Journal of Threatened
Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 June 2026 | 18(6): 29067–29078
ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.10072.18.6.29067-29078
#10072 | Received 02 August 2025 | Final received 11 June 2026| Finally
accepted 15 June 2026
A comparative web-traffic
analysis of three renowned wildlife conservation organisations - International Union for Conservation of Nature
(IUCN), Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and World Wide
Fund for Nature (WWF)
Saswat Pati
1 &
V. Vijay Kumar 2
1,2 XIM University, Nijigada Kurki, Harirajpur, Kakudia, Odisha
752050, India.
1 saswat@stu.xim.edu.in
(corresponding author), 2 vijaykumarvijayan@gmail.com
Editor: Aditya Srinivasulu,
Zoo Outreach Organisation, Hyderabad, India. Date
of publication: 26 June 2026 (online & print)
Citation: Pati, S. & V.V. Kumar (2026). A Comparative
Web-Traffic Analysis of Three Renowned Wildlife Conservation Organisations -
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Wildlife Conservation
Society (WCS) and World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). Journal of Threatened Taxa 18(6): 29067–29078. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.10072.18.6.29067–29078
Copyright: © Pati & Kumar 2026. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use,
reproduction, and distribution of this article in any medium by providing
adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publication.
Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Author details: Saswat Pati, a doctoral research scholar at the School of Communications, XIM University, India, is a wildlife conservationist and filmmaker working with global organizations. His projects promote awareness through media, earning him the Biju Patnaik Award and recognition in national and international conservation efforts. V. Vijay Kumar, PhD, is an associate professor and former dean, School of Communications, XIM University,
India. He specializes in audiovisual content, entertainment television, and reality TV. His research spans television, film, leisure studies, Tamil cinema, and digital media. He co-edited two volumes on media and marginality in 2025 with Peter Lang Academic Publishers.
Author contribution: Saswat Pati & V. Vijay Kumar: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Original Draft Preparation, Writing-Review & Editing. Saswat Pati: Formal Analysis, Software, Visualization. V. Vijay Kumar: Project Administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation.
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to all individuals and institutions who contributed to the successful completion of this study. We are especially thankful to the reviewers and the editorial team for their valuable comments, constructive suggestions, and insightful feedback, which significantly enhanced the quality of this manuscript. We also gratefully acknowledge the unwavering support and encouragement of our family members throughout the research and writing process.
Abstract: The International Union for Conservation of Nature
(IUCN), Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), and
World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) are among the leading wildlife organisations that provide significant scientific information. These
organisations, through their
highly data-centric and
interactive websites, communicate
conservation and have been accessed by an audience
base across the globe. Each
part of the world encounters a diverse range of
conservation-related issues. Analysing
the communication strategies of each
of these websites can provide key insights into the domain of wildlife conservation pedagogy.
This study is based on quantitative web analytics
utilising web tools and
software that provide
insights such as attributes
and visual portraits on the engagement of the
audience of these websites,
trending search topics,
audience engagement, learning behaviours,
website performance, user behaviour
analysis, and communication strategies.
WWF recorded the highest monthly visits (≈ 1.56 million)
but the highest bounce rate
(68.63%), whereas IUCN recorded
the longest mean visit duration (2 min 21 s). The findings
describe how the three
organisations’ publicly reported
web-traffic profiles differ
in audience geography, search-term
composition, social-referral mix and engagement metrics and discuss the limits of inferring audience intent from aggregate
analytics.
Keywords: Audience engagement, communication strategy,
International Union for Conservation of Nature, web analytics, websites,
wildlife conservation, Wildlife Conservation Society, World Wide Fund for
Nature.
INTRODUCTION
In the world wide web ecosystem, search engines facilitate
information-seeking behaviour for day-to-day
activities, data, and knowledge. Global internet usage has grown substantially
in recent decades, intensifying both the volume of online conservation
information and the challenge of identifying credible sources. Search engines
return large volumes of information of varying quality, creating challenges for
users seeking reliable scientific data on wildlife and conservation (Cuan-Baltazar et al. 2020). Credible websites characterized
by institutional affiliation, evidence-based content, and transparent
governance represent a small but disproportionately influential subset of this
online information environment (Guess et al. 2020). Few websites of each industry
are referred to as the most reliable source with negligible misinformation
(Guess et al. 2020). The online information disseminated through some of the
leading organizations is backed up by its content, website design, navigation,
algorithmic architecture, and user engagement (Anwyl-Irvine
et al. 2021). It becomes much more intricate when the community tries to look
for scientific information about wildlife (Cuan-Baltazar et al. 2020). Conservation and protection are
the key measures to help nature grow and recover from habitat degradation.
