Abundance and diversity of Odonata in temporary water bodies of Coimbatore and Salem districts in Tamil Nadu

 

R. Arulprakash1 & K. Gunathilagaraj 2

 

Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641003, India

Email: 1 avrarulprakash@gmail.com; 2 gunathilagaraj@yahoo.com

 

 

 

Date of publication (online): 26 July 2010

Date of publication (print): 26 July 2010

ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print)

 

Editor: K.A. Subramanian

 

Manuscript details:

Ms # o2035

Received 18 August 2008

Final revised received 20 March 2010

Finally accepted 10 May 2010

 

Citation: Arulprakash, R. & K. Gunathilagaraj (2010). Abundance and diversity of Odonata in temporary water bodies of Coimbatore and Salem districts in Tamil Nadu. Journal of Threatened Taxa 2(8): 1099-1102.

 

Copyright:© R. Arulprakash & K. Gunathilagaraj2010. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium for non-profit purposes, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication.

 

 

 

For tables – click here

 

 

Odonata, dragonflies and damselflies, constitute a small, well known order of insects that are widely distributed all over the world (Tillyard 1917).  They are denizens of many aquatic ecosystems and their distribution covers a great deal of continuum from temporary to permanent water bodies (Corbet 1999; Johansson & Suhling 2004). Earlier 54 species of Odonata: Anisoptera (33) and Zygoptera(21) inhabitating temporary water bodies were recorded from different parts of India (Fraser 1933, 1934, 1936; Kumar 1973 a,b; Singh & Prasad 1976; Ram et al. 1982; Kaushik et al. 1990, 1991; Prasad 2002).  But no study has been carried out so far from the temporary water bodies of Tamil Nadu, hence the present study.  Odonatafauna was surveyed in 13 temporary water bodies of Salem and Coimbatore districts of Tamil Nadu.

Material and Methods: Odonata were collected from 13 temporary water bodies of Coimbatore (8) and Salem (5) districts in Tamil Nadu.  In all the temporary water bodies sampled, water is present only during the rainy season (December - April) and remain dry during the summer season.  Geo co-ordinates of the temporary water bodies sampled are given in Table 1. Collections were made after the north-east monsoon (January to April, 2006) and only adult Odonata was collected with the help of a sweep net (35cm dia. and 70cm ht.) by slowly walking around the water bodies.  The identity of the collected Odonata was carried out by following the keys given by Fraser (1933, 1934, 1936), Kumar & Prasad (1981), Ram et al. (1982), Barrion & Litsinger(1994) and Emiliyamma & Radhakrishnan(2000).  Odonatadiversity was computed using the Simpson’s index (Simpson 1949).

                                           s

            Simpson’s index (λ) = ∑ ni(ni-1) / N (N-1)

                                           i = 1

 

Where, ni is the number of individuals of the ith species, and N is the total number of individuals in the sample

Simpson’s index (λ) varies from 0 to 1.  An increase in the value of the index indicates a decrease in diversity and vice-versa.

Results: Twenty-one species of Odonata(14 species of Anisoptera and seven species of Zygoptera) belonging to 17 genera under four families were recorded from 13 temporary water bodies of Coimbatore and Salem districts in Tamil Nadu (Table 2).  Trees present around the temporary water bodies provide shade over the habitat. Aquatic vegetations need microclimate for their proliferation. In the study, this microclimate was provided by the trees in the form of shade.

Anisoptera dominated the temporary water bodies except in the Commonyeri tank (where both Anisoptera and Zygoptera were in equal proportion), Selvapuram tank (near equal) and Nagarajapuram tank (Zygopteradominant) and no Zygoptera was recorded in the Boominaicken patty tank. Both Anisoptera and Zygopterawere represented by two families each viz., Gomphidae,Libellulidae (Anisoptera) and Coenagrionidae and Lestidae(Zygoptera). Of them, Libellulidae was represented by the maximum number of species (11) and individuals (317) followed by Coenagrionidae, Gomphidae and Lestidae.

Pantala flavescens (Fabricius) (Libellulidae) was the most abundant Anisoptera and Ceriagrion coromandelianum (Fabricius) (Coenagrionidae) the most abundant Zygoptera among the 21 species recorded.  Three species of Anisopteraviz., Diplacodes trivialis (Rambur),Orthetrum sabina (Drury) and P. flavescens (Libellulidae) were recorded from all the 13 temporary water bodies sampled and none of the Zygoptera colonised all the temporary water bodies.  Only Ceriagrion coromandelianum (Coenagrionidae) was present in 12 temporary water bodies. Neurothemis tullia (Drury) and Rhodothemis rufa (Rambur) (Libellulidae) were confined to Nagarajapuramtank.

Among the temporary water bodies, Utkulam Tank (Coimbatore) had the maximum number of individuals (72) and species (16) and minimum in BoominaickenPatti (Salem) (8 individuals and 4 species). Simpson’s index (λ) showed maximum Odonatadiversity in Kamalapuram tanks one and two (Salem) followed by Nagarajapuram and Utkulamtanks (Coimbatore) (Table 3).  Minimum Odonata diversity was found in UkkadamTank (Coimbatore).

