Frugivory and seed dispersal by the Asian Elephant Elephas maximus in the tropical forests of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, southern India
Nagarajan Baskaran 1 &
Ajay A. Desai 2
1,2 Bombay Natural History Society, Hornbill
House, S.B. Singh Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400001, India
1 Present address: Department of Zoology and
Wildlife Biology, A.V.C. College (Autonomous), Mannampandal,Mayiladuthurai, Tamil Nadu 609305, India.
2 Present address: BC 84 Camp, Belgaum,
Karnataka 590001, India
1 nagarajan.baskaran@gmail.com (corresponding
author), 2 ajayadesai.1@gmail.com
Abstract: Seed dispersal plays a potential role in plant species demographic
processes. Elephants are important seed-dispersing agents. We studied frugivoryand seed dispersal by Asian Elephants in the tropical deciduous and thorn
forests of the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, southern
India. We determined fruit
consumption based on the presence of seeds and fruit remnants in elephant dung
piles. In total, we identified seeds of eight plant species belonging to seven
families in 16% out of 455 dung piles examined between 1991 and 2004. Coinciding with a peak fruiting season
in the study area, seeds and other fruit parts appeared in the dung piles
significantly more frequently during the dry season than in the wet seasons
(southwest and northeast monsoons). Owing to differences in fruit species abundance in different habitats,
there was more evidence of fruit consumption in the dry thorn than in the dry
and moist deciduous forests. This
corresponds with insufficient grass availability in thorn forests during the
dry season and an increase in browse consumption as a supplementary diet. Seeds of Tamarindus indica and Acacia intsiawere found in elephant dung more frequently than other species. Seed and fruit
remnants were found in almost an equal number of dung piles of both bulls and
herds.
Keywords: Asian Elephant, fruit consumption, seed
dispersal, southern India.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2848.4893-7 | ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:687E643B-A057-4721-A448-048C4F263D76
Editor: Meena Venkataraman, Mumbai, India. Date of
publication: 26 October 2013 (online & print)
Manuscript details: Ms #
o2848 | Received 25 June 2011 | Final received 03 October 2013 | Finally
accepted 05 October 2013
Citation: Baskaran, N. & A.A. Desai (2013).Frugivory and seed dispersal by the Asian
Elephant Elephas maximusin the tropical forests of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve,
southern India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 5(14): 4893–4897; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2848.4893-7
Copyright: © Baskaran& Desai 2013. Creative Commons
Attribution 3.0 Unported License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium,
reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and
the source of publication.
Funding: United States Fish and Wildlife
Service and Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India.
Competing Interest: The
authors declare no competing interests. Funding sources had no role in study
design, data collection, results interpretation and manuscript writing.
Acknowledgements: We thank the Forest Departments of Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala for
permission to carry out the study. We also thank the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India, for
financial support. We are thankful
to Late Mr. J.C Daniel, Bombay Natural History
Society for his encouragement and support during the project
The publication of this article is
supported by the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF), a joint initiative
of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the
European Commission, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of
Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank.
For images, tables -- click here
Seed dispersal plays
a potential role in plant species demographic processes such as predation,
germination, growth and reproduction (Nathan & Muller-Landau 2000). Elephants are important seed-dispersing
agents (Alexander 1978; Lieberman et al. 1987; Chapman et al. 1992). Being a wide-ranging animal that
consumes large quantities of fruits and defecating intact seeds, the elephant
not only disperses the seeds but also carries them farther away from the parent
trees where they would otherwise suffer higher mortality from density-dependent
factors (Barnes 1996) and high predation (Janzen 1970; Connell 1971). Seeds passing through the gut of
mammalian frugivores may have a greater probability
of seed germination (Willson 1993) while elephant
dung also promotes the establishment of seedlings by providing a suitable
nutritive medium (Ridley 1930; Coughenour & Delting 1986; Dinerstein & Wemmer 1988; Campos-Arceiz et al.
2008) and protection from desiccation (Kitamura et al. 2007). Thus, elephants are regarded as the
largest frugivore and the “mega-gardener” of the
forest (Campos-Arceiz & Blake 2011). Fruits form a part of elephants’ diet in
both Africa (Merz 1981; Short 1981; Lieberman et al.
