Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 March 2021 | 13(3): 17906–17917

 

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4733.13.3.17906-17917

#4733 | Received 28 November 2019 | Final received 14 October 2020 | Finally accepted 04 March 2021

 

 

An appraisal of avian species diversity in and around Purulia Town, West Bengal, India

 

Swastik Mahato 1, Sudipta Mandal 2  & Dipanwita Das 3

 

1 J.K. College, Purulia, Purulia, West Bengal 723101, India.

2 Bangabasi College, 19, Rajkumar Chakraborty Sarani, Kolkata, West Bengal 700009, India.

3 Bagnan College, Khalore, Bagnan, Howrah, West Bengal 711303, India.

1 321swstk@gmail.com, 2 smzoology@gmail.com, 3 dipanwita.das05@gmail.com (corresponding author)

 

 

Editor: C. Srinivasulu, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India.     Date of publication: 26 March 2021 (online & print)

 

Citation: Mahato, S., S. Mandal & D. Das (2021). An appraisal of avian species diversity in and around Purulia Town, West Bengal, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 13(3):17906–17917. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4733.13.3.17906-17917

 

Copyright: © Mahato et al. 2021. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.  JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.

 

Funding: Self funded.

 

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Author details: Swastik Mahato is a junior research fellow in the Department of Zoology, Jagannath Kishore College, Purulia, West Bengal. He is actively involved in exploring the rich biodiversity of this region. Sudipta Mandal is a faculty of the Post Graduate Department of Zoology, Bangabasi College, Kolkata, West Bengal. He has about 10 years field experience in exploring biodiversity of Eastern and North East India with special interests on Avian and Lepidopteran diversity. Presently his works are focused on various aspects of urban biodiversity.  Dipanwita Das is presently working as Assistant Professor in Zoology, Bagnan College, Howrah, West Bengal. She has comprehensive knowledge on the biodiversity profile of western part of West Bengal and presently involved in the documentation of bird and butterfly diversity of this region.

 

Author contribution: SM-—field work, photographic documentation, literature review and proof reading. SM—study design, plan of work, literature review, manuscript writing and proof reading.  DD-—literature review, statistical analysis, manuscript writing and proof reading.

 

Acknowledgements: The authors are grateful to the Principals of Jagannath Kishore College, Purulia; Bangabasi College, Kolkata and Bagnan College, Howrah, West Bengal for granting necessary permissions and providing facilities to carry out the research work. The authors would also like to appreciate the help and support rendered by Dr. Partha Pratim Saha and Mr. Supriya Samanta during the study.

 

 

Abstract: Purulia, the westernmost district of West Bengal, India is least explored with respect to the biological diversity and relatively little information is available to date.  The present study was conducted from February 2017 to January 2018 to document avifaunal diversity in Purulia Town and surroundings.  Sampling was done through the line transect method with photographic documentation and subsequent identification following suitable keys.  Species richness and seasonal abundance were calculated.  Altogether, 115 species of birds belonging to 19 orders and 43 families were recorded during the study period.  Passeriformes was the most dominant order represented by 46 species during the study.  The Shannon-Wiener (H’) value was highest for January (1.564).  A large number of migratory birds visit Purulia every year mostly during winter and it is reflected in the present study.  Diverse foraging habit among the birds was observed during the study period and omnivorous birds (29%) were found in highest number followed by invertivores (26%), carnivores (25%), granivores (8%), herbivores (7%), frugivores (3%), and nectarivores (2%).  The present study is a preliminary effort to document the avifaunal diversity of Purulia and a more extensive systematic study should be carried out to investigate and protect the avifaunal diversity of this region.

 

Keywords: Bird, feeding guild, species diversity, species richness.

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

About 10,721 species of birds are living in this planet (Billerman et al. 2020) distributed from the polar regions to the tropical forests and are even prominent in the highly populated metropolitan cities.  Approximately, 75% and 45% of total bird species around the globe are adapted to forest habitats and human-modified habitats, respectively (BirdLife International 2018), where they play important role in pollination, seed dispersal, pest control, and act as an indicator of a healthy environment (Hadley et al. 2012; Ramachandra 2013).  Birds play a crucial role in plant pollination; through their faeces, they carry seeds and initialize the distribution of plants to distant places; act as scavengers, which help in ecological decomposition.  Birds are considered good ecological indicators as they exploit all trophic levels in a food chain acting as herbivore, carnivore, or omnivore.  They respond to the qualitative and/or quantitative changes in the environment and usually indicate the secondary changes in their surroundings (Morrison 1986; Koskimies 1989).  Population dynamics of bird species may indicate natural disasters like drought (Blake et al. 1994) or anthropogenic stress like the introduction of new species in the ecosystem and urbanization (Savidge 1984; O’Connell et al. 2000).

