Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 September 2026 | 18(9): 29596–29605

 

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) 

https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.10118.18.9.29596-29605   

#10118 | Received 30 August 2025 | Final received 13 July 2026| Finally accepted 21 August 2026

 

Avifaunal diversity with reference to their feeding guilds of Mahadare Conservation Reserve, Maharashtra, India

 

Riya Patil 1 , Gayatri Pawar 2, Neha Bendre 3 , Aruna Shelar 4  & Sunil Bhoite 5        

 

1,2,4,5  Mahadare Ecological Research (Interdisciplinary) Organization, Satara, Maharashtra 415002, India.

3 Yashwantrao Chavan Institute of Science, Satara, Maharashtra 415001, India.

1 riornitho06@gmail.com (corresponding author), 2 gayatripawar805@gmail.com, 3 nehabendre1277@gmail.com,

4 arunashelar1194@gmail.com, 5 bhoitesunil@rediffmail.com

 

 

 

Editor: H. Byju, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.             Date of publication: 26 September 2026 (online & print)

 

Citation: Patil, R., G. Pawar, N. Bendre, A. Shelar & S. Bhoite (2026). Avifaunal diversity with reference to their feeding guilds of Mahadare Conservation Reserve, Maharashtra, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 18(9): 29596–29605. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.10118.18.9.29596-29605

  

Copyright: © Patil et al. 2026. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.

 

Funding: None.

 

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Author details: Riya Patil is a freelance researcher at Mahadare Ecological Research (Interdisciplinary) Organization (MERI), Satara, and is pursuing a master’s in Environmental Science and Conservation Practices at ATREE, Bengaluru. Her primary research interests include avifaunal behaviour, ecology, and bird conservation.

Gayatri Pawar is a freelance researcher at Mahadare Ecological Research (Interdisciplinary) Organization (MERI), Satara, and is pursuing a PhD on the entomofauna of the Kaas Plateau. Neha Bendre is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Zoology and Fisheries at Yashwantrao Chavan Institute of Science, Satara. Her academic and professional work focuses on zoology and related biological sciences. Sunil Bhoite is a founder, mentor and researcher at Mahadare Ecological Research (Interdisciplinary) Organization (MERI), Satara. He has served as the Honorary Wildlife Warden of Satara District for the past 14 years and contributes to wildlife conservation and research. Aruna Shelar is a freelance researcher at Mahadare Ecological Research (Interdisciplinary) Organization (MERI), Satara. Her research interests focus on birds.

 

Author contributions: Riya Patil contributed to conceptualisation, field surveys, data collection, and manuscript writing. Gayatri Pawar contributed to manuscript writing and editing. Sunil Bhoite contributed to conceptualisation and manuscript editing. Neha Bendre contributed to manuscript writing and editing. Aruna Shelar contributed to field surveys and data collection.

 

Acknowledgements: We express our sincere gratitude to the Satara Forest Department (T) and Mahadare Ecological Research (Interdisciplinary) Organization, Satara, for their contributions and cooperation throughout the study and for providing the opportunity and needful resources to carry out the research.

 

 

Abstract: The study aims to provide baseline data on avian diversity and their feeding guilds in the Mahadare Conservation Reserve.  Surveys were conducted over a period of two years, from April 2021 to May 2023, with point count methods. A total of 126 species of birds were recorded, with the order Passeriformes being dominant, followed by Accipitriformes. The findings also showed that the Insectivore guild had the highest number of species, followed by Carnivore and Omnivore guilds, respectively. Furthermore, the study also recorded high feeding guild diversity (H’FD = 2.247), which provides a basis for diversity and feeding behavior. The records include seven endemic, three ‘Vulnerable’, and two ‘Near Threatened’ species, along with seven winter migrants and 23 local migrant species, highlighting the avifaunal significance of the area. The study area is surrounded by human settlements and still holds a diversity of birds, and attention is required to understand more about the guilds, along with their distribution and preferences. This first-time study documents avifaunal diversity, evaluates feeding guilds, and assesses the conservation significance of Mahadare Conservation Reserve.

 

Keywords: Baseline data, bird conservation, ecotone, feeding behavior, functional diversity, guild distribution, scheduled species, Western Ghats.

 

 

Introduction

 

Birds are recognized as excellent biodiversity indicators due to their diverse range of habitats and distribution (Fraixedas et al. 2020). Since they belong to higher trophic levels in a food web, they are easily affected by the variations or effects caused on the lower levels. They are also effective bio-controllers, thus reducing their harmful effects on the environment as well as human health (Gregory et al. 2003; Manigandan et al. 2024). Food and feeding habits of birds influence their reproductive success and also provide more details about the constitution of a habitat (Molokwu-Odozi et al. 2007; Archana et al. 2024). Livestock grazing, human encroachment, extraction of resources, an increase in agricultural land, and non-native monoculture plantations lead to degradation of the habitat. These major threats are the genesis of habitat fragmentation, forming discontinuous systems and producing the edge effect in birds (Kale et al. 2010). Logging has caused significant ecosystem damage to the region, exposing the avian population to edge effects, human activities, predators, and brood parasites. The resulting loss of forest cover and leaf litter also affects the forest interior-dependent birds, which rely on closed canopy forest conditions away from habitat edge (Zakaria et al. 2014; Shafie et al. 2023).