There are various stakeholders, including government and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs), who work toward conservation and
communicate conservation (Pati & Kumar 2023).
These three organizations were therefore selected as case studies for the
present analysis (see Methods for full selection criteria).
Despite the growing use of digital platforms in conservation
communication, limited peer-reviewed research has systematically evaluated the
online audience engagement strategies of major wildlife NGOs using web
analytics data. It remains unclear how these organizations differ in terms of
digital reach, audience demographics, and content emphasis, information that
could help conservation practitioners optimize online communication. This study
addresses that gap by applying SimilarWeb web
analytics to compare IUCN, WCS, and WWF across quantitative metrics of audience
engagement, geographic distribution, and search behaviour.
The IUCN was established in 1948 and as of 2024, it is one of the
leading wildlife organizations in the world, collaborating with governments,
NGOs, environmental networks, researchers, and scientists to promote
conservation and sustainable development. IUCN focuses on biodiversity
conservation, climate change mitigation, and habitat protection. It is
internationally recognized for the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, a
globally authoritative index of extinction risk. On the other hand, WCS strikes
a balance between community needs and conservation objectives. It aims to
conserve 14 priority (large-scale) wildlife ecosystems in the world, which
represent half of the world’s biodiversity. It works closely with tourists,
travelers, and activists to achieve conservation-related goals. They invest in
zoological gardens, central parks, and movies to promote conservation. With
various on-ground activities and online initiatives, they create engaging
conservation approaches for the users. Similarly, WWF is a pioneer in six
global environmental concerns, namely forest, marine, freshwater, wildlife,
food, and climate. They work across 200 ecologically valuable regions and are
famous for using modern communication strategies (Martin 2005). WWF reports
working with more than six million supporters across 100+ countries on its
mission to conserve nature and reduce threats to biodiversity.
Accordingly, among various organisations, the
three highest-traffic wildlife conservation websites IUCN, WCS and WWF selected
based on global web traffic rankings from SimilarWeb
(see Methods) are taken into consideration to understand and analyze the
audience engagement, demographics, geography and various wildlife-related
trending topics based upon the metadata analysis conducted in SimilarWeb software. The three websites were selected based
on the following objective criteria: (1) global organizational scope; (2)
ranking among the top three wildlife-focused domains by monthly visitor count
as recorded by SimilarWeb during the study period;
and (3) availability of complete web analytics data for the study timeframe. Web
traffic statistics are one of the most widely accepted methods for shortlisting
a website. The study refers to the average number of posts or metrics of
popularity (Stringham et al. 2021).
The website’s selection also varies depending on the desired information
required. Leads of websites are generated by social media that promote
wildlife-related topics and increase website traffic. Each of these websites
has various attributes that differ, and the community refers to one of these
for a specific requirement. The relevant keywords then help the websites
generate a larger audience and maintain their hold among the huge set of
information floating across the search engine.
Although conservation organizations increasingly rely on websites as
primary communication channels, few studies compare how leading global
organizations differ in the audiences they reach and the topics those audiences
search for. This study addresses that gap by comparing the publicly reported web-traffic
profiles of IUCN, WCS, and WWF, asking whether organizations with different
missions show measurably different audience geographies, search-term
compositions, and engagement metrics. Characterizing these differences offers
conservation practitioners a baseline for understanding which audiences each
organization currently reaches online, and where outreach gaps may exist.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Data were extracted from SimilarWeb on 30
April 2024. For each of the three websites (iucn.org, wcs.org, worldwildlife.org), the
following metrics were recorded for 01 February–30 April 2024: total monthly
visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, bounce rate, total page views,
audience geographic distribution (top five countries by traffic share), social
traffic sources (percentage by platform), and industry distribution categories.
Values represent estimated monthly averages as reported by SimilarWeb.
Top search terms were identified using the SimilarWeb
‘Search’ module and visualized as word clouds using Mentimeter
online platform. No inferential statistical analyses were performed; all
results are reported descriptively.