Habitat loss is one of the key factors responsible for the rapid decline of the avian species population (Prasad et al. 2014).  Anthropogenic activities like agriculture, urbanization, and firewood collection have contributed to deforestation and the simultaneous habitat degradation of the bird communities that affect the variety and variability of bird population (Storch et al. 2003).  Understanding the changes in the diversity and abundance of the birds linked with the degradation of the natural habitats and ecosystems could help in framing necessary conservation actions.

Avian species diversity and distribution are not consistent with the landscape (Bibby et al. 1992).  The pattern of biodiversity changes with environmental factors, climatic conditions, topography and habitats (Rodríguez-Estrella 2007; Jankowiski et al. 2009).  Purulia is the westernmost district of West Bengal, India, and is topographically an undulated land which is the eastern part of Chotanagpur plateau.  This district faces severe water scarcity in summer.  Plants like Palash Butea monosperma, Kusum Schleichera oleosa, Mahua Madhuca longifolia, Neem Azadirachta indica, Kend Diospyros melanoxylon, Haritaki Terminalia chebula, Amla Phyllanthus emblica, Karange Pongamia pinnata, Bamboo Bambusa spp. which can tolerate drought, flourish in this district (Das 2016; Samanta et al. 2017).  Purulia has been least explored concerning the biological diversity and relatively little published information is available to date (Das 2016; Samanta et al. 2017; Das 2018).  In this circumstance, to enrich the knowledge on the biodiversity profile, an attempt was made to update the information about birds of Purulia Town and surroundings for the diversity and seasonal abundance.  The main objective of the study was to determine bird species diversity and abundance to prepare a checklist of birds as well as to create awareness among the local people of Purulia to help maintain the ecological balance.

 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Study Site

The present study was carried out to document the avifaunal diversity from February 2017 to January 2018 in and around Purulia Town (23.33 N; 86.36 E), Purulia, West Bengal, India.  Five locations, namely, Ketika, Sidho-Kanho-Birsha University campus, Saheb Bandh, Surulia Deer Park, and Kansai river-side, situated in and around the town were selected for the study (Fig. 1).  Ketika, situated about 2km from Purulia railway station, is a well-wooded residential area with trees, bushes, open lands with intermittent small ponds, and ditches.  Sidho-Kanho-Birsha University campus is a vast open land with scattered bushes and trees.  Saheb Bandh is a large man-made lake with some vegetation surrounding it.  Surulia Deer Park is an urban forest with a mini zoo inside it.  Kansai river-side was the area around the bank of river Kansai flowing by the south boundary of the town.

 

Data collection

Each study site was visited once a month.  Line transect method was employed to record avifaunal richness and abundance (Hutto et al. 1986; Bibby et al. 1992; Buckland et al. 2004).  The field surveys were conducted at 06.30–07.30 h, 12.00–13.00 h, and 16.30–17.30 h, and the values were averaged to obtain representative data of a particular count (Gibbons & Gregory 2006).

From the starting spot of any predetermined route, the bird species or their calls were recorded along either side of the transect.  The starting point and the direction of transects were often random.  The length of the route often varied due to topography, roads, water body that limited access.  The opportunistic counts of birds during other times and other places were also included to document a comprehensive checklist (Hossain & Aditya 2016).

Following visual observation or hearing a bird’s call the presence of the birds was confirmed with the help of a binocular (Olympus 8 × 40 DPS1) and photographs were taken with digital cameras (Nikon Coolpix P520 and Canon 1200d, 55–250mm lens).  Based on the visual observations and photographs, birds were identified following standard guidebooks (Ali 2002; Grimmett et al. 2011).  Monthly data obtained from the one-year study was divided into four seasons: summer (March to May), monsoon (June to August), post-monsoon (September to November), and winter (December to February) to compare seasonal variations in avian species richness and abundance.

Species richness and diversity were calculated using Biodiversity Pro software (McAleece et al. 1997).  The bird species diversity was calculated using the Shannon-Wiener diversity index [H′ = ∑ pilnpi] and Shannon diversity index [Hmax= Log10(S)].  Measurement of Shannon’s evenness index was calculated using the following formula J = H′/ Hmax (pi = proportion of total sample belonging to ith species, S = total number of species in habitats (species richness) (Magurran 2004).