1987; White et al. 1993; Tchamba & Seme 1993; Feer 1995) and Asia
(Oliver 1978; Sukumar 1989; McKay 1990; Sivaganesan & Johnsingh 1995;
Kitamura et al. 2007; Campos-Arceiz et al. 2008;
Campos-Arceiz 2009; Roy 2009). A large number of studies focus on the
feeding behaviour of Asian Elephants in India (Sukumar1989; Sivaganesan & Johnsingh1995; Baskaran 1998; Roy 2009; Baskaranet al. 2010) but none of them have specifically focused on frugivoryand seed dispersal. This paper
reports the frugivory and seed dispersal by Asian
Elephants in the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, southern
India.
Study Area
The study was carried
out in the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, southern India
(1005’–12015’N & 7600’–77015’E),
extending over 5,520km2, between 1992–1994 and
2000–2004. Within the
Biosphere Reserve, the study focused on the elephants’ frugivoryand seed dispersal in the Mudumalai Wildlife
Sanctuary (at present a Tiger Reserve), NilgiriNorth, Sathiyamangalam and Coimbatore forest divisions
in Tamil Nadu, Bandipur Tiger Reserve in Karnataka
and Wayanad Wildlife Sanctuary in Kerala. This area has an estimated population of
4,500–5,800 elephants (Synchronized Elephant Census 2005). It
receives a rainfall of 600–2000 mm from both the southwest
(May–August) and northeast (September–December) monsoons. The vegetation mainly consists of
tropical dry, moist deciduous and dry thorn forests (Champion & Seth 1968).
Tropical dry
deciduous forest is the dominant type in the study area, distributed in the
central part of Bandipur Tiger Reserve and Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary. The tree species composition is mainly Anogeissus latifolia,Tectona grandisand Terminalia sp. The tree canopy is mostly semi-open and
the understorey is dominated by grass species Themeda cymbaria, Cymbopogon flexuosusand Themeda triandra. Fruit trees found edible to elephants
include Bauhinia racemosa and Grewia tiliifolia,and shrub species Grewia hirsuta.
Tropical moist
deciduous forest occurs only in the northern part of the reserve (covering the
western part of the Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary,
most of Wayanad Wildlife Sanctuary and the northwestern part of BandipurTiger Reserve). The dominant tree
species are Tectona grandis,
Lagerstroemia lanceolata, Grewia tiliifolia, Kydia calycina, Pterocarpus marsupium and Syzygium cumini. The tree canopy is mostly closed. The ground cover is mainly composed ofHelicteres isora,Desmodium spp. and Curcuma sp. Weed species
such as Lantana camara and Chromolaena odoratum are common. The dominant grass species are Cyrtococcum patens, C. oxiphyllum, Themeda cymbaria, Apluda mutica and Imperata cylindrica. Bamboo Bambusa arundinacea is very common along the perennial
water sources and is a characteristic feature of this forest type. Woody
plant fruit species eaten by elephants here include Artocarpus heterophyllus, Bauhinia recemosa,Mangifera indicaand Grewia tiliifoliabut are found in low densities except the last species which is found in
moderate density.
Tropical thorn forest
is confined to the eastern side of Mudumalai Wildlife
Sanctuary, Bandipur Tiger Reserve, the western parts
of Sathiyamangalam and the southern parts of
Coimbatore Forest Division. The
dominant tree species include Ziziphus mauritiana, Acacia spp., Anogeissus latifolia, Albizzia amara and Erythroxylum monogynum. Acacia intsia (an important elephant
browse) and Lantana sp. are the common woody shrubs that are abundant
along the dry streams and perennial water sources. The tree canopy is mostly open. The understoreyconsists of Acacia intsia, Opuntiasp. and Gymnosporea emarginatus. These shrubs are distributed in isolated
patches separated from one another by intervening strips of grass cover. Heteropogon contartus, Bothriochloa sp., Digitariasp. and Aristida adscencionisare the dominant grass species. Grass availability is poor because of low rainfall, and poor soil
nutrients coupled with severe cattle grazing in many areas. Unlike the deciduous habitats, dry thorn
habitats support a wide variety of fruit species edible to elephants, which
includes Acacia intsia and Grewia hirsuta which belong to the shrub category, and Bauhinia racemosa, Mangifera indica, Tamarindus indica, Ziziphus mauritiana which belong
to the tree category.
