On
the presence of Aglaiscashmirensis Kollar (Nymphalidae) and Heliophorus senaKollar (Lycaenidae) in Rupa, Arunachal Pradesh, India
Manari Greeshma
GopuramHouse, P.O. Kolathara, Kozhikode, Kerala 673655, India
Email:
greeshma6@gmail.com
Date of publication (online): 26 August 2010
Date of publication (print): 26 August 2010
ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print)
Editor: Peter Smetacek
Manuscript details:
Ms
# o2384
Received
11 January 2010
Finally
accepted 07 July 2010
Citation: Greeshma, M.
(2010). On the presence of Aglais
cashmirensis Kollar
(Nymphalidae) and Heliophorus sena Kollar (Lycaenidae) in Rupa, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa2(9): 1165-1166.
Copyright: © Manari
Greeshma 2010. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. JoTT allows
unrestricted use of this article in any medium for non-profit purposes,
reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and
the source of publication.
Acknowledgements:I am grateful to Peter Smetacek, Bhimtal, Uttarakhand, for
identifying the butterflies, to Dr. Prashanth Mohanraj, Bangalore, Karnataka
and Maria Abraham, Mallikassery, Kerala, for help with literature and to my
husband, Lt. Col. S. Sarkar for his support.
The butterflies of Arunachal Pradesh are not
well known. Among the earliest
lists of the area is that by Betts (1950) who reported the Papillionidae,
Pieridae, Nymphalidae and Riodinidae. Subsequently Arora & Mondal (1981) reported the Papilionidae. There does not seem to be any list of
the Lycaenidae and Hesperiidae of the area.
Materials
and Methods: Butterflies in and around Rupa (27011’60”N
& 92024’E, 1800m), Arunachal Pradesh, India, were photographed
between May 2008 and November 2009. These were sent to Peter Smetacek, Bhimtal, India for
identification. Among the species
recorded, there were two that deserved special notice, the Indian TortoiseshellAglaiscashmirensis Kollar (Image 1) and the Sorrel
Sapphire Heliophorussena Kollar (Image 2).
Discussion: Aglais cashmirensisand Heliophorussena are residents of Rupa and the larval host plants of both,
i.e. UrticaL. (Urticaceae) and Rumexhastatus D. Don (Polygonaceae) respectively, are well
established throughout the area.
Aglaiscashmirensis aesis Fruhstorfer was noted by Betts (1950) from
“Meadows, 5000 to 8000 ft in temperate Momba country only”, Momba referring to
the human inhabitants of a part of what was then the Balipara Frontier
Tract. However, subsequent authors
such as Haribal (1992) and Kehimkar (2008) apparently overlooked this report
and gave a distribution as far west as Sikkim (Haribal 1992) and Bhutan
(Kehimkar 2008) for the species when it is, in fact, well established in
western Arunachal Pradesh.
It is on the wing from February to December but
absent in the months of June, July and August, which is the wet season in this
area. It has been noted mainly at
widely cultivated exotic garden flowers such as Gaillardia pulchella, Chrysanthemum indica,C. frutescens,Tagetes minutaand Tagetespatula.
It is a common insect near habitation and
wasteland where its larval food plant, Urtica sp., grows plentifully.
Heliophorussena has so far not been reported from Arunachal
Pradesh. Haribal (1992) does not
mention the species while Kehimkar (2008) states that it is found from
Afghanistan to Nepal. The present
record extends the distribution of this species to western Arunachal
Pradesh. While this species was
previously considered a west Himalayan endemic, it is now clear that it has a
pan-Himalayan distribution and may well be found even further east, since the
range of the larval host plant, Rumex hastatus,extends from Afghanistan to southwestern China (Polunin & Stainton 1984).
The distribution of H. sena is of interest. Earlier authors such as Evans (1932)
and Wynter-Blyth (1957) reported it from Chitral to Kumaon. Thus it appeared to be a west Himalayan
endemic, although the distribution of its larval hostplant, R. hastatus, was
known to extend to southwestern China. Since there are other members of the genus with a very restricted
distribution, such as Heliophorusoda Hewitson (Himachal Pradesh to Uttarakhand in India (Evans
1932)) and Heliophorusbakeri Evans (Chitral to Himachal Pradesh in India (Evans
1932)), it appeared that climatic factors were restricting H. sena from
extending its distribution to the extent of its larval host plant. It is now
evident that the butterfly extends over most of the range of R. hastatus. Robinson et al. (2001) report H. sena as having
also been bred on Abutilon(Malvaceae) on the basis of a card index in the Natural History Museum, London,
but this does not appear to be its food plant of choice, since Abutilon is also
found at low elevation on the Gangetic plain where the butterfly does not
venture.
H. sena is quite
local and will rarely be found more than a few hundred meters from the nearest
patch of R. hastatus. Where there is an undisturbed patch of
the plant, the butterfly can be very common for most of the year.
It is a common butterfly in Rupa, especially in
the vicinity of its larval host plant. Since R. hastatusgrows abundantly near river banks and waterbodies, the butterfly is commonest
in such places. It is on the wing
from February to November. It is
very fond of Hydrangeablossoms and is also attracted to Calendula
officinalis.
Conclusion: The range
of two Himalayan butterfly species is extended eastwards to Rupa in western
Arunachal Pradesh. Although A. cashmirensis was
reported from the area earlier (Betts 1950), the report was evidently
overlooked and so it has become necessary to re-report it.
Both A
cashmirensis and H.
sena are common and well established in Rupa and their
presence earlier was reported but overlooked in the case of the former and
simply not reported in the case of H.
sena, since the Lycaenidae of Arunachal Pradesh do not appear
to have been reported in the literature so far.
REFERENCES
Arora,
G.S. & D.K. Mondal (1981). On the Papilioninae
(Papilionidae: Lepidoptera) from Arunachal Pradesh and Adjoining areas of Assam
in North-Eastern India. Records
of the Zoological
Survey of India, Occasional
Paper 29: 65pp+7pl.
Betts,
F.N. (1950). On a collection of butterflies from the
Balipara Frontier Tract and the Subansiri area (northern Assam). Journal of the Bombay Natural History
Society 49(3): 488-502.
Evans,
W.H. (1932). The
Identification of Indian Butterflies. Bombay
Natural History Society, Bombay, x+454pp+32pl.
Haribal,
M. (1992). The
Butterflies of The Sikkim Himalaya and Their Natural History.Sikkim Nature Conservation Foundation, Gangtok, 217pp.
Kehimkar,
I. (2008). The
Book of Indian Butterflies. Bombay Natural History Society and
Oxford University Press, Oxford, xvi+497pp.
Polunin,
O. & A. Stainton (1984). Flowers of The Himalaya. Oxford University
Press, Delhi, 580pp.+128pl.
Robinson,
G.S., P.R. Ackery, I.J. Kitching, G.W. Beccaloni & L.M. Hernandez (2001). Hostplants of The Moth
and Butterfly Caterpillars of The Oriental Region.The Natural History Museum and Southdene Sdn. Bhd., Kuala Lumpur, 744pp.
Wynter-Blyth,
M.A. (1957). Butterflies
of The Indian Region. Bombay Natural History
Society, Bombay, xx+523pp+72pl.