Discussion: Temporary water bodies are found throughout the world particularly in tropical countries (Williams 1997). Anisopterawas abundant in most of the water bodies sampled. This might be due to their high dispersal ability (Batzer & Wissinger 1996; Williams 1997; Lawler 2001; Kadoya et al. 2004) and their adaptability to wide range of habitats (Hodgkin & Watson 1958; Suhling et al. 2004, 2005). Less abundance of damselflies was probably due to their limited dispersal ability (Weir 1974), undulating environment afforded by the temporary water bodies (Williams 1997; Kadoya et al. 2004) and partial or absence of shade cover (Clark & Samways1996). The abundance of damselflies in Nagarajapuram,Commanyeri and Selvapuramtanks could be attributed to the presence of shade over the habitat from the trees present around the water bodies and to the presence of aquatic vegetation. This is in confirmation with the findings of Fraser (1933) and Subramanian (2005) who revealed that shade and aquatic vegetation could favour Zygoptera more than Anisoptera. The size of the temporary water bodies determines the species richness and diversity of Odonata(Lounibos et al. 1990; Clark & Samways 1996; Stewart & Samways1998; Schindler et al. 2003; Kadoya et al. 2004; Carchini et al. 2005; Suh & Samways 2005). The maximum Odonatadiversity in Kamalapuram tanks one and two might be due to their larger size. Factors affecting Odonataspecies assemblage in temporary water bodies are human disturbances (modification of habitat structure) (Moore 1982; Brown 1991; Stewart & Samways 1998; Norma-Rashid et al. 2001; Timmet al. 2001; Clausnitzer 2003; Oppel2005a, b), contamination of water bodies (Watson et al. 1982) and the presence of predators (Williams 1987; Blaustein 1992). Minimum diversity in Ukkadam tank could be due to the discharge of sewage water into the tank and presence of insectivorous fish. The abundance of Libellulidae (Anisoptera) and Coenagrionidae (Zygoptera) in the present study might be due to their shorter life cycle and widespread distribution (Norma-Rashid et al. 2001) and tolerant to wide range of habitats (Gentry et al. 1975; Samways 1989).

Conclusion: The survey of 13 temporary water bodies revealed the occurrence of 21 species of Odonata.  Odonata belonging to the family Libellulidae dominated in all the temporary water bodies except Nagarajapuram Tank (Coimbatore) which was dominated by Zygoptera.  The presence of shade cover and aquatic vegetation favoured zygopteranpopulation more than Anisoptera.  P. flavescens (Libellulidae) was the most dominant Odonata and D. trivialis, O. sabina and P. flavescens were present in all temporary water bodies sampled.  Maximum Odonata diversity was observed in Kamalapuramtanks one and two.

 

 

References

 

Barrion, A.T. & J.A. Litsinger(1994). Taxonomy of rice insect pests and their arthropod parasites and predators, pp.13-362. In: Heinrichs, E.A (ed.). Management of Rice Insects. Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi, 779pp.

Batzer, D.P. & S.A. Wissinger(1996). Ecology of insect communities in non-tidal wetlands. Annual Review of Entomology 41: 75-100.

Blaustein, L. (1992). Larvivorus fishes fail to control mosquitoes in experimental rice plots. Hydrobiologia 232: 219-232.

Brown, K.S.J. (1991). Conservation of neotropical environments: insects as indicators, pp.349-404. In: Collins, N.M. & J.A. Thomas (eds.). The Conservation of Insects and their Habitats. Academic Press, New York.

Carchini, G., A.G. Solimni & A. Ruggiero (2005). Habitat characteristics and odonate diversity in mountain ponds of central Italy. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 573-581.

Clark, T.E. & M.J. Samways (1996). Dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators of biotope quality in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 1001-1012.

Clausnitzer, V. (2003). Dragonfly communities in coastal habitats of Kenya: indication of biotope quality and the need of conservation measures. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 333-356.

Corbet, P.S. (1999). Dragonfly: Behaviour and Ecology of Odonata. Cornell University Press, New York, 829pp.

Emiliyamma, K.G. & C. Radhakrishnan (2000). Odonata (Insecta) of Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary, Kerala, India. Records of Zoological Survey of India 98: 157-167.

Fraser, F.C. (1933, 1934, 1936). The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma. Odonata. Vols. 1-3. Taylor and Francis, London.

Gentry, J.B., C.T. Garten, F.G. Howell & M.H. Smith (1975). Thermal ecology of dragonflies in habitats receiving reactor effluent, pp.563-574. In: Environmental Effect of Cooling Systems at Nuclear Power Plants. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.

Hodgkin, E.P. & J.A.L. Watson (1958). Breeding of dragonflies in temporary waters. Nature 181: 1015-1016.

Johansson, F. & F. Suhling (2004). Behaviour and growth of dragonfly larvae along a permanent to temporary water habitat gradient. Ecological Entomology 29: 196-202.

