Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 February 2021 | 13(2): 17651–17669

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6159.13.2.17651-17669

#6159 | Received 15 May 2020 | Final received 03 February 2021 | Finally accepted 07 February 2021

Ichthyofaunal diversity in the upper-catchment of Kabini River in Wayanad part of Western Ghats, India

Dencin Rons Thampy ¹ , M.R. Sethu ², M. Bibin Paul ³ & C.P. Shaji ⁴

¹ River Research Centre, Karthika, Manalattil, Ollur Post, Thrissur, Kerala 680306, India.

² Canopy Geospatial Solutions, Thalappillil, PKRA-19, Thekkumbhagam, Ernakulam, Kerala 682301, India.

³ Conservation Biologist, Forests and wildlife Department, Government of Kerala, Peechi Wildlife Division, Peechi, Thrissur, Kerala 680653, India.

⁴ Chakkalakkal house, Meladoor P.O, Annamanada, Thrissur, Kerala 680741, India.

¹dencinrons@gmail.com (corresponding author), ² sethumadhavn7@gmail.com, ³bibinpaul133@gmail.com, ⁴shajibarb@gmail.com

Editor: Rajeev Raghavan, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS), Kochi, India. Date of publication: 26 February 2021 (online & print)

Citation: Thampy, D.R., M.R. Sethu, M.B. Paul & C.P. Shaji (2021). Ichthyofaunal diversity in the upper-catchment of Kabini River in Wayanad part of Western Ghats, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 13(2): 17651–17669. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6159.13.2.17651-17669

Copyright: © Thampy et al. 2021. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.

Funding: Self funded.

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Authors details: Dencin Rons Thampy, works as a research associate at the River Research Centre, Thrissur focussing on the diversity, distribution, ecology and evolution of freshwater fishes and has a keen interest on the ecology and conservation of aquatic ecosystems. M.r Sethu, is the director of Canopy Geospatial Solutions, Ernakulam. He is currently conducting his doctoral study in Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (KUFOS) and has a keen interest on the distribution and diversity of marine and freshwater fishes of Kerala. M. Bibin Paul, is employed as a conservation biologist at Peechi Wildlife Division, Kerala State Forests and Wildlife Department. He works on the diversity, distribution and ecology of freshwater fishes and bats. C.p Shaji, is a former principal scientific officer at the Kerala State Biodiversity Board. He is interested in the taxonomy, systematics and ecology of freshwater and estuarine fishes.

Author contributions: DRT, conceived the idea; DRT, MBP and MRS conducted field surveys; DRT and CPS did taxonomic studies; DRT developed the manuscript with the inputs from MBP and CPS; MRS developed the maps for the study; CPS was in charge of overall direction and planning.

Acknowledgements: The authors are indebted to Anvar Ali, Department of Fisheries Resource Management, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, Kochi and Rahul G. Kumar, Peninsular and Marine Fish Genetics Research Centre, ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Kochi for helping with the identification and taxonomy; the late Latha Anantha, Unnikrishnan Soolapani, Ravi S.P, Manju Vasudevan, and Zabna A.B of River Research Centre, Thrissur, and Suprabha Seshan and Purvi Jain of Gurukula Botanical Sanctuary, Periya, Wayanad, for their collaborations and support; P. Dhanesh Kumar IFS, DFO, Flying Squad, Calicut, Kerala State Forests and Wildlife Department and George Chandy, officer in charge, Centre for Wildlife Studies, KVASU, Pookode for their support and encouragement; Agin George Kurian, Arjun M.S. Ajisha Said, Maxwell Sandeep Aloshious, Azarudheen, Arun A.P., Ajeesh Chacko, Dericson Bino Mathew, Eldho Nirappath, and Jomin James for their assistance in the field and Rahul G. Kumar, Arjun M.S., Abhijith T.V., Anandu V., and Subin Yacob for photographs; Suresh, Hareendran, Appu, and Sanjay for helping with the collection of fishes. Field work in various reserved forests and protected areas of Wayanad were carried out with official permits from the Kerala State Forest and Wildlife Department to Dencin Rons Thampy and Bibin Paul M. We are grateful to Rajeev Raghavan, subject editor and three anonymous reviewers for critical commentary that helped substantially improve the final manuscript.

Abstract: We present here a detailed account of the diversity, distribution, threats, and conservation of freshwater fishes in the upper-catchment of the Kabini River in the Wayanad part of the Western Ghats Biodiversity Hotspot. A total of 136 fish species belonging to 13 orders, 29 families, and 69 genera were recorded. Order Cypriniformes dominated with five families, 36 genera, and 84 species, and Cyprinidae was the dominant family represented by 51 species within 21 genera. The true diversity of ichthyofauna in this catchment, is still unclear and requires further exploration and taxonomic studies. At least 44 species recorded during the study are endemic to the Western Ghats, of which 16 are endemic to the Cauvery River System and two species endemic to the Kabini Catchment. A total of 20 non-native fish species were recorded from the study area, of which six species were inter-basin (within India) transplants and 14 species were exotic. Among the native species with confirmed identity, four are Critically Endangered (CR) and nine Endangered (EN) as per the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. As a part of the study, we also extend the distribution ranges of Opsarius malabaricus, Laubuka trevori, Opsarius bendelisis, Puntius cauveriensis, Oreichthys coorgensis, Mesonoemacheilus pambarensis, Hypselobarbus curmuca, and Pseudosphromenus cupanus to the Kabini Catchment. The presence of four species, which were earlier considered to be endemic to the west flowing rivers of the Western Ghats, viz, Laubuka fasciata, Hypselobarbus kurali, Sahyadria denisonii, and Puntius mahecola, in an east flowing stream is reported and discussed. Deforestation and removal of riparian vegetation, pollution, stream channel modification, sand mining, destructive fishing practices, dams and other impoundments, monsoon fishing, and non-native species are the major threats to freshwater fishes in the region. Strategies for the conservation of aquatic ecosystems in the Kabini Catchment are discussed.

Keywords: Biodiversity hotspot, conservation, freshwater fish, species, taxonomy.

INTRODUCTION

The Western Ghats of India, a global biodiversity hotspot (together with Sri Lanka) is also the principal watershed of peninsular India (Myers et al. 2000). Rivers and streams of the Western Ghats are exceptionally biodiverse with high levels of endemism (Kottelat & Whitten 1996; Dahanukar et al. 2011). Much of these critical ecosystems, however, are threatened by a range of anthropogenic stressors (Dahanukar et al. 2011; Kumar et al. 2019). Around 340 species of freshwater fishes are known from the Western Ghats till date, of which more than 60% are endemic (Dahanukar & Raghavan 2013).

