Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26
September 2019 | 11(12): 14576–14581
The first photographic record
of the Red Panda Ailurus fulgens (Cuvier, 1825) from Lamjung
District outside Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal
Ganesh Ghimire 1, Malcolm Pearch
2, Badri Baral 3, Bishnu Thapa 4 & Rishi Baral
5
1,4,5
Tribhuvan University, Central Department of Zoology, Kirtipur
44618, Kathmandu, Nepal.
2 Harrison
Institute, Centre for Systematics and Biodiversity Research, Bowerwood House, 15 St. Botolph’s Road, Sevenoaks, Kent
TN13 3AQ, United Kingdom.
3 Nepal
Environmental Research Institute, Tarakeshwor 9, Kathmandu,
Nepal.
5 National
Trust for Nature Conservation, Annapurna Conservation Area Project, P.O. Box
183, Hariyo Kharka, Pokhara,
Nepal.
1 ganesh061nep@gmail.com,
2 harrisoninst@btinternet.com, 3 badribaral@neri.com.np, 4
chhetry.bishnu366@gmail.com, 5 right.rishi1@gmail.com
(corresponding author)
Abstract: In May and June, 2018, a series of field surveys was
undertaken to determine the presence of the Red Panda Ailurus
fulgens in Marsyangdi
Rural Municipality in Lamjung District, western
Nepal. A single, adult, Red Panda was
photographed and recorded on video at Nafada Khola while scratch marks and distinctive scats provided
evidence of Red Panda activity at eleven further localities at elevations
between 3,150 and 3,650 m. Threats to
the habitat of A. fulgens within the study
area are discussed.
Keywords: Ailurus fulgens, Red Panda, distribution, Lamjung
District, Nepal.
doi: https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4828.11.12.14576-14581
|
ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:960F4820-5302-40CD-9333-5586B142AB98
Editor: Angela R. Glatston, Red
Panda Network, Eugene, USA. Date of publication: 26
September 2019 (online & print)
Manuscript details: #4828 | Received 15 January 2019
| Final received 22 June 2019 | Finally accepted 31 August 2019
Citation: Ghimire, G., M. Pearch, B. Baral, B. Thapa &
R. Baral (2019). The first
photographic record of the Red Panda Ailurus fulgens (Cuvier, 1825) from Lamjung
District outside Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Journal of Threatened Taxa 11(12): 14576–14581. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4828.11.12.14576-14581
Copyright: © Ghimire et al. 2019. Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and
distribution of this article in any medium by adequate credit to the author(s)
and the source of publication.
Funding: Small Grant from
The Rufford Foundation, UK.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing
interests.
Acknowledgements:
We are pleased to acknowledge the
Department of National Parks & Wildlife Conservation, and the National
Trust for Nature Conservation (Annapurna Conservation Area Project) for
providing useful information and for granting permission to undertake this
research. We extend our thanks to Ganesh
Tripathi and to the local guides, Maita Bahadur Gurung and Balaram
Gurung, for their help during the field survey.
We are grateful to Basanti Kumpakha
and Dipak Raj Basnet for their kind assistance with GIS mapping. This research was funded by a Small Grant
from The Rufford Foundation, U.K., for which the lead
author would like to express his sincere appreciation.
The Red Panda Ailurus fulgens is classified as Endangered by IUCN and is
confined to the temperate forests in the foothills of the Himalaya. Its range extends from Kalikot
District in western Nepal (Dangol 2014), eastwards
through northeastern India, Bhutan, and northern
Myanmar to Sichuan Province in south-central China (Glatston
et al. 2015). Throughout its range, its
preferred bamboo habitat is increasingly under threat from human activity,
adding further pressure to its highly disjunct distribution.
Despite having extensive tracts of bamboo forest
between 2,500 and 4,000 m, which is the species’ preferred habitat, Nepal is
considered currently to support only 1.9% of the total global population of Red
Pandas (Bista & Paudel
2014).