Methods
Free ranging elephants were followed and
fresh dung piles were collected on observed defecation. The dung samples were collected during
the course of systematic observations on the feeding and ranging behavior of radio-collared elephants between (1991 and
1995) and population demography monitoring based on opportunistic sightings of
non-collared elephants between (1991 and 2004) in the NilgiriBiosphere Reserve, southern India. Date, habitat type, assessment of age of defecating individual into adult,
sub-adult and juvenile and if the defecation was that of a herd or a bull were
also recorded. The dung piles were broken up into small pieces
and thoroughly examined for woody plant fruit remains such as seeds, pericarp
and pulp. The fruit remains were
further segregated and identified up to species level by comparing them with
fresh specimens of fruits/seed from the field. It is likely that our study
underestimated the number of fruits species consumed by elephants since we
examined elephant dung in situ and this estimate should be treated as the
minimum number of fruits consumed. Occurrence of fruit remains (presence) in the dung
piles was expressed as % occurrence arrived by dividing the total number of
dung piles containing a given species of fruit remnants by the total number of
dung piles sampled with respect to habitat, age category and social status of
elephants. The observed difference
was tested for statistical significance using chi-square analysis. Biases arising due to the wide-ranging
nature of elephants across habitats can be considered overcome by rigorous
monitoring of ranging and habitat-use using radio-telemetry. For the same reason, care was also taken
to avoid sampling dung piles at the periphery of any habitat.
Observations and Results
Of the 455 elephant dung piles examined, woody
plant fruit remains that were mainly seeds from eight species namely—Acacia intsia, Artocarpus heterophyllus,Bauhinia racemosa, Grewia hirsuta, Grewia tiliifolia, Mangifera indica, Tamarindus indica and Ziziphus mauritiana, belonging
to seven families occurred in 72 dung piles (15.8%). Seeds of A. intsia, T. indica and M. indicaappeared more frequently (Table 1). Fruit matter/seed was recorded significantly in more number of dung
piles examined during the dry season (25.7%) than in the first wet (17.1%) and
second wet (10.1%) seasons (Table 1) (c2 = 8.187, df = 2, P = 0.01). T. indica, A. intsia andB. recemosa seeds had the highest occurrence
during the dry season, while in first wet season it was seeds of M. indica and G. tiliifolia and
in the second wet season it was seeds of G. hirsuta and Z. mauritiana.
Fruit remains and seeds appeared
almost in an equal number of dung piles of bulls (18.3%) and herds (14.9%) (2= 0.751, df =
1, P = 0.386).
Among the three habitats, the elephant dung
piles examined in dry deciduous forests were rarely found with seeds or other
fruit remnants (6.5%) compared to moist (17.1%) and dry thorn forests (25.7%) (Table 2). G.tiliifolia was the only seed recorded in dry
deciduous forests, while in moist deciduous forests, two species—M. indica and Artocapus heterophyllus—were found with the former
being more frequent. More diverse seeds (six species) had appeared in the
elephant dung in dry thorn forest. Seeds of A. intsia (9.3%), a
common shrub, and T. indica (9.3%), a
relatively rare tree species, in the study area occurred often in the dung
piles. A considerable number of
dung piles also had seeds of G. hirsuta (3.5%)
and B. racemosa (3.1%), while the most common
fruit species, Z. mauritiana was noticeable
only in 0.89% of dung piles revealing that this species was not the preferred
choice. The consumption of fruit
species in different habitats by and large related to their availability in
each habitat (Table 2). However,
some of the fruit species though commonly found in some habitats did not appear
in the dung piles. For example B.racemosa, a species found in moderate numbers in
dry deciduous habitats, had not been recorded in the dung piles from the same
habitat and similarly, the G. tiliifolia in
moist deciduous habitats.