Migratory status and feeding habits of the enlisted birds was determined by personal observation as well as information available in the literature (Ali 2002; Grimmett et al. 2011; Birdlife International 2018).

 

 

RESULTS

 

In the present study, 115 species of birds consisting of 19 orders and 43 families were recorded in and around Purulia Town (Table 1; Image 1a, b).  Passeriformes was found to be the most dominant order represented by 46 species (Fig. 2).  Among the families, Anatidae was represented by the highest of nine species (Table 1).  The residential status of the recorded birds shows that 78 species of birds were a permanent resident of Purulia, 36 bird species were winter migrants, and only one species Jacobin Cuckoo Clamator jacobinus was a summer migrant  (Table 1).  Among the winter migrants, Red-Crested Pochard Netta rufina, Northern Shoveler Anas clypeata, Garganey Spatula querquedula, Eurasian Wigeon Mareca penelope, Northern Pintail Anas acuta, Gadwall Mareca strepera, and Ferruginous Duck Aythya nyroca took shelter in the Saheb Bandh, Purulia.  Among the 115 species of birds, 43 species were partly or completely dependent on water bodies.

The species richness value was highest in the winter season (104) and in December (99); whereas, this was lowest in Monsoon (69) and in August (61) (Table 4).  The overall avian diversity index (H′) for the town and surroundings was 3.66.  The biodiversity index was also calculated month-wise (Fig. 3) and it depicts that the Shannon-Wiener (H′) value was highest for January (1.564) though the H′ value does not differ significantly for the rest of the months.  Shannon evenness (J′) value was lowest in December (0.767) and highest for July (0.857).

Feeding guilds included invertivorous, granivorous, nectarivorous, frugivorous, omnivorous, carnivorous, and herbivorous categories (Table 1, Fig. 4).  Among the invertivorous birds, insectivorous and molluscivorous species specialized for feeding on only insects and mollusks (Table 1, Fig. 4) were considered.  Omnivorous birds (29%) were found in the highest number followed by invertivores (26%), carnivores (25%), granivore (8%), herbivore (7%), frugivore (3%), and nectarivore (2%).  Of all invertivores, insectivores represented 70% in number (Fig. 4).

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

As evident from the present study, Purulia Town and its surrounding places nurture a widely diversified avian group with its arid environment, wild flora, the fragmented agricultural field, plantation, and gardens that provides a complex landscape.  The study area is moderately rich with its avifauna with 115 species, and when compared with previous observations in different parts of India it has been found that the species richness at Purulia (Table 2) was lower than the values reported for Burdwan (144) (Hossain & Aditya 2016), and the surrounding area of western Kachchh (252) (Gajera et al. 2013).  But the avian diversity was higher than that reported for Kolkata surroundings (48 species) (Sengupta et al. 2014).  Shannon diversity index (H′) for the present study (3.66) was found to be higher than the Silent Valley (3.3) and moist deciduous forest of Mukkali (3.45) (Jayson & Mathew 2000), which indicates that Purulia Town possesses a rich avian diversity.

The present species richness value is greater than the richness values for Purulia Saheb bandh (24 species) reported in 2000 (Nandi et al. 2004); Santragachi Lake of Howrah District, West Bengal (22 species) (Roy et al. 2011); and Bakreswar and Hinglo Reservoirs and Adra Saheb Bandh Lake (24 species) (Khan et al. 2016).  Though Purulia is an arid district, local aquatic bodies, especially Saheb Bandh and Kansai River, support the avian groups that dependent on aquatic habitat.  The species richness value for the avian species was highest in winter, which is due to the presence of a large number of migratory birds especially in local water bodies like Saheb Bandh.

The resultant data reveals the functional roles and resource utilization patterns in the local ecosystem of the town.  The availability of food resources is directly dependent on the precipitation rate and as an arid district of West Bengal, Purulia is severely deprived of water.  Therefore, scarcity of water acts as a limiting factor for the survival of avian groups and a lesser number of granivores, herbivores, frugivores, and nectarivores throughout the year justifies the fact (Fig. 4).  Interestingly, omnivores were highest in number followed by insectivores which might also be due to extreme weather conditions (Fig. 4).  There are evidence about the influence of landscape on local species richness (Gaston 2000; Lawton 2000; Daube et al. 2003; Hossain & Aditya 2016).

As urbanization and developmental activities may destroy or degrade the natural habitats of birds therefore, there are urgent needs for the conservation of local habitats, including wetlands and water bodies.  Successful conservation of birds would require continuous monitoring by government authorities and awareness among local people.

 

 

Table 1. Checklist of birds found in Purulia Town and surroundings with their seasonal occurrence, residential status, species abundance (Pi value), and feeding habits.