The research begins with data
acquisition using SimilarWeb, a commercial web
analytics platform that generates estimated traffic data based on a proprietary
panel and algorithmic modelling. It is important to note that SimilarWeb data were estimates rather than direct
measurements; the platform does not publish confidence intervals for individual
site estimates, which is acknowledged as a limitation of the present study. SimilarWeb was selected because it provides standardized,
multi-metric web traffic data across multiple organizations simultaneously,
enabling direct comparison. Its use in web analytics and digital communication
research is well established (Weischedel & Huizingh 2006; Tarafdar &
Zhang 2008). However, it is important to recognise
that the initial phase of this study involves extensive data cleaning and
preparing datasets for more efficient analysis. Given the wide variety of
formats used by different organizational websites, manually cleaning and
formatting the data is crucial for eliminating inconsistencies and ensuring a
uniform set of information for analysis. All traffic metrics were exported
directly from SimilarWeb’s web interface; no web
scraping was performed. Exported fields were checked manually for completeness
and formatting consistency before analysis.
With the rise of dynamic websites
replacing static ones, it is essential to understand how these advancements
impact communication strategies in wildlife organizations. These organizations
utilize websites as their main platform to inform the public, raise awareness,
and foster engagement with conservation efforts (Weinreich
et al. 2008). Through web optimization strategies, organizations can enhance
user experience, increase their reach, and convey information more effectively
(Weischedel & Huizingh
2006). Websites play a critical role in attracting visitors, informing them
about conservation projects, and encouraging support for wildlife protection
through various channels (Tarafdar & Zhang 2008).
The three organizations were
selected because each has a global remit, an English language site, and a
comparable conservation mission. Data source used was SimilarWeb,
covering February–April 2024. Metrics extracted were monthly visits, mean visit
duration, pages per visit, bounce rate, page views, gender split, country
traffic share, social-referral share, industry/ category distribution, and top
search terms. Search terminology word clouds were generated from SimilarWeb’s reported search terms.
Scope and Limitation
Search-term data indicate the terms users searched for before or after
visiting these websites, but cannot reliably establish user intent, motivation
or organizational communication strategy. This limitation impacts the ability
to ensure that the analysis of wildlife communication is based solely on
credible sources. The presence of misinformation can skew understanding and may
affect the validity of the findings. The selection of websites for analysis was
based on subjective criteria, such as metadata from SimilarWeb
and general popularity metrics. Manual data collection is time-intensive and
prone to human error, which can impact the reliability of the data. The
challenge of integrating data from different website formats and ensuring its
accuracy further complicates the analysis. These methods often operate in a
legal grey area and may breach privacy or data protection regulations (Zimmer
2010). Ethical constraints around acquiring sensitive or unauthorized data,
especially from the dark web, pose additional challenges (Tai 2012). Ensuring
ethical compliance while collecting and analyzing data remains a critical
concern.
Ethical Considerations and Legal Framework
SimilarWeb provides aggregated, anonymized, publicly available estimates of
website traffic. No personal data were collected, no human participants were involved, and
no web scraping was performed; therefore, no ethics approval was required (Sula
2016).
Research Questions
The central aim of this research
is to understand how key wildlife conservation websites engage their audiences
and disseminate information.
These research questions are
grounded in a web analytics framework for evaluating organizational digital
communication effectiveness (Tarafdar & Zhang
2008; Weinreich et al. 2008), in which audience
demographics, geographic reach, content discovery terms, and social traffic
serve as proxy indicators of communication performance. Together, they reflect
the breadth, depth, and thematic orientation of audience engagement across the
three organizations. To achieve this, the following research questions are
posed:
R1: What are the primary demographics of users
accessing these websites, and how do they engage with the content?
R2: Which countries around the world
follow these websites for seeking information?
R3: What conservation-related topics are most
frequently searched on these websites?
R4: How does social traffic influence engagement
on these wildlife conservation platforms?
Data Collection Process
This is a descriptive
quantitative web-analytics study. Differences between the three organisations are reported descriptively; no
inferential statistics were applied because the data are population-level
estimates for single websites. Using SimilarWeb, the researcher gains access
to valuable data on web traffic, audience behaviour,
and geographical distribution of users. The tool was selected for its robust
features, which provide comprehensive insights into the reach and effectiveness
of the websites being studied. Quantitative analysis focuses on measuring
metrics like visitor count, engagement rates, and the geographic location of
the audience, which allows for a comparative study of web traffic and audience
demographics. On the qualitative side, the content quality of each website is assessed based on credibility, alignment with
scientific research, and clarity in communication. The comparative analysis of
these three wildlife websites (WWF, WCS, IUCN) allows the researcher to
identify patterns in how different organizations communicate their conservation
efforts and engage their online audiences.