Bird feeding guilds provide valuable insights into functional diversity and ecosystem functioning by reflecting resource use, trophic interactions, and habitat quality, making them effective indicators of ecological integrity (Naveen et al. 2026). In the biodiversity-rich Western Ghats, conservation reserves play a crucial role in safeguarding heterogeneous habitats and their avifauna, yet information on the functional structure of bird communities in many reserves remains limited. Mahadare forest lies in the northwestern part of Satara District, Maharashtra (Mohite et al. 2020). It comprises evergreen, semi-evergreen, and deciduous forest types, forming a unique ecotone region, and was declared a conservation reserve in 2022 (WLP.06.22/CR-170/F-1). The forest also consists of paddy cultivation, adding to the lepidopteran and arachnid diversity. Mahadare is a fragmented patch situated within the city and is surrounded by settlements, making it susceptible to anthropogenic activities such as logging, light pollution, and constant disturbance. It is also a part of the Western Ghats and is therefore home to a diversity of organisms. However, there exists a gap in the study of avian diversity in the region, making this the first methodical avifaunal survey of the area with an aim to document avifaunal diversity, evaluate functional composition through feeding guilds, and assess the conservation significance of Mahadare Conservation Reserve.

 

 

Materials and Methods

 

Study area

Mahadare Conservation Reserve (MCR) (17.247° N, 73.963° E) situated at an average elevation of 800 m, lies in the northern Western Ghats, with temperatures ranging from 19–31 oC. Its topography includes paddy fields, human settlements, teakwood plantations, grassland, and wetlands with a total area of 105 ha. The reserve consists of two major water bodies, one being a reservoir and the second an irrigation tank (Sutar et al. 2025)

 

Data collection

Field surveys were carried out for a period of two years, from April 2021 to May 2023, twice a week in four-hour time blocks (600–1,000 h; 1,000–1,400 h; 1,400–1,800 h), which were covered on alternate days using the point count method and opportunistic sightings. The points were allotted empirically in the form of concentric zones (Image 1) around the point (approximately 100 m), and birds were identified with their audio and visual cues (Roy et al. 2013). A total of eight points (human settlement, teak plantations, forest area, paddy field, grassland 1, grassland 2, Mahadare Lake, Elephant Lake) were identified in the area with a minimum distance of 100 m between them. Bird observations and documentation were done with the help of a camera (Nikon D5300) and Nikon Action EX 7 x 50 binoculars. The standard field guides were referred to for species identification (Grimmett et al. 1998; Ali 2002). Feeding guilds were assigned based on field observations (Aggarwal et al. 2015; Mukhopadhyay & Mazumdar 2019; Bernard et al. 2023). The migratory status of birds was followed (Bhuyan et al. 2024). Species present year-round were classified as Resident (R), those observed only in winter were marked as Winter Migratory (WM), and those migrating locally as Local Migratory (LM). IUCN Red List categories: Vulnerable (VU), Near Threatened (NT), and Least Concern (LC) have been mentioned for the respective species (Derebe et al. 2023). The Wildlife Protection Act status: Schedule I and II were followed (Gaur et al. 2021).

 

Data analysis

The Shannon–Wiener index (Shannon & Weaver 1963) was used to understand the feeding guild richness (Gamito & Furtado 2009).

It is calculated as: H’FD = -∑ⁿᵢ₌₁ (pᵢ log₂ pᵢ)

Where pi is the relative abundance of the ith feeding group, obtained as pi = fgi / ∑ⁿᵢ₌₁ fgi with fgi representing the number of individuals belonging to the ith feeding group, and n being the total number of feeding groups. This index varied between 0 and H’FD maximum (H’FDmax = log2n); that is, for six feeding guilds, it would range between 0–2.584. The evenness index (Pielou 1969) would help in understanding the feeding guild distribution in species with the equation: JFD = H’FD / H’FDmax, which varies between 0–1. All graphs (Pie charts and bar plots) were prepared in Microsoft Excel 365.