 

 

Scientific name

Common name

Seasonal occurrence#

Status^

Pi value*

Feeding habit$

ORDER 1 : Accipitriformes

Family: Accipitridae

1

Accipiter badius (Gmelin, 1788)

Shikra

ALL

R

0.00173

C

2

Milvus migrans (Boddaert,1783)

Black Kite

ALL

R

0.00479

C

3

Pernis ptilorhynchus (Temminck, 1821)

Oriental Honey Buzzard

S, W

R

0.00005

C

4

Circus aeruginosus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Western Marsh Harrier

W

WM

0.00002

C

ORDER 2 : Anseriformes

Family: Anatidae

5

Dendrocygna javanica (Horsfield, 1821)

Lesser Whistling Duck

ALL

R

0.12926

G

6

Netta rufina (Pallas, 1773)

Red-Crested Pochard

S, PM, W

WM

0.01085

G

7

Nettapus coromandelianus (Gmelin, 1789)

Cotton Pygmy Goose

ALL

WM

0.00191

H

8

Anas clypeata (Linnaeus, 1758)

Northern Shoveler

S, PM, W

WM

0.00511

O

9

Spatula querquedula (Linnaeus, 1758)

Garganey

S, W

 

0.00041

O

10

Mareca penelope (Linnaeus, 1758)

Eurasian Wigeon

PM

WM

0.00002

H

11

Anas acuta (Linnaeus, 1758)

Northern Pintail

S, PM, W

WM

0.00702

H

12

Mareca strepera (Linnaeus, 1758)

Gadwall

S, PM, W

WM

0.00629

H

13

Aythya nyroca (Güldenstädt, 1770)

Ferruginous Duck

W

 

0.00010

O

ORDER 3: Apodiformes

Family: Apodidae

14

Cypsiurus balasiensis (J.E. Gray, 1829)

Asian Palm Swift

ALL

R

0.01229

I

15

Apus affinis (JE Gray, 1830)

Little Swift

ALL

R

0.01775

I

ORDER 4 : Bucerotiformes

Family: Upupidae

16

Upupa epops (Linnaeus, 1758)

Common Hoopoe

ALL

R

0.00049

I

Family: Bucerotidae

17

Ocyceros birostris (Scopoli, 1786)

Indian Grey Hornbill

W

R

0.00002

F

ORDER 5 : Charadriiformes

Family: Charadriidae

18

Charadrius dubius (Scopoli, 1786)

Little Ringed Plover

M, PM, W

R

0.00215

IV

19

Vanellus indicus (Boddaert, 1783)

Red-wattled Lapwing

S, W

R

0.00044

IV

20

Vanellus malabaricus (Boddaert, 1783)

Yellow-wattled Lapwing

ALL

R

0.00367

IV

Family: Jacanidae

21

Hydrophasianus chirurgus (Scopoli, 1786)

Pheasant-tailed Jacana

ALL

R

0.00338

IV

22

Metopidius indicus (Latham, 1790)

Bronze-winged Jacana

ALL

R

0.00605

O

Family: Scolopacidae

23

Actitis hypoleucos (Linnaeus, 1758)

Common Sandpiper

W

WM

0.00018

C

24

Gallinago gallinago (Linnaeus, 1758)

Common Snipe

S, W

WM

0.00128

O

25

Calidris temminckii (Leisler, 1812)

Temmnick’s Stint

W

WM

0.00175

IV

Family: Laridae

26

Gelochelidon nilotica (Gmelin, 1789)

Gull-billed Tern

PM,W

WM

0.00167

I

ORDER 6 : Ciconiiformes

Family: Ciconiidae

27

Anastomus oscitans (Boddaert, 1783)

Asian Openbill-Stork

ALL

R

0.01043

M

28

Leptoptilos javanicus (Horsfield, 1821)

Lesser Adjutant

S, M, W

R

0.00023

C

ORDER 7 : Columbiformes

Family: Columbidae

29

Columba livia (Gmelin, 1789)

Rock Pigeon

ALL

R

0.04163

G

30

Spilopelia chinensis (Scopoli, 1768)

Spotted Dove

ALL

R

0.01801

G

31

Streptopelia decaocto (Frivaldszky, 1838)

Eurasian Collared-Dove

ALL

WM

0.01599

G

32

Streptopelia tranquebarica (Hermann, 1804)

Red Turtle Dove

PM, W

R

0.00026

H

33

Treron phoenicopterus (Latham, 1790)