Timeframe and Research Duration
This study spans a period of
three months, from February to April 2024, to ensure that a representative
sample of data is collected. This three-month window provides a snapshot of
website engagement during this specific period. It is acknowledged that a
three-month duration is insufficient to fully capture annual seasonal variation
in web traffic; findings should therefore be interpreted as representative of
this particular period rather than as annual trends. It also allows sufficient
time to conduct both quantitative and qualitative analyses, ensuring that the
study’s findings are both reliable and
actionable.
RESULTS
The following interpretations are descriptive inferences from observed
traffic patterns. SimilarWeb data reflect user behaviour metrics and cannot directly establish
organizational strategy, user intentions, or communication effectiveness. The
IUCN had significant searches for research, species, biology, social
networks, conservation, books, references, and publications (refer to Figure
1). The commonly searched words among the other two websites (WCS & WWF)
are news, jobs, publication, and community. The most frequent search terms
associated with the IUCN site were research, species, biology, conservation,
books, and publications. IUCN’s traffic patterns suggest a predominantly
science-oriented audience. IUCN maintains multiple organizations, such as the
IUCN Red List, Green List, and many more that provide universally accepted
information about species and nature.
The analysis of search terms for IUCN compared to WCS and WWF reveals a
distinct focus of user interest. IUCN’s search terms, such as research, species,
biology, and conservation indicate a strong inclination towards in-depth
scientific research and authoritative studies on biodiversity and
sustainability. This contrasts with the WCS and WWF, where commonly searched
terms include news, jobs, and community, reflecting a broader interest in
current studies, career opportunities, and engagement with conservation
communities.
These differences indicate that the search terms associated with IUCN
were more research oriented than those associated with WCS & WWF. Its
resources, including the IUCN Red List and Green List, are globally recognized
for their rigorous standards and comprehensive data on species and ecosystems.
The WWF had audiences who searched for education, magazines, nature,
shopping, science, environment news, sustainability, activism, charity, blogs,
and wildlife mostly (refer to Figure 2). This organization is charitable and
works for various communities across 100+ countries to generate funds and
provide a deep immersion experience through adaptation schemes. WWF provides a
deep understanding of various charismatic species and tries to conserve
wildlife using these species as umbrella species. The organization works mostly
on content creation and distribution, resulting in trending searches such as
shopping, magazines, journals, and books. The website contains a designated
active link to help viewers sponsor or donate to a cause. The website also
offers a variety of artefacts such as wildlife magnets, badges, books, and
magazines for sale. They cover mostly charismatic species.
The search terms associated with the WWF such as education, magazine,
nature, shopping, and activism highlight its focus on engaging the public
through diverse content and fundraising efforts. WWF’s strategy involves leveraging
charismatic species to drive awareness and support for conservation. The
frequent searches related to shopping, magazines, and blogs suggest that WWF
actively promotes merchandise and educational materials as part of its
outreach. This aligns with its mission to generate funds and foster deeper
public engagement with conservation issues. The presence of links for donations
and a range of merchandise for sale indicates WWF’s dual approach: advancing
conservation through direct funding and enhancing public interest via engaging
content and products. Search terms and on-site content for WWF
frequently referenced charismatic species, such as the Tiger and Snow Leopard,
alongside merchandise and donation pages.
WCS delivered the most different trending searches word cloud
with searches such as movies, zoo, credit cards, shopping, travel, news, and
retail stores (refer to Figure 3). This website had a significantly low
conservation-based search, with ‘environment activism action’ being the only
trending search. This website has a lot of active links for wildlife bookings
and participation, resulting in searches based on travel, credit cards, movies,
zoos, and shopping. Active links of different offers and ads lead to the search
of topics such as English news, online US news, email news online, Google Sign,
search engines, web search live, and social networks to a large extent. WCS
looks for individuals who participate in fieldwork and experience conservation,
wildlife or nature-based issues in a practical environment.
WCS’s trending searches predominantly commercial and recreational terms
such as zoos, travel, movies, and shopping suggest an audience oriented toward
experiential wildlife engagement rather than conservation-focused
information-seeking. The low incidence of conservation-related searches, with
‘environment activism action’ being the sole exception, underscores WCS’s
strategy of engaging audiences through experiential and commercial avenues
rather than through activism or scientific discourse.