Kadoya, T., S. Suda& I. Washitani (2004). Dragonfly species richness on man-made ponds: effects of pond size and pond age on newly established assemblages. Ecological Research 19: 461-467.

Kaushik, S., S. Sharma, M.N. Saxena & D.N. Saksena(1990). Habitat ecology of anisopteran nymphs in certain water bodies of Madhya Pradesh. Acta Hydrochimica Hydrobiologica 18: 443-447.

Kaushik, S., S. Sharma, M.N. Saxena & D.N. Saksena(1991). Habitat ecology of zygopteran (Odonata) nymphs in certain water bodies of Madhya Pradesh. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 88: 400-405.

Kumar, A. (1973a). Description of the last instar larvae of Odonata from Dehra Dun Valley (India) with notes on biology. I. Suborder Zygoptera. Oriental Insects 7: 83-118.

Kumar, A. (1973b). Description of the last instar larvae of Odonata from Dehra Dun Valley (India) with notes on biology. II. Suborder Anisoptera. Oriental Insects 7: 291-331.

Kumar, A. & M. Prasad (1981). Field ecology, zoogeography and taxonomy of the Odonata of Western Himalaya, India. Records of Zoological Survey of India, Occasional Paper 20: 1-118.

Lawler, S.P. (2001). Rice fields as temporary wetlands: a review. Israel Journal of Zoology 47: 513-528.

Lounibos, L.P., R.L. Escher, L.B. Dewald, N. Nishimura & V.L. Larson (1990). Odonataassociated with water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes). Odonatologica 19: 359-366.

Moore, N.W. (1982). Conservation of odonata - first step towards a world strategy. Advances in Odonatology 1: 205-211.

Norma-Rashid, Y., A. Mohd-Sofian& M. Zakaria-Ismail (2001). Diversity and distribution of odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) in the fresh water swamp lake, Tasek Bera, Malaysia. Hydrobiologia 459: 135-146.

Oppel, S. (2005a). Habitat associations of an odonata community in a lower montanerain forest in Papua New Guinea. International Journal of Odonatology 8: 243-257.

Oppel, S. (2005b). Comparison of two Odonata communities from a natural and a modified rainforest in Pupua New Guinea. International Journal of Odonatology 9: 89-102.

Prasad, M. (2002). Odonata diversity in western Himalaya, India, pp.221-254. In: Kumar, A. (ed.). Current Trends in Odonatology. Daya Publishing House, Delhi.

Ram, R., V.D. Srivastava & M. Prasad (1982). Odonata (Insecta) fauna of Calcutta and surroundings. Records of Zoological Survey of India 80: 169-196.

Samways, M.J. (1989). Taxon turnover in odonata across a 3000 m altitudinal gradient in Southern Africa. Odonatologica 18: 263-274.

Schindler, M., C. Fesl& A. Chovanec (2003). Dragonfly associations (Insecta: Odonata) in relation to habitat variables: a multivariate approach. Hydrobiologia 497: 169-180.

Simpson, E.H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688.

Singh, A. & M. Prasad (1976). Odonata of DoonValley, 1. Anisoptera. Records of Zoological Survey of India 70: 21-38.

Stewart, D.A.B. & M.J. Samways (1998). Conserving dragonfly (Odonata) assemblages relative to river dynamics in an African Savanna game reserve. Conservation Biology 12: 683-692.

Subramanian, K.A. (2005). Dragonflies and Damselflies of Peninsular India: A Field Guide. Project Lifescape, Indian Academy of Science, Bangalore, India, 118pp.

Suh, A.N. & M.J. Samways(2005). Significance of temporal changes when designing a reservoir for conservation of dragonfly diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 165-178.

Suhling, F., G. Sahlen, J. Kasperski & D. Gaedecke(2005). Behavioural and life history traits in temporary and perennial waters: comparisons among three pairs of sibling dragonfly species. Oikos108: 609-617.

Suhling, F., K. Schenk, T. Padeffke & A. Martens (2004). A field study of larval development in a dragonfly assemblage in African desert ponds (Odonata). Hydrobiologia 528: 75-85.

Tillyard, R.J. (1917). The Biology of Dragonflies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 396pp.

Timm, H., M. Ivask& T. Mols (2001). Response of macro invertebrates and water quality to long-term decrease in organic pollution in some Estonian streams during 1990-1998. Hydrobiologia 464: 153-164.

Watson, J.A.L., A.H. Arthington & D.L. Conrick (1982). Effect of sewage effluent on dragonflies (Odonata) of Bulimba Creek, Brisbane. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 33: 517-528.

Weir, J.S. (1974). Odonata collected in and near seasonal pools in Wankie National Park, Rhodesia with notes on the physio-chemical environments in which nymphs were found. Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa 37: 135-145.

Williams, D.D. (1987). The Ecology of Temporary Waters. Croom Helm, London, 193pp.

Williams, D.D. (1997). Temporary ponds and their invertebrate communities. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 7: 105-117.