Yellow-footed Green Pigeon

ALL

R

0.00532

F

ORDER 8 : Coraciiformes

Family: Alcedinidae

34

Alcedo atthis (Linnaeus, 1758)

Small blue Kingfisher

ALL

R

0.00461

C

35

Ceryle rudis (Linnaeus, 1758)

Pied Kingfisher

ALL

R

0.00086

C

36

Halcyon smyrnensis (Linnaeus, 1758)

White-throated Kingfisher

ALL

R

0.00469

C

Family: Coraciidae

37

Coracias benghalensis (Linnaeus, 1758)

Indian Roller

ALL

R

0.00364

C

Family: Meropidae

38

Merops orientalis (Latham, 1802)

Green Bee-eater

S, PM, W

R

0.03565

I

Family: Campephagidae

39

Coracina macei (Lesson, 1830)

Large Cuckooshrike

PM, W

R

0.00018

I

ORDER 9 : Cuculiformes

Family: Cuculidae

40

Centropus sinensis (Stephens, 1815)

Greater Coucal

W

R

0.00021

C

41

Centropus bengalensis (Gmelin, 1788)

Lesser Coucal

ALL

R

0.00154

C

42

Clamator jacobinus (Boddaert, 1783)

Jacobin Cuckoo

S, M, PM

SM

0.00013

O

43

Hierococcyx varius (Vahl, 1797)

Common Hawk-Cuckoo

ALL

R

0.00065

O

44

Eudynamys scolopaceus
(Linnaeus, 1758)

Asian Koel

S, M, PM, W

R

0.00157

F

ORDER 10: Falconiformes

Family: Falconidae

45

Falco tinnunculus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Common Kestrel

W

R

0.00005

C

ORDER 11 : Galliformes

Family: Phasianidae

46

Francolinus pondicerianus (Gmelin, 1789)

Grey Francolin

S, PM, W

R

0.00123

G

ORDER 12 : Gruiformes

Family: Rallidae

47

Amaurornis phoenicurus (Pennant, 1769)

White-breasted Waterhen

ALL

R

0.00341

O

48

Fulica atra (Linnaeus, 1758)

Common Coot

ALL

R

0.00697

O

49

Gallinula chloropus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Common Moorhen

ALL

R

0.00521

O

50

Porphyrio porphyrio (Linnaeus, 1758)

Purple Swamphen

ALL

R

0.00875

O

ORDER 13 : Passeriformes

Family: Alaudidae

51

Eremopterix griseus (Scopoli, 1786)

Ashy-crowned Sparrow-lark

PM

WM

0.00026

O

Family: Cisticolidae

52

Orthotomus sutorius (Pennant, 1769)

Common Tailorbird

S, M, PM

R

0.00225

O

53

Prinia socialis (Sykes, 1832)

Ashy Prinia

W

R

0.00010

O

54

Cisticola juncidis (Rafinesque, 1810)

Zitting Cisticola

PM, W

R

0.00118

I

Family: Corvidae

55

Corvus splendens (Vieillot, 1817)

House Crow

ALL

R

0.02420

O

56

Dendrocitta vagabunda (Latham, 1790)

Rufous Treepie

ALL

R

0.00797

O

Family: Dicruridae

57

Dicrurus macrocercus (Vieillot, 1817)

Black Drongo

ALL

R

0.02608

I

58

Dicrurus aeneus (Vieillot, 1817)

Bronzed Drongo

M

R

0.00005

I

Family: Estrildidae

59

Euodice malabarica (Linnaeus, 1758)

Indian Silverbill

ALL

R

0.01814

O

60

Lonchura punctulata (Linnaeus, 1758)

Scaly-breasted Munia

ALL

R

0.01473

G

Family: Hirundinidae

61

Hirundo rustica (Linnaeus, 1758)

Barn Swallow

S, W

WM

0.00133

I

62

Ptyonoprogne concolor (Sykes, 1832)

Dusky Crag Martin

W

WM

0.00078

I

Family: Laniidae

63

Lanius cristatus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Brown Shrike

W

WM

0.00005

IV

64

Lanius schach (Linnaeus, 1758)

Long-tailed Shrike

W

WM

0.00013

IV

65

Turdoides striata (Dumont, 1823)

Jungle Babbler

ALL

R

0.03807

I

66

Iduna caligata (Lichtenstein, 1823)

Booted Warbler

W

R

0.00036

I

67

Acrocephalus stentoreus (Hemprich & Ehrenberg, 1833)

Clamorous Reed Warbler

PM, W

R

0.00010

I

Family: Motacillidae

68

Anthus rufulus (Vieillot, 1818)