The presence of numerous active links for bookings and participation in
wildlife experiences suggests that WCS targets travelers seeking immersive
encounters with nature. This approach is reflected in the popular searches
related to travel, credit cards, and retail stores. WCS’s search patterns are consistent with a
tourism- and experience-oriented audience, though the available traffic data
were unavailable to draw conclusions about whether this reflects deliberate
organizational strategy or user self-selection. The emphasis on offers, ads,
and experiential content aligns with its goal of engaging a broader audience
through appealing, practical experiences rather than through traditional
conservation messaging.
Industry Distribution Analysis
The data distribution analysis for the IUCN reveals a significant
emphasis on social networking platforms, which account for 12.40% of the data
distribution. This prominence in the social networking category indicates
IUCN’s strategic focus on leveraging digital and social media channels to reach
and engage with a broad audience. Given that IUCN is heavily involved in
policymaking and governance, this high percentage underscores the
organization’s commitment to using these platforms for advocacy, information
dissemination, and stakeholder engagement (refer to Table 1). The substantial
allocation of data to social networking reflects IUCN’s recognition of the
importance of digital communication in modern conservation efforts. By
prioritizing social media, IUCN can effectively communicate its standards,
policies, and conservation messages to a global audience, enhancing its
visibility and influence.
Following social networking, the data distribution in ‘Law and
Government’ at 8.23% highlights IUCN’s role in shaping conservation policies
and its reliance on official channels for policy-related information. The
third-highest data distribution in ‘News and Media’ (8.18%) further emphasizes
the importance of media in amplifying IUCN’s messages and updates. The
comparatively lower percentage for each Science and Education sub-category
(7.08% and 6.56%) is individually lower than ‘Social Networking’ (12.40%), and
‘Law and Government’ (8.23%), indicates that within IUCN’s observed industry
distribution, traffic is proportionally more concentrated in social and
policy-related categories than in educational content categories during the
study period. This approach aligns with IUCN’s mission to impact policy and
public awareness, leveraging its substantial presence on social platforms to drive
engagement and influence in conservation matters.
The WWF demonstrates a notable emphasis on science and education, with
11.02% of its content allocated to this category, and an additional 7.13%
dedicated specifically to Environmental Science, totaling 18.15%. This
substantial focus highlights WWF’s commitment to disseminating scientific
knowledge and educational resources related to environmental conservation.
Despite the IUCN having a more prominent role in scientific research, WWF’s
considerable investment in Science and Education underscores its strategic
objective to educate the public and stakeholders about conservation issues
through accessible and impactful content.
The significant 10.15% allocation of data to the news and media further
illustrates WWF’s strategy of using media to amplify its research findings and
educational initiatives. This focus on media outreach complements their
educational efforts by ensuring that conservation messages reach a broad
audience through various channels, enhancing public engagement and awareness.
In contrast, the relatively lower percentages for computers,
electronics, technology (5.20%), and Law & Government (4.99%) suggest that
while WWF does address technological and policy aspects, these are less central
to their primary mission compared to their educational and media efforts. This
distribution indicates WWF’s strategic prioritization of science-based content
and public education, reflecting its commitment to fostering informed
environmental stewardship and leveraging media to broaden its reach and impact
in the conservation arena (refer to Table 2).
The WCS shows a distinctive approach in its data distribution
across various sectors, with a primary focus on News and Media, which accounts
for 12.78% of their content. This indicates a strategic emphasis on leveraging
media platforms to engage the public and disseminate information about wildlife
conservation. The substantial investment in News and Media reflects WCS’s
commitment to keeping its audience informed about current events, updates, and
conservation efforts through widely consumed channels. In addition to its media
focus, WCS allocates 6.95% of its data to Law and Government, highlighting its
involvement in policy-related matters and its role in shaping and advocating
for environmental legislation. This is complemented by a 5.94% allocation to
Computers, Electronics, and Technology, which suggests that WCS also engages
with digital tools and platforms, albeit to a lesser extent compared to News
and Media.
One notable aspect of WCS’s data distribution is its 4.58% allocation to
Finance. This is unique among the three organizations analyzed, indicating that
WCS integrates financial aspects into its outreach strategy. This allocation
suggests a focus on financial engagement, possibly through fundraising or
financial support mechanisms. The presence of such a significant percentage in
Finance underscores WCS’s approach to driving financial contributions and
support through its media and social networking efforts (refer to Table 3).