 

 

Results and Discussion

 

In the present study, a total of 126 species of birds, belonging to 19 different orders and 55 families, were recorded (Table 1). Among these, order Passeriformes (58) represented the highest number of species, followed by order Accipitriformes (10). The fewest species were found in order Sulliformes (1), Podicipediformes (1), and Ciconiiformes (1) (Image 2). The families that recorded the highest number of species are Accipitridae (10), Muscicapidae (8) and Cuculidae (6). In addition, 124 (98%) of the recorded bird species were listed under the Wildlife Protection Act of 1972. Of these, a total of 17 (13%) birds were categorised under Schedule I and 107 (84%) under Schedule II. According to the IUCN Red List criteria, two ‘Near Threatened’ species, Asian Woolly-necked Stork Ciconia episcopus, and Indian Courser Cursorius coromandelicus, and three ‘Vulnerable’ species, Tawny Eagle Aquila rapax, River Tern Sterna aurantia, and Great Hornbill Buceros bicornis, were observed. The remaining 121 species were listed under ‘Least Concern’.

Additionally, the study also reports seven species in the region that are endemic to India, namely Indian Scimitar-Babbler Pomatorhinus horsfieldii, Indian Yellow Tit Machlolophus aplonotus, Spot-breasted Fantail Rhipidura albogularis, White-cheeked Barbet Psilopogon viridis, Grey Junglefowl Gallus sonneratii, Malabar Lark Galerida malabarica, and Malabar Whistling-Thrush Myophonus horsfieldii (Table 1). The studies of Sayyed (2016) recorded 208 avian species across 10,48,000 ha of Satara District, whereas our study, conducted within just 105 ha, recorded 126 avian species, which accounts for approximately 61% of the total species reported in the district. This underscores the ecological importance of the present habitat. The nearest Important Bird and Biodiversity Area (IBA) site, Koyna Wildlife Sanctuary (Mehta 2012), recorded 269 species of birds (Sreekumar & Bhatnagar 2021). The present study documented 96 (76%) birds resident to the Indian subcontinent, 23 (18%)  Local Migratory, and seven (5%) Winter Migratory species.

Birds observed during the study are placed under six different categories according to their dietary preferences as Insectivore, Carnivore, Nectivore, Omnivore, Granivore, and Frugivore. MCR consists of a mosaic of different habitats (Image 3). These include two freshwater bodies and small seasonal streams. Surrounding these water bodies are patches of dry deciduous forest characterized by an open canopy and seasonal leaf shedding. The landscape also features patches of semi-evergreen and evergreen forest. In addition, grasslands and cultivated paddy fields add to the habitat heterogeneity. The diverse habitat structures within the study area influence the coexistence of avian species (Panda et al. 2021; Byju et al. 2025; Kumar et al. 2025). It was seen that the Insectivore guild (38) comprised the highest number of bird species, followed by Carnivores (34), Omnivores (30), Granivores (12), Frugivores (9), whereas the Nectivore Guild (3) made up the least number of species (Image 4). The feeding guild diversity index (H’FD = 2.25) and the evenness index (JFD= 0.87) show high feeding diversity with a slightly uneven distribution, as Insectivorous and Carnivorous guilds dominate (Ghosh et al. 2022).

The feeding behaviour in birds varies in accordance with resource availability and niche partitioning, eventually providing insights into the habitat. Mahadare, with its diverse habitats, comprises 51 reptile and nine amphibian species (Dhale et al. 2024). These species serve as an important food source for carnivorous avian species, especially for migratory raptors such as the Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus (R. Patil per. obs. 2022). Takahashi & Ohkawara (2007) and Wood et al. (2010) stated that paddy fields are suitable habitats for breeding and foraging of aquatic and terrestrial birds. We have observed that the ploughed soil of paddy fields attracts birds such as Blue-cheeked Bee-eater Merops orientalis, Tickell’s Blue Flycatcher Cyornis tickelliae, Red-vented Bulbul Pycnonotus cafer, Indian Paradise Flycatcher Terpsiphone paradisi, and Black-naped Monarch Hypothymis azurea that feed on the insect diversity of paddy fields.   MCR consists of multiple small streams, a natural reservoir, and an irrigation tank. These waterbodies support rich aquatic biodiversity with 22 species of fish, which serve as a food source for the fish-eating birds (Mohite et al. 2020). The waterbodies host 21 species of aquatic birds from two feeding guilds: Carnivore (16) and Omnivore (5). Species from the Carnivorous guild are mainly dependent on fishes and amphibians as their primary source of food, along with invertebrates such as snails, worms, and crustaceans. Aquatic birds such as Indian Spot-billed Duck Anas poecilorhyncha, Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea, and Green-winged Teal Anas crecca of the Omnivorous guild feed on young shoots and seeds of grasses of the aquatic vegetation, along with molluscs and other invertebrates (Image 4).