Discussion
Comparison of diet in other elephant ranges: Seeds and fruit remains were found in >90%
of the elephant dung piles in Bia National Park,
Ghana (Short 1981; Lieberman et al. 1987), 80% in the rain forests of Gabon
(White et al. 1993; Feer 1995) and 65% in Santchou Reserve, Cameroon (Tchamba& Seme 1993). Our study however shows that seeds and
fruit remains occurred in only 15.8% of the dung piles, which is very low
compared to the studies reported above. Such differences in fruit consumption could be attributed to the
variation in the habitat quality and availability of other food resources
between the areas. The direct
observation on the feeding behaviour of elephants in Sri Lanka (McKay 1990)
indicated that elephants occasionally ate fruits. Olivier (1978) and Roy (2009) also
reported that fruits appear to form a minor constituent of elephant’s diet
respectively in the rain forests of Malaysia and northeasternIndia, respectively. Therefore, it
is apparent that elephants do not rely much on fruits not only in the present
study area but also in other parts of India and Asia unlike the elephants in
Africa.
The number of woody
plant fruit species recorded in the present study (eight species) was less than
those recorded by Short 1981 (35 species); Lieberman et al. 1987 (11 species);
White et al. 1993 (72 species); Tchamba & Seme 1993 (22 species); Feer 1995
(55 species) in Africa and Olivier 1978 (nine genera) in Asia. The dependence of elephants on more
varieties of fruit species in Africa than in Asia (except Malaya) could be
related to habitat conditions. Most
of the African and Malayan habitats where the seed dispersal studies were
conducted are rain forests unlike the tropical dry habitats found in most of
the elephant ranges in India and Sri Lanka (South Asia). The tropical dry forests of South Asia,
the deciduous and dry thorn habitats that harbour the major proportion of
elephant population, are grass dominatedhabitats. Since the elephants are
highly adapted to feeding on grass (Olivier 1978), they consume grass as the
principal diet and thus the contribution of fruits to the annual diet of
elephants is very low in the tropical dry forests of South Asia (McKay 1990; Baskaran 1998; Baskaran et al.
2010). However, the ability to
survive in varying habitats such as rain forests and deserts is helped by their
ability to shift to browse resources including fruits in the absence or
insufficient supply of grass as seen in West Africa (Short 1981; Feer 1995; White et al. 1993) and South-east Asia (Olivier
1978; Kitamura et al. 2007).
Fruit consumption observations in study area: The
greater occurrence of seeds and fruit fragments during the dry season than the wet
season in the present study is consistent with White et al. (1993) and Roy
(2009). The highest use of fruits
during the dry season coincided with the peak fruiting season of major fruit
species such as T. indica, A. intsia and B. racemosa. Fruit consumption by elephants observed
in the dry thorn forest during the dry season in MudumalaiWildlife Sanctuary (Sivaganesan & Johnsingh 1995) is consistent with present findings. Ripe fruits of M. indicaand A. heterophyllus were available during the
first wet season and thus these species were eaten more often during the first
wet season.
To summarize,
elephants consume a lesser number of fruit species in the tropical dry forests
of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve than in the rainforest
habitats of Asia and Africa. The elephants’ ability to retain the seeds in the gut for a longer time
(Campos-Arceiz 2009) along with longer daily
displacement (Baskaran 1998), plays a potential role
in tropical plant species demographic processes through dispersing the seeds over
long distances from parent trees. Although this study has produced base line information on frugivory and seed dispersal by Asian Elephants, a more
detailed study on the elephants’ role in aspects including the rate of fruit removal and fruit foraging efficiency, seed dispersal distance, germination success, seedling growth
and establishment rates in the Indian region would increase our understanding
and address the lacuna in the available information on the role Asian Elephants
play in maintaining the tree species diversity in Asian forests.
REFERENCES
Alexander, D.Y. (1978). Dispersal of seeds by elephants in tai forest,
Ivory-coast. Terre Vic - Review Ecology 32:
47–72.
Baskaran, N.
(1998). Ranging and resource
utilization by Asian Elephant (Elephas maximus Linnaeus) in NilgiriBiosphere Reserve, South India. PhD Thesis. Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirapalli, India, 138+iii.
Baskaran, N., M. Balasubramanian, S. Swaminathan & A.A. Desai (2010). Feeding ecology of the Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus Linn.) in the NilgiriBiosphere Reserve, Southern India. Journal of Bombay
Natural History Society 107(1): 3–13.
Barnes, R.F.W. (1996). The conflict between humans and elephants in the
central African forests. Mammal Review 26(2–3):
67–80; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.1996.tb00147.x
Campos-Arceiz, A. (2009). The ecological role of Asian Elephants as agents of seed dispersal
in human-dominated landscape. PhD Thesis. Tokyo
University, 93pp.