Despite several studies on freshwater fish fauna of southern Western Ghats, most upstream tributaries of major river systems continue to remain underexplored. Kabini is one of the major tributaries of the east flowing Cauvery River, originating from the Wayanad region of the Western Ghats. Studies on freshwater fishes of Wayanad date back to Jerdon (1847, 1849) and Day (1867) who described several species from the region, but the first comprehensive list of freshwater fishes of Wayanad was compiled only in the 1990s (Shaji & Easa 1995). Three species, viz., Pethia pookodensis (Mercy & Jacob 2007), Pethia nigripinnis (Knight, Rema Devi, Indra & Arunachalam 2012), and Dario neela (Britz et al. 2018), were subsequently described from this region. Most upstream tributaries of Kabini, however, continue to be poorly studied and the diversity and distribution of fish species in the river system has not been investigated in a comprehensive manner over the past two decades. In this paper, we provide an overview of the diversity and distribution of fishes in the upper-catchment region of Kabini in Wayanad, identify threats to the river and its fish species, and suggest conservation plans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Area

Kabini, also known as river Kapila is an important tributary of Cauvery which waters almost the entire part of the Wayanad Plateau. Kabini is an east flowing eighth order stream with a total basin area of 7,060.362km² spread across the southern Indian states of Kerala, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu. A major part of its catchment area is in Mysore and Chamarajnagar districts of Karnataka. The river flows for around 250km before joining the main Cauvery River at Thirumakudal in Karnataka; however, in Kerala, Kabini is a seventh order stream with a catchment area of only about 1,934.5km².

For the present study, the total catchment area of Kabini in Wayanad was further subdivided into six sub-catchments following Wakode et al. (2011). Sub-catchments were selected based on the sixth order tributaries, and the seventh order main stem of Kabini, viz., 1. Panamaram sub-catchment, 2. Mananthavady sub-catchment, 3. Karapuzha sub-catchment, 4. Bavali sub-catchment, 5. Nugu sub-catchment, and 6. Kabini sub-catchment.

Wayanad has a total forest cover area of 907km², divided into three major administrative divisions, viz., Wayanad Wildlife Sanctuary (344.44km²), Wayanad North (214.94km²), and Wayanad South forest divisions (347.66km²). The forest patches in various sub-catchment regions of Kabini are represented by 118.9km² in the Panamaram sub-catchment, 167.8km² in the Mananthavady sub-catchment, 4.7km² in the Karapuzha Sub-catchment, 123.2km² in the Bavali sub-catchment, 147.1km² in the Nugu sub-catchment, and 138.9km² in the Kabini sub-catchment. Nagarhole and Bandipur tiger reserves of Karnataka, and Mudumalai Tiger Reserve of Tamil Nadu are the other important protected areas in the Kabini Basin.

Mapping

The drainage basin of Kabini River was digitized prior to the study. For the delineation of catchments and sub-catchments ArcGIS pro software and Arc Hydro tool was used. Cartosat V3.0 data was used for the delineation of the drainage basin. Streams were delineated using Arc Spatial analyst extension and hydrology tool. Drainage channels were ordered according to Strahler’s (1957) classification.

Sampling sites and methods

Fish sampling was carried out from March 2014 to March 2020. A total of 89 different stream stretches were selected across various sub-catchments of the Kabini (Image 1), with sampling done at every 500m point of the total stream length (Image 2). GPS co-ordinates at each sampling location was recorded using standard digital GPS reader (Garmin eTrex 30x).

Fish were collected using monofilament gillnets, cast nets and scoop nets of varying mesh size, with the help of local fishers. Traditional fishing techniques like bund making, bamboo cage traps and sieving by cloth were also used in suitable areas. Only a minimum number of fish were collected for identification and the rest were released back into the stream, immediately after capture. Samples were fixed in 5% formaldehyde after anaesthesia with clove oil and later preserved in 70% ethanol. Samples for molecular studies were directly fixed in 80–99 % ethanol. Under the same sampling effort, we categorize records of 10 or less than 10 individual specimens of a species as ‘very rare’, 10–50 as ‘rare’, 50–100 as ‘moderate’, and more than 100 as ‘common’. This classification is not based on any standard methodology or literature.

Species identification and morphometry:

Measurements were made with point to point using a digital-callipers to the nearest 0.1mm. Fish were identified by comparing the measurements and counts with the type/type series and/or as mentioned in the original description. Fish identification was confirmed using the relevant taxonomic literature for each group. Collected fish specimens are deposited in the museum collection of the Zoological Survey of India Western Ghats Research Centre, Kozhikode (ZSI WGRC) and the Laboratory of Systematics and Germplasm Conservation, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, Kochi (KUFOS). A few species could be identified only up to the generic level, as they showed significant variations in morphology from the currently known species. Some species which closely resembled known species whose specific status could not be confirmed due to a few marked differences in morphology were labelled with cf. (confusion). Specimens which could not be identified up to species level and some species with confusing identity have not been deposited in the museum collection as further studies on them are in progress, while some other species including most of the non-native species could not be preserved due to different logistic reasons (e.g., large size). We follow Nelson et al. (2016); Tan & Armbruster (2018) for family status while overall taxonomy and nomenclature follows Fricke et al. (2020).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Diversity and distribution

A total of 136 fish species belonging to 13 orders, 29 families and 69 genera were recorded from the study area (Table 1). Cypriniformes was the most dominant order with five families, 36 genera and 84 species, followed by Siluriformes with seven families, 11 genera and 21 species. Cyprinidae was the most dominant family represented by 51 species belonging to 21 genera, followed by Danionidae (19 species within eight genera) and Nemacheilidae (11 species within four genera). Lack of detailed taxonomic and systematic revisions have rendered the diversity of several groups of fishes in the Western Ghats to be obscure. The specific identity of 45 species collected during the present study could not be confirmed. We refrain from citing some recent publications in predatory journals following the journal policy (see Raghavan et al. 2015). Among the 91 species with confirmed specific identity, 44 are endemic to the Western Ghats, of which 16 are endemic to the Cauvery River System (Image 15a–d, Image 16e,g,i,k and Image 17a–h) and two species are currently known only from the Kabini Catchment (Image 15a, Image 17g). A total of 20 non-native fish species were also recorded from the study area, of which six species were inter-basin transplants within India, and 14 species were exotic to the country. Among the 74 native species with confirmed specific identity, four are Critically Endangered (CR) (Image 15a–d), nine Endangered (EN), three Vulnerable (VU), four Near Threatened (NT), 44 Least Concern (LC), and one species Data Deficient (DD). The conservation status of a further eight species have not yet been assessed.

Panamaram sub-catchment had the highest species richness (n= 98), followed by Kabini (n= 97) and Mananthavady (n= 90) sub-catchments. Number of threatened species was highest in the Bavali sub-catchment (n= 14), followed by Panamaram sub-catchment (n=13) (Figure 1).

Seventeen species (Table 2) which were earlier reported from Kabini could not be collected during the present study. Voucher specimens of these species are not available and based on the latest taxonomic literature, many are assumed to be misidentifications.

Kabini River Basin, identified as a freshwater Key Biodiversity Area (IUCN 2014) is among the regions of Western Ghats with the highest richness and endemism of freshwater faunal groups (Molur et al. 2011). The present study revealed that the river system is exceptionally rich in ichthyofaunal diversity. The total species richness of 136 is higher than many of the studied rivers in Kerala including the Bharathapuzha (117 species) (Bijukumar et al. 2013), and the Chalakkudy (98 species) (Raghavan et al. 2008). It is also important to note that the present study only surveyed the upper-catchment region of Kabini falling within the state boundary of Kerala and a detailed study in the lower reaches of the river and the tributaries in Karnataka may lead to more species being added into the list.