Butterflies act as a prey base for many avifaunal species . Resendiz-Infante & Gauthier (2020) mentioned observations referring to the seasonal diversity of birds, which often reflects the timing of breeding in accordance with the abundance of caterpillars. Sutar et al. (2025) recorded 184 butterfly species from MCR, which supports the observation of rich insect availability. Similarly, the present study showed bird count at its peak during winter months (Oct-Jan), coinciding with high butterfly activity (Seress et al. 2018). Several insectivorous winter migrants, such as the Bluethroat Luscinia svecica, Ultramarine Flycatcher Ficedula superciliaris, and Red-breasted Flycatcher Ficedula parva, were also recorded during this period. Colour, seed size, and fruiting arrangement influence fruit selection in frugivorous birds (Azman et al. 2011), and Mahadare comprises 392 plant species, which include a diversity of fruiting and flowering trees such as Black Clutch Senegalia catechu, Golden Shower Cassia fistula, and Indian Beech Pongamia pinnata. The region also reported 72 flowering plants, which serve as host plants for butterflies (Bhoite et al. 2025). This indirectly supports avian diversity by hosting their prey base. The floral diversity of the area supports the avian population in numerous ways, including nesting and feeding on those trees or shrubs. During summer, it was observed that birds such as Small Minivet Pericrocotus cinnamomeus, Coppersmith Barbet Psilopogon haemacephalus, Brown-headed Barbet Psilopogon zeylanicus, and Pale-Billed Flowerpecker Dicaeum erythrorhynchos were mostly seen feeding on Cluster Fig Ficus racemosa. Coppersmith Barbet was also seen nesting in the crevices of this tree. Trees such as Red Silk Cotton Bombax ceiba and Indian Mango Mangifera indica are a few important species that are directly beneficial to the avian populations of the region, fulfilling the guild structure. Species such as the Puff-throated Babbler Pellorneum ruficeps were mainly observed foraging in the leaf litter of Teak Tectona grandis by turning over leaves.

 

Conclusion

 

MCR is an ecotone region that acts as a transition zone between diverse habitats. The presence of multiple feeding guilds highlights the functional diversity of the region, not just taxonomic richness. Studying the feeding guild distribution in a region can also help in understanding the various nuances of community assemblages, along with the structural complexity of a given area. Since feeding guilds provide insights into ecosystem functioning, the loss of specific guilds can potentially disrupt activities such as pest regulation, pollination, and seed dispersal, which could severely alter ecosystems. In order to gain in-depth knowledge about the effects of change in feeding guild diversity, it is important to assess the long-term impacts of climate change and land-use change, along with their functional redundancy and resilience.  

 

 

Table 1. Checklist of birds from Mahadare Conservation Reserve, Satara, Maharashtra, India.

Order

Family

Scientific name

Common name

IUCN Red List status

Migratory status (for India)

Feeding guild

Podicipediformes

Podicipedidae

Tachybaptus ruficollis (Pallas, 1764) II

Little Grebe

LC

LM

Car

Sulliformes

Phalacrocoracidae

Microcarbo niger (Vieillot, 1817) II

Little Cormorant

LC

R

Car

Pelicaniformes

Ardeidae

Ardea cinerea ( Linnaeus, 1758) II

Grey Heron

LC

LM

Car

Nycticorax nycticorax (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Black-crowned Night Heron

LC

LM

Car

Ardeola grayii (Sykes, 1832) II

Indian Pond Heron

LC

R

Car

Ardea coromanda (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Eastern Cattle Egret

LC

R

Car

Egretta garzetta (Linnaeus, 1766) II

Little Egret

LC

R

Car

Threskiornithidae

Threskiornis melanocephalus (Latham, 1790) II

Black-headed Ibis

LC

LM

Car

Pseudibis papillosa (Temminck, 1824) II

Red-naped Ibis

LC

LM

Car

Ciconiiformes

Ciconiidae

Ciconia episcopus (Boddaert, 1783) II

Asian Woolly-necked Stork

NT

LM

Car

Anseriformes

Anatidae

Anas poecilorhyncha (Forster, 1781) II

Indian Spot-billed duck

LC

R

Omn

Tadorna ferruginea (Pallas, 1764) II

Ruddy Shelduck

LC

LM

Omn

Anas crecca (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Green-winged Teal

LC

WM

Omn

Accipitriformes

Accipitridae

Elanus caeruleus (Desfontaines, 1789) II

Black-winged kite

LC

R

Car

Pernis ptilorhynchus (Temminck, 1821) II

Crested Honey Buzzard

LC

R

Car

Milvus migrans (Boddaert, 1783) II

Black Kite

LC

R

Car

Haliastur indus (Boddaert, 1783) I

Brahminy Kite

LC

R

Car

Tachyspiza badia (Gmelin, JF, 1788) I

Shikra

LC

R

Car

Aquila rapax (Temminck, 1828) I

Tawny Eagle

VU

LM

Car

Nisaetus cirrhatus (Gmelin, JF, 1788) I

Changeable Hawk- Eagle

LC

R

Car

Aquila fasciata (Vieillot, 1822) I

Bonelli's Eagle

LC

LM

Car

Ictinaetus malaiensis (Temminck, 1822) I

Black Eagle

LC

LM

Car

Spilornis cheela (Latham, 1790) I

Crested Serpent Eagle

LC

R

Car

Falconiformes

Falconidae

Falco tinnunculus (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Common Kestrel