Overall, the data distribution reflects WCS’s strategy of combining media
outreach with financial engagement. By prioritizing News and Media and
leveraging social networking platforms, WCS effectively communicates its
conservation messages and engages with its audience. This approach likely
enhances public awareness and support while facilitating financial
contributions to further its conservation goals. The emphasis on media and
finance illustrates a unique strategy for balancing information dissemination
with financial sustainability.
Social Media Traffic
The social traffic of these three websites depicts very different
strategies followed by each of them (refer to Table 4 and Figure 4). IUCN uses
LinkedIn the most for social presence, whereas WCS and WWF use Twitter (X) and
other platforms more, respectively. IUCN communicated through almost all social
platforms: 59.02% via LinkedIn, 12.76% Facebook, 11.96% Twitter (X), and 4.46%
YouTube, with the remaining 11.8% spread across other minor platforms such as WhatsApp.
(February-April 2024).
WCS’s communication strategy is to reach 54.75% of the audience through
Twitter. Unlike IUCN, the organization uses LinkedIn for 10.83% and Facebook
for 16.19% of its social traffic to communicate with their audience. No
measurable YouTube referral traffic was recorded for WCS between February and
April 2024. This organization targets consumers who are active on Twitter to
showcase their conservation-related matters and targets financial support more
than the IUCN and WWF.
Social traffic to WWF.org was primarily driven by LinkedIn (32.89%) and
Facebook (27.06%). Twitter data for WWF were unavailable in SimilarWeb
during the study period. The large proportion attributed to other platforms
(40.05%) limits precise interpretation of WWF’s social media engagement
profile. No measurable YouTube social traffic was recorded for WWF.org during
this period.
Each of the organizations used different strategies and platforms to
communicate with their target audience and was successful enough to have a
steady growth in social traffic through the months.
The top five countries are the United States with 38.97% of traffic
share, followed by India with 6.07%, United Kingdom with 3.87%, Canada with
2.88% and Mexico with 2.81% (refer to Figure 5). The United States accounted
for the highest combined traffic share (38.97%) across the three websites. The
reasons for this geographic distribution were not assessed in the present study
and may reflect multiple factors beyond the scope of this dataset. WWF has the
most traffic share split among the three in all five top countries. It is
surprising to witness the massive traffic share WWF has and the impact it must
have created over time. WWF has 74.4% of the traffic share in Mexico, followed
by the United States with 67.9%, 65.8% traffic share in Canada, 60.2% in the
United Kingdom and 57.9% in India. WWF demonstrated the highest traffic share
in all five top countries during the study period, indicating broader
geographic reach relative to IUCN and WCS based on SimilarWeb
data. IUCN holds 33.0% of the traffic share in India, followed by the United
Kingdom at 25.8%, 24.0% in Mexico, 18.9% in Canada and a 5.4% traffic share in
the United States.
WCS has the least traffic share in these five top countries, with 26.7%
being the highest in the United States. WCS has a traffic share of 15.3% in
Canada, followed by 13.9% in the United Kingdom, 9.1% in India and the least in
Mexico with a 1.6% traffic share. This comparative study would provide overall
website engagement over three months (February–April 2024). The measure
criteria are monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, bounce
rate, and page views (refer to Figure 6).
IUCN provides their audience with informative and engaging content,
helping them get the best visit duration of 2 minutes and 21 seconds over 2.64
pages surfed in a single visit. IUCN manages to hold the audience’s attention
and provides the necessary information. The bounce rate is low compared to the
other two organizations. IUCN recorded 509,306 monthly visits and 1.344 million page views over the study period. It indicates very
high audience engagement relative to a smaller number of monthly visits.
WCS website lags in all categories, except bounce rate is slightly
better than WWF. WCS recorded 467,649 monthly visits and the mean visit
duration of 1 minute 07 seconds. WCS
recorded the fewest pages per visit (2.06) and page views of 961,436 of the
three sites.
WWF has the highest number of monthly visits at 1.56 million and the
highest number of page views with 3.910 million in three months. WWF recorded
the highest bounce rate (68.63%) and an average visit duration of 1 minute 37
seconds. While these metrics indicate that a large proportion of visitors
exited after viewing a single page, bounce rate alone cannot support
conclusions about content quality. High bounce rates may also reflect direct-access
behaviour or single-page goal completion.
The three websites project a very similar gender-based engagement, where
females make up more than 60% of each of the websites. IUCN has a 38.26% male
audience. WCS has 36.82% males, followed by WWF with 38.61% males as their
website audience. Female audiences were recorded more in the three months, with
61.74% with IUCN, 63.18% with WCS, and 61.39% in WWF (refer to Figure 7).