Paddyfield Pipit

ALL

R

0.00642

I

69

Anthus hodgsoni (Richmond, 1907)

Olive-backed Pipit

PM, W

WM

0.00097

O

70

Anthus trivialis (Linnaeus, 1758)

Tree Pipit

PM

 

0.00018

O

71

Motacilla alba (Linnaeus, 1758)

White Wagtail

ALL

WM

0.00571

C

72

Motacilla cinerea (Tunstall, 1771)

Grey Wagtail

S,W

WM

0.00149

I

73

Motacilla citreola (Pallas, 1776)

Citrine Wagtail

S, PM,W

WM

0.00217

C

74

Motacilla flava (Linnaeus, 1758)

Yellow Wagtail

S, W

WM

0.00212

O

Family: Muscicapidae

75

Copsychus saularis (Linnaeus, 1758)

Oriental Magpie Rrobin

ALL

R

0.00791

I

76

Ficedula albicilla (Pallas, 1811)

Taiga Flycatcher

W

WM

0.00021

I

77

Saxicoloides fulicatus (Linnaeus, 1766)

Indian Robin

ALL

R

0.00333

O

78

Saxicola maurus (Pallas, 1773)

Siberian Stonechat

W

WM

0.00026

I

79

Phoenicurus ochruros (S.G. Gmelin, 1774)

Black Redstart

W

WM

0.00002

O

80

Eumyias thalassinus (Swainson, 1838)

Verditer Flycatcher

W

WM

0.00002

O

81

Luscinia svecica (Linnaeus, 1758)

Blue Throat

PM, W

WM

0.00178

O

Family: Nectariniidae

82

Cinnyris asiaticus (Latham, 1790)

Purple Sunbird

ALL

R

0.00228

N

83

Leptocoma zeylonica (Linnaeus, 1766)

Purple-rumped Sunbird

ALL

R

0.00333

N

Family: Oriolidae

84

Oriolus kundoo (Sykes, 1832)

Indian Golden Oriole

ALL

R

0.00440

O

85

Oriolus xanthornus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Black-hooded Oriole

ALL

R

0.00506

O

Family: Passeridae

86

Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758)

House Sparrow

ALL

R

0.00797

G

87

Gymnoris xanthocollis (Burton, 1838)

Chestnut Shouldered Petronia

PM

R

0.00002

H

Family: Ploceidae

88

Ploceus philippinus (Linnaeus, 1766)

Baya Weaver

ALL

R

0.01324

G

Family: Pycnonotidae

89

Pycnonotus cafer (Linnaeus, 1766)

Red-vented Bulbul

S, M, PM

R

0.00749

O

Family: Phylloscopidae

90

Phylloscopus trochiloides (Sundevall, 1837)

Greenish Warbler

S, M

WM

0.00031

IV

Family: Sturnidae

91

Acridotheres ginginianus (Latham, 1790)

Bank Myna

ALL

R

0.09439

O

92

Acridotheres tristis (Linnaeus, 1766)

Common Myna

ALL

R

0.07866

O

93

Gracupica contra (Linnaeus, 1758)

Asian Pied Starling

ALL

R

0.04719

O

94

Sturnia malabarica (Gmelin, 1789)

Chestnut-tailed Starling

ALL

R

0.00749

O

95

Sturnia pagodarum (Gmelin, 1789)

Brahminy Starling

ALL

R

0.00773

O

Family: Chloropseidae

96

Chloropsis jerdoni (Blyth, 1844)

Jordan's Leafbird

PM, W

R

0.00073

O

ORDER 14 : Pelecaniformes

Family: Ardeidae

97

Ardea alba (Linnaeus, 1758)

Great White Egret

ALL

R

0.00086

C

98

Ardea intermedia (Wagler, 1827)

Intermediate Egret

S, W

R

0.00010

C

99

Ardea purpurea (Linnaeus, 1766)

Purple Heron

S, PM, W

R

0.00028

C

100

Ardeola grayii (Sykes, 1832)

Indian Pond Heron

ALL

R

0.01208

C

101

Bubulcus ibis (Linnaeus, 1758)

Cattle Egret

ALL

R

0.00975

C

102

Egretta garzetta (Linnaeus, 1766)

Little Egret

ALL

R

0.01491

C

103

Nycticorax nycticorax (Linnaeus, 1758)

Black-crowned Night Heron

ALL

R

0.00576

C

Family: Threskiornithidae

104

Pseudibis papillosa (Temminck, 1824)

Red-Naped Ibis

ALL

WM

0.01030

C

105

Threskiornis melanocephalus (Latham, 1790)