LC

R

Car

 

 

Falco peregrinus (Tunstall, 1771) I

Peregrine Falcon

LC

WM

Car

Galliformes

Phasianidae

Perdicula asiatica (Latham, 1790) II

Jungle Bush Quail

LC

R

Gran

 

 

Gallus sonneratii (Temminck, 1813) I*

Grey Junglefowl

LC

R

Gran

 

 

Pavo cristatus Linnaeus, 1758 I

Indian Peafowl

LC

R

Gran

Gruiformes

Rallidae

Amaurornis phoenicurus (Pennant, 1769) II

White-breasted waterhen

LC

R

Omn

Porphyrio poliocephalus (Latham, 1801) II

Grey-headed swamphen

LC

R

Omn

Charadriiformes

Recurvirostridae

Himantopus himantopus (Latham, 1801) II

Black-winged Stilt

LC

LM

Car

Glareolidae

Cursorius coromandelicus (Gmelin, JF, 1789) I

Indian Courser

NT

LM

Car

Charadriidae

Vanellus indicus (Boddaert, 1783) II

Red-wattled Lapwing

LC

R

Car

Laridae

Sterna aurantia (Gray, JE), 1831 I

River Tern

VU

LM

Car

Columbiformes

Columbidae

Treron phoenicopterus (Latham, 1790) II

Yellow-footed Green Pigeon

LC

R

Gran

Columba livia (Gmelin JF, 1789)

Rock Pigeon

LC

R

Gran

Spilopelia chinensis (Scopoli, 1786) II

Spotted Dove

LC

R

Gran

Spilopelia senegalensis (Linnaeus, 1766) II

Laughing Dove

LC

R

Gran

Chalcophaps indica (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Asian Emerald Dove

LC

LM

Gran

Psittaciformes

Psittaculidae

Psittacula krameri (Scopoli, 1769) II

Rose-ringed Parakeet

LC

R

Frug

Psittacula eupatria (Linnaeus, 1766) II

Alexandrine Parakeet

LC

R

Frug

Psittacula cyanocephala (Linnaeus, 1766) II

Plum-headed Parakeet

LC

R

Frug

Loriculus vernalis (Sparrman, 1787) II

Vernal Hanging Parrot

LC

LM

Frug

Cuculiformes

Cuculidae

Cuculus micropterus (Gould, 1838) II

Indian Cuckoo

LC

R

Omn

Hierococcyx varius (Vahl, 1797) II

Common Hawk Cuckoo

LC

R

Ins

Cacomantis passerinus (Vahl, 1797) II

Grey-bellied Cuckoo

LC

LM

Ins

Clamator coromandus (Linnaeus, 1766) II

Chestnut-winged Cuckoo

LC

LM

Omn

Eudynamys scolopaceus (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Asian Koel

LC

R

Omn

Centropus sinensis (Stephens, 1815) II

Greater Coucal

LC

R

Omn

Strigiformes

Tytonidae

Tyto javanica (Scopoli, 1769) I

Eastern Barn Owl

LC

R

Car

Strigidae

Bubo bengalensis (Franklin, 1831) I

Rock Eagle- Owl

LC

R

Car

Athene brama (Temminck, 1821) II

Spotted Owlet

LC

R

Car

Caprimulgiformes

Apodidae

Apus affinis (Hodgson, 1837) II

Little Swift

LC

R

Ins

Caprimulgidae

Caprimulgus indicus (Latham, 1790) II

Jungle Nightjar

LC

LM

Ins

Coraciiformes

Alcedinidae

Ceryle rudis (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Pied Kingfisher

LC

R

Car

Alcedo atthis (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Common Kingfisher

LC

R

Car

Halcyon smyrnensis (Linnaeus, 1758) II

White-throated Kingfisher

LC

R

Car

Meropidae

Merops orientalis (Latham, 1801) II

Asian Green Bee-eater

LC

R

Ins

Coraciidae

Coracias benghalensis (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Indian Roller

LC

LM

Omn

Bucerotiformes

Upupidae

Upupa epops (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Common Hoopoe

LC

LM

Omn

Bucerotidae

Buceros bicornis (Linnaeus, 1758) I

Great Hornbill

VU

LM

Frug

Ocyceros birostris (Scopoli, 1786) II

Indian Grey Hornbill

LC

R

Frug

Piciformes

Megalaimidae

Psilopogon hemacephalus (S. Müller, 1776) II

Coppersmith Barbet

LC

R

Frug

Psilopogon zeylanicus (Gmelin JF, 1788) II

Brown-headed Barbet

LC

R

Frug

Psilopogon viridis (Boddaert, 1783) II*

White-cheeked Barbet

LC

R

Frug

Picidae

Leiopicus mahrattensis (Latham, 1801) I

Yellow-crowned Woodpecker

LC

R

Ins

Dinopium benghalense (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Black-rumped Flameback