In Nepal, A. fulgens
has been reported from the following districts: Taplejung,
Panchthar, Sankhuwasabha, Solukhumbu, Ramechhap, Dolakha, Sindhupalchowk, Rolpa, Rukum, and Mugu (Jnawali et al. 2012), Ilam
(Williams 2004), Jajarkot (Baral
2014), Kalikot (Dangol
2014), Khotang (Mali 2014), Bhojpur,
Dolpa, and Lamjung (MoFSC 2016), and Rasuwa, Nuwakot, Myagdi, Baglung, and Dhading (Bista et
al. 2017). Ailurus
fulgens was reported to occur in Manang District (Paudel 2009) but
its presence there has not been confirmed (Bista et
al. 2017).
The protected areas in Nepal in which the species is
known to occur include Kangchenjunga Conservation Area (Mahato
& Karki 2005; Yonzon 1996), Manaslu
Conservation Area (Yonzon et al. 1997), Makalu Barun National Park (Jackson 1990), Sagarmatha National
Park (Mahato 2004), Langtang National Park (Yonzon 1989; Yonzon & Hunter
1991; Yonzon et al. 1991; Fox et al. 1996), Annapurna
Conservation Area (Shrestha & Ale 2001), Dhorpatan
Hunting Reserve (Sharma & Kandel 2007), and Rara
National Park (Sharma 2008).
Until the present study, Ailurus
fulgens was known to occur in Lamjung
District only within Annapurna Conservation Area (MoFSC
2016) although scats consistent with those of A. fulgens
were identified also in the District at Ghermu
(28.3780N & 84.4110E)
(MoFSC 2016).
The purpose of the current field surveys was to determine the presence
and population status of A. fulgens in Lamjung District outside protected areas.
Materials And Methods
Study area
Lamjung District is located in Gandaki Province in western
Nepal. The total population of the
district is 1,67,724 with 42,079 households (CBS 2011). The district is located between 28.055–28.5100N
and 84.189–84.1890E (Fig.
1). It has an elevation range of
385-–8,162m and covers an area of 1,692km² (DDC 2011). The climate is dictated by elevation and
topography, which results in a mosaic of different geographical zones, from
subtropical conditions in southern areas to an alpine zone in the north. Average annual rainfall is 2,448mm.
(www.meteomean.com), more than 80% of which occurs during the monsoon season
(June to September) (DDC 2011). Average
air temperature ranges from a minimum of 15.50°C to a maximum of 27.17°C (DDC
2011).
Marsyangdi Rural Municipality is the largest of the rural
municipalities in Lamjung District and covers an area
of 597.25km2 with a total population of 18,759 (CBS 2011). The Municipality is located
between 28.251–28.5100N and 84.238–84.6190E. Marsyangdi Rural Municipality is characterised by
subtropical, temperate, subalpine, alpine, and nival
vegetation. Common plant species include
Abies spectabilis,
Betula utilis, Drepanostachyum
falcatum, Juniperus
spp., Quercus lanata, Q. semecarpifolia, Rhododendron anthopogon,
R. arboreum, R. barbatum, and
Tsuga dumosa.
Marsyangdi Rural Municipality has nine wards, of which wards 5,
6, and 7 (Ghermu, Bahundanda,
and Bhulbhule VDCs) lie outside Annapurna
Conservation Area (ACA) with the remainder of the wards being managed as part
of the ACA.
Seasonal transhumance (the movement of cattle and
herders between lower valleys in winter and higher pastures in summer) is
commonplace within the study area.
Methods
As a part of a Rufford Small
Grant project, a team comprising six members surveyed areas near Ghermu, Bahundanda, and Bhulbhule (Wards 5, 6, and 7 of Marsyangdi
Rural Municipality) in May and June, 2018.
An area of 15.54km2 of potential Red Panda
habitat were searched and 12 line transect surveys were done. Length of
transects varied between 780m and 1500m depending upon the terrain. Red Panda signs like scat, scratch marks were
searched for 12 search-effort hours in the potential habitats. Relative abundance of signs per unit hour and
unit kilometer was estimated.
A Canon Powershot SX 50 camera was used to photograph the single,
adult A. fulgens together with arboreal
scratch marks, and scats. A video of the
Red Panda was recorded using the same camera.