Black-headed Ibis

ALL

WM

0.00870

I

ORDER 15 : Piciformes

Family: Picidae

106

Dinopium benghalense (Linnaeus, 1758)

Black-rumped Flameback Woodpecker

ALL

R

0.00099

I

Family: Megalaimidae

107

Psilopogon haemacephalus (Statius Muller, 1776)

Coppersmith Barbet

S, PM, W

R

0.00401

F

ORDER 16 : Podicipediformes

Family: Podicipedidae

108

Tachybaptus ruficollis (Pallas, 1764)

Little Grebe

ALL

R

0.00388

C

ORDER 17 : Psittaciformes

Family: Psittaculidae

109

Psittacula eupatria (Linnaeus, 1766)

Alexandrine Parakeet

ALL

R

0.02168

H

110

Psittacula krameri (Scopoli, 1769)

Rose-ringed Parakeet

ALL

R

0.02003

H

ORDER 18: Strigiformes

Family: Strigidae

111

Athene brama (Temminck, 1821)

Spotted Owlet

ALL

R

0.00361

C

112

Bubo bengalensis (Franklin, 1831)

Indian Eagle-owl

S

R

0.00002

C

113

Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769)

Barn Owl

ALL

R

0.00152

C

ORDER 19: Suliformes

Family: Phalacrocoracidae

114

Phalacrocorax carbo (Linnaeus, 1758)

Great Cormorant

S

R

0.00002

C

115

Phalacrocorax fuscicollis (Stephens, 1826)

Indian Cormorant

ALL

R

0.01224

C

# PM—Pre Monsoon | M—Monsoon | W—Winter | S—Summer

^R—Resident | WM—Winter migrant | SM—Summer Migrant

* Pi value— species abundance/total abundance in the community

$ O—Omnivorous | C—Carnivorous | I—Insectivorous |  IV—Invertivorous |  M—Molluscivorous | H—Herbivorous | G—Granivorous | N—Nectarivorous | F—Frugivorous

 

 

Table 2. Species richness values (both month-wise and season-wise) of the birds recorded in the present study.

Seasons

Months

Species Richness Values

Month wise

Season wise

Summer

Mar

81

85

Apr

69

May

67

Monsoon

Jun

62

69

Jul

58

Aug

61

Post-monsoon

Sep

63

86

Oct

66

Nov

82

Winter

 

Dec

99

104

 

Jan

96

Feb

85

 

For figures & images - - click here

 

REFERENCES

 

Ali, S. (2002). The Book of Indian Birds (13th Revised Edition). Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 326pp.

Bibby, C.J., N.D. Burgess & D.A. Hill (1992). Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London, 257pp.

Billerman, S.M., B.K. Keeney, P.G. Rodewald & T.S. Schulenberg (Eds.) (2020). Birds of the World. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/home

BirdLife International (2018). State of the world’s birds: indicators for our changing world. Cambridge, UK. www.birdlife.org.

Blake, J.G., J.M. Hanowski, G.J. Niemi & P.T. Collins (1994). Annual variation in bird populations of mixed conifer northern hardwood forests. Condor 96: 381–399.

Buckland, S.T., D.R. Anderson, K.P. Burnham, J.L. Laake, D.L. Borchers & L. Thomas (Eds.) (2004). Advanced Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 434pp.

Das, D. (2016). Above ground arthropod diversity in a tropical deciduous forest in Ayodhya Hill, Purulia, India. Proceedings of the Zoological Society 69: 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-015-0140-0

Das D. (2018). Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) diversity in relation to habitat utilization at Jagannath Kishore College, Purulia, West Bengal (India). Journal of Insect Biodiversity 007(1): 001–016. https://doi.org/10.12976/jib/2018.07.1.1

Daube, J., H. Michaela, S. Dietmar, W. Rainer, O. Annette & W. Volkmar (2003). Landscape structure as an indicator of biodiversity: matrix effects on species richness. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 98: 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00092-6

Gajera, N.B., A.K.R. Mahato & V.V. Kumar (2013). Status, distribution, and diversity of birds in mining environment of Kachchh, Gujarat. International Journal of Biodiversity 2013: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/471618

Gaston, K.J.  (2000). Biodiversity: higher taxon richness. Progress in Physical Geography 24: 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913330002400108

Ghosh, S. (2010). Urban biodiversity of Calcutta: Flowering plants, Butterflies, Birds and Mammals West Bengal, India, West Bengal, India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 327: 1–250.