DISCUSSION
The results reveal a trade-off between audience reach and engagement depth.
IUCN’s higher engagement-quality metrics despite a lower monthly visit volume,
and WWF’s high traffic volume alongside a relatively higher bounce rate,
exemplify this inverse relationship. WWF demonstrates a contrasting approach
with a heavy emphasis on Science and Education (18.15%), indicating a robust
commitment to educational outreach and scientific knowledge dissemination. The
organization’s focus on charismatic species and the substantial allocation of
resources to News and Media (10.15%) reflects its strategy of using compelling
narratives and media to drive public engagement and fundraising efforts. WWF’s
integration of shopping and charitable initiatives into its website, alongside
educational content, reveals a dual approach: advancing conservation through
public engagement and leveraging merchandise sales to fund its activities. This
strategy underscores WWF’s emphasis on blending activism with commercial
outreach to foster deeper connections with a broader audience. WWF’s
integration of merchandise, activism, and education is consistent with the
dual-mode conservation communication strategy (Martin 2005).
WCS exhibits a unique strategy by focusing predominantly on News and
Media (12.78%) and integrating financial aspects into its outreach (4.58%). The
heavy emphasis on media and commercial elements such as travel
and retail indicates WCS’s strategy to attract tourists and generate revenue
through immersive wildlife experiences. This approach contrasts with the more
traditional conservation messaging of IUCN and WWF. WCS’s relatively low focus
on conservation-specific content and higher engagement with tourism and retail
suggest a model that combines conservation with consumerism. The inclusion of
finance and travel-related content highlights WCS’s strategic focus on engaging
a financially contributing audience through direct interactions with wildlife. WCS’s
tourism-oriented engagement model is consistent with experiential conservation
communication approaches documented by Weinreich et
al. (2008).
The comparative analysis of these organizations reveals divergent
strategies in digital engagement. IUCN’s strength lies in leveraging social
media for policy advocacy and broad outreach. WWF excels in combining
scientific education with engaging media and fundraising efforts, while WCS
integrates tourism and financial engagement into its conservation strategy. Each
organization’s approach reflects its broader mission and audience engagement
goals, offering insights into how digital platforms are used to advance
conservation objectives. The data distribution also highlights regional
differences in audience engagement, with WWF showing a strong presence in
Mexico and the United States. This geographic disparity underscores the varied
impacts of these organizations’ digital strategies across different regions.
The substantial traffic share for WWF in Mexico suggests successful localized
outreach, while WCS’s lower traffic in these regions reflects a more niche
audience. The analysis underscores the distinct website communication
strategies of IUCN, WWF, and WCS. While IUCN emphasizes scientific and
policy-driven engagement, WWF integrates educational content with
consumer-driven outreach, and WCS focuses on experiential and financial
engagement. These approaches reflect each organization’s strategic priorities
and offer valuable insights into how digital platforms can be utilized to
achieve diverse conservation goals.
CONCLUSION
The study showcased various strategies for promoting and communicating
conservation across different platforms. The researcher considered various key
factors to find out how web metrics can differ significantly and still help
organizations get the desired reach. The top three leading wildlife
organizations (IUCN, WCS, & WWF) were taken into consideration to prove the
same. SimilarWeb data for February–April 2024 reveals
distinct digital engagement profiles for each organization. IUCN’s traffic was
characterized by higher per-visit engagement (longest visit duration, lowest
bounce rate) and science-oriented search terms. WWF recorded the highest
overall traffic volume, the greatest geographic reach, and the strongest
emphasis on Science and Education in its industry distribution. WCS showed the
lowest combined traffic share and a predominance of tourism and retail-related
search activity.
Industry distribution of IUCN indicated that the website is very much
inclined towards social network promotion and has most of the information
disseminated through social network platforms. The organization also worked on
government policies and research-based activities, making it prominently
visible in the science and education industry. WWF also followed a similar
approach and has good visibility in Science and Education. WCS had a simpler
strategy and targeted a niche audience through Twitter. They projected a
variety of ads and promotions of fun-filled conservation-related experiences.
They had 4.58% of industry distribution under finance, making it inclined
towards direct payment from the audience.
The findings pointed strongly towards the social media platforms. To get
a much more informative insight into the communication strategies, Facebook,
LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, and other platforms were analyzed. The majority of
the organizations used LinkedIn and Twitter to keep the audience informed. WWF
used Facebook as well for communication.