Co-ordinates of localities were ascertained using a hand-held Garmin
eTrex10 GPS.
Results
New locality record
One adult Ailurus fulgens was sighted in the forested area of Nafada Khola (28.4380N
& 84.5300E), Marsyangdi Rural
Municipality Ward Number 7 (Bhulbhule) on 28 May 2018
at 07.00h. (Fig. 1, Image 1A).
A total of 11
scat groups were observed in 12 line transects of length ranging between 780m
and 1500m. Relative abundance of Red
Panda scats was 1.44 scat groups per 1,000m walk and 0.92 scats groups per hour
search effort in 15.54km2.
Scratch marks consistent with those of A. fulgens were observed on a tree trunk approximately 50m
east of the site (Fig. 1, Image 1B).
Scats consistent with those of A. fulgens were observed between 3,150m and 3,650m at 11
localities within 200m of the live observation site (Fig. 1, Image 2C). The principal threats to the preferred
habitat of the Red Panda within the study area were identified as overgrazing
by cattle, man-made forest fires, and the collection of tender shoots and
mature stalks of bamboo by local people.
Discussion
This paper provides the first photographic evidence of
Red Panda in Lamjung, which was once reported as one
of the potential areas for Red Panda (Jnawali et al.
2012). Different researchers have
considered the panda sign encounter rate as the basis for abundance
analysis. Williams (2004) found 5.1 Red
Panda sign/km and 235 pellets per day in the altitudinal range of 2,800–3,000 m
in eastern Nepal, Ilam. Pradhan et al. (2001) suggested rate of
pellet groups and Red Panda to be 28.83±32.16 and 2.98 ± 2.1/100 hours walk
respectively in Singhalila National Park,
Darjeeling. In the study area, the scat
group encounter rate was found to be 1.44 scat groups per 1,000m walk and 0.92
scats groups per hour search effort on an average which is lower than those
encountered by Williams (2004). So, the
study area may have lower relative density than Ilam
and similar to Jumla.
This relative abundance in small spatial scale over short period of
study, however, may mislead the results hence an intensive study over a period
of time is highly recommended for better understanding of numbers of Red Pandas
in this isolated habitat and to meet Red Panda Conservation Action Plan
(2019-2023)’s aim of protecting and managing the Red Panda population in Nepal
through a holistic approach of conservation including research, monitoring,
awareness building, habitat improvement, and threat management (DNPWC and DFSC
2018).
The adult Red Panda, which was observed from a
distance of approximately 100m, was seen grooming itself and resting on a moss
covered, horizontal limb of a mature Himalayan Birch Betula utilis (Image 1A).
The tree was growing on a north-west facing slope with a gradient of 39˚
(cp. Wei et al. 1999). The immediate
area was dominated by Himalayan Birch, Eastern Himalayan Fir Abies spectabilis,
and Rhododendron spp. with an understorey of Slender Bamboo (Drepanostachyum falcatum). This floral matrix compares favourably with
Red Panda habitat reported by Yonzon (1989). The nearest water source, the Nafada River, was at a distance of 100m.
Scratch marks considered to have been made by A. fulgens were observed on the trunk of a tree 50m east
of the live observation site (Image 1B).
Red Panda fur was found at the site.
Red Panda scats are spindle-shaped, soft, moist, and
green in colour (Image 1C). They are
highly diagnostic and are reliable indicators of Red Panda activity. Scats consistent with those of A. fulgens were observed at 11 localities within an area
of 15.54km2, each locality lying within 200m of the live observation
site (Fig. 1). The localities were
situated between 3,150 and 3,650 m. The
fresh scats were found on the limbs of trees and on the ground over a two month
period (May–June 2018). The size of Red
Panda scats can be helpful in determining whether they are those of a mature or
immature individual (Yonzon 1989). The size of scats ranged from 35.5mm to
40.3mm in length and 15.2-mm to 20.7mm in width. Owing to the limited duration of the field
survey, it was not possible to determine the abundance of Red Pandas in the
study area but the variation in scat size would seem to indicate the presence
of at least one mature and one immature individual and, accordingly, the
possibility of a reproductive population.