All six sub-catchment regions of Kabini support good numbers of endemic and threatened fish species, and have equal conservation value. Higher order streams running through forests (Images 6, 7 and 8) supported the highest number of species, while several endemic species like Neolissochilus wynaadensis, Pterocryptis wynaadensis, Dario neela, loaches belonging to the family Nemacheilidae and Balitoridae and a few catfishes of the family Sisoridae could be recorded only from the lower order hill streams (Image 3,4 and 5) which are comparatively less disturbed.

Though we studied several streams in the region during the survey span of six years, records of more species are expected and further taxonomic studies are essential for calculating the true diversity of fishes in this region. It was noted that the assemblage and diversity of fishes are greatly dependent on the climatic conditions and vary between seasons, with several species available only during the monsoon.

Range extensions and first records

Our study revealed the presence of several species which were previously not recorded from Wayanad, and from the east flowing river systems. Laubuka fasciata (Image 16j), Hypselobarbus kurali (Image 16d), Sahyadria denisonii (Image 16f), and Puntius mahecola (Image 16h) are species considered endemic to the west flowing streams of Western Ghats (Abraham 2011a,b; Raghavan & Ali 2011; Ali et al. 2015). All four species mentioned above were recorded from various locations (Table 3) within the Banasura Sagar Reservoir and could not be collected from any other part of the Kabini catchment. This suggests that the four species could have either been introduced to the reservoir, or might be inter-basin migrants between Kuttiyadi and Kabini rivers, facilitated by a feeder canal which connects the Banasura Sagar Reservoir with the Kakkayam Reservoir built across the west flowing Kuttiyadi River (Image 2). It is currently not understood what the nature and population status of these species inside the reservoir are, as their presence is known only from a few specimens. Juvenile specimens of H. kurali and S. denisonii, however, were collected during the present study, which confirms that both species are breeding within the reservoir limits. Sahyadria denisonii is also one of the most traded ornamental fishes (Raghavan et al. 2018) and therefore the possibilities of introduction of this species into the Kabini Basin by aquarist and breeders needs to be considered. Laubuka fasciata, H. kurali, and P. mahecola are, however, rare native species which are not commonly found in the ornamental fish trade in Kerala, and there are less likely chances of the introduction of these species into the reservoir, further supporting the idea of inter-basin migration. A feeder canal is also suspected to facilitate the movement of fish species endemic to Cauvery River System into the Kuttiyadi Basin (Gopi 2006). There is, however, no conclusive evidence to prove these speculations, and until any further information becomes available, all four species are considered native to the study region.

Opsarius malabaricus (Image 16a), described from northern Malabar was considered as a synonym of Opsarius bakeri until Knight et al. (2015), cleared the identity of the two species, based on collections from west flowing Payaswini and Valapattanam rivers of Kasargod and Kannur districts. Ten specimens of this species were collected from two locations (Table 3), within the catchment area of Banasura Sagar Reservoir, where they are rarely seen.

Laubuka trevori (Image 16e), is a recently described species from the Cauvery Catchment in Coorg District of Karnataka. This species was recorded from four different locations (Table 3) within the Kabini Catchment, extending the range of this species to the Kerala part of the Western Ghats.

In Kerala, Opsarius bendelisis (Image 16c) is known only from Chinnar and Pambar rivers of Amaravati Catchment in Idukki District (Easa & Shaji 1996). Our study confirms the range extension of this species to northern Kerala and for the first time from the Kabini Catchment.

Puntius cauveriensis (Hora, 1937) (Image 16i) is an endangered barb, endemic to the Cauvery River System in Karnataka, with records from Ithipuzha and Malampuzha in west flowing Bharathapuzha requiring confirmation (Shaji 2011). In our study, we recorded P. cauveriensis from seven different locations (Table 3) within the Kabini Catchment extending the range of this species to the Kerala part of Western Ghats.

Oreichthys coorgensis (Image 16g) is a poorly known species of small barb known only from the upper reaches of the Cauvery River in Coorg District of Karnataka (Knight & Kumar 2015). We report the range extension of this species to the Kerala part of Western Ghats with specimens collected from a single location (Table 3) within Kabini Catchment.

Pethia pookodensis (Image 15a) is a Critically Endangered small-sized barb endemic to Wayanad, with confirmed records only from the Pookode Lake in Wayanad, the type locality (Ali & Raghavan 2015). During our study, the species was recorded from all the sub-catchments of Kabini, confirming their occurrence outside the type locality, and its wide distribution range. A reappraisal of the conservation status of the species is hence required.

Mesonoemacheilus pambarensis (Image 16k), currently known only from Chinnar and Pambar rivers of Amaravati Catchment in Kerala, and from the Bhavani River in Tamil Nadu (Anoop et al. 2018) was collected from four different locations (Table 3) in Wayanad, extending the range of this species to northern Kerala.

Hypselobarbus curmuca (Image 16b) and Pseudosphromenus cupanus (Image 16l), which were not recorded from Wayanad in previous ichthyofaunal studies were recorded in our study. Hypselobarbus curmuca was found be to be very rare in Kabini with records only from two locations (Table 3), while Pseudosphromenus cupanus is widely distributed in the basin with records from all the major tributaries of Kabini.

Major threats

Deforestation and removal of riparian vegetation (Image 9), pollution (Image 13), stream channel modification, sand mining, destructive fishing practices, dams & other impoundments, monsoon fishing, and non-native species are the major threats to freshwater fishes in the region. Riparian vegetation along Kabini and its major tributaries are severely disturbed, and in many cases totally destroyed. Over the past few decades, the natural vegetation across many of the streams has been cleared for agricultural plantations and construction. The Kuruva-Vettathur River Islands (Images 1,7 and 8) is the only region in the Kabini main stem where the riparian vegetation is currently intact. Similarly, the stream stretches running through reserved forests and protected area network are the only reaches with intact or less disturbed riparian buffer. Most of the stream stretches outside forests are severely disturbed, with riparian vegetation completely removed, particularly evident in Panamaram, Karapuzha, and Mananthavady sub-catchments. Loss of forest cover negatively impacts freshwater fish and several other faunal groups, since the nutrient cycle in stream ecosystems are regulated by a healthy riparian buffer (Vannote et al. 1980; Junk et al. 1989; Pusey & Arthington 2003). In addition, several freshwater fish species in the Western Ghats exploit allochthonous food resources and use the flooded riparian forests as spawning grounds (Arunachalam 2000). Canopy cover is also important in regulating stream water temperature which in turn plays an important role in the distribution of fish communities (Marsh-Matthews & Matthews 2000).

Indiscriminate sand and gravel mining poses irreparable damage to habitats in the Kabini. Even the smallest stream stretches in the region are exploited for sand. Large scale destruction of river beds due to sand mining for commercial purposes are evident in Panamaram River, Mananthavady River, and Kabini main stem (Image 12). Sand mining-related stream bank modifications resulted in mass failure of stream banks in several locations during the floods of 2018 and 2019.