Gibbons, D.W. & R.D. Gregory (2006). Birds, pp 308–344. In: Sutherland, W.J. (ed.). Ecological Census Techniques: AHandbook. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 446pp.

Grimmett, R., C. Inskipp & T. Inskipp (2011). Birds of the India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Sri Lanka and the Maldives. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 528pp.

Hadley, S.J.K., A.S. Hadley & M. Betts (2012). Acoustic classification of multiple simultaneous bird species: a multi-instance multi label approach. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 131(6): 4640–4650. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4707424

BirdLife International (2018). Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 3. Available at: http://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_v3_Nov18.zip.

Hossain, A. & G. Aditya (2016). Avian diversity in agricultural landscape: Records from Burdwan, West Bengal, India. Proceedings of the Zoological  Society 69(1): 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-014-0118-3

Hutto, R.L., S.M. Pletschet, P. Hendricks (1986). A fixed–radius point count method for non-breeding and breeding season use.  Auk 103: 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/103.3.593

Jankowski, J.E., A.L. Ciecka, N.Y. Meyer & K.N. Rabenold (2009). Beta diversity along environmental gradient: implications of habitat specialization in tropical montane landscapes. Journal of Animal Ecology 78: 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01487.x

Javed, S. & R. Kaul (2000). Field Methods for Birds Survey. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, India, Department of Wildlife Sciences, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh and World Pheasant Association, South Asia Regional Office (SARO), Delhi.  Mumbai, 61pp.

Jayson, E. & D.N. Mathew (2000).Diversity and species abundance distribution of birds in the tropical forests of Silent Valley, Kerala. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 97: 390–400.

Khan, T.N., A. Sinha & P. Hazra (2016). Population trends and community composition of migratory waterbirds in three emerging wetlands of global significance in southwestern Bengal, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(3): 8541–8555. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2652.8.3.8541-8555

Koskimies, P. (1989). Birds as a tool in environmental monitoring. Annales Zoological Fennici 26: 153–166.

Lawton, J.H. (2000). Community Ecology in a Changing World. Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe.Germany, 227pp.

Magurran, A.E. (2004). Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing.  Oxford, UK, 256pp.

McAleece, N., J.D.G. Gage, P.J.D. Lambshead & G.L.J. Paterson (1997). BioDiversity Professional Statistics Analysis Software. Jointly developed by the Scottish Association for Marine Science and the Natural History Museum London.

Morrison, M.L. (1986). Bird population as indicators of environmental change. Current Ornithology 3: 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6784-4_10

Nandi, N.C., S. Bhuinya & S.R. Das (2004). Notes on mid-winter water bird population of some selected wetlands of Bankura and Purulia districts, West Bengal. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 102(Part 1–2): 47–51.

O’Connell, T.J., L.E. Jackson & R.P. Brooks (2000). Bird guilds as indicators of ecological condition in the Central Appalachians. Ecological  Applications 10: 1706–1721. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1706:BGAIOE]2.0.CO;2

Prasad, K.K., B. Ramakrishna, C. Srinivasulu & B. Srinivasulu (2014). Avifaunal diversity of Manjeera Wildlife Sanctuary, Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 6(2): 5464–5467. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3505.5464-77

Ramchandra, A.M. (2013). Diversity and richness of bird species in newly formed habitats of Chandoli National Park in Western Ghats, Maharashtra State, India. Biodiversity Journal 4(1): 235–242

Rodríguez-Estrella, R. (2007). Land use changes affect distributional patterns of desert birds in the Baja California peninsula, Mexico. Diversity and Distribution 13: 877–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00387.x

Roy, U.S., A.R. Goswami, A. Aich & S.K. Mukhopadhyay (2011). Changes in densities of water bird species in Santragachi Lake, India: potential effects on limno chemical variables. Zoological Studies 50(1): 76–84.

Samanta, S, D. Das & S. Mandal (2017). Butterfly fauna of Baghmundi, Purulia,
West Bengal, India: a preliminary checklist. Journal of Threatened Taxa 9(5): 10198–10207.
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2841.9.5.10198-10207

Savidge, J.A. (1984). Guam: paradise lost for wildlife. Biological Conservation 30: 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(84)90049-1

Sengupta, S., M. Mondal & P. Basu (2014). Bird species assemblages across a rural urban gradient around Kolkata, India. Urban Ecosystems 17(2): 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0335-y

Storch, D., M. Konvicka, J. Benes, J. Martinková & K. Gaston (2003). Distribution patterns in butterflies and birds of the Czech Republic: Separating effects of habitat and geographical position. Journal of Biogeography 30(8): 1195–1208. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00917.x