LC

R

Ins

Dryocopus javensis (Horsfield, 1821) II

White-bellied Woodpecker

LC

R

Ins

Passeriformes

Alaudidae

Galerida malabarica (Scopoli, 1786) II*

Malabar Lark

LC

LM

Omn

Hirundinidae

Hirundo rustica Linnaeus, 1758 II

Barn Swallow

LC

R

Ins

Petrochelidon fluvicola (Blyth, 1855) II

Streak-throated Swallow

LC

R

Ins

Hirundo smithii (Leach, 1818) II

Wire-tailed Swallow

LC

R

Ins

Laniidae

Lanius schach (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Long-tailed Shrike

LC

R

Ins

Oriolidae

Oriolus kundoo (Sykes, 1832) II

Indian Golden Oriole

LC

R

Omn

Dicruridae

Dicrurus macrocercus (Vieillot, 1817) II

Black Drongo

LC

R

Omn

Dicrurus leucophaeus (Vieillot, 1817) II

Ashy Drongo

LC

WM

Omn

Dicrurus caerulescens (Linnaeus, 1758) II

White-Bellied Drongo

LC

R

Omn

Sturnidae

Sturnia pagodarum (Gmelin, JF, 1789) II

Brahminy Starling

LC

R

Omn

Acridotheres tristis (Linnaeus, 1766) II

Common Myna

LC

R

Omn

Acridotheres fuscus (Wagler, 1827) II

Jungle Myna

LC

R

Omn

Corvidae

Dendrocitta vagabunda (Latham, 1790) II

Rufous Treepie

LC

R

Ins

Corvus splendens (Vieillot, 1817)

House Crow

LC

R

Omn

Corvus macrorhynchos Wagler, 1827 II

Large-billed Crow

LC

R

Omn

Vangidae

Tephrodornis pondicerianus (Gmelin JF, 1789) II

Common Woodshrike

LC

R

Omn

Campephagidae

Lalage melanoptera (Rüppell, 1839) II

Black-headed Cuckooshrike

LC

LM

Omn

Pericrocotus speciosus (Latham, 1790) II

Scarlet Minivet

LC

R

Ins

Pericrocotus cinnamomeus (Linnaeus, 1766) I

Small Minivet

LC

R

Ins

Passeriformes

Aegithinidae

Aegithina tiphia (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Common Iora

LC

R

Ins

Pycnonotidae

Pycnonotus cafer (Linnaeus, 1766) II

Red-vented Bulbul

LC

R

Omn

Pycnonotus jocosus (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Red-whiskered Bulbul

LC

R

Omn

Pellorneidae

Pellorneum ruficeps (Swainson, 1832) II

Puff-throated Babbler

LC

R

Ins

Timaliidae

Dumetia hyperythra (Franklin, 1831) II

Tawny-bellied Babbler

LC

R

Omn

Pomatorhinus horsfieldii (Sykes, 1832) II*

Indian Scimitar- Babbler

LC

R

Omn

Leiothrichidae

Alcippe poioicephala (Jerdon, 1841) II

Brown-cheeked Fulvetta

LC

R

Ins

Argya striata (Dumont, 1823) II

Jungle Babbler

LC

R

Omn

Muscicapidae

Muscicapa muttui (Layard, 1854) II

Brown-breasted Flycatcher

LC

R

Ins

Ficedula parva (Bechstein, 1792) II

Red-breasted Flycatcher

LC

WM

Ins

Ficedula superciliaris (Jerdon, 1840) II

Ultramarine Flycatcher

LC

WM

Ins

Cyornis tickelliae (Blyth, 1843) II

Tickell's Blue Flycatcher

LC

R

Ins

Luscinia svecica (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Bluethroat

LC

WM

Ins

Copsychus fulicatus (Linnaeus, 1766) II

Indian Robin

LC

R

Ins

Myophonus horsfieldii (Vigors, 1831) II*

Malabar Whistling Thrush

LC

R

Ins

Copsychus saularis (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Oriental Magpie Robin

LC

R

Ins

Monarchidae

Terpsiphone paradisi (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Indian Paradise-flycatcher