Heavy siltation of streams due to deforestation and sand mining which modify the stream beds directly affects several endemic species as it degrades their breeding substrates (Dahanukar et al. 2011). Hill stream loaches of the families Balitoridae, Cobitidae, and Nemacheilidae, and several species of cyprinids including the Critically Endangered Neolissochilus wynaadensis and Tor remadevii are particularly vulnerable to siltation.

Indiscriminate fishing, often using destructive practices such as dynamiting and poison fishing is observed in almost all the major sub-catchments of Kabini. Monsoon triggers the local migration of several fish species from large rivers into smaller streams, flooded marsh lands (Image 10), paddy fields and riparian forests, which serves as their spawning grounds. This mass movement of fishes is locally called ‘ootha or ootha keattam” (Shaji & Laladhas 2013). Many of the migratory routes, mostly at the mouths of smaller seasonal streams are blocked and large numbers of spawning individuals are caught. Fishing during ootha, though banned by the Government of Kerala, is seldom enforced, and is one of the major factors resulting in the decline and extirpation of several fish species.

Exotic fish species pose serious threats to the fish fauna of Kabini, especially to those having low population sizes and narrow distribution. Cyprinus carpio, Ctenopharyngodon idella, Clarias gariepinus, Pterygoplichthys sp., Oreochromis mossambicus, O. niloticus, Poecilia reticulata, and Xiphophorus helleri are invasive species as per the IUCN Global Invasive Species Database (2020). Oreochromis niloticus, Clarias gariepinus, Poecilia reticulata, and Cyprinus carpio are now well established, and widely distributed in the Kabini Basin. Occurrence of the bichir (Polypterus sp.) (Image 18) in the Kabini River system is known only from the collection of seven individuals during the 2018 monsoon. Similarly, species such as Osphronemus goramy, Trichopodus trichopterus, Pterygoplichthys sp., and Xiphophorus helleri were also collected only during the post flood period of 2018 and could be attributed to their escape from private aquaculture facilities during the flood. Flood-associated inundation of fish farms and other aquaculture facilities is identified as one of the major factors facilitating the introduction of several exotic species into rivers and other open water sources (Casimiro et al. 2018; Bijukumar et al. 2019).

Climate change is also accelerating the decline of fish diversity in the Kabini catchment. Kabini experienced severe shortage of water during the summers of 2017, 2018, and 2019 (Image 11), and also experienced massive floods during the monsoons of 2018 and 2019 (Image 14). Extreme climatic events increase the susceptibility of freshwater fishes to infections and disease outbreaks (Lopez et al. 2010), which was evident during the summer and post flood months of 2018 and 2019, when bacterial disease outbreaks resulted in widespread mortality of fishes at several locations in the Kabini catchment.

Conservation measures

Streams and rivers across the Kabini Catchment are severely threatened by a range of anthropogenic activities, leading to the fragmentation of available habitats. For the effective conservation of aquatic species in the river basin, a landscape-scale conservation strategy should be implemented, such that the complexity and diversity of the watershed is maintained. Longitudinal and lateral drainage network connections including lower order streams, head-water tributaries, upper-slope areas, wetlands and flood plains in the region should be maintained to provide un-obstructed corridors, to satisfy the life history requirements of several endemic species. River protection should be taken as a priority issue by the District Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (DEIAA) before giving clearances for activities such as mining, waste disposal plants and construction. To stop further ecological degradation of the river, we recommend that clearance should not be given to any large-scale constructional activities along the stream stretches, which includes dams, buildings and roads.

Structural diversity and species integrity of plant communities in wetland and riparian zones within the catchment should be conserved and the continuity of riparian forests can be maintained via restoration of degraded landscapes. Eco-restoration of the river can be initiated by the local self-governments by collaborating with non-governmental organizations, educational institutes and other public bodies like the Vana Samrakshana Samithi of the state forest and wildlife department.

It is also important to maintain the physical integrity of the ecosystems which include stream banks, shorelines and substrates. Regular monitoring of river sand extraction, recording the severity of extraction and periodic environmental auditing could prevent further degradation of river beds. Immediate actions are to be taken by the government to stop illegal sand mining in the region. Large scale conversion of floodplains and marshes for construction and unsustainable farming practices should be prohibited by strict implementation of the available laws. Actions should also be taken to stop the disposal of sewage water and domestic wastes into the river system.

Destructive fishing practices and indiscriminate harvest of fishes in Kabini, especially during the breeding seasons should be completely prohibited. The official ban on dynamiting and poisoning should be reinforced by the concerned authorities. Seasonal streams and marshes adjacent to the main river channels should be protected to secure the migratory corridors and spawning grounds of several native species.

Immediate actions are also to be taken to control the populations of exotic and invasive species in the river system and the introduction of new non-native species should be prevented. Farming and cultivation of non-native species in the regions adjacent to river channels should not be promoted, and parties associated with such activities have to be made aware of the issue.

Designation of river reaches in reserved forest areas as fish sanctuaries or river sanctuaries with elevated protection level will also help in conserving the habitat and the species. Kuruva-Vettathur River Island region (image 1) in the Kabini main stem is a potential site which can be declared a riverine sanctuary.

Conservation and management of aquatic environments in the Kabini Basin require research involving inter-disciplinary approaches aimed at understanding the various aspects of landscape evolution, biodiversity and socio-economic vulnerability. Awareness campaigns involving researchers, students, farmers, fishing communities and other stakeholders can be arranged at local levels to create a network of people who can be employed for long-term monitoring and restoration of ecosystems.

Table 1. Details of fish species collected from the Upper Catchment region of Kabini River in Wayanad District from March 2014 to March 2020.