Campos-Arceiz, A. & S. Blake (2011). Mega-gardeners of the forests - the role
of elephants in seed dispersal. Acta ecologica 27: 542–533; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2011.01.014
Campos-Arceiz, A., Z. Lint, W.H. Seiki & P. Leimgruber (2008). Working with mahouts to explore the diet of work elephants in Myanmar
(Burma). Ecological Research 23: 1057–1064; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11284-008-0466-4
Chapman, L.J., C.A.
Chapman & R.W. Wrangham (1992). Balanites wilsoniana:
elephant dependent dispersal? Journal of Tropical Ecology 8(3):
275–278; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400006519
Connell, J.H. (1971). On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in
some marine animals and in rain forest trees, pp. 298–310. In: Boer, P.J.
& G.R. Gradwell (eds.). Dynamics
of Populations. Centre
for Agriculture publications and documentations, Wageningen,
The Netherlands.
Coughenour, M.B. & J.K. Delting (1986). Acacia tortilis seed germination responses to water potential and nutrients. African Journal of Ecology 24:
203–205.
Dinerstein, E. & C.M. Wemmer (1988). Fruits rhinoceros eat: dispersal of Trewia nudiflora (Euphorbiaceae)
in lowland Nepal. Ecology 69: 1689–1694.
Feer, F.
(1995). Morphology of fruits dispersed by African
elephants. African Journal of Ecology 33(3): 279–284; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1995.tb00808.x
Janzen, D.H. (1970). Herbivores and number of tree species in tropical forest. American Naturalist 104: 504–528.
Kitamura, S., T. Yumoto, P. Poonswad & P. Wohandee (2007). Frugivory and
seed dispersal by Asian elephants in a moist evergreen forest of Thailand. Journal of Tropical Ecology 23: 373–376; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266467407004026
Lieberman, D., M.
Lieberman & C. Martin (1987).Notes on the seeds in the elephant dung from Bia National Park. Biotropica 19:
365–369.
McKay, G.M. (1990). Behavioural ecology of the Asiatic Elephant in
Southern Ceylon. Smithsonian contribution to
Zoology, Smithsonian Institution press, City of Washington.
Merz, G. (1981). Recherché on the
nutrition biology and habitat preference of the forest elephants Loxodonta africana cyclotis Matschie, 1900. Mammalia 45: 300–312.
Nathan, R. & H.
Muller-Landua (2000). Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their
determinants and consequences for recruitments. Trends in Ecology and
Evolution 15(7): 278–285; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01874-7
Olivier, R.C.D. (1978). On the ecology of Asian Elephant. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University
of Cambridge.
Ridley, H.N. (1930). The Dispersal of Plants Throughout The World. L. Reeve & Co., Ashford, 744pp.
Roy, M. (2009). Habitat use and foraging ecology of Asian Elephant (Elephas maximus) in Buxa Tiger
Reserve and adjoining areas of north western Bengal. PhD Thesis. Vidyasagar University, Paschim Medinipur, West Bengal, India.
Short, J.C. (1981). Diet and feeding behaviour of forest elephant. Mammalia 45: 177–185.
Sivaganesan, N. & A.J.T. Johnsingh (1995). Food resources crucial to the wild elephants in Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, south India. In: Proceedings
of the International Seminar on the conservation of Asian elephant. Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, June 1993. Bombay
Natural History Society.
Sukumar, R., N.V. Joshi & V. Krishnamurthy (1988). Growth in the Asian Elephants. In: Proceedings
of Indian Academyof Sciences (Animal Sciences), 97(6): 561–571.
Sukumar, R. (1989). The Asian Elephants Ecology and
Management. Cambridge University Press, Great Briton,
251pp.
Tchamba,
M.N. & P.M. Seme (1993). Diet and feeding behaviour of the forest elephant in
the Santchou Reserve, Cameroon. African
Journal of Ecology 31(2): 165–171; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1993.tb00529.x
White, L.J.T., E.G.C. Tutin& M. Fernandez (1993). Group composition and diet of elephants Loxodonta africana cyclotis Matschie 1900, in
the Lope Reserve, Gabon. African Journal of Ecology31: 181–199.
Willson, M.E. (1993). Mammals as
seed-dispersal mutualists in North America. Oikos 67:
59-76.