LC

R

Ins

Hypothymis azurea (Boddaert, 1783) II

Black-naped Monarch

LC

R

Ins

Rhipiduridae

Rhipidura albogularis (Lesson, 1831) II*

Spot-breasted Fantail

LC

R

Ins

Cisticolidae

Prinia buchanani (Blyth, 1844) I

Rufous-fronted Prinia

LC

R

Ins

Prinia inornata (Sykes, 1832) II

Plain Prinia

LC

R

Ins

Prinia socialis (Sykes, 1832) II

Ashy Prinia

LC

R

Ins

Orthotomus sutorius (Pennant, 1769) II

Common Tailorbird

LC

R

Ins

Turdidae

Turdus simillimus (Jerdon, 1839) II

Indian Blackbird

LC

R

Ins

Geokichla citrina (Latham, 1790) II

Orange-headed Thrush

LC

R

Ins

Paridae

Parus cinereus (Vieillot, 1818) II

Cinereous Tit

LC

R

Ins

Machlolophus aplonotus (Blyth, 1847) II*

Indian Yellow Tit

LC

R

Ins

Dicaeum erythrorhynchos (Latham, 1790)[2] II

Pale-billed Flowerpecker

LC

R

Nect

Motacillidae

 Motacilla cinerea (Tunstall, 1771) II

Grey Wagtail

LC

WM

Car

Motacilla maderaspatensis (Gmelin, JF, 1789) II

White-browed Wagtail

LC

R

Car

Nectariniidae

Leptocoma zeylonica (Linnaeus, 1766) II

Purple-rumped Sunbird

LC

R

Nect

Cinnyris asiaticus (Linnaeus, 1766) II

Purple Sunbird

LC

R

Nect

Zosteropidae

Zosterops palpebrosus (Temminck, 1824) II

Indian White-eye

LC

R

Ins

Passeridae

Gymnoris xanthocollis (Burton, 1838) II

Yellow-throated Sparrow

LC

R

Omn

Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758) II

House Sparrow

LC

R

Omn

Ploceidae

Ploceus philippinus (Linnaeus, 1766) II

Baya Weaver

LC

R

Gran

Emberizidae

Emberiza lathami (Gray JE, 1831) II

Crested Bunting

LC

R

Gran

Estrildidae

Amandava amandava (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Red Avadavat

LC

R

Gran

Lonchura punctulata (Linnaeus, 1758) II

Scaly-breasted Munia

LC

R

Gran

IUCN—International Union for Conservation of Nature | LC—Least Concern | NT—Near Threatened | VU—Vulnerable | R—Resident | Local Migratory—LM | Winter Migratory—WM | Car—Carnivore | Omn—Omnivore | Ins—Insectivore | Frug—Frugivore | Gran—Granivore | Nect—Nectivore | *—Endemic to India | Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act, 2022: I—Schedule I | II—Schedule II.

 

FOR IMAGES - - CLICK HERE FOR FULL PDF

 

 

References

 

Aggarwal, A.G. et al. (2015). Avian diversity and density estimation of birds of the Indian Institute of Forest Management campus, Bhopal, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 7(2): 6891–6902. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o4004.6891-902

Ali, S. (2002). The Book of Indian Birds, 13th Edition (revised by J.C. Daniel). Oxford University Press, 326 pp.

Archana, T.R. et al. (2024). Effects of plant and avian frugivore interaction networks on landscape patterns and seed dispersal functions in the southern Western Ghats, India, Ornithological Science 23: 35–43. https://doi.org/10.2326/osj.23.35

Azman, N.M. et al. (2011). Avian diversity and feeding guilds in a secondary forest, an oil palm plantation and a paddy field in riparian areas of the Kerian River Basin, Perak, Malaysia. Tropical Life Sciences Research 22(2): 45–64. 

Bernard, T. et al. (2023). Assessing the influence of anthropogenic land-use changes on bird diversity and feeding guilds—A case study of Kalametiya Lagoon (Southern Sri Lanka). Diversity 15: 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15030432

Bhoite, S.H. et al. (2025). Checklist of floristic diversity of Mahadare Conservation Reserve, Satara, Maharashtra, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 17(10): 27688–27704. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.9023.17.10.27688-277046

Bhuyan, A. et al. (2024). Diversity and species richness of avian fauna in varied habitats of Soraipung range and vicinity in Dehing Patkai National Park, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 16(3): 24956–24966. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8775.16.3.24956-24966

Byju, H. et al. (2025). The avifauna of Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu along the Southeast coast of India: waterbird assessments and conservation implications across key sanctuaries and Ramsar sites. PeerJ 13: e18899. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.188998

Derebe, Y. et al. (2023). Species diversity, relative abundance, and distribution of avifauna in different habitats within Lewi Mountain, Awi Zone, Ethiopia. Heliyon 9: e12345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17127

Dhale, O. et al. (2024). Diversity of amphibians and reptiles in Mahadare Conservation Reserve, Satara District (MS), Western Ghats, India. African Journal of Biological Science 6(9):4896-4901.