Order/Family/Species	^aRed List Status	Native/ Introduced	Presence in Kabini River System	^bEndemism	Distribution	Voucher code
Cypriniformes: Danionidae
Opsarius gatensis (Valenciennes, 1844)	LC	Native	Common	WG	C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3009
Opsarius malabaricus Jerdon, 1849	NA	Native	Very Rare	WG	C1	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3010
Opsarius bendelisis (Hamilton, 1807)	LC	Native	Very Rare		C5,C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2003
Salmostoma acinaces (Valenciennes, 1844)	LC	Native	Common	PI	C1,C2,C3,C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2004
Salmostoma boopis (Day, 1874)	LC	Native	Moderate	WG	C1,C2,C3,C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3011
Salmostoma balookee (Sykes, 1839)	LC	Native	Common	PI	C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3012
Amblypharyngodon cf. mola (Hamilton, 1822)	-	Native	Common		C1,C2,C3,C4, C5,C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2005
Amblypharyngodon melettinus (Valenciennes, 1844)	LC	Native	Rare	PI, SL	C1,C2	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3013
Laubuka trevori Knight, 2015	NA	Native	Very Rare	WG-CY	C1, C2	KUFOS.F.2019.2006
Laubuka cf. laubuca (Hamilton, 1822)	-	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2007
Laubuka fasciata (Silas, 1958)	VU	Native	Very Rare	WG-KL	C1	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3015
Danio rerio (Hamilton, 1822)	LC	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2008
Devario cf. malabaricus (Jerdon, 1849)	-	Native	Very Rare		C1, C2	KUFOS.F.2019.2009
Devario sp. 1 ***	-	Native	Rare		C1, C2, C4
Devario neilgherriensis (Day, 1867)	EN	Native	Very Rare	WG-CY	C5	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3016
Devario sp.2***	-	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6
Esomus cf. thermoicos (Valenciennes, 1842)	-	Native	Rare		C1, C2, C3, C4, C5	KUFOS.F.2019.2012
Rasbora dandia (Valenciennes, 1844)	LC	Native	Common	PI, SL	C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3017
Rasbora neilgherriensis (Day, 1867) (Thampy et al. 2020)	NA	Native	Very Rare	WG-CY	C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER.3140
Cyprinidae
Tor khudree (Sykes, 1839)*	-	Transplanted	Rare		C1, C2, C4, C6
Tor remadevii Kurup & Radhakrishnan, 2011*	CR	Native	Very Rare	WG-CY	C4, C5, C6
Neolissochilus wynaadensis (Day, 1873)	CR	Native	Rare	WG- CY	C1, C2, C3, C4	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3018
Neolissochilus sp. ***	-	Native	Very Rare		C6
Systomus sarana (Hamilton, 1822)	LC	Native	Rare	PI	C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3019
Barbodes carnaticus (Jerdon, 1849)	LC	Native	Moderate	WG	C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3020
Hypselobarbus dubius (Day, 1867)	EN	Native	Very Rare	WG-CY	C4, C5,C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3021
Hypselobarbus micropogon (Valenciennes, 1842)	EN	Native	Very Rare	WG-CY	C1, C2, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3022
Hypselobarbus kurali Menon & Rema Devi, 1995	LC	Native	Very Rare	WG	C1	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3023
Hypselobarbus curmuca (Hamilton, 1807)	EN	Native	Very Rare	WG	C4, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2015
Hypselobarbus sp.***	-	Native	Very Rare		C6
Dawkinsia rubrotincta (Jerdon, 1849)	NA	Native	Rare	WG-CY	C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2016
Dawkinsia filamentosa (Valenciennes, 1844)	LC	Native	Very Rare		C1,C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3024
Sahyadria denisonii (Day, 1865)	EN	Possibly transplanted	Very Rare	WG	C1	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3025
Puntius cf. chola (Hamilton, 1822)	-	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3026
Puntius cf. sophore (Hamilton, 1822)	-	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2017
Puntius cauveriensis (Hora, 1937)	EN	Native	Rare	WG-CY	C2, C4, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2018
Puntius dorsalis (Jerdon, 1849)*	LC	Native	Rare		C6
Puntius cf. parrah Day, 1865	-	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2019
Puntius mahecola (Valenciennes, 1844)	DD	Native	Very Rare	WG-KL	C1	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3027
Puntius vittatus Day, 1865	LC	Native	Rare		C1, C2, C4, C6	ZSI-WGRC: 3028
Puntius cf. bimaculatus (Bleeker, 1863)	-	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2020
Puntius cf. melanostigma (Day, 1878)***	-	Native	Rare		C1, C2, C6
Puntius sp. 1***	-	Native	Very Rare		C5
Waikhomia cf. sahyadriensis (Silas, 1953)***	-	Native	Very Rare		C2
Oreichthys coorgensis (Jayaram, 1982) ***	NA	Native	Very Rare	WG-CY	C6
Haludaria fasciata (Jerdon, 1849)	LC	Native	Common	WG	C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3029
Pethia pookodensis (Mercy & Jacob, 2007)	CR	Native	Rare	WG-KB	C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2024
Pethia sp.***	-	Native	Very Rare		C6
Pethia punctata (Day, 1865)	LC	Native	Rare	WG	C1	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3030
Pethia conchonius (Hamilton, 1822)	LC	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3031
Pethia nigripinnis (Knight, Rema Devi, Indra & Arunachalam, 2012)	NA	Native	Common	WG	C1, C2, C4	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3032
Pethia cf. sharmai (Menon & Rema Devi, 1993)***	-	Native	Rare		C6
Osteochilichthys nashii (Day, 1869)	LC	Native	Rare	WG	C1, C2, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3033
Kantaka brevidorsalis (Day, 1873)	LC	Native	Rare	WG-CY	C5	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3034
Cirrhinus mrigala (Hamilton, 1822)*	-	Transplanted	Common		C1,C2, C3, C6
Gymnostomus ariza (Hamilton, 1807)	NA	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3035
Bangana cf. dero (Hamilton, 1822)	-	Unknown	Common		C1, C2, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2027
Labeo kontius (Jerdon, 1849)	LC	Native	Very Rare	WG-CY	C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3036
Labeo cf. potail (Sykes, 1839)***	-	Native	Very Rare		C5
Labeo cf. nigrescens Day, 1870***	-	Native	Very Rare		C5, C6
Labeo calbasu (Hamilton, 1822)*	-	Transplanted	Very Rare		C6
Labeo cf. boga (Hamilton, 1822)	-	Unknown	Rare		C1, C2, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2028
Labeo cf. porcellus (Heckel, 1844)	-	Unknown	Rare		C2, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2029
Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822)*	-	Transplanted	Common		C1,C2, C3, C5, C6
Labeo catla (Hamilton, 1822)*	-	Transplanted	Common		C1,C2, C3, C5 C6
Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758*	-	Exotic	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6
Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes, 1844)*	-	Exotic	Rare		C3, C6
