral

0.25±0.050

N/A

N/A

1.032±0.043

14

Powder down

Tail

0.25±0.050

N/A

N/A

0.765±0.028

15

Bristle

Near Eye and Beak

0.26±0.024

1±0.032

1.26±0.051

0.316±0.008

16

Filoplume

Wings

N/A

N/A

1.94±0.262

0.288±0.017

 

 

Table 3. Feather microstructures.

 

Feather type

Feather location

Villi

Villi shape

Nodes

Node shape

Prongs

Prong size

Hooklets

Ventral teeth

Internode shape

Pigmentation

0/1

KNB/PNT

0/1

2,3,4

0/1

S/L

0/1

0/1

STR/KNK

Nodes

Internodes

Ramus

1

Wing Feather

Right Wing

1

KNB, PNT

1

2, 3

1

S

1

1

STR

6

5

6

2

Tail Contour

Tail

1

KNB, PNT

1

2, 3

1

S

1

1

STR

6

5

6

3

Body Contour

Dorsal & Ventral

1

KNB, PNT

1

2,3,4

1

S

1

0

STR

6

5

5, 6

4

Semiplume

Dorsal, Ventral & Tail

1

KNB, PNT

1

2,3,4

1

S

0

0

STR

6,5

5

5,6

5

Down

Dorsal, Ventral & Tail

1

KNB, PNT

1

2,3,4

1

S

0

0

STR

6

5

5, 6

6

Powder Down

Dorsal, Ventral & Tail

1

KNB, PNT

1

3

0

NA

0

0

STR

5,6

5

6

7

Bristle

Near eye and beak

1

KNB,PNT

1

2

1

L

0

0

STR

6

5

6

8

Filoplume

Wings

0

NA

1

2

1

L

0

0

STR

5

5

5, 6

0—Absent | 1—Present | KNB—Knobbed | PNT—Pointed | 2—Plain pronged node | 3—Plain unpronged node | 4—Quadrilobed node | S—Small | L—Large | STR—Straight | KNK—Kinked | 5—Patchy pigmentation | 6—Dark pigmentation | NA—Not applicable.

 

 

For figure & images - - click here for full PDF

 

 

References

 

Ali, S. & S.D. Ripley (1987). Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan. Vol. 5. Oxford University Press, Bombay, 278 pp.

Ahmed, A. (1997). Live Bird Trade in Northern India. TRAFFIC India, New Delhi, 104pp.

Ahmed, A. (2001). Fraudulence in Indian live bird trade: An identification monograph for control of illegal trade. TRAFFIC India, New Delhi, 24 pp.

Ahmed A. (2013). ‘WILDLIFE ON SALE’: An insight into the Sonepur Mela, Bihar. TRAFFIC POST 17: 16.

Brom, T. (1991). The diagnostic and phylogentic significance of feather structures. PhD Thesis. Universiteit van Amsterdam, Instituutvoor Taxonomische Zoölogie, University of Amsterdam, viii+277 pp.

Chandler, A.C. (1916). A study of Feathers, with reference to their taxonomic significance. University of California Press, Berkeley, 274 pp.

Day, M.G. (1966). Identification of hair and feather remains in the gut
and faeces of stoats and weasels. Journal of Zoology 148(2): 201–
217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1966.tb02948.x  

Dove, C.J. (1997). Quantification of Microscopic Feather Characters
Used in the Identification of North American Plovers. The Condor
99(1): 47–57.

Dove, C.J. (2000). A Descriptive and Phylogenetic Analysis of Plumulaceous Feather Characters in Charadriiformes. Ornithological Monograph 51: 1-–163.

Dove, C.J. & S.C. Peurach (2002). Microscopic Analysis of Feather and Hair Fragments Associated with Human Mummified Remains from Kagamil Island, Alaska. To the Aleutians and Beyond-The Anthropology of William S. Laughlin. Ethnographical Series 20: 51–62.

Dey, P., S.D. Ray, S.K. Sharma, P. Pramod & R.P. Singh (2021).Identification of a unique barb from the dorsal body contour feathers of the Indian Pitta Pitta brachyura (Aves: Passeriformes: Pittidae). Journal of Threatened Taxa 13(8): 19029–19039. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6362.13.8.19029-19039

Gill, F.B. (2007). Ornithology. Third Edition, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York City, 725 pp.

Kannan, R. & D.A. James (2020). Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis), version 1.0. In; Billerman, S.M. (ed.). Birds of the World. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.commyn.01

Lei, F.M., Y.H. Qu, Y.L. Gan, A. Gebauer & M. Kaiser (2002).The feather microstructure of Passerine sparrows in China. Journal für Ornithologie 143(2): 205–212.

Lowe, S., M. Browne, S. Boudjelas & M. De Poorter (2004). 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species – A Selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. Invasive Species Specialist Group (Species Survival Commission) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN), 12 pp.

Lee, J., S.D. Sarre, L. Joseph & J. Robertson (2016). Microscopic characteristics of the plumulaceous feathers of Australian birds: a preliminary analysis of taxonomic discrimination for forensic purposes. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 48(4): 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2015.107603

Lovette, I.J. & J.W. Fitzpatrick (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of Bird Biology. John Wiley & Sons, UK, 716 pp.

Robertson, J., C. Harkin & J. Govan (1984). The identification of bird feathers. Scheme for feather examination. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 24(2): 85-–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-7368 (84)72301-2

Robertson, G.R. (2002). Birds of a feather stick: microscopic feather residues on stone artifacts from Deep Creek Shelter, New South Wales, pp. 175–182. Proceedings of the 2001 Australian Archaeological Assoc Annual Conference, Tempus, Anthropology Museum, The University of Queensland.

Ray, S.D., P. Dey, N. Islam, S.K.S. Sharma, P. Pramod & R.P. Singh (2021). Comparative study of Yellow-billed Babbler (Turdoides affinis) feather reveals uniformity in their microstructure among individuals. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 9(1): 51–64. https://doi.org/10.18006/2021.9(1).51.64