Fraixedas, S. et al. (2020). A state-of-the-art review on birds as indicators of biodiversity: Advances, challenges, and future directions. Ecological Indicators 118: 106728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106728

Gamito, S. & R. Furtado (2009). Feeding diversity in macroinvertebrate communities: A contribution to estimate the ecological status in shallow waters. Ecological Indicators 9(5): 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.11.005

Gaur, P. et al. (2021). Residential, IUCN, and WPA Status of the avian fauna observed in Indore city (M.P.), India. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology 20: 113–121. https://doi.org/10.46488/NEPT.2021.v20i01.012

Ghosh, M. et al. (2022). Species composition and classification of guilds in birds with respect to food and feeding behavior: Evidences from suburban landscape in Hooghly District, West Bengal. International Journal of Zoology and Applied Biosciences 7(1): 34–42.

Gregory, R.D. et al. (2003). Using birds as indicators of biodiversity. Ornis Hungarica 12–13: 11–24.

Grimmett, R. et al. (1998). Pocket Guide to the Birds of Indian Subcontinent. Oxford University Press, Mumbai, 888 pp.

Kale, M.P. et al. (2010). Patterns of fragmentation and identification of possible corridors in North Western Ghats. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 38(3): 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-010-0035-8

Kumar, S.N. et al. (2025) Avifaunal diversity of Chinnavedampatti Lake: an urban wetland in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Experimental Zoology India 28: 1383–1395. https://doi.org/10.51470/jez.2025.28.2.1383

Manigandan, S. et al. (2024). Harmonizing ecology and society: an integrated analysis of vulture conservation in the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 16(6): 25330–25344 https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8915.16.6.25330-25344

Mehta, P. (2012). Identifying important areas for bird conservation in the Western Ghats region of Maharashtra, India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 109: 123–134.

Mohite, P. et al. (2020). Freshwater fish diversity of Mahadare, Satara District, Maharashtra (Western Ghats). Our Heritage 68(34): 171-179. 

Molokwu-Odozi, M. et al. (2007). Feeding behaviour of birds foraging on predictable resources in habitats of different quality. Ostrich, Journal of African Ornithology 78(2): 295–298. https://doi.org/10.2989/OSTRICH.2007.78.2.28.108

Mukhopadhyay, S. & S. Mazumdar (2019). Habitat-wise composition and foraging guilds of avian community in a suburban landscape of lower Gangetic plains, West Bengal, India. Biologia 74(9): 1069–1078. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-019-00225-y

Naveen, K.S. et al. (2026). Waterbird assemblage structure, seasonal dynamics and anthropogenic pressures in Sengulam Lake, an urban wetland of the Noyyal River Basin, south India. AgroEnvironmental Sustainability 4(2): 157–171. https://doi.org/10.59983/s2026040206

Panda, B. et al. (2021). Habitat heterogeneity influences avian feeding guild composition in urban landscapes: Evidence from Bhubaneswar, India. Ecological Processes 10: 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00318-2

Pielou, E.C. (1969). An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. Wiley, New York.

Reséndiz-Infante, C. & G. Gauthier (2020). Temporal changes in reproductive success and optimal breeding decisions in a long-distance migratory bird. Scientific Reports 10: 22067. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79071-2

Roy, S. et al. (2013). Study on avifaunal diversity from three different regions of North Bengal, India. The Open Conservation Biology Journal 1: 120–129.

Sayyed, A. (2016). Faunal diversity of Satara District, Maharashtra, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(10): 9305–9314. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.2364.8.10.9305-9314

Seress, G. et al. (2018). Impact of urbanization on abundance and phenology of caterpillars and consequences for breeding in an insectivorous bird. Ecological Applications 28(5): 1143–1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1720

Shafie, N.J. et al. (2023). Bird species composition, density and feeding guilds in contrasting lowland dipterocarp forests of Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. Tropical Ecology 64(2): 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-022-00267-5

Shannon, C.E. & W.W. Weaver (1963). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

Sreekumar, S. & P.S. Bhatnagar (2021). Koyna Wildlife Sanctuary, Maharashtra. Conservation Area Series 66. Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata.

Sutar, S.R. et al. (2025). Butterfly diversity in Mahadare Conservation Reserve, Satara (MS), Western Ghats: A synoptic checklist. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology 46(12): 64–85. https://doi.org/10.56557/upjoz/2025/v46i125045

Takahashi, M. & K. Ohkawara (2007). Breeding behavior and reproductive success of Grey-headed Lapwing Vanellus cinereus on farmland in central Japan. Ornithological Science 6(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2326/osj.6.1

Wood, C. et al. (2010). Implications of rice agriculture for wild birds in China. Waterbirds 33(1): 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1675/063.033.0104

Zakaria, M. et al. (2014). Comparison of understorey bird species in relation to edge–interior gradient in an isolated tropical rainforest of Malaysia. Environment, Development and Sustainability 16(2): 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-013-9482-7