Garra stenorhynchus (Jerdon, 1849)	LC	Native	Moderate	WG	C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2030
Garra cf. mullya (Sykes, 1839)	-	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3037
Garra mcclellandi (Jerdon, 1849)*	LC	Native	Rare	WG-CY	C1, C2, C4, C6
Balitoridae
Balitora mysorensis Hora, 1941***	VU	Native	Very Rare	WG	C1, C2, C4
Bhavania australis (Jerdon, 1849)	LC	Native	Common	WG	C1, C2, C4, C5	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3038
Nemacheilidae
Paracanthocobitis cf. mooreh (Sykes, 1839)	-	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2031
Schistura cf. denisoni (Day, 1867)	-	Native	Rare		C1, C2, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2032
Schistura cf. nilgiriensis (Menon, 1987)	-	Native	Moderate		C1, C2	KUFOS.F.2019.2033
Schistura semiarmata (Day, 1867)	LC	Native	Common	WG	C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2034
Schistura sp. 1***	-	Native	Rare		C1, C2
Schistura sp. 2***	-	Native	Rare		C2, C4
Schistura striata (Day, 1867)	EN	Native	Moderate	WG-CY	C1, C2, C4, C5	KUFOS.F.2019.2037
Mesonoemacheilus pambarensis (Rema Devi & Indra, 1994)	VU	Native	Rare	WG-CY	C1, C4	KUFOS.F.2019.2038
Mesonoemacheilus guentheri (Day, 1867)	LC	Native	Common	WG	C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2039
Mesonoemacheilus sp.***	-	Native	Very Rare		C5, C1
Nemacheilus monilis Hora, 1921	LC	Native	Rare	WG	C1, C2, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2041
Cobitidae
Lepidocephalichthys thermalis (Valenciennes, 1846)	LC	Native	Common	PI, SL	C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3038
Siluriformes: Bagridae
Mystus seengtee (Sykes, 1839)	LC	Native	Common	PI	C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3040
Mystus malabaricus (Jerdon, 1849)	NT	Native	Rare	WG	C2, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2042
Mystus montanus (Jerdon, 1849)	LC	Native	Common	WG	C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2043
Mystus cf. armatus (Day, 1865)***	LC	Native	Very Rare		C5
Mystus cf. vittatus (Bloch, 1794)	-	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C5 C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3041
Mystus cf. bleekeri (Day, 1877)***	-	Native	Very Rare		C1
Hemibagrus punctatus (Jerdon, 1849)	CR	Native	Very Rare	WG-CY	C1,C2, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3042
Batasio sp.***	-	Native	Very Rare		C2
Siluridae
Pterocryptis wynaadensis (Day, 1873)	EN	Native	Rare	WG	C1,C2, C4	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3043
Ompok bimaculatus (Bloch, 1794)	NT	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3044
Ompok malabaricus (Valenciennes, 1840)	LC	Native	Rare	WG	C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2045
Wallago attu (Bloch & Schneider, 1801)*	NT	Native	Very Rare		C1, C5, C6
Sisoridae
Glyptothorax cf. annandalei Hora, 1923	-	Native	Moderate		C1,C2, C4, C5	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3045
Glyptothorax madraspatanus (Day, 1873)***	EN	Native	Very Rare	WG	C4, C5, C6
Glyptothorax sp. 1***	-	Native	Very Rare		C1, C2, C4
Glyptothorax sp. 2***	-	Native	Very Rare		C2, C4
Clariidae
Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822)*	-	Exotic	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6
Clarias cf. dussumieri Valenciennes, 1840	-	Native	Very Rare		C1, C5	KUFOS.F.2019.2048
Heteropneustidae
Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch, 1794)	LC	Native	Moderate		C1,C2, C3, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3046
Pangasiidae
Pangasius sp.*	-	Exotic	Rare		C1, C6
Loricariidae
Pterygoplichthys sp.*	-	Exotic	Rare		C6
Cyprinodontiformes: Aplocheilidae
Aplocheilus lineatus (Valenciennes, 1846)	LC	Native	Common	PI	C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3047
Aplocheilus sp.***	-	Native	Common		C1,C2, C4, C6
Poecilidae
Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859*	-	Exotic	Common		C1, C2, C3, C6
Xiphophorus maculatus (Günther, 1866)*	-	Exotic	Rare		C6
Xiphophorus helleri Heckel, 1848*	-	Exotic	Rare		C1
Synbranchiformes: Mastacembelidae
Mastacembelus armatus (Lacepède, 1800)	LC	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3048
Ovalentaria (incertae sedis) : Ambassidae
Parambassis thomassi (Day, 1870)	LC	Native	Rare	WG	C1,C2, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3049
Parambassis cf. ranga (Hamilton, 1822)	-	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3050
Parambassis sp.***	-	Native	Very Rare		C6
Chanda nama Hamilton, 1822	LC	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3051
Cichliformes: Cichlidae
Oreochromis mossambicus (Peters, 1852)*	-	Exotic	Common		C1,C2, C3, C5, C6
Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758)*	-	Exotic	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6
Pseudetroplus maculatus (Bloch, 1795)	LC	Native	Common	PI,SL	C1,C2, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3058
Anabantiformes: Anabantidae
Anabas cobojius (Hamilton, 1822)*	-	Transplanted	Very Rare		C6
Pristolepididae
Pristolepis marginata Jerdon, 1849	-	Native	Rare	WG	C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3052
Pristolepis sp.***	-	Native	Rare		C1, C2, C6
Channidae
Channa gachua (Hamilton, 1822)	LC	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2052
Channa marulius (Hamilton, 1822)	LC	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2053
Channa striata (Bloch, 1793)	LC	Native	Rare		C1,C2, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2054
Channa punctata (Bloch, 1793)	LC	Native	Very Rare		C1,C2	KUFOS.F.2019.2055
Badidae
Dario neela Britz, Anoop & Dahanukar, 2018	NA	Native	Rare	WG- KB	C1, C2	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER : 2696
Osphronemidae
Pseudosphromenus cupanus (Cuvier, 1831)	LC	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3054
Osphronemus goramy Lacepède, 1801*	-	Exotic	Very Rare		C3
Trichopodus trichopterus (Pallas, 1770)	-	Exotic	Very Rare		C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3055
Gobiiformes: Gobiidae
Glossogobius giuris (Hamilton, 1822)	LC	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3053
Osteoglossiformes: Notopteridae
Notopterus notopterus (Pallas, 1769)	LC	Native	Common		C1,C2, C3, C4, C5, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3056
Anguilliformes: Anguillidae
Anguilla bengalensis (Gray, 1831)*	NT	Native	Very Rare		C6
Beloniformes: Hemiramphidae
Hyporhamphus cf. limbatus (Valenciennes, 1847)	-	Native	Common		C1,C2, C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2057
Belonidae
Xenentodon cancila (Hamilton, 1822)	LC	Native	Rare		C1, C6	ZSI/WGRC/IR/VER: 3057
Characiformes: Serrasalmidae
Piaractus brachypomus (Cuvier, 1818)*	-	Exotic	Rare		C1, C2, C6
Polypteriformes: Polypteridae
Polypterus sp.	-	Exotic	Very Rare		C6	KUFOS.F.2019.2058