Several threats to Red Panda habitat were identified
within the survey area. Principal
amongst these were grazing by livestock and man-made forest fires. Mahato (2004)
mentioned overgrazing pressure between 3,200m and 3,400m in prime Red Panda
habitats. We observed similar
overgrazing pressure caused by the movement of cattle throughout the study
area, particularly during seasonal transhumance. Grazing, trampling of vegetation and soil
compaction were noted to damage the understorey and to impact negatively on
floral regeneration. These movements
during the main season when Red Pandas give birth and raise young (May–August)
have been identified as a threat to Red Panda populations (Jnawali
et al. 2012). Other threats to habitat
integrity included the collection of bamboo and plants. Tender shoots of bamboo are utilised in
cooking while the stalks are used as winter cattle fodder, in the construction
of walls and roofs of buildings, to stabilise soil in the fields, for basket
weaving, and for producing utilitarian bamboo products such as ‘nanglo’ (a flat, round, woven tray used for sifting grain)
and ‘mandro’ (a mat for sun-drying cereals). Plants that are collected include Paris polyphylla (Himalayan Paris), Berberis
asiatica (Asiatic Barberry), and Daphne spp.
(Lokhta).
The current distribution of A. fulgens in Nepal is shown in Fig. 2 while Fig. 3
indicates the extent of the Red Panda’s preferred habitat throughout the
country. Although resident in a
broad area of the Nepalese Himalaya, it is clear from a comparison of the two
figures that the distribution of A. fulgens is
markedly disjunct with a notable hiatus between eastern and western
subpopulations. It is recommended that further field research be
undertaken in Nepal, particularly in Kaski District,
which adjoins Lamjung District to the west and from
which there are no records of A. fulgens despite
the presence of suitable Red Panda habitat. Efforts to create
corridors between isolated groups to maintain genetically viable populations,
as suggested by Bista et al. (2017), should be
encouraged.
For
figures & image – click here
References
Baral, B. (2014). Baseline study of Red Panda (Ailurus
fulgens fulgens, Cuvier
1825) in Jajarkot district, Mid-Western Nepal.
Master’s Thesis. Central Department
of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan
University, Kathmandu, Nepal, 52pp.
Bista, D. & R. Paudel (2014).
An overview of the status and
conservation initiatives of Red Panda Ailurus
fulgens (Cuvier, 1825) in Nepal. The
Initiation 05: 171–181.
Bista, D., S. Shrestha, P. Sherpa, G.J. Thapa, M. Kokh, S.T. Lama & S.R. Jnawali
(2017). Distribution and habitat use of
Red Panda in the Chitwan-Annapurna Landscape of Nepal. PloS
one 12(10): e0178797.
CBS (2011). National Population and Housing Census 2011. Central
Bureau of Statistics. National Planning Commission Secretariat,
Kathmandu, Nepal, 262pp.
Cuvier, F.G. (1825). Panda. In: Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, E. & F.G. Cuvier (eds.). Histoire naturelle des mammifères: avec des figures
originales, coloriées, dessinées d’après des animaux vivans.
A. Belin, Paris, 5(50): 3pp.
Dangol, B. (2014). Habitat
and Distribution of Red Panda: A case from Ranchuli VDC Kalikot District, Nepal. Master’s Dissertation. Central Department
of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan
University, Kathmandu, Nepal, 33pp.
DDC (District Development
Committee, Lamjung) (2011). District Profile of Lamjung.
District Development Committee, Lamjung, Nepal.
DNPWC and DFSC (2018). Red Panda Conservation Action Plan for Nepal
(2019–2023). Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation and
Department of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal
Fox, J., P.B. Yonzon & N. Podger (1996). Mapping conflicts between biodiversity and human needs in Langtang National Park, Nepal. Conservation
Biology 10(20): 562–569.