To understand the audience and their origins, the researcher analyzed
audience engagement across the top five countries. WWF had the highest
engagement throughout the five countries, ranging from 57.9% in India to 74.4%
in Mexico. WCS has the least traffic share in four of the five top countries;
the exception is the United States, where IUCN holds the smallest share.
Another important question was to understand the number of people being
involved in three months and their particulars to understand the audience’s
engagement in detail. A comparative website study was done to understand the
audience’s engagement in the top three wildlife organizations. WWF recorded the
highest visit volume, whereas IUCN recorded the longest visit duration, the
most pages per visit and the lowest bounce rate. Most of the audience were
females, with more than 60% for each of the organizational websites.
Future Research
Directions
Future research could benefit from incorporating additional data
sources, such as user feedback, surveys, and qualitative assessments of website
content. This would provide a more holistic view of how information is
perceived and utilized by different audiences. Analyzing the quality and impact
of the content disseminated by these organizations could offer deeper insights.
As web technologies evolve, future research should consider the impact of new
digital tools and platforms on information dissemination. Exploring the use of
emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and interactive media,
could offer insights into how these innovations shape audience engagement and
conservation efforts.
Developing a robust ethical framework for web scraping and data
collection in research could address current challenges. Establishing clear
guidelines for handling sensitive data and ensuring compliance with legal and
ethical standards would enhance the integrity of future studies. Future
research should focus on assessing the real-world impact of online conservation
efforts. Measuring how digital engagement translates into tangible conservation
outcomes, such as increased funding, policy changes, or improved conservation
practices, would provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of different
communication strategies.
For
figures - - click here for full PDF
ReferenceS
Anwyl-Irvine, A., E.S. Dalmaijer, N. Hodges & J.K. Evershed
(2021). Realistic
precision and accuracy of online experiment platforms, web browsers, and
devices. Behavior Research Methods 53(4): 1407–1425. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01501-5
Cuan-Baltazar, J.Y., M.J. Muñoz-Perez, C. Robledo-Vega, M.F. Pérez-Zepeda & E. Soto-Vega
(2020).
Misinformation of COVID-19 on the internet: infodemiology
study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 6(2): e18444. https://doi.org/10.2196/18444
Guess, A.M., B. Nyhan & J. Reifler (2020). Exposure to untrustworthy
websites in the 2016 US election. Nature Human Behaviour
4(5): 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0833-x
Martin, C. (2005). Globalisation and national environmental
policy: the influence of WWF, an international non-governmental organisation, chapter 14.
Edited by Frank Wijen, Kees
Zoeteman, and Jan Pieters. A
Handbook of Globalisation and Environmental Policy. Edward
Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781954355.00024
Pati, S. & V.V. Kumar (2023). The medium is the message:
audio-visual communication over textual communication—a matter of
‘effectiveness’ in communicating conservation. Global Media Journal-Indian Edition;
Volume 15 Issue 2; December 2023. https://gmj.manipal.edu/issues/Dec2023/P4.pdf
Stringham, O.C., A. Toomes, A.M. Kanishka, L. Mitchell, S. Heinrich, J.V. Ross
& P. Cassey (2021). A guide to using the internet to monitor and quantify the wildlife trade.
Conservation Biology 35(4): 1130–1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13675
Sula, C.A. (2016). Research ethics in an age of big
data. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology 42(2):
17–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/bul2.2016.1720420207
Tai, M.C.T. (2012). Deception and informed consent in
social, behavioral, and educational research (SBER). Tzu Chi Medical
Journal 24(4):
218–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcmj.2012.05.003
Tarafdar, M. & J. Zhang (2008). Determinants of reach and
loyalty: a study of website performance and implications for website design. Journal
of Computer Information Systems 48(2): 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2008.11646005
Weinreich, H., H. Obendorf,
E. Herder & M. Mayer (2008). Not quite the average: an empirical study of web use. ACM
Transactions on the Web 2(1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/1326561.1326566
Weischedel, B. & E.K. Huizingh (2006). Website optimization with web
metrics: a case study, pp. 463–470. In: Proceedings of the 8th International
Conference on Electronic Commerce. The new e-commerce: innovations for
conquering current barriers, obstacles and limitations to conducting successful
business on the internet. Fredericton New Brunswick Canada August 13 - 16,
2006. Association for Computing MachineryNew York,
NY, United States, https://doi.org/10.1145/1151454.1151525
Zimmer, M. (2010) “But the data
is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics Inf Technol 12: 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5