^a Endemism: WG—Western Ghats | PI—Peninsular India | SL—Sri Lanka | KL—Kerala | CY—Cauvery River System | KB—Kabini Catchment.

^b IUCN Red list Categories: CR—Critically Endangered | EN—Endangered | VU—Vulnerable | NT—Near Threatened | DD—Data Deficient | NA—Not Assessed

c—Catchments: C1—Panamaram Sub-catchment | C2—Mananthavady Sub-catchment | C3—Karapuzha Sub-catchment | C4—Bavali Sub-catchment | C5—Nugu Sub-catchment | C6—Kabini Sub-catchment.

*—specimens not preserved | ***—specimens not submitted as further studies are in progress.

Table 2. Details of fish species reported from Kabini Catchment in the literature, which were not recorded during the present study.

	Species name	Author	Remarks
1	Sperata aor (Hamilton, 1822)	Arunachalam et al. 2000a, 2000b	Not recorded during the present study
2	Puntius amphibius (Valenciennes, 1842)	Easa & Basha 1995; Shaji & Easa 1995; Easa & Shaji 1997; Shaji & Easa 1998, Arunachalam et al. 2000b & Kurup et al. 2004	Possible misidentification with Puntius mahecola or another Puntius sp., the specific identity of which could not be confirmed
3	Parambassis baculis (Hamilton, 1822)	Arunachalam et al. 2000a	Not recorded during the present study
4	Opsarius bakeri (Day, 1865)	Kurup et al. 2004	Likely to be Opsarius malabaricus
5	Opsarius canarensis (Jerdon, 1849)	Arunachalam & Manimekalan 2000b	Likely to be Opsarius malabaricus
6	Tariqilabeo latius (Hamilton, 1822).	Kurup et al. 2004	Not recorded during the present study
7	Glyptothorax lonah (Sykes, 1839)	Kurup et al. 2004	Possible miss misidentification with Glyptothorax sp. 2, the specific identity of which could not be confirmed
8	Mystus oculatus (Valenciennes, 1840)	Kurup et al. 2004	Not recorded during the present study
9	Indoreonectes evezardi (Day, 1872)	Kurup et al. 2004	Not recorded during the present study
10	Mesonoemacheilus petrubanarescui (Menon, 1984)	Easa & Basha 1995; Shaji & Easa 1995; Kurup et al. 2004	Possible misidentification with another similar looking species of Mesonoemacheilus, the specific identity of which could not be confirmed
11	Tor putitora (Hamilton, 1822)	Kurup et al. 2004	Likely to be Tor remadeviae
12	Dawkinsia arulius (Jerdon, 1849)	Easa & Basha 1995; Shaji & Easa 1995; Arunachalam & Manimekalan 2000a	Likely to be Dawkinsia rubrotincta
13	Esomus danrica (Hamilton, 1822)	Easa & Basha 1995; Shaji & Easa 1995b	Likely to be Esomus cf. thermoicos
14	Pethia ticto (Hamilton, 1822)	Easa & Basha 1995; Shaji & Easa 1995; Arunachalam & Manimekalan 2000b	Possible misidentification with Pethia nigripinnis or another Pethia sp., the specific identity of which could not be confirmed
15	Hypselobarbus thomassi (Day, 1874)	Easa & Shaji 2003	Not recorded during the present study
16	Hypselobarbus periyarensis (Raj, 1941)	Arunachalam et al. 2000b	Possible misidentification, as the species is currently considered endemic to the Periyar River Basin (Ali & Raghavan, 2011)
17	Batasio travancoria Hora & Law, 1941	Arunachalam & Manimekalan 2000b	Mentioned as Batasio sp. in the present study

Table 3. Details of sampling locations of the species recorded for the first time in Kabini Basin.

	Species	Details/ GPS co-ordinates of locations
1	Laubuka fasciata	11.597°N, 75.926°E to 11.670°N, 75.958°E
2	Hypselobarbus kurali	11.597°N, 75.926°E to 11.670°N, 75.958°E
3	Sahyadria denisonii	11.597°N, 75.926°E to 11.670°N, 75.958°E
4	Puntius mahecola	11.597°N, 75.926°E to 11.670°N, 75.958°E
5	Opsarius malabaricus	11.636°N, 75.926°E & 11.616°N, 75.929°E
6	Laubuka trevori	11.910°N, 75.984°E;11.845°N, 75.939°E; 11.827°N, 75.840°E &11.532°N, 76.025°E
7	Opsarius bendelisis	11.808°N, 76.095°E; 11.846°N, 76.120°E & 11.706°N, 76.396°E
8	Puntius cauveriensis	11.747°N, 76.128°E; 11.777°N, 75.925°E; 11.831°N, 76.093°E; 11.852°N, 76.128° E; 11.862°N, 76.098°E; 11.862°N, 76.204°E & 11.827°N, 76.209°E
9	Oreichthys coorgensis	11.829°N, 75.094°E
10	Mesonoemacheilus pambarensis	11.909°N, 75.985°E; 11.843°N, 76.113°E; 11.837°N, 75.817°E & 11.352°N, 76.025°E
11	Hypselobarbus curmuca	11.833°N, 76.095°E & 11.859°N, 76.101°E
12	Pseudosphromenus cupanus	Widely distributed: All the major tributaries and the main stem of Kabini in Wayanad.

For figures & images - - click here

REFERENCES

Abraham, R. (2011a). Hypselobarbus kurali. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011: e.T172485A6901847. Downloaded on 11 May 2020. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-1.RLTS.T172485A6901847.en

Abraham, R. (2011b). Puntius mahecola. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011: e.T172365A6876934. Downloaded on 11 May 2020. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-1RLTS.T172365A6876934.en

Ali, A., R. Raghavan & N. Dahanukar (2015). Sahyadria denisonii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T169662A70082469. Downloaded on 11 May 2020. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-1.RLTS.T169662A70082469.en

Ali, A. & R. Raghavan (2011). Hypselobarbus periyarensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011: e.T172351A6874205. Downloaded on 31 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-1.RLTS.T172351A6874205.en

Ali, A. & R. Raghavan (2015). Pethia pookodensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T172333A70366431. Downloaded on 12 May 2020. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-1.RLTS.T172333A70366431.en

Anoop, V.K., N. Dahanukar, S. Philip, L. Thomas & R. Raghavan (2018). Phylogeny of the hillstream loach genus Mesonoemacheilus reveals widespread diversification through ancient drainage connections in the Western Ghats Biodiversity Hotspot. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 129(2018): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2018.08.013

Arunachalam, M. (2000). Assemblage structure of stream fishes in the Western Ghats. Hydrobiologia 430: 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004080829388

Arunachalam, M. & A. Manimekalan (2000a). Economically important and cultivable fishes of the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, pp. 237-–239 In: Ponniah, A.G. & A. Gopalakrishnan (eds.). Endemic Fish Diversity of Western Ghats. National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources - NATP, 1(347).

Arunachalam, M. & A. Manimekalan (2000b). Ornamental fish diversity of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, In: Ponniah, A.G. & A. Gopalakrishnan (eds.). Endemic Fish Diversity of Western Ghats. National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources - NATP, 1(347): 228–229.

Arunachalam, M., J.A. Johnson & A. Manimekalan (2000a). Cultivable and ornamental fishes in rivers of Wynad District, Kerala, In: Ponniah, A.G. & A. Gopalakrishnan (eds.). Endemic Fish Diversity of Western Ghats. National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources - NATP, 1(347): 240–243.

Arunachalam, M., J.A. Johnson, A. Manimekalan, A. Sankaranarayanan & R. Soranam (2000b). Cultivable and ornamental fishes of Western Ghats rivers of south India. In: Ponniah, A.G. & A. Gopalakrishnan (eds.). Endemic Fish Diversity of Western Ghats. National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources - NATP, 1(347): 205–214.

Bijukumar, A., S. Philip, A. Ali, S. Sushama & R. Raghavan (2013). CEPF Western Ghats Special Series: Fishes of River Bharathapuzha, Kerala, India: diversity, distribution, threats and conservation. Journal of Threatened Taxa 5(15): 4979–4993. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3640.4979-93

Bijukumar, A., S. Raj, C.P. Arjun, U. Katwate & R. Raghavan (2019). Jurassic invaders: flood-associated occurrence of arapaima and alligator gar in the rivers of Kerala. Current Science 116(10): 1628–1630.

Britz, R., V.K. Anoop & N. Dahanukar (2018). Dario neela, a new species of badid fish from the Western Ghats of India (Teleostei: Percomorpha: Badidae). Zootaxa 4429(1): 141–148. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4429.1.6

Casimiro, A.C.R, D.A.Z. Garcia, A.P. Vidotto-Magnoni, J.R. Britton, A.A. Agostinho, F.S. Almeida & M.L. Orsi (2018). Escapes of non-native fish from flooded aquaculture facilities: the case of Paranapanema River, southern Brazil. Zoologia 35: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.35.e14638

Dahanukar, N. & R. Raghavan (2013). Freshwater fishes of Western Ghats: Checklist MIN-Newsletter of IUCN SSC/WI, FFCNSA 1: 6–16.