Glatston, A., F. Wei, Z.Than &
A. Sherpa (2015). Ailurus fulgens.
(errata version published in 2017). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
2015: e.T714A110023718. Downloaded on 19 September 2019. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T714A45195924.en
DNPWC and DFSC (2018). Red Panda Conservation Action Plan for Nepal
(2019–2023). Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation and Department
of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Jackson, R. (1990). Threatened wildlife, crop and wildlife depredation
and grazing in the Makalu Barun National Park and
Conservation Area. Department of National Parks and Wildlife
Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
105pp.
Jnawali, S., K. Leus, S. Molur, A. Glatston & S.
Walker (Eds.) (2012). Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens).
Population and Habitat Viability Assessment (PHVA) and Species Conservation
Strategy (SCS) Workshop Report. National Trust for Nature Conservation,
Kathmandu, Nepal, Conservation Breeding Specialist Group and Zoo Outreach
Organization, Coimbatore, India. 66pp.
Mahato, N.K. (2004). Status of Red Panda (Ailurus
fulgens) in Kangchenjunga region of Nepal. Tigerpaper 31: 7–9.
Mahato, N.K., & J.B. Karki (2005). Distribution and habitat assessment of Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens) in
Kanchenjunga Conservation Area with reference to Riya Samba and Lama Khanak forests. Nepal Journal of Forestry 12:
32–40.
Mali, N. (2014). Status and Conservation Threats of Red Panda in Chiuridada and Nirmalidada VDCs
of Khotang District, Nepal. Master’s Dissertation.
Central Department of Environmental Sciences, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu,
Nepal. 43pp.
MoFSC (2016).
National Survey of Red Panda to Assess its Status, Habitat and Distribution in
Nepal. Ministry of Forest & Soil
Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal. 16pp.
Unpublished report.
Paudel, K. (2009). Status and Distribution of Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens) in
Manang District, Nepal Bachelor’s Dissertation,
Institute of Forestry, Tribhuvan University, Pokhara Campus, Nepal, 43pp.
Sharma, H.P. (2008). Distribution and conservation status of Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens) in
Rara National Park, Nepal. Final Report. People’s
Trust for Endangered Species, London, UK.
Sharma, H.P. & R.N. Kandel.
(2007). Red Panda Ailurus
fulgens in the Dhorpatan
Hunting Reserve of Nepal: An Assessment of Their Conservation Status. People’s
Trust for Endangered Species, London, UK.
Shrestha, R. & S.B. Ale
(2001). Species diversity of Modikhola watershed. King Mahendra
Trust for Nature Conservation, Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Pokhara,
Nepal. 47pp.
Wei, F., Z. Feng, Z. Wang & J.
Hu (1999). Current distribution, status and
conservation of wild Red Pandas Ailurus fulgens in China. Biological conservation 89(3):
285–291.
Williams, B.H. (2004). Red Panda in Eastern Nepal; how do they fit into the
biological conservation of the Eastern Himalaya? Conservation Biology in
Asia 16: 236–250.
www.meteomean.com – see: https://www.meteomean.com/en/climate/lamjung
www.redpandanetwork.org – see: https://www.redpandanetwork.org/assessing-the-status-habitat-and-distribution-of-red-pandas-in-nepal/
Yonzon, P.B. (1989). Ecology and conservation of the Red Panda in the
Nepal-Himalayas. PhD Thesis, University of Maine, Orono, USA. 169pp.
Yonzon, P.B. (1996). Status of Wildlife in the Kanchanjungha
Region: A Reconnaissance Study Report. Report Series no. 23, WWF Nepal Program,
Kathmandu, 18pp.
Yonzon, P.B. & M.L. Hunter (1991). Conservation of the Red Panda Ailurus
fulgens. Biological conservation 57(1):
1–11.
Yonzon, P.B., R. Jones & J. Fox (1991). Geographic information systems for assessing habitat
and estimating population of Red Pandas in Langtang National Park, Nepal. Ambio 20: 285–288.
Yonzon, P.B., P. Yonzon, C.
Chaudhary & B. Vaidya (1997).
Status of Red Panda in Himalaya. Resources Himalaya Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal,
21pp.