Dahanukar, N., R. Raghavan, A. Ali, R. Abraham & C.P. Shaji (2011). The status and distribution of freshwater fishes of the Western Ghats, pp. 21–48. In: Molur, S., K.G. Smith, B.A. Daniel & W.R.T. Darwall (comp.). The Status of Freshwater Biodiversity in the Western Ghats, India. International Union for Conservation of Nature & Zoo Outreach Organization, 116pp.

Day, F. (1867). On some fishes from the Wayanad. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 347–352.

Easa, P.S. & C. Basha (1995). A Survey on the Habitat and Distribution of Stream Fishes in the Kerala Part of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve. Kerala Forest Research Institute. Research Report 104: 1–87.

Easa, P.S. & C.P. Shaji (1996). Fresh water fishes of Pambar River, Chinnar Wildlife Sanctuary, Kerala. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 93(2): 304–305.

Easa, P.S. & C.P. Shaji (1997). Freshwater fish diversity in Kerala part of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve. Current Science 73: 180–182.

Easa, P.S. & C.P. Shaji (2003). Biodiversity Documentation for Kerala, 8: Freshwater Fishes. Kerala Forest Research Institute, India, 127pp.

Fricke, R., W.N. Eschmeyer & R. Van der Laan (eds) (2020). Eschmeyer’s catalogue of fishes: genera, species, references. http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp. Electronic version accessed on 02 September 2020.

Global Invasive Species Database (2020). http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/search. Electronic version accessed 09 September 2020.

Gopi, K.C. (2006). Fish fauna of Kozhikode District, Kerala, south India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 244: 1–39.

IUCN (2014). Using freshwater KBAs for informing conservation and development policy and action in Kerala and Tamil Nadu. Results from the ‘Refining and validating freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) for Kerala and Tamil Nadu’ workshops. IUCN, Cambridge, UK.

Jerdon, T.C. (1847). The fishes of South India. Madras Journal of Literature and Science 15: 139–149.

Jerdon, T.C. (1849). On the freshwater fishes of southern India. Madras Journal of Literature and Science 15: 302–346.

Junk, W. J., P.B. Bayley & R.E. Sparks (1989). The flood-pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publications Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106: 110–27.

Kottelat, M. & T. Whitten. (1996). Freshwater biodiversity in Asia with special reference to fish. World Bank Technical Paper# 343.

Knight, J.D.M. (2015). Description of two new species of Laubuka (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from River Cauvery, southern India. Zootaxa 4000(5): 518–530. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4000.5.2

Knight, J.D.M. & R.G. Kumar (2015). A review of the species of Oreichthys (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) in the Western Ghats, India. Zootaxa 3914(2):157–167. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3914.2.5

Knight, J.D.M, A. Rai, R. D’souza & B. Vijaykrishnan (2015). Barilius ardens (Teleostei: Cyprinidae), a new species from the Western Ghats, India, with redescription of Barilius malabaricus and Barilius canarensis. Zootaxa 3926(3): 396–412. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3926.3.5

Kurup, B.M., K. Radhakrishnan & T.G. Manojkumar (2004). Biodiversity status of fishes inhabiting rivers of Kerala (S. India) with special reference to endemism, threats and conservation measures. Proceedings of Second Large Rivers Symposium, 163–182pp.

Lopez, M.M., P. Gale, B. Oidtmann & E. Peeler (2010). Assessing the impact of climate change on disease emergence in freshwater fish in the United Kingdom. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 57: 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1865-1682.2010.01150.x

Marsh-Mathews, E. & W.J Mathews (2000). Geographical, terrestrial and aquatic factors: which most influence the structure of stream fish assemblages in Midwestern United States. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 9: 9–21

Mercy, A.T.V. & E. Jacob (2007). A new species of Teleostei: Puntius pookodensis (Cyprinidae) from Wayanad, Kerala, India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 104: 76–78.

Molur, S., K.G. Smith, B.A. Daniel & W.R.T. Darwall (2011). The Status of Freshwater Biodiversity in the Western Ghats, India. International Union for Conservation of Nature Gland, Switzerland & Zoo Outreach Organization Coimbatore, India. 116pp.

Myers, N., R.A. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G.A.B. da Fonseca & J. Kent (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(6772): 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501

Nelson, J., T. Grande & M. Wilson (2016). Fishes of the World, fifth edition. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, xlii+707pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119174844

Pusey, B.J. & A.H. Arthington (2003). Importance of the Riparian Zone to the Conservation and Management of Freshwater Fish: A Review. Marine and Freshwater Research 54(1): 1–16

Raghavan, R. & A. Ali (2011). Laubuca fasciata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011: e.T172501A6904678. Downloaded on 11 May 2020. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-1.RLTS.T172501A6904678.en

Raghavan, R., N. Dahanukar & S. Molur (2015). Curbing academic predators: JoTT’s policy regarding citation of publications from predatory journals. Journal of Threatened Taxa 7(10): 7609–7611. http://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o4388.7609-11

Raghavan, R., G. Prasad, A. Ali & B. Pereira (2008). Fish fauna of Chalakudy River, part of Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot, Kerala, India: Patterns of distribution, threats and conservation needs. Biodiversity Conservation 17: 3119–3131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9293-0

Raghavan R, A. Ali, S. Philip & N. Dahanukar (2018). Effect of unmanaged harvests for the aquarium trade on the population status and dynamics of redline torpedo barb: A threatened aquatic flagship. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 28(3): 567–574. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2895

Shaji, C.P. (2011). Puntius cauveriensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011: e.T172379A6879427. Downloaded on 11 May 2020. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-1.RLTS.T172379A6879427.en

Shaji, C.P. & P.S. Easa (1995). Freshwater fish diversity in Wayanad, Kerala, south India. The Zoological Society of Kerala 5: 30–36

Shaji, C.P. & P.S. Easa (1998). Status and distribution of endemic freshwater fishes in Kerala, Western Ghats, India. Tiger Paper 25: 21–24.

Shaji, C. P. & K. Laladhas (2013). Monsoon flood plain fishery and traditional fishing methods in Thrissur District, Kerala. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 12: 102–108.

Strahler A.N. (1957). Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. American Geophysical Union Transactions 38: 913–920

Tan, M. & J. Armbruster (2018). Phylogenetic classification of extant genera of fishes of the order Cypriniformes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). Zootaxa 4476(1): 6–39. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4476.1.4

Thampy, D.R., A.G. Kurian, K.R. Devi & R.G. Kumar. (2020). The identity of Rasbora neilgherriensis (Teleostei: Danionidae), with a re-description. Zootaxa 4894(2): 261–268. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4894.2.5

Vannote, R.L., G.W. Minshall, K.W. Cummins, J.R. Seebell & C.E. Cushing (1980).The River Continuum Concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–137.

Wakode, H., D. Dutta, V. Desai, K. Baier & R. Azzam (2011). Morphometric analysis of the upper catchment of Kosi River using GIS techniques. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 6: 